It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Because they don't work.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
They make dopes feel better. They make it easier for a nut job to pick a good target?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
pittmike wrote:
They make dopes feel better. They make it easier for a nut job to pick a good target?

Which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
pittmike wrote:
They make dopes feel better. They make it easier for a nut job to pick a good target?

yeah see, this is one of the things that always bugged me about those stickers you see on the doors everywhere... who are they for? i first saw them on a temporary/ish FEMA office right by the des plaines metra station, and it had me laughing like "who are these stickers for? if someone was gonna run up in here brandishing a gun demanding 'justice' then surely they're not gonna be deterred by some sticker on the door saying no guns, right? and if it's for the rest of us who ain't packing heat during our day-to-day affairs, then shit is it to make regular people feel good like they're protected by the stickers of society?"

of course, talking to some security guard/type people they tell me that's for the concealed carry crowd, but still you know, i can't help but think up some twisted sketch comedy show i'll surely never be able to do anything with where you have a cpl dudes ready to barge in a place all guns blazing finna get theirs and then as they roll up with their ski masks on and stuff it's like FUCK.... DUDE.... WE CAN'T BRING OUR GUNS IN... THERE'S A STICKER ON THE DOOR THAT SAYS NO GUNS!!! -- "what? what in the actual fuck? shit.... can we do this without weapons?" and then maybe you can work in some kind of a homage to the butterfinger scene that netted charlie sheen kristy swanson in the chase.... but still, you know, it's just hilarious to see these authoritative stickers prominently placed on the doors like something something benjamin franklin quotes about liberty and security.

Benjamin Franklin wrote:
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.


but evidently they deserve very demonstrative stickers on the doors.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92045
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

Again I ask the question - Which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Kind of like colleges are safe speech zones.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92045
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

Exactly. AR15s are pointless as they are useless to defend and only are good for killing civilians.

So why are they needed again?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

Exactly. AR15s are pointless as they are useless to defend and only are good for killing civilians.

So why are they needed again?

If you end up in a situation the 2nd Amendment was written for, you're going to need longer reach than a pistol provides. You'll want a trusty AR-15 or other sort of long gun then. Mass shooters don't snipe people, they go into confined areas to perform their killings. That is why Virginia Tech was so deadly even though no rifles were present.

Whether it was Pulse, Stoneman Douglas, or Sandy Hook, a pistol would've been just as effective for the shooter and wouldn't have changed the death counts as the victims were all defenseless and unarmed in a confined space.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

(Before this gets derailed by BRick) Again, again - Ogie & Mike: which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

(Before this gets derailed by BRick) Again, again - Ogie & Mike: which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

Fort Hood is a prime example as military personnel cannot carry on base. School shootings are all gun free zones, Pulse Nightclub, etc. The people carrying these attacks hit soft places where they will face little resistance as they won't get a high body count if they are quickly engaged. Even if they are not hit when first engaged, they will be forced to take cover themselves and will be put on the defensive. Most mass shooters don't do well in that situation which is why you see them quickly decide to end it themselves once in a defensive situation.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

(Before this gets derailed by BRick) Again, again - Ogie & Mike: which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

Fort Hood is a prime example as military personnel cannot carry on base. School shootings are all gun free zones, Pulse Nightclub, etc.

I give you more credit than that. Those locations were chosen for specific reasons...none of which were related to a concern of return fire. You know that, right?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

Again I ask the question - Which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

I'll ask you... which were not?
Do you know how many mass shootings were on gun free zones over the last 50+ years?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Darkside wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

Again I ask the question - Which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

I'll ask you... which were not?
Do you know how many mass shootings were on gun free zones over the last 50+ years?


They weren't chosen because they were gun free zones is I think zippy's point.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Darkside wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

Again I ask the question - Which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?

I'll ask you... which were not?
Do you know how many mass shootings were on gun free zones over the last 50+ years?

I am not arguing your OP. I’m sure a large number of shootings were in gun free zones. My point is those locations were chosen for reasons not related to the fact that they were gun free.

Edit: what Speeps said.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I give you more credit than that. Those locations were chosen for specific reasons...none of which were related to a concern of return fire. You know that, right?

That is part of it, but if there was a higher probability of someone being armed and able to intervene quickly, don't you think another target may have been considered? It's no coincidence that these people scope out and select places that are what we would call "soft targets". If the places they scoped out were populated by some people who may be equipped to return fire, then the plans very well may change.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92045
Location: To the left of my post
So an AR15 can take out trained military personnel but a trained pistol owner can easily take out an AR15?

