It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
A writer that specializes in DV is going after the judge for being too hard, against a sexual predator. My God, these people exist!!!
https://twitter.com/quasimado
Quote:
@quasimado
Honestly, I don't want to hear a judge say they're honored & privileged to send someone to their death.
I want it to be the hardest part of their job, and something they undertake with equanimity.



Quote:
Some mixed messages here. Sexual assault is bad! Except if the victim is a criminal, then it's maybe okay?

These are unacceptable comments from a judge, IMO. Prison rape is a systemic problem in this country.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
I don't care what she wrote...you had me at Huffington Post.

Nomination approved.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
sjboyd0137 wrote:
I don't care what she wrote...you had me at Huffington Post.

Nomination approved.

Put me down for both sentences as well.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
What about the death sentence?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Image

She has a point, here. I was taken aback when I saw those comments to, thinking they might raise issues for Nassar to appeal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Nomination denied, Jeltsen is right. Nassar deserves his sentence and a lot of good came from letting victims speak, but you must be able to see how this judge is really going into business for herself. I'm not a lawyer, I've never been convicted of anything, and I never got to follow through on jury duty because one case got settled on the steps and the other one got postponed, so I'm not familiar with how much judges speak their minds here, but I have a feeling this judge laid it on suspiciously thick. And Jeltsen's point about the fetishization of rape as de facto legal punishment is a good one that shouldn't go ignored.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Danny B would have an on air aneurysm if the verdict got overturned because of the judges comments.

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Image

She has a point, here. I was taken aback when I saw those comments to, thinking they might raise issues for Nassar to appeal.


She(Judge Aquilina) specifically stated the Constitution does not allow for cruel punishment. Interesting to see yourself and this HuffPost feminist on the front lines of defense for a child rapist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
denied, as others have said, these comments can give Nassar grounds to appeal and get the conviction overturned for a retrial.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
But what about the child rapists?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
I agree with the nomination being denied. A judge shouldn't say this.

I doubt there is any way it benefits the convicted but it's still not a great way to end things.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".

Yeah this is a really bad look by her .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
She said she'd sentence him to being raped if she could. I don't think that gets into mistrial territory, but it is a bit theatrical.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
badrogue17 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".

Yeah this is a really bad look by her .


Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Caller Bob wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".

Yeah this is a really bad look by her .


Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:

I don't think any of us care about his rights. However, the statements can open grounds for him to fight the conviction. Thus they shouldn't have been made

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Based on her comments maybe he gets a new sentencing hearing with a different judge? Who cares.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Nassar plead, I believe, so the worst that could happen is re-sentencing, whether that would be with the same judge I don't know, but it's probably a good idea for a higher court to take a look at a judge saying they would order a convict raped but for the Constitution.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".

Yeah this is a really bad look by her .


Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:

I don't think any of us care about his rights. However, the statements can open grounds for him to fight the conviction. Thus they shouldn't have been made


No, not really.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".

Yeah this is a really bad look by her .


Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Yes, someone does.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Curious Hair wrote:
She said she'd sentence him to being raped if she could. I don't think that gets into mistrial territory, but it is a bit theatrical.

I'm not a lawyer like Regular Reader, good dolphin, or JLN, but my guess is that since he already was convicted she can say that she wishes he could be given a harsher sentence against the Constitution without it being a mistrial. It doesn't mean she judged him unfairly prior to the conviction.

Still, bad and useless thing to do.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Based on her comments maybe he gets a new sentencing hearing with a different judge? Who cares.
The victims, the taxpayers of Michigan, those who think the Constitutional ban of cruel and unusual punishment is good?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
She said she'd sentence him to being raped if she could. I don't think that gets into mistrial territory, but it is a bit theatrical.

I'm not a lawyer like Regular Reader, good dolphin, or JLN, but my guess is that since he already was convicted she can say that she wishes he could be given a harsher sentence against the Constitution without it being a mistrial. It doesn't mean she judged him unfairly prior to the conviction.

Still, bad and useless thing to do.


It does open the judge up for reprimand or censure, though, which I don't think would be totally unwarranted in this case, if only for the "death warrant" crack alone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".

Yeah this is a really bad look by her .


Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Yes, someone does.


Odd coming from someone that likes to stand on their soapbox

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

So, you're just going to lean right into being a huge piece of shit? Fuck you.


Keep up fighting the good fight for those kiddie rapists, JLN.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I thought it was really out of line when she said his mom should have swallowed and he was gonna catch the hands of the law.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
She said she'd sentence him to being raped if she could. I don't think that gets into mistrial territory, but it is a bit theatrical.

I'm not a lawyer like Regular Reader, good dolphin, or JLN, but my guess is that since he already was convicted she can say that she wishes he could be given a harsher sentence against the Constitution without it being a mistrial. It doesn't mean she judged him unfairly prior to the conviction.

Still, bad and useless thing to do.


So many "board lawyers" here...yet everyone is convinced a conviction can be overturned on a case in which the defendent already "plead". hmmm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Also this judge needs to drop the idea that she isn't grandstanding for the media. Any judge should be removed from the bench if they say they've signed a defendant's "death warrant".

Yeah this is a really bad look by her .


Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Yes, someone does.


Odd coming from someone that likes to stand on their soapbox

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:

So, you're just going to lean right into being a huge piece of shit? Fuck you.


Keep up fighting the good fight for those kiddie rapists, JLN.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22533
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
She said she'd sentence him to being raped if she could. I don't think that gets into mistrial territory, but it is a bit theatrical.

I'm not a lawyer like Regular Reader, good dolphin, or JLN, but my guess is that since he already was convicted she can say that she wishes he could be given a harsher sentence against the Constitution without it being a mistrial. It doesn't mean she judged him unfairly prior to the conviction.

Still, bad and useless thing to do.


So many "board lawyers" here...yet everyone is convinced a conviction can be overturned on a case in which the defendent already "plead". hmmm


Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Nassar plead, I believe, so the worst that could happen is re-sentencing, whether that would be with the same judge I don't know, but it's probably a good idea for a higher court to take a look at a judge saying they would order a convict raped but for the Constitution.


Idiot. And I'm not even a lawyer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
That's going to disappoint Brick. He really looks up to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
America, take note:

There are multiple people defending an actual child rapist in this thread.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group