It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 179 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I guess that "well regulated" doesn't appear in the 2nd for MANY



It appears as a modifier of "militia" in a statement that lays out a reason why your right to bear arms shall not be infringed.


I personally hate these gun threads now in part because of the linguistic gymnastics on display to buttress the ever present logic issues.



The linguistic gymnastics are used by those trying to take the guns. There is nothing ambiguous about "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You may not like that, and that's fine. But the words are very clear.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I guess that "well regulated" doesn't appear in the 2nd for MANY



It appears as a modifier of "militia" in a statement that lays out a reason why your right to bear arms shall not be infringed.


I personally hate these gun threads now in part because of the linguistic gymnastics on display to buttress the ever present logic issues.



The linguistic gymnastics are used by those trying to take the guns. There is nothing ambiguous about "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You may not like that, and that's fine. But the words are very clear.

"Well regulated" seems a little ambiguous.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I guess that "well regulated" doesn't appear in the 2nd for MANY



It appears as a modifier of "militia" in a statement that lays out a reason why your right to bear arms shall not be infringed.


I personally hate these gun threads now in part because of the linguistic gymnastics on display to buttress the ever present logic issues.



The linguistic gymnastics are used by those trying to take the guns. There is nothing ambiguous about "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You may not like that, and that's fine. But the words are very clear.

"Well regulated" seems a little ambiguous.


It's like the Old Testament. It doesn't count.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I guess that "well regulated" doesn't appear in the 2nd for MANY



It appears as a modifier of "militia" in a statement that lays out a reason why your right to bear arms shall not be infringed.


I personally hate these gun threads now in part because of the linguistic gymnastics on display to buttress the ever present logic issues.



The linguistic gymnastics are used by those trying to take the guns. There is nothing ambiguous about "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You may not like that, and that's fine. But the words are very clear.

"Well regulated" seems a little ambiguous.


"Well-regulated" refers to the militia the guys drafting the document considered necessary. It's the reason we have an unfettered right to bear arms. You may not consider a militia, well-regulated or otherwise, to be necessary in the United States circa 2018. That's fine. But it does not change the very specific language of the document.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Mass shootings are part and parcel of living in a country that guarantees the right to own a gun to nearly all it's citizens.


Just put a shit load of security at every school (like we do for politicians and govt buildings) and call it a day. Mass shootings always suck, but the ones with children are the worst.


I trust this closes the matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
"Well-regulated" refers to the militia the guys drafting the document considered necessary. It's the reason we have an unfettered right to bear arms. You may not consider a militia, well-regulated or otherwise, to be necessary in the United States circa 2018. That's fine. But it does not change the very specific language of the document.
Are you advocating for no rules on weapon ownership because of "Shall not be infringed"?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I guess that "well regulated" doesn't appear in the 2nd for MANY



It appears as a modifier of "militia" in a statement that lays out a reason why your right to bear arms shall not be infringed.


I personally hate these gun threads now in part because of the linguistic gymnastics on display to buttress the ever present logic issues.



The linguistic gymnastics are used by those trying to take the guns. There is nothing ambiguous about "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED". You may not like that, and that's fine. But the words are very clear.

"Well regulated" seems a little ambiguous.


"Well-regulated" refers to the militia the guys drafting the document considered necessary. It's the reason we have an unfettered right to bear arms. You may not consider a militia, well-regulated or otherwise, to be necessary in the United States circa 2018. That's fine. But it does not change the very specific language of the document.

Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Frankly I'm starting to blame Pres. Clinton and his goofy argument over "what is is" for this garbage. :wink:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


I believe they thought the militia should be well regulated once it was called. I don't know. That part may be somewhat ambiguous, but it's just a precursor to the very clear language that follows. The fact that the militia is necessary is the reason your right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It certainly is not a reason to infringe said rights.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Regular Reader wrote:
Frankly I'm starting to blame Pres. Clinton and his goofy argument over "what is is" for this garbage. :wink:


Well he was a lawyer.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


I believe they thought the militia should be well regulated once it was called. I don't know. That part may be somewhat ambiguous, but it's just a precursor to the very clear language that follows. The fact that the militia is necessary is the reason your right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It certainly is not a reason to infringe said rights.