Very confusing

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

(Before this gets derailed by BRick) Again, again - Ogie & Mike: which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?


I didn’t say there were. Logically I think it is easier to decide to attack the target where no guns are allowed. I would go there before say the police station for my massacre.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I give you more credit than that. Those locations were chosen for specific reasons...none of which were related to a concern of return fire. You know that, right?

That is part of it, but if there was a higher probability of someone being armed and able to intervene quickly, don't you think another target may have been considered? It's no coincidence that these people scope out and select places that are what we would call "soft targets". If the places they scoped out were populated by some people who may be equipped to return fire, then the plans very well may change.

Actually I don’t think that. These shooters are irrational are frequently targeting a location for a reason. Fired from a job, bullied at school, etc. I seriously doubt the idea of a soft target enters into their thought process.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
pittmike wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Because they don't work.

yep, it's a lot easier to open fire on a bunch of people when you know none of them have a means to fight back.

Most mass shooters are cowards and that is why they put a bullet in their own brain the minute they are engaged by the police. They are not prepared for a firefight where someone else will shoot back at them.

They probably know that their guns are "pretty useless".

if they are not well trained (most mass shooters aren't) and going against someone who is properly trained, then yes they are going to be at a disadvantage the minute they face any amount of resistance.

You would be shocked with how easily a trained pistol user can take down untrained rifle users provided they are not at distances exceeding 75 yards.

(Before this gets derailed by BRick) Again, again - Ogie & Mike: which shooting locations were chosen because they were gun free?


I didn’t say there were. Logically I think it is easier to decide to attack the target where no guns are allowed. I would go there before say the police station for my massacre.
Do you think these shooters are “logical” or emotional?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So an AR15 can take out trained military personnel but a trained pistol owner can easily take out an AR15?

Very confusing

A trained AR-15 user certainly can. I don't think you realize how many of us are ex-military and do spend a lot of weekends on the range. Now granted an untrained AR-15 user will be nothing but an easy target for infantry, but one who has undergone some training and is very familiar with their rifle would put up a solid fight and could even have the upper-hand if proper concealment is used for an ambush. Once again, the rifle gives you an effective range of 500 yards and anyone who has undergone military training should be able to use it to that range.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I give you more credit than that. Those locations were chosen for specific reasons...none of which were related to a concern of return fire. You know that, right?

That is part of it, but if there was a higher probability of someone being armed and able to intervene quickly, don't you think another target may have been considered? It's no coincidence that these people scope out and select places that are what we would call "soft targets". If the places they scoped out were populated by some people who may be equipped to return fire, then the plans very well may change.

Actually I don’t think that. These shooters are irrational are frequently targeting a location for a reason. Fired from a job, bullied at school, etc. I seriously doubt the idea of a soft target enters into their thought process.

They do have a reason for the target, but I am saying they probably reconsider if they expect to encounter resistance. What they are doing has no point to them if they cannot go in unopposed and kill as many of their targets as possible. I'd say it is a mixture of the two that leads to them selecting their eventual location

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92045
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So an AR15 can take out trained military personnel but a trained pistol owner can easily take out an AR15?

Very confusing

A trained AR-15 user certainly can. I don't think you realize how many of us are ex-military and do spend a lot of weekends on the range. Now granted an untrained AR-15 user will be nothing but an easy target for infantry, but one who has undergone some training and is very familiar with their rifle would put up a solid fight and could even have the upper-hand if proper concealment is used for an ambush. Once again, the rifle gives you an effective range of 500 yards and anyone who has undergone military training should be able to use it to that range.

So how is it "pretty useless" and no more effective than a pistol?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I give you more credit than that. Those locations were chosen for specific reasons...none of which were related to a concern of return fire. You know that, right?

That is part of it, but if there was a higher probability of someone being armed and able to intervene quickly, don't you think another target may have been considered? It's no coincidence that these people scope out and select places that are what we would call "soft targets". If the places they scoped out were populated by some people who may be equipped to return fire, then the plans very well may change.

Actually I don’t think that. These shooters are irrational are frequently targeting a location for a reason. Fired from a job, bullied at school, etc. I seriously doubt the idea of a soft target enters into their thought process.

