Lets ban America and TM. These guys want the genocide of blacks and women. These alt right pricks are a cancer. Burpa derpa derpa derpa dooo. Rabble rabble!

Google "eye roll gif images" and that gif never shows up. Google "planet of the apes eye roll gif images" and it's the first one.

Maybe he uses Bing or Yahoo?

It is a bad look no matter how you view it. The vast majority of racists will never admit that they are racist. If you wait for most racists to admit that they are racist then you will be waiting a long time. Don't know if JLN is or isn't but it is insensitive to post a monkey while debating a black person. Its bad to post a monkey while debating a white person too. Bad connotation if nothing else.

Calling that reaction GIF objectively racist is pants-on-head insane. Stop it.

It's the pinnacle of absurd thought policing by liberals to say that, in the presence of a black person, there is a list of otherwise completely innocuous things that immediately become objectively racist to say or reference.

It is a bad look no matter how you view it. The vast majority of racists will never admit that they are racist. If you wait for most racists to admit that they are racist then you will be waiting a long time. Don't know if JLN is or isn't but it is insensitive to post a monkey while debating a black person. Its bad to post a monkey while debating a white person too. Bad connotation if nothing else.

Oh lord please not another 10 pages of this please.

Everyone is racist to a point.

shakes - didnt you use to do Jerry Seinfeld voice impressions when you were on North's show? I thought it was one of the better impressions you did. Now some of the others needed work like Kramer

Calling that reaction GIF objectively racist is pants-on-head insane. Stop it.

It's the pinnacle of absurd thought policing by liberals to say that, in the presence of a black person, there is a list of otherwise completely innocuous things that immediately become objectively racist to say or reference.

This particular depiction of African Americans isn't something new and to presume that it is displays willful ignorance. You're calling people insane for pointing out something that is common knowledge.

You see how desperate people get to talk about anything other than the topic at hand when you bring it up.

We can talk about it. Either black people have a genetic predisposition to be violent or there are socioeconomic factors at play you’d rather not discusss. You’re not being insightful man. Educated people have been talking about this issue for decades. They heavily lean one way.

Many questions like this can't be definitively answered because the research would be too offensive to someone in our perpetually aggrieved society.

The idea of a black crime gene is absurd but we cant dispel it because anyone who tries to study it is made a pariah. So we can't definitively answer and that breeds continued division.

The SJW and their ilk make many questions unable to be answered.

Questions like:
Are single mother homes worse for children versus a two parent household?
Do children of gay and lesbian couples have more issues relative to children of straights?
Do transgenders have a 47% suicide rate because of mental illness untreated or bigotry?

Why do lesbians report higher rates of domestic and sexual abuse in relationships?

None of these questions can be studied because some group in society will cry bloody murder over hurt feelings and "bigotry". Even though if the research could dispel these views they won't allow it because if it doesn't then the group has to solely argue on emotion and not science. If it turns out children of gays are worse off we have a duty to stop gay adoption no matter how "bigoted" that view is.

So yes the literature indicates socioeconomic forces drive crime because only research in favor of that view is conducted or published.

We rely on "sociology" even though it has been shown to be a discipline plagued by emotion over reason as evidenced by the 67 gender nonsense and Jordan Petersons writings.

So what happens? Well if a person brings up hard numbers like the demographics of violent crime they are told they "lie" or don't paint the whole picture. So I can see how a person can just conclude these groups are overly sensitive.

The lefts embrace of multicularlism, "diversity" and sociological concepts like "white privilege" only further alienate the outsiders. People weren't born alt right, society pushes them right. Its sad because at the end of the day right and left just want people to be happy, but the left thinks to make POC happy you have to make whites/koreans/Pakistanis unhappy.

Yes I included Koreans and Pakistanis because of what you see in stuff like the LA riots and Philly forcing shop owners to remove bullet proof glass because it hurts peoples feelings.

Some on the left don't see these minorities as American success stories but "problematic". Its sad.

Many questions like this can't be definitively answered because the research would be too offensive to someone in our perpetually aggrieved society.

The idea of a black crime gene is absurd but we cant dispel it because anyone who tries to study it is made a pariah. So we can't definitively answer and that breeds continued division.

The SJW and their ilk make many questions unable to be answered.

Questions like:
Are single mother homes worse for children versus a two parent household?
Do children of gay and lesbian couples have more issues relative to children of straights?
Do transgenders have a 47% suicide rate because of mental illness untreated or bigotry?

Why do lesbians report higher rates of domestic and sexual abuse in relationships?

None of these questions can be studied because some group in society will cry bloody murder over hurt feelings and "bigotry". [Even though if the research could dispel these views they won't allow it because if it doesn't then the group has to solely argue on emotion and not science. If it turns out children of gays are worse off we have a duty to stop gay adoption no matter how "bigoted" that view is.

So yes the literature indicates socioeconomic forces drive crime because only research in favor of that view is conducted or published.

We rely on "sociology" even though it has been shown to be a discipline plagued by emotion over reason as evidenced by the 67 gender nonsense and Jordan Petersons writings.

So what happens? Well if a person brings up hard numbers like the demographics of violent crime they are told they "lie" or don't paint the whole picture. So I can see how a person can just conclude these groups are overly sensitive.

The lefts embrace of multicularlism, "diversity" and sociological concepts like "white privilege" only further alienate the outsiders. People weren't born alt right, society pushes them right. Its sad because at the end of the day right and left just want people to be happy, but the left thinks to make POC happy you have to make whites/koreans/Pakistanis unhappy.

Yes I included Koreans and Pakistanis because of what you see in stuff like the LA riots and Philly forcing shop owners to remove bullet proof glass because it hurts peoples feelings.

Some on the left don't see these minorities as American success stories but "problematic". Its sad.

You're dancing around a genetic predisposition with all this stuff.

Duh reading compression is teh hard.

Genetic predisposition is ridiculous and it needs to be disproved.

Same as how we had to have a commission to dispel 9/11 nutjobs and for the Kennedy assassination.

Ignorance should be dispelled by the most science as possible.