It is currently Tue Dec 03, 2024 12:40 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 592 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FF has Jokic as a top 10 player :lol: :lol: :lol:
Maybe I'm missing something.

Light em up Chicago?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I had him that last year. He’s taken a step back this year. Probably in the 15-20 range overall.

Jokic is the obvious answer in this thread though. The first step to being great is playing in games. Embiid hasn’t gotten past the first step yet. Once he does I would reconsider.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Embiid

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
I had him that last year. He’s taken a step back this year. Probably in the 15-20 range overall.

Jokic is the obvious answer in this thread though. The first step to being great is playing in games. Embiid hasn’t gotten past the first step yet. Once he does I would reconsider.


Injury argument is weak play and is repeatedly made as a means of providing wiggle room. Ben Simmons has played in fewer games than Embiid yet you placed in the top 10 as i recall. Again a weak play for such an "Assanine thought"

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I had him that last year. He’s taken a step back this year. Probably in the 15-20 range overall.

Jokic is the obvious answer in this thread though. The first step to being great is playing in games. Embiid hasn’t gotten past the first step yet. Once he does I would reconsider.


Injury argument is weak play and is repeatedly made as a means of providing wiggle room. Ben Simmons has played in fewer games than Embiid yet you placed in the top 10 as i recall. Again a weak play for such an "Assanine thought"

Ben Simmons hasn’t missed 80% of his career games.

I’m sorry that I want my franchise guys to play in more than 20% of the games. I know it’s asking a lot.

Weak play. Lol.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 10:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I had him that last year. He’s taken a step back this year. Probably in the 15-20 range overall.

Jokic is the obvious answer in this thread though. The first step to being great is playing in games. Embiid hasn’t gotten past the first step yet. Once he does I would reconsider.


Injury argument is weak play and is repeatedly made as a means of providing wiggle room. Ben Simmons has played in fewer games than Embiid yet you placed in the top 10 as i recall. Again a weak play for such an "Assanine thought"

Ben Simmons hasn’t missed 80% of his career games.

I’m sorry that I want my franchise guys to play in more than 20% of the games. I know it’s asking a lot.

Weak play. Lol.


He is playing now and he is decidedly the better player. If his career ends tomorrow i can simply use the argument regarding him being better "at the time".

Ben Simmons has only played in 25% of his available games. That really is some increase.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
another boorish thread ...You. FF. and Nas in a great round table discussion that no on gives fuck about

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
another boorish thread ...You. FF. and Nas in a great round table discussion that no on gives fuck about



Speaking of things no one gives a fuck about when was the last anyone besides me responded to one of your shitty ass posts?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15141
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I had him that last year. He’s taken a step back this year. Probably in the 15-20 range overall.

Jokic is the obvious answer in this thread though. The first step to being great is playing in games. Embiid hasn’t gotten past the first step yet. Once he does I would reconsider.


Injury argument is weak play and is repeatedly made as a means of providing wiggle room. Ben Simmons has played in fewer games than Embiid yet you placed in the top 10 as i recall. Again a weak play for such an "Assanine thought"

weak play? Derrick Rose would like to have a word with you. Also Doug Collins.

Also Ralph Sampson. Also Greg Oden.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
City of Fools wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I had him that last year. He’s taken a step back this year. Probably in the 15-20 range overall.

Jokic is the obvious answer in this thread though. The first step to being great is playing in games. Embiid hasn’t gotten past the first step yet. Once he does I would reconsider.


Injury argument is weak play and is repeatedly made as a means of providing wiggle room. Ben Simmons has played in fewer games than Embiid yet you placed in the top 10 as i recall. Again a weak play for such an "Assanine thought"

weak play? Derrick Rose would like to have a word with you. Also Doug Collins.

Also Ralph Sampson. Also Greg Oden.


Using prospective injury as a rationale for stating that player A is Better than Player B is a weak play. Whenever he has played he has played at an All Star level. None of the injuries suffered has prevented him from playing at an All Star level. The fact remains that in the 60 Some odd games he has played as a professional his play has been better than Jokic's. That is what you off of. Any player can be injured.

Its weak to say a guy is better because you think the other guy will be injured at some point. That is a new one.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
Using prospective injury

Do you know what prospective means?

This isn't about speculation on the future. This is about the fact that Embiid has missed 80% of his team's games over a 3.5 year period. You're delusional if you think that is not a big deal and not worth factoring into a discussion on who you would want going forward.

Quote:
The fact remains that in the 60 Some odd games he has played as a professional his play has been better than Jokic's.