They do have a reason for the target, but I am saying they probably reconsider if they expect to encounter resistance. What they are doing has no point to them if they cannot go in unopposed and kill as many of their targets as possible. I'd say it is a mixture of the two that leads to them selecting their eventual location

Again I disagree. They are not normal. They aren’t concerned with consequences. They choose a specific location because their psychosis leads them there.

And I hesitate to note that there was an armed security guy at the school in FL.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I give you more credit than that. Those locations were chosen for specific reasons...none of which were related to a concern of return fire. You know that, right?

That is part of it, but if there was a higher probability of someone being armed and able to intervene quickly, don't you think another target may have been considered? It's no coincidence that these people scope out and select places that are what we would call "soft targets". If the places they scoped out were populated by some people who may be equipped to return fire, then the plans very well may change.

Actually I don’t think that. These shooters are irrational are frequently targeting a location for a reason. Fired from a job, bullied at school, etc. I seriously doubt the idea of a soft target enters into their thought process.

They do have a reason for the target, but I am saying they probably reconsider if they expect to encounter resistance. What they are doing has no point to them if they cannot go in unopposed and kill as many of their targets as possible. I'd say it is a mixture of the two that leads to them selecting their eventual location

Again I disagree. They are not normal. They aren’t concerned with consequences. They choose a specific location because their psychosis leads them there.

And I hesitate to note that there was an armed security guy at the school in FL.

Do you believe that psychosis lead an armed assassin to choose a gun free zone by chance?
Bear in mind that over 95% of mass shootings happened at gun free zones.
That's just chance?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So an AR15 can take out trained military personnel but a trained pistol owner can easily take out an AR15?

Very confusing

A trained AR-15 user certainly can. I don't think you realize how many of us are ex-military and do spend a lot of weekends on the range. Now granted an untrained AR-15 user will be nothing but an easy target for infantry, but one who has undergone some training and is very familiar with their rifle would put up a solid fight and could even have the upper-hand if proper concealment is used for an ambush. Once again, the rifle gives you an effective range of 500 yards and anyone who has undergone military training should be able to use it to that range.

So how is it "pretty useless" and no more effective than a pistol?

it's about range. For a mass shooter within the confines of a structure, it is as effective as a pistol and the better trained pistol shooter will have the upper hand over the novice AR-15 shooter. The rifle's advantages come from that range, which cannot be exploited in the types of environments that mass shooters typically target. Range means nothing in the confines of a night club or school.

In mass shooting events (other than Vegas) a pistol would have proven just as effective for the shooter. Vegas and Charles Whitman at UT are the only 2 mass shooting events I can think of where the rifle made sense as the weapon of choice. Even at University of Texas, Whitman was using a single shot bolt action rifle and he killed and wounded more people than Cruz did with his AR-15 at Stoneman Douglas.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19371
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

Whether it was Pulse, Stoneman Douglas, or Sandy Hook, a pistol would've been just as effective for the shooter and wouldn't have changed the death counts as the victims were all defenseless and unarmed in a confined space.


No way this is true considering the actual shooters.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun Free Zones
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Darkside wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
I give you more credit than that. Those locations were chosen for specific reasons...none of which were related to a concern of return fire. You know that, right?

That is part of it, but if there was a higher probability of someone being armed and able to intervene quickly, don't you think another target may have been considered? It's no coincidence that these people scope out and select places that are what we would call "soft targets". If the places they scoped out were populated by some people who may be equipped to return fire, then the plans very well may change.

Actually I don’t think that. These shooters are irrational are frequently targeting a location for a reason. Fired from a job, bullied at school, etc. I seriously doubt the idea of a soft target enters into their thought process.

They do have a reason for the target, but I am saying they probably reconsider if they expect to encounter resistance. What they are doing has no point to them if they cannot go in unopposed and kill as many of their targets as possible. I'd say it is a mixture of the two that leads to them selecting their eventual location

Again I disagree. They are not normal. They aren’t concerned with consequences. They choose a specific location because their psychosis leads them there.

And I hesitate to note that there was an armed security guy at the school in FL.

Do you believe that psychosis lead an armed assassin to choose a gun free zone by chance?
Bear in mind that over 95% of mass shootings happened at gun free zones.
That's just chance?
I generally think you’re a pretty bright guy but you seem to have trouble understanding my point. I’m guessing a large portion of the U.S. is gun free. I don’t believe living through the killing affects a mass shooters thought process in any way.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group