It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Caller Bob wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
She said she'd sentence him to being raped if she could. I don't think that gets into mistrial territory, but it is a bit theatrical.

I'm not a lawyer like Regular Reader, good dolphin, or JLN, but my guess is that since he already was convicted she can say that she wishes he could be given a harsher sentence against the Constitution without it being a mistrial. It doesn't mean she judged him unfairly prior to the conviction.

Still, bad and useless thing to do.


So many "board lawyers" here...yet everyone is convinced a conviction can be overturned on a case in which the defendent already "plead". hmmm
Um, I specifically mentioned it was done after the conviction.

You do know that technically a conviction and pleading guilty are two separate things right?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Quite a thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22598
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Douchebag wrote:
America, take note:

There are multiple people defending an actual child rapist in this thread.


Not...really, like, at all? Saying a judge shouldn't gleefully say they have signed a death warrant isn't denying or excusing the actions of the accused/convicted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Douchebag wrote:
America, take note:

There are multiple people defending an actual child rapist in this thread.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
America, take note:

There are multiple people defending an actual child rapist in this thread.


Not...really, like, at all? Saying a judge shouldn't gleefully say they have signed a death warrant isn't denying or excusing the actions of the accused/convicted.

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:

Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Yes, someone does.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Curious Hair wrote:
I thought it was really out of line when she said his mom should have swallowed and he was gonna catch the hands of the law.



You took it the wrong way. That's on you.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:58 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
The obvious and tasteless grandstanding by the judge does not eclipse the repulsive evils committed by the offender.

Nomination denied.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22598
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
America, take note:

There are multiple people defending an actual child rapist in this thread.


Not...really, like, at all? Saying a judge shouldn't gleefully say they have signed a death warrant isn't denying or excusing the actions of the accused/convicted.

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:

Yeah, someone really needs to consider the rights of a man that raped over 100 girls. :roll: :roll: :roll:


Yes, someone does.


Oh, you mean DB meant "defending the rights of an actual child rapist"? Then yes. Absolutely no shame in that, try as you might.

I thought he/you meant "defending the actions of an actual child rapist".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
pittmike wrote:
Based on her comments maybe he gets a new sentencing hearing with a different judge? Who cares.


This is what the 2nd or 3rd thread in the last day where you've ended "who cares"?

Everyone should care about inflamatory judges who bring that kind of personal animus to a case. Parkins had it right earlier, give him a fair trial, if convicted or if he pleads out, sentence him appropriately, send him to jail and move on.

Give the scumbag the 175 on top of the 60 he already got and let him go suffer in the hell he created for himself.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22598
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Regular Reader wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Based on her comments maybe he gets a new sentencing hearing with a different judge? Who cares.


This is what the 2nd or 3rd thread in the last day where you've ended "who cares"?

Everyone should care about inflamatory judges who bring that kind of personal animus to a case. Parkins had it right earlier, give him a fair trial, if convicted or if he pleads out, sentence him appropriately, send him to jail and move on.

Give the scumbag the 175 on top of the 60 he already got and let him go suffer in the hell he created for himself.


Stop defending a child rapist, RR.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Interesting that you find a kiddie rapist getting verbally taking behind the woodshed "inflammatory". America(Poster) was right...Patton would see this shit hole today and say "why bother".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:08 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
I've known a couple judges in my day. They've both told me similar things: they have a persona they must uphold, however they're still human and not devoid of emotion.

Cameras, media, high profile case? I'm surprised this judge didn't attack the man herself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22598
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I've known a couple judges in my day. They've both told me similar things: they have a persona they must uphold, however they're still human and not devoid of emotion.

Cameras, media, high profile case? I'm surprised this judge didn't attack the man herself.


Can't a judge bar cameras and media from the courtroom? If all it takes for her to openly wish for the ability to sentence a defendant to rape is a heinous conviction and some media buzz, this person shouldn't be a judge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
I think you need to take a look at her entire "body of work/career" before you say she "shouldn't be a judge". I get she was mean to a kiddie rapist, and that upsets you, but you should probably look at other cases she judged, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:14 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I've known a couple judges in my day. They've both told me similar things: they have a persona they must uphold, however they're still human and not devoid of emotion.