It's not a fact. That's an opinion based on your view that scoring points is all that matters. Jokic is very unselfish, and naturally plays as a facilitator. Let's look at some career metrics though:

Jokic

23.7 PER, .201 WS/48, 121 Ortg, 107 Drtg, .604 TS%

Embiid

23.4 PER, .137 WS/48, 105 Ortg, 102 Drtg , .583 TS%


So Jokic beats your boy across the board in advanced metrics. But you don't like metrics, so lets go to per 36 minute stats so we can finally find something Embiid is better at:

Jokic

19.1 ppg/12.2 rpg/5,4 apg/2.7 TO/game .530 FG%

Embiid

27.8 ppg/12 rpg/3.5 apg/5.0 TO/game .479 FG%


So Embiid takes A LOT more shots per game, and scores more per game, but less efficiently. Rebounding is a tie. Jokic is obviously a lot better at faciliating and running an offense through him, and shoots the ball more efficiently as well. Embiid also turns the ball over roughly twice as much, which has to be a big knock on him.

I'll take Jokic.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Using prospective injury

Do you know what prospective means?

This isn't about speculation on the future. This is about the fact that Embiid has missed 80% of his team's games over a 3.5 year period. You're delusional if you think that is not a big deal and not worth factoring into a discussion on who you would want going forward.

Quote:
The fact remains that in the 60 Some odd games he has played as a professional his play has been better than Jokic's.

It's not a fact. That's an opinion based on your view that scoring points is all that matters. Jokic is very unselfish, and naturally plays as a facilitator. Let's look at some career metrics though:

Jokic

23.7 PER, .201 WS/48, 121 Ortg, 107 Drtg, .604 TS%

Embiid

23.4 PER, .137 WS/48, 105 Ortg, 102 Drtg , .583 TS%


So Jokic beats your boy across the board in advanced metrics. But you don't like metrics, so lets go to per 36 minute stats so we can finally find something Embiid is better at:

Jokic

19.1 ppg/12.2 rpg/5,4 apg/2.7 TO/game .530 FG%

Embiid

27.8 ppg/12 rpg/3.5 apg/5.0 TO/game .479 FG%


So Embiid takes A LOT more shots per game, and scores more per game, but less efficiently. Rebounding is a tie. Jokic is obviously a lot better at faciliating and running an offense through him, and shoots the ball more efficiently as well. Embiid also turns the ball over roughly twice as much, which has to be a big knock on him.

I'll take Jokic.



He takes more shots because he is the more dominant player. That is usually how it works. You would bitch like hell if Justin Holiday took as many shots as Lauri Markannen. Embiid is also a much better defender. You'd be hard pressed to find 5% of the NBA fanbase that believes he is better. Speculating on who may or may not get hurt is weak. If he gets hurt he gets hurt. His injuries have not prevented him from being the better player which means they must not be all that serious. He is playing at a higher level currently and that is all that matters.

Embiid is capable of dominating offensively and defensively. Jokic isn't.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
If he gets hurt he gets hurt. His injuries have not prevented him from being the better player which means they must not be all that serious

:lol: :lol: :lol:

He's missed 3 entire seasons out 3.5 total seasons but yeah his injuries have not been serious.

Appreciate the chuckle man.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Staying healthy is the only thing stopping Embiid from being a top 5 player.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Staying healthy is the only thing stopping Embiid from being a top 5 player.

He has to improve in basically every facet of the game to become a top 5 player.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Staying healthy is the only thing stopping Embiid from being a top 5 player.

He has to improve in basically every facet of the game to become a top 5 player.


Great scorer, great rebounder and solid defender.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Staying healthy is the only thing stopping Embiid from being a top 5 player.

He has to improve in basically every facet of the game to become a top 5 player.


Great scorer, great rebounder and solid defender.

Good scorer, good rebounder, average defender. Guys like AD and Cousins are better at every part of the game still than Embiid is, and I don't think either one of us would have either guy as a top 5 player currently.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Using prospective injury

Do you know what prospective means?

This isn't about speculation on the future. This is about the fact that Embiid has missed 80% of his team's games over a 3.5 year period. You're delusional if you think that is not a big deal and not worth factoring into a discussion on who you would want going forward.

Quote:
The fact remains that in the 60 Some odd games he has played as a professional his play has been better than Jokic's.

It's not a fact. That's an opinion based on your view that scoring points is all that matters. Jokic is very unselfish, and naturally plays as a facilitator. Let's look at some career metrics though:

Jokic

23.7 PER, .201 WS/48, 121 Ortg, 107 Drtg, .604 TS%

Embiid

23.4 PER, .137 WS/48, 105 Ortg, 102 Drtg , .583 TS%


So Jokic beats your boy across the board in advanced metrics. But you don't like metrics, so lets go to per 36 minute stats so we can finally find something Embiid is better at:

Jokic

19.1 ppg/12.2 rpg/5,4 apg/2.7 TO/game .530 FG%

Embiid

27.8 ppg/12 rpg/3.5 apg/5.0 TO/game .479 FG%


So Embiid takes A LOT more shots per game, and scores more per game, but less efficiently. Rebounding is a tie. Jokic is obviously a lot better at faciliating and running an offense through him, and shoots the ball more efficiently as well. Embiid also turns the ball over roughly twice as much, which has to be a big knock on him.

I'll take Jokic.



Now you really aren't making sense. If likely to be injured isn't your argument then what is it? Who cares if Embiid was injured previously. Each time he plays its at a high level.

