There are going to be some children who suffer certain disciplinary consequences. Those consequences will befall them because they understand, or will soon understand, that although they are exercising many of their first amendment rights, there are reasonable and well founded restrictions on, and abridgments of their first amendment rights.

Also, even in the districts where no disciplinary action will be brought against students, it would be undeniable that if the student body decided to exercise their first amendment rights with a walk-out every day, that the administration would enact severe disciplinary actions. This would be enacted, and would be just and proper because, and you may have read this somewhere before, there are reasonable and well founded restrictions on, and abridgments of first amendment rights.

The students understand that the Bill of Rights protects many different rights of the citizenry, but for reasonable, well founded, and legitimate reasons, there are restrictions on the various rights granted under the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was incorporated into the Constitution as a set of Amendments, whole cloth, it would be wholly inconsistent to state that one or more of the Amendments can be reasonably, rationally, and judiciously infringed upon, but this one magical Amendment can have no restrictions.

I take major issue with curtailment of our granted rights. It is one of the reasons that while I oppose the cause the walkout students are taking up, I don't oppose the walkout itself. The walkout itself is an exercising of Constitutional Rights. In fact I'm old enough to recall walk-outs around 2000 over locker searches in some schools (that was more localized though).

Restrictions upon our rights are literally nothing more than restrictions on our liberty. They must be opposed at all stops. So yes I support these students walking out even when I don't support their reason for doing so.

Virginia Tech had more fatalities than Columbine and Parkland combined and was accomplished entirely with pistols. How many times do we have to expose your lack of understanding when it comes to firearms?

Virginia Tech had more fatalities than Columbine and Parkland combined and was accomplished entirely with pistols. How many times do we have to expose your lack of understanding when it comes to firearms?

So you are saying there should be no restrictions at all on, lets say the freedom of speech.

No restrictions. So if someone wanted to stand on the street in front of your house and play Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream Speech at 110 decibels from 2 AM till 6 AM, you don't think there should be any restrictions on this type of political speech?

So you are saying there should be no restrictions at all on, lets say the freedom of speech.

No restrictions. So if someone wanted to stand on the street in front of your house and play Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream Speech at 110 decibels from 2 AM till 6 AM, you don't think there should be any restrictions on this type of political speech?

Give me a real example and I'll play your stupid game

Banning the AR-15 is nothing more than virtue signaling.

Please see the above referenced hypothetical situation regarding a US citizen lawfully standing on public property and taking no other action aside from exercising his right to free speech as guaranteed by the first amendment. Do you believe that there should be any restrictions on the first amendment rights of this citizen as he is choosing to exercise them in this hypothetical situation.

Yes or no answer please, thank you in advance for cooperating.

That's a disingenuous reply given what I even know about the "pistols" that were used.

I'm more sad that you don't have the same respect for the rights of MANY people. Some say that's a sign of mental illness.