Cameras, media, high profile case? I'm surprised this judge didn't attack the man herself.


Can't a judge bar cameras and media from the courtroom? If all it takes for her to openly wish for the ability to sentence a defendant to rape is a heinous conviction and some media buzz, this person shouldn't be a judge.


Absolutely cameras can be banned from the courtroom. Then again, people still know the name of Lance Ito.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22598
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
I think you need to take a look at her entire "body of work/career" before you say she "shouldn't be a judge". I get she was mean to a kiddie rapist, and that upsets you, but you should probably look at other cases she judged, no?


No, one of my "shouldn't be a judge" tests is simply asking "has this judge wished for a defendant to be raped because of the severity of their crime?". Got another one that's pretty much the same, but it asks whether the judge has gleefully proclaimed to have signed a defendant's "death warrant".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Women judges...just sayin.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
I've known a couple judges in my day. They've both told me similar things: they have a persona they must uphold, however they're still human and not devoid of emotion.

Cameras, media, high profile case? I'm surprised this judge didn't attack the man herself.


Can't a judge bar cameras and media from the courtroom? If all it takes for her to openly wish for the ability to sentence a defendant to rape is a heinous conviction and some media buzz, this person shouldn't be a judge.


Absolutely cameras can be banned from the courtroom. Then again, people still know the name of Lance Ito.


Yeah, Ito..big time celebrity now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
I think you need to take a look at her entire "body of work/career" before you say she "shouldn't be a judge". I get she was mean to a kiddie rapist, and that upsets you, but you should probably look at other cases she judged, no?


No, one of my "shouldn't be a judge" tests is simply asking "has this judge wished for a defendant to be raped because of the severity of their crime?". Got another one that's pretty much the same, but it asks whether the judge has gleefully proclaimed to have signed a defendant's "death warrant".



If you are ever interviewing me for a position, I'll be sure to indicate to you I am sympathetic to child predators.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55995
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Lissen I don't like dese showboat look-at-me glory-seekin' judges, I wanna real blue-collar lunchpail judge who keeps dere head down and does da jaahhb widdout bein asssked. I'll hang up and hear wh'you have ta say.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Curious Hair wrote:
Lissen I don't like dese showboat look-at-me glory-seekin' judges, I wanna real blue-collar lunchpail judge who keeps dere head down and does da jaahhb widdout bein asssked. I'll hang up and hear wh'you have ta say.
List your three favorite Judges;

Smails
Wapner
Reinhold

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Lissen I don't like dese showboat look-at-me glory-seekin' judges, I wanna real blue-collar lunchpail judge who keeps dere head down and does da jaahhb widdout bein asssked. I'll hang up and hear wh'you have ta say.
List your three favorite Judges;

Smails
Wapner
Reinhold


How Apatow doesn't make this list is beyond me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Because his name is Judd, not Judge. You fuck.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Because his name is Judd, not Judge. You fuck.

Not a fan of inflamatory posters who bring that kind of personal animus to a thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Caller Bob wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Because his name is Judd, not Judge. You fuck.

Not a fan of inflamatory posters who bring that kind of personal animus to a thread.


Nicely played :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quite a thread.

Yup. Any issue that can bring JLN, RR, Rick, and CH together on the same side is interesting.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22598
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Because his name is Judd, not Judge. You fuck.

Not a fan of inflamatory posters who bring that kind of personal animus to a thread.


I think you need to take a look at his entire "body of work/posting career" before you say he's an "inflamatory [sic] poster". I get he was mean to an genius, and that upsets you because you're the genius, but you should probably look at other threads he's posted in, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Caller Bob is having a great day at CFMB. This is career defining stuff here.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quite a thread.

Yup. Any issue that can bring JLN, RR, Rick, and CH together on the same side is interesting.


Yeah, I never thought I'd see the day JLN went to bat for Reader on this board. Even more shocking the topic...Compassion for Kiddie Didlers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Douchebag wrote:
Caller Bob is having a great day at CFMB. This is career defining stuff here.


He's doing a great job proving that rpb is right about him.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group