It is currently Sat Feb 22, 2025 9:31 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38941
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.

No. You can’t legislate away everything .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
No.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
No.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
badrogue17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.

No. You can’t legislate away everything .


This.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
leashyourkids wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.

No. You can’t legislate away everything .


This.


leashyourcrazies ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43865
badrogue17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.

No. You can’t legislate away everything .

But we legislated away locking up mentally unstable people. Maybe we should go back to how it was before?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
“Mental health concern” would be politicized to the point of absurdity.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38941
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Douchebag wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.

No. You can’t legislate away everything .

But we legislated away locking up mentally unstable people. Maybe we should go back to how it was before?

Only if it means you go away with them .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38941
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.

For how long ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:40 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Only if they can have their emotional support animal in the cell with them.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.


Fuck you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7084
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.


No, you don't lock them up and throw away the key. You admit them to a (private not government run) mental hospital and treat the problem. Make them tax exempt and make the NFL give them 1% of all revenue to help fund them. The NFL would then be given immunity to law suits for head injuries and we can get back to watching football. Win win for everyone.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43865
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.

Someone murder Terry's Peeps.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16728
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Juiced wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.


No, you don't lock them up and throw away the key. You admit them to a (private not government run) mental hospital and treat the problem. Make them tax exempt and make the NFL give them 1% of all revenue to help fund them. The NFL would then be given immunity to law suits for head injuries and we can get back to watching football. Win win for everyone.


Alonzo Spellman supports this.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
If you are truly interested in this issue, then you should see Sheriff Tom Darts' comments on the issue. He has been on the radio and PBS programming advocating for a better way of handling mental health "criminals" outside the traditional justice system.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56730
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Which CFMB poster should be Baker Acted? Choose three.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
badrogue17 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.

For how long ?


MANY years.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43865
Curious Hair wrote:
Which CFMB poster should be Baker Acted? Choose three.

WHO GOES FIRST?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Curious Hair wrote:
Which CFMB poster should be Baker Acted? Choose three.


How about one poster three times...Caller Bob? I think him going soft yesterday is a sign of increasing instability.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Douchebag wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Which CFMB poster should be Baker Acted? Choose three.

WHO GOES FIRST?


yOou cHUSE!

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
denisdman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Which CFMB poster should be Baker Acted? Choose three.


How about one poster three times...Caller Bob? I think him going soft yesterday is a sign of increasing instability.

Caller Bob going soft? I don't believe it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Douchebag wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.

Someone murder Terry's Peeps.


Tweeder, you think you'll enjoy prison?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
badrogue17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This isn't exactly a gun thread but it comes out of the gun debate. With many of these people talk about "warning signs" and how police failed to act accordingly. The question is what exactly should police be allowed to do? What should the courts be able to do? If someone is a "danger" then should they be locked up until they aren't a danger? We used to do this but it is now considered inhumane to lock someone away because they are considered mentally unstable.

No. You can’t legislate away everything .

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38777
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Douchebag wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.

Someone murder Terry's Peeps.


No cease and desist PM's from Speeps yet!!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
tommy wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Which CFMB poster should be Baker Acted? Choose three.


How about one poster three times...Caller Bob? I think him going soft yesterday is a sign of increasing instability.

Caller Bob going soft? I don't believe it.


Caller Bob wrote:
So because I

1) Have a heart(sort of)
2) Respect the decision of people that own and operate this message board

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:59 pm 
But... but... the issue isn't the guns it's mental health. How can you possibly say we can't lock up people with a mental health concern?? This was supposed to solve our gun issues!


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Seacrest wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
If someone is making a threat to someone, yes lock them up.

Someone murder Terry's Peeps.


No cease and desist PM's from Speeps yet!!


Image

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
denisdman wrote:
tommy wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Which CFMB poster should be Baker Acted? Choose three.


How about one poster three times...Caller Bob? I think him going soft yesterday is a sign of increasing instability.

Caller Bob going soft? I don't believe it.


Caller Bob wrote:
So because I

1) Have a heart(sort of)
2) Respect the decision of people that own and operate this message board

That's it! Nothing is sacred anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group