It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:23 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 846 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 29  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
rogers park bryan wrote:
Right. Kinda sucks for parents of dead children though.

It does suck, but some level of insecurity is the price you pay for a free society.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Right. Kinda sucks for parents of dead children though.

It does suck, but some level of insecurity is the price you pay for a free society.


Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Right. Kinda sucks for parents of dead children though.

It does suck, but some level of insecurity is the price you pay for a free society.


Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.


Gotta spend money to make money!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?
.


apparently MANY around here hitting the pipe early today. BETTER FOR YOU THAN BEER!!

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Caller Bob wrote:
Image

Whoever came up with this is living in some sort of alternative reality.

Muslim shooter -> blame white people
Hispanic shooter -> blame white people
Black shooter -> blame white people
White shooter -> blame guns


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Your proposed law would never hold up against the 2nd Amendment. It's really not even worth discussing because no reading of the 2nd Amendment would allow for it
Huh? It's not my proposed law that we should lock people up for youtube comments.

My first paragraph was about the hypothetical repeal of the 2nd Amendment because literally nothing else is an option for a generation that grew up with "Bad guy shooting up a school" drills for themselves and their kids.

That is the kind of thing that can really shape a generation of people. There is a generation that fears nuclear war far more than I do and a lot of it probably has to do with drills preparing for the coming nuclear war and how to protect yourself by hiding under your desk.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:30 am
Posts: 1497
pizza_Place: Bianchis
Caller Bob wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Right. Kinda sucks for parents of dead children though.

It does suck, but some level of insecurity is the price you pay for a free society.


Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.


Gotta spend money to make money!


A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Ah, Lemonparty, the 8th sacrament.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
SuperMario wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Right. Kinda sucks for parents of dead children though.

It does suck, but some level of insecurity is the price you pay for a free society.


Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.


Gotta spend money to make money!


A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.


DON'T BRING UP BUSH!

HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.

Moving goalposts again.

We're talking US Military vs a Bundy type group

They would not need nukes or F-15s

They would be stopped by common sense and political fall out. Not email guns.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
America wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Image

Whoever came up with this is living in some sort of alternative reality.

Muslim shooter -> blame white people
Hispanic shooter -> blame white people
Black shooter -> blame white people
White shooter -> blame guns

I'm open to an explanation on the first 3. I don't see much of that.

I miss good amount of persecution against whites apparently. Luck o the Irish maybe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
How reliable is the CCHR? I see they were started by the Church of Scientology but that was in the late 60's, not the empire we know today. Are they total bullshit, half-bullshit...?

https://www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/

Quote:
At least 36 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs resulting in 172 wounded and 80 killed (in other school shootings, information about their drug use was never made public—neither confirming or refuting if they were under the influence of prescribed drugs). The most important fact about this list, is that these are only cases where the information about their psychiatric drug use was made public.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
How reliable is the CCHR? I see they were started by the Church of Scientology but that was in the late 60's, not the empire we know today. Are they total bullshit, half-bullshit...?

https://www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/

Quote:
At least 36 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs resulting in 172 wounded and 80 killed (in other school shootings, information about their drug use was never made public—neither confirming or refuting if they were under the influence of prescribed drugs). The most important fact about this list, is that these are only cases where the information about their psychiatric drug use was made public.

:lol: Do you have to ask?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.

Moving goalposts again.

We're talking US Military vs a Bundy type group

They would not need nukes or F-15s

They would be stopped by common sense and political fall out. Not email guns.


What's the point of limiting it to a small group, though? Why don't you just limit it to one person instead of a handful?

Seems like you want to argue on your own terms with an arbitrary set of circumstances that just happen to support your belief.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
How reliable is the CCHR? I see they were started by the Church of Scientology but that was in the late 60's, not the empire we know today. Are they total bullshit, half-bullshit...?

https://www.cchrint.org/school-shooters/

Quote:
At least 36 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs resulting in 172 wounded and 80 killed (in other school shootings, information about their drug use was never made public—neither confirming or refuting if they were under the influence of prescribed drugs). The most important fact about this list, is that these are only cases where the information about their psychiatric drug use was made public.

:lol: Do you have to ask?


I swear I've heard the name referenced before by legitimate outlets. Might be a confabulation, though. Uh-oh, I'm confabulating, NO GUNS FOR ME.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.


They've poisoned, performed experiments and MANY other awful things. I wouldn't be quick to say what they wouldn't do.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
Nothing associated with Scientology is to be taken seriously.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
storkinastorm wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.

Moving goalposts again.

We're talking US Military vs a Bundy type group

They would not need nukes or F-15s

They would be stopped by common sense and political fall out. Not email guns.


What's the point of limiting it to a small group, though? Why don't you just limit it to one person instead of a handful?

Seems like you want to argue on your own terms with an arbitrary set of circumstances that just happen to support your belief.

No I'm arguing with Ogie and his contention about Bundy.

Ask him I guess, he brought it up


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.

Moving goalposts again.

We're talking US Military vs a Bundy type group

They would not need nukes or F-15s

They would be stopped by common sense and political fall out. Not email guns.


What's the point of limiting it to a small group, though? Why don't you just limit it to one person instead of a handful?

Seems like you want to argue on your own terms with an arbitrary set of circumstances that just happen to support your belief.

No I'm arguing with Ogie and his contention about Bundy.

Ask him I guess, he brought it up

Tell me, if the Feds killed Bundy and some of the militiamen there, how would the larger militia movement react? How would US soldiers (many of whom have family in militias and are sympathetic to their movement) would react?

You're speaking of it as a small group. I'm speaking in terms to the larger militia movement in this country, and yes it exists.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1000
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
[

I'm not a lawyer...

FFS. Well, that at least explains a lot of your specious legal analysis on this board.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 11:02 am
Posts: 1000
Location: Illini Inn
pizza_Place: Amato's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.

Moving goalposts again.

We're talking US Military vs a Bundy type group

They would not need nukes or F-15s

They would be stopped by common sense and political fall out. Not email guns.


What's the point of limiting it to a small group, though? Why don't you just limit it to one person instead of a handful?

Seems like you want to argue on your own terms with an arbitrary set of circumstances that just happen to support your belief.

No I'm arguing with Ogie and his contention about Bundy.

Ask him I guess, he brought it up

Tell me, if the Feds killed Bundy and some of the militiamen there, how would the larger militia movement react? How would US soldiers (many of whom have family in militias and are sympathetic to their movement) would react?

You're speaking of it as a small group. I'm speaking in terms to the larger militia movement in this country, and yes it exists.

You must be a big supporter of the Palestinians.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Peter Puck wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
[

I'm not a lawyer...

FFS. Well, that at least explains a lot of your specious legal analysis on this board.


Yeah but you thought I was, which leads me to believe that, like Reader, you're using "specious legal analysis" to mean "stuff I disagreed with". :lol:

Now what goes into "reporting" someone to the FBI?


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4045
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The Bill of Rights is a fantastic document and I personally cherish those rights and would not part with any of them if it made me more safe and secure. What's the point of safety and security if you have no liberty?


Why are you not rioting in the streets today over the infringement of the 6th amendment that occurs hundreds of millions of times a year?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Peter Puck wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.

Moving goalposts again.

We're talking US Military vs a Bundy type group

They would not need nukes or F-15s

They would be stopped by common sense and political fall out. Not email guns.


What's the point of limiting it to a small group, though? Why don't you just limit it to one person instead of a handful?

Seems like you want to argue on your own terms with an arbitrary set of circumstances that just happen to support your belief.

No I'm arguing with Ogie and his contention about Bundy.

Ask him I guess, he brought it up

Tell me, if the Feds killed Bundy and some of the militiamen there, how would the larger militia movement react? How would US soldiers (many of whom have family in militias and are sympathetic to their movement) would react?

You're speaking of it as a small group. I'm speaking in terms to the larger militia movement in this country, and yes it exists.

You must be a big supporter of the Palestinians.

I can actually understand how an individual Palestinian may feel and why many would be drawn to terrorism. Would it shock you if I told you I understand the rationale? I would say though in reality it is their leaders are the ones who have really let them down as their own leadership is the biggest obstacle to them having their own free state, which has been offered on multiple cases.

That's all I'll say in regards to that here though as I really don't want to derail it too much.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
One Post wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The Bill of Rights is a fantastic document and I personally cherish those rights and would not part with any of them if it made me more safe and secure. What's the point of safety and security if you have no liberty?


Why are you not rioting in the streets today over the infringement of the 6th amendment that occurs hundreds of millions of times a year?


:roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
One Post wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The Bill of Rights is a fantastic document and I personally cherish those rights and would not part with any of them if it made me more safe and secure. What's the point of safety and security if you have no liberty?


Why are you not rioting in the streets today over the infringement of the 6th amendment that occurs hundreds of millions of times a year?

Have you not seen the posts I've made in other threads about how I believe our current justice system is rigged? Especially when cops can plant evidence with impunity and we are supposed to accept the word of a cop as the truth when they testify on the stand?

Are you going to bring up the 4th Amendment next? If you do I also was happy when someone tried to shoot up the NSA yesterday.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

That's all I'll say in regards to that here though as I really don't want to derail it too much.


Too late.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Nas wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
How high do you have to be to think that the U.S. government could squash uprisings with nuclear weapons and F-15s?

It wouldn't and couldn't happen that way. Can you imagine being in the room when a president gave the order to nuke downtown Manhattan? My hope would be that the order would be refused on several levels.

We ARE the government. Those people in the military, congress, the bureaucracy, the cabinet, etc. are our neighbors, friends, and family. The government isn't some nebulous evil force that would nuke its own citizens. We could very well overthrow the government if enough people believed in it.


They've poisoned, performed experiments and MANY other awful things. I wouldn't be quick to say what they wouldn't do.


It's cute though, their little GI Joe fantasies. So let them continue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
they COULD nuke 90% of America, but that would be the only way they could wipe out armed resistance in rural America. The lack of understanding of rural culture here is astounding.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

That's all I'll say in regards to that here though as I really don't want to derail it too much.


Too late.

:lol:

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2018 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
Hatchetman wrote:
The lack of understanding of rural culture here is astounding.

I never understood why someone would want to screw their sister.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 846 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 29  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group