So last time and I'm going to have to assume that is what you want. Are you advocating for there to be no restrictions on guns in this country because SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:13 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


I believe they thought the militia should be well regulated once it was called. I don't know. That part may be somewhat ambiguous, but it's just a precursor to the very clear language that follows. The fact that the militia is necessary is the reason your right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It certainly is not a reason to infringe said rights.

So last time and I'm going to have to assume that is what you want. Are you advocating for there to be no restrictions on guns in this country because SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED?



I believe the people should be able to have whatever weapons the government has.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
And just like that, I officially win for all time the "I'm more liberal than you" argument.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Quote:
The City of Highland Park has an ordinance that prohibits possession of assault weapons or large-capacity magazines (those that can accept more than ten rounds). The ordinance defines an assault weapon as any semi-automatic gun that can accept a large-capacity magazine and has one of five other features: a pistol grip without a stock (for semiautomatic pistols, the capacity to accept a magazine outside the pistol grip); a folding, telescoping, or thumbhole stock; a grip for the non-trigger hand; a barrel shroud; or a muzzle brake or compensator. Some weapons, such as AR-15s and AK-47s, are prohibited by name.



The 7th Circuit's upholding of the above Highland Park ban on both a defined set of semi-automatic rifles and large capacity magazines isn't exactly a resounding endorsement for gun control. After going through elaborate/confusing discussion of Heller (landmark 2nd Amendment case from last decade) and related case-law, with a speculative side-trip into societal benefits of gun-control, the court hangs its hat on "federalism and diversity" in letting the Highland Park law stand:

https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20150427097

7th Circuit above called out the Supreme Court or legislators to clarify the law in this area. Supremes declined to review the 7th Circuit's decision, with Thomas and Scalia dissenting and wanting to take the case. Thomas concluding, after taking the the 7th Circuit to task for a gross-misreading of Heller,

I would grant certiorari to prevent the Seventh Circuit from relegating the Second Amendment to a second-class right

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 3_7l48.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


I believe they thought the militia should be well regulated once it was called. I don't know. That part may be somewhat ambiguous, but it's just a precursor to the very clear language that follows. The fact that the militia is necessary is the reason your right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It certainly is not a reason to infringe said rights.

What, you don't think it's okay to infringe on one's rights in order to "increase the public's sense of safety"??

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


I believe they thought the militia should be well regulated once it was called. I don't know. That part may be somewhat ambiguous, but it's just a precursor to the very clear language that follows. The fact that the militia is necessary is the reason your right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It certainly is not a reason to infringe said rights.

What, you don't think it's okay to infringe on one's rights in order to "increase the public's sense of safety"??

I'll ask you too then. Do you think there should be absolutely no restrictions on weapons ownership in this country?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


I believe they thought the militia should be well regulated once it was called. I don't know. That part may be somewhat ambiguous, but it's just a precursor to the very clear language that follows. The fact that the militia is necessary is the reason your right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It certainly is not a reason to infringe said rights.

So last time and I'm going to have to assume that is what you want. Are you advocating for there to be no restrictions on guns in this country because SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED?



I believe the people should be able to have whatever weapons the government has.


Yikes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Don Tiny wrote:
What, you don't think it's okay to infringe on one's rights in order to "increase the public's sense of safety"??



yeah, that paragraph clanks off the rim in the 7th Circuit's Highland Park decision,

Quote:
If it has no other effect, Highland Park's ordinance may increase the public's sense of safety. Mass shootings are rare, but they are highly salient, and people tend to overestimate the likelihood of salient events. If a ban on semiautomatic guns and large-capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting, and makes the public feel safer as a result, that's a substantial benefit.

https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20150427097



Image

that's one slippery-freaