It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 254 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.


I had a reply but i might just table it for now.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22518
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Nas wrote:
JLN never misses an opportunity to try to score points for some imaginary victory. It can be entertaining but at some point he takes that away and you're left wanting to stab your eyes. Don't make me want to stab my eyes.


Voctory is mine!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event.[quote]

Jobbers aren't placed in pay per views. At best you're a mid carder. Buddy Roberts or more apropo in your case Baron Von Ratsheky.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.



You're nothing more than a ham and egger.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22518
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.


I had a reply but i might just table it for now.


And I'll put you THROUGH that table when we meet in the Tournament. For months you've been running your mouth about me as a poster, trying to catch me unawares to try to take the title, MY TITLE. You did it at In Your Thread, you did it through Summerpost and at Screens, Keyboards and Sources. I'm putting a stop to that come Tournament time. No more stipulations, no more cries about hypocrisy, it's ending next week. So take a seat, class is in session. Try to take good notes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Edit: I meant "standing wrist lock", not "armbar".


Image

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.


I had a reply but i might just table it for now.


And I'll put you THROUGH that table when we meet in the Tournament. For months you've been running your mouth about me as a poster, trying to catch me unawares to try to take the title, MY TITLE. You did it at In Your Thread, you did it through Summerpost and at Screens, Keyboards and Sources. I'm putting a stop to that come Tournament time. No more stipulations, no more cries about hypocrisy, it's ending next week. So take a seat, class is in session. Try to take good notes.



And very Trump-like, or again apropo in your case Drumpf like you will seek to nullify the results.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.


I had a reply but i might just table it for now.


And I'll put you THROUGH that table when we meet in the Tournament. For months you've been running your mouth about me as a poster, trying to catch me unawares to try to take the title, MY TITLE. You did it at In Your Thread, you did it through Summerpost and at Screens, Keyboards and Sources. I'm putting a stop to that come Tournament time. No more stipulations, no more cries about hypocrisy, it's ending next week. So take a seat, class is in session. Try to take good notes.


Image

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.



It only serves that a Nazi would see the words Jew and cooked and see cooked Jews. Not that you are a NAZI though you are going to have a hard time refuting the charge given your interest in correlating such things.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:55 pm 
Can we interrupt Jucie backpedaling again to clarify for the "Bernie got screwed" crowd that Bernie is not , in fact, a member of the Democratic Party?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22518
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.



It only serves that a Nazi would see the words Jew and cooked and see cooked Jews. Not that you are a NAZI though you are going to have a hard time refuting the charge given your interest in correlating such things.


Image

You keep trying to wiggle out and I just keep wrenching it tighter.

Also sad to see that you have to resort to calling me a Nazi outright but in the next sentence say you're not calling me a Nazi. That, and you, is pretty shitty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.



It only serves that a Nazi would see the words Jew and cooked and see cooked Jews. Not that you are a NAZI though you are going to have a hard time refuting the charge given your interest in correlating such things.


Image

You keep trying to wiggle out and I just keep wrenching it tighter.

Also sad to see that you have to resort to calling me a Nazi outright but in the next sentence say you're not calling me a Nazi. That, and you, is pretty shitty.


On the contraire mon freire. You are attempting to pass me off as an anti Semite and attempting to hide behind "what others might think". The other in this case is you since you are the person that first made reference to the cooking of Jews. The only group with an antennae for that sort of thing (other than Holocaust survivors and Jewish people) Are Nazis. Blacks don't have an interest in that from what I know about Black people. Nazis on the other hand are a different story altogether. History has shown us that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22518
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.



It only serves that a Nazi would see the words Jew and cooked and see cooked Jews. Not that you are a NAZI though you are going to have a hard time refuting the charge given your interest in correlating such things.


Image

You keep trying to wiggle out and I just keep wrenching it tighter.

Also sad to see that you have to resort to calling me a Nazi outright but in the next sentence say you're not calling me a Nazi. That, and you, is pretty shitty.


On the contraire mon freire. You are attempting to pass me off as an anti Semite and attempting to hide behind "what others might think". The other in this case is you since you are the person that first made reference to the cooking of Jews. The only group with an antennae for that sort of thing (other than Holocaust survivors and Jewish people) Are Nazis. Blacks don't have an interest in that from what I know about Black people. Nazis on the other hand are a different story altogether. History has shown us that.


Now you're trying to argue you can't be anti-Semitic because you're black. That's what you're saying here, and it is hilarious.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.



It only serves that a Nazi would see the words Jew and cooked and see cooked Jews. Not that you are a NAZI though you are going to have a hard time refuting the charge given your interest in correlating such things.


Image

You keep trying to wiggle out and I just keep wrenching it tighter.

Also sad to see that you have to resort to calling me a Nazi outright but in the next sentence say you're not calling me a Nazi. That, and you, is pretty shitty.


On the contraire mon freire. You are attempting to pass me off as an anti Semite and attempting to hide behind "what others might think". The other in this case is you since you are the person that first made reference to the cooking of Jews. The only group with an antennae for that sort of thing (other than Holocaust survivors and Jewish people) Are Nazis. Blacks don't have an interest in that from what I know about Black people. Nazis on the other hand are a different story altogether. History has shown us that.