You are anticipating an injury and including it in your rationalization yet it is not about prospective injury.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
You responded to the same post multiple times. By CFMB rules that means I automatically win the argument.


I already explained to you why it's not about prospective injury. If you were unable to understand what I said we can drop it, since I really can't dumb it down anymore or make it any more clear.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
You responded to the same post multiple times. By CFMB rules that means I automatically win the argument.


I already explained to you why it's not about prospective injury. If you were unable to understand what I said we can drop it, since I really can't dumb it down anymore or make it any more clear.



Its a stupid rationale. He has been injured for three years and thus what again?


Its dumb if he is making All Star teams and playing at a high level. When he plays he is better than Jokic and everyone in the league believes that. If his injuries have prevented him from playing at a high level then maybe you have something. You don't.


The fact remains that as it stands now Embiid is the better player. It is interesting how you have no problem using in the moment for guys like Butler yet now it seems ambiguous. Embiid is playing and you are talking about injuries from previous years. He is simply better and both fans and NBA players regard him as being better. If he wasn't voted in he'd have been selected. THis kid is on his way to being All NBA and I know you don't care about such things but so what. It carries much more weight in NBA circles than John Hollinger and his silly printouts.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
THis kid is on his way to being All NBA and I know you don't care about such things but so what. It carries much more weight in NBA circles than John Hollinger and his silly printouts.

Interesting.

Steph Curry:

2× NBA Most Valuable Player (2015, 2016)
5× NBA All-Star (2014–2018)
2× All-NBA First Team (2015, 2016)
2× All-NBA Second Team (2014, 2017)

Kyrie Irving:

5× NBA All-Star (2013–2015, 2017, 2018)
All-NBA Third Team (2015)
No All-NBA First Team or Second Team selections, No MVPs.

Who ya crappin LTG?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Quote:
Its dumb if he is making All Star teams


watch out world !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Staying healthy is the only thing stopping Embiid from being a top 5 player.

He has to improve in basically every facet of the game to become a top 5 player.


Great scorer, great rebounder and solid defender.

Good scorer, good rebounder, average defender. Guys like AD and Cousins are better at every part of the game still than Embiid is, and I don't think either one of us would have either guy as a top 5 player currently.



No they aren't. Embiid falls out of bed and he instantly is a better defender than Cousins. He is a better post player and rim protector than Davis also. Better passer than Davis. Better mid range shooter than Davis. Where are all of these "facets" wit which you speak. More athletic than Cousins and a much better competitor too. I say this as a Cousins guy.

Right now in terms of overall impact it isn't even close.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Davis is a much better passer and a better shooter. Post ups are even. Davis is a much better defensive player. Davis can dribble better. He takes better shots and turns it over less.

Davis vs Embiid is not a conversation.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
THis kid is on his way to being All NBA and I know you don't care about such things but so what. It carries much more weight in NBA circles than John Hollinger and his silly printouts.

Interesting.

Steph Curry:

2× NBA Most Valuable Player (2015, 2016)
5× NBA All-Star (2014–2018)
2× All-NBA First Team (2015, 2016)
2× All-NBA Second Team (2014, 2017)

Kyrie Irving:

5× NBA All-Star (2013–2015, 2017, 2018)
All-NBA Third Team (2015)
No All-NBA First Team or Second Team selections, No MVPs.

Who ya crappin LTG?



When matched up head to head Irving destroyed him. If they matchup again head to head he will do the same thing. That was always my argument. You thought it was ludicrous and you were wrong. YOu are moving the goalposts. Curry is more accomplished. The argument between Irving and Curry is also a much closer one than the one between Jokic and Embiid also. Irving will be in the Hall Of Fame when his career is over. He has a ring and Curry has 2. Perception is the only thing standing between those two. Irving will be top five in MVP voting this year. Curry may not. I expect Durant to get the nod. Can't have 2 guys from the same team battling for MVP votes. Durant will receive more votes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Davis is a much better passer and a better shooter. Post ups are even. Davis is a much better defensive player. Davis can dribble better. He takes better shots and turns it over less.

Davis vs Embiid is not a conversation.



You said better at every facet and that is false. There is no way that Davis has the post game that Embiid has. Embiid is the closest thing to Akeem Olujawon that this league has seen. He has Akeem Olujuwon type game with more size. Davis doesn't impact games in nearly the way that Embiid does.

Davis is more accomplished but if you asked NBA guys who'd they rather have it would be Embiid. Nas correctly stated that the only thing preventing him from being top 5 is injury.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:

Davis is more accomplished but if you asked NBA guys who'd they rather have it would be Embiid.

This is wrong, and downright laughable really.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Also, Embiid is not Olajuwon :lol: :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
Perception is the only thing standing between those two.

Perception... and stats, shooting, success, and overall game. Other than that yeah basically the same guy.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Also, Embiid is not Olajuwon :lol: :lol:


Your Eye test isn't worth two dead flies. You are stats inc. at this stage. If you don't see Olajuwon type post up ability then you haven't been paying attention.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 592 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group