Don Tiny wrote:
They weren't nearly entertaining enough for MANY listeners to ultimately put up with the parts they didn't like. I tune in expecting to be entertained and informed. Everyone, I suspect, knows what I'm looking for ... there are several dozen examples of B&B (and even a few great B&G examples too) on YT that demonstrate when the entertainment part of the show was rolling along. This pairing didn't do that enough, and they didn't do that enough by choice (but not by cracky).
Bring up politics once in a while. Bring up socio-economic issues once in a while. That's just being topical and, ideally, informative as well, especially when there's a direct, or fairly direct, tie-in to sports. Don't spend a LOT of time preaching a message (good, bad, or indifferent) that is specifically being preached for two concurrent reasons: (a) to preach to the choir, and (b) to piss off people that disagree.
There was rarely any honest effort, that I could detect anyway (and I'm no dullard if I might immodestly say so), put into trying to explain or discuss or cover non-sports things of importance (real or imagined) in the hopes that maybe some who disagreed might be inclined to at least put their own ideas to the test and possibly, in time, change their viewpoint partly b/c these two made some points that caught the listeners' attention. Those few that perhaps considered rethinking or at least debating the issue were, far more often than not, shouted down. Do that to stupid meatball callers, that's fine. If you're (ostensibly) trying to have a discussion (rather than just a monologue), it's not difficult to discern that thanking callers that agree and shitting on callers that question anything when you're not trying to be entertaining is fatiguing for the listeners, even the ALS'ers. Shit, the last couple of years I've (sort of) come around on Laurence precisely because of the precipitous drop-off of the afternoon show, even when Terry was around as well as the cavalcade of guest hosts toward the very end.
Too much grandstanding and self-aggrandizement turns people off (except Trump voters I guess), and as a result MANY listeners apparently turned their radios off or to another channel. Cause and effect; nothing more complex than that. Generally speaking, the rest is mostly secondary and tertiary supposition.
Goff thought he was Deion Sanders, but was closer to Walt Harris ... good, but not great (brief flashes of exception excluded). Great likely would've overcome the hubris; good, unfortunately, did not.
Dan failed to course-correct and thought he'd roll on b/c he's FOTS.
And let the record show ... heyyyy ... that this all comes from an aforementioned ALS'er.
I'm quoting this because it speaks for me and in better language than I could have put it. Therefore:
This.
It's a shame. That show hooked me on sportsradio...they'll never be another B&B.