Now you're trying to argue you can't be anti-Semitic because you're black. That's what you're saying here, and it is hilarious.



No I'm not. Your lawyer skills stink. That is understandable given the circumstances. I just provided a perfect illustration of the one group that sees cooked and Jews and thinks of cooked Jews. You don't find it interesting and ironic that you were the one person that made this connection?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The first person to make reference to the cooking of Jewish people was you. Given your affinities for such things it makes sense that you'd think that way.

:lol: You're not going to reverse out of this armbar, LTG.

And by the way, you don't follow up a straight match at the board's biggest pay per view event with a loser leaves stipulation match at a house show the next week. That's just bad booking.



It only serves that a Nazi would see the words Jew and cooked and see cooked Jews. Not that you are a NAZI though you are going to have a hard time refuting the charge given your interest in correlating such things.


Image

You keep trying to wiggle out and I just keep wrenching it tighter.

Also sad to see that you have to resort to calling me a Nazi outright but in the next sentence say you're not calling me a Nazi. That, and you, is pretty shitty.


On the contraire mon freire. You are attempting to pass me off as an anti Semite and attempting to hide behind "what others might think". The other in this case is you since you are the person that first made reference to the cooking of Jews. The only group with an antennae for that sort of thing (other than Holocaust survivors and Jewish people) Are Nazis. Blacks don't have an interest in that from what I know about Black people. Nazis on the other hand are a different story altogether. History has shown us that.


Now you're trying to argue you can't be anti-Semitic because you're black. That's what you're saying here, and it is hilarious.



To illustrate how tone deaf you truly are you are commentimg in a thread about a black person that i've already labeled to be Anti Semitic. In your warped worldview that somehow is "hilarious" however.
The hilarity of it all is that you lack a basic ability to comprehend. You parse and work angles. Parse words and infer when its convenient and feign ignorance when its not.


Where is your proof that i don't think that blacks can be Anti Semitic?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Baby McNown wrote:
Can we interrupt Jucie backpedaling again to clarify for the "Bernie got screwed" crowd that Bernie is not , in fact, a member of the Democratic Party?


Nah. DNC didn't want him because he is Jewish. Couldn't have been because he only joined the party in order to run for President. Forget the fact that he had spent the majority of his political career bashing the party also.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:32 pm
Posts: 847
pizza_Place: Gigio's in Des Plaines
There is no fucking way in hell that LTG had any ill intent with his “cooking jews” statement.

_________________
Bunk wrote:
Son, they’re gonna beat on your white ass like it’s a rented mule


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
whiskey dick wrote:
“cooking jews”


Image

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Farrakhan only exists to appease the extremes on each side.

I can't remember the last time most took him seriously. But that thinking got us trump.


How many Twitter followers does a Jew-hater need to be taken seriously?

Twitter followers? This guy has high ranking Congressmen and leaders of marches which get millions to show up supporting him and scared to criticize him. If he is so powerless, then why can't they simply condemn him and cut ties with him.

The real answer is that black antisemitism is seen as separate from and less pernicious than European antisemitism, and thus less necessary to condemn. Blacks who hate Jews because of slumlords or slave merchants haven't carried out exiles, pogroms, or genocides as a result, and even if they wanted to, they've never had the power to do so, so it's handwaved away and more or less left alone as one of those black things outsiders can't understand, like those NBA jackets that have every team's logo on them. The fact that southern blacks all but refused to vote for a Jew in the Democratic primaries was something the media superficially acknowledged without ever exploring, and I wish they had explored it and laid this issue bare.



What you conveniently neglect to mention is that Sanders essentially wrote off the black vote in the South. Sanders stated that the black vote in the South was insignificant because Dems lose the South in the General anyway. Another thing that is difficult for some (Many in fact on here) to believe is that blacks were and are Pro-Clinton. I know many remained home but those that voted voted for the Clintons. Aside from Obama there wasn't any Dem that was going to garner the black vote. People that sought to make Sander's religion an issue are simply being foolish.

Even Farrakhan's ranting is probably due more to religion than anything. Jewish people were instrumental during the Civil Rights movement after all. It rubbed some leaders (mostly radical ones) the wrong way because they'd prefer that blacks be at the forefront of the movement in terms of planning and other things. If blacks were anti Jewish this would not have occurred. In my experiences in life there is a semblance of solidarity between what Jewish people and black people have experienced historically.

As stated before it is dangerous to equate everything with the Holocaust. It is also dangerous to equate everything with slavery. To insinuate that blacks didn't vote for Sanders because he is Jewish is ignorant and presumptuous. My reason for not voting for him was due to the fact that he wasn't a Dem and I was pro Hillary. It had nothing to do with religion. I also didn't like his policies. They were impractical and costly. I agree that there should always be a mix of socialism and capitalism but costly, reckless spending programs aren't best for the country.

I also believed that he'd have a difficult time working with members of Congress. WHy? because he has never demonstrated that he can work with members of Congress.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
long time guy wrote:
costly, reckless spending programs aren't the way to move the country forward.

they did though

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
long time guy wrote:
costly, reckless spending programs aren't the way to move the country forward.

they did though


When? the Bailout? Socialized medicine and education weren't going to accomplish it and I am anti Bailout too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
New Deal, the interstates, Great Society, unless you're arguing that Medicare and infrastructure moved us backward

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
New Deal, the interstates, Great Society, unless you're arguing that Medicare and infrastructure moved us backward


The New Deal didn't move us forward. New Deal was in place for 9 years and did very little. WWII moved us forward. I'm pro New Deal also. Roosevelt also realized that pure socialism was an abject failure. He was anti Dole and be believed that permanent welfare would be a disastrous in the long run

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Not trying to interrupt this exciting back and forth, but did someone say Cooking Jews?
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
long time guy wrote:
Roosevelt also realized that pure socialism was an abject failure.

Right, he believed we needed some socialism in order to save capitalism. I wish today's Democrats felt that way.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Roosevelt also realized that pure socialism was an abject failure.

Right, he believed we needed some socialism in order to save capitalism. I wish today's Democrats felt that way.


I think that today's Dems do believe in that but Sanders plans are more radical and costly than that. There is something to the notion that his plans might establish a permanent welfare class. There are people that I know that have heaped generations upon generations of welfare upon society. I'm in favor govt assistance but to a point. I'm also in favor of assistance those in need as opposed to those that are wealthy. I just have an issue with generations upon generations of people that are only interested in gaming the system. It doesn't matter if they are rich or poor.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Curious Hair wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Farrakhan only exists to appease the extremes on each side.

I can't remember the last time most took him seriously. But that thinking got us trump.


How many Twitter followers does a Jew-hater need to be taken seriously?

Twitter followers? This guy has high ranking Congressmen and leaders of marches which get millions to show up supporting him and scared to criticize him. If he is so powerless, then why can't they simply condemn him and cut ties with him.

The real answer is that black antisemitism is seen as separate from and less pernicious than European antisemitism, and thus less necessary to condemn. Blacks who hate Jews because of slumlords or slave merchants haven't carried out exiles, pogroms, or genocides as a result, and even if they wanted to, they've never had the power to do so, so it's handwaved away and more or less left alone as one of those black things outsiders can't understand, like those NBA jackets that have every team's logo on them. The fact that southern blacks all but refused to vote for a Jew in the Democratic primaries was something the media superficially acknowledged without ever exploring, and I wish they had explored it and laid this issue bare.



Will all the fucking apologists do me a favor (or not) and stop insulting the intelligence of people with this bullshit. This is bigoted as hell. Period.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
Can you explain why?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
long time guy wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Farrakhan only exists to appease the extremes on each side.

I can't remember the last time most took him seriously. But that thinking got us trump.


How many Twitter followers does a Jew-hater need to be taken seriously?

Twitter followers? This guy has high ranking Congressmen and leaders of marches which get millions to show up supporting him and scared to criticize him. If he is so powerless, then why can't they simply condemn him and cut ties with him.

The real answer is that black antisemitism is seen as separate from and less pernicious than European antisemitism, and thus less necessary to condemn. Blacks who hate Jews because of slumlords or slave merchants haven't carried out exiles, pogroms, or genocides as a result, and even if they wanted to, they've never had the power to do so, so it's handwaved away and more or less left alone as one of those black things outsiders can't understand, like those NBA jackets that have every team's logo on them. The fact that southern blacks all but refused to vote for a Jew in the Democratic primaries was something the media superficially acknowledged without ever exploring, and I wish they had explored it and laid this issue bare.



Will all the fucking apologists do me a favor (or not) and stop insulting the intelligence of people with this bullshit. This is bigoted as hell. Period.

Once again, you're reaching. What CH wrote is more or less a summarization of a piece from The Atlantic:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... ch/555122/

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SJW's for Farrakhan
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
long time guy wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Farrakhan only exists to appease the extremes on each side.

I can't remember the last time most took him seriously. But that thinking got us trump.


How many Twitter followers does a Jew-hater need to be taken seriously?

Twitter followers? This guy has high ranking Congressmen and leaders of marches which get millions to show up supporting him and scared to criticize him. If he is so powerless, then why can't they simply condemn him and cut ties with him.

The real answer is that black antisemitism is seen as separate from and less pernicious than European antisemitism, and thus less necessary to condemn. Blacks who hate Jews because of slumlords or slave merchants haven't carried out exiles, pogroms, or genocides as a result, and even if they wanted to, they've never had the power to do so, so it's handwaved away and more or less left alone as one of those black things outsiders can't understand, like those NBA jackets that have every team's logo on them. The fact that southern blacks all but refused to vote for a Jew in the Democratic primaries was something the media superficially acknowledged without ever exploring, and I wish they had explored it and laid this issue bare.



Will all the fucking apologists do me a favor (or not) and stop insulting the intelligence of people with this bullshit. This is bigoted as hell. Period.


Disagree wholeheartedly.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 254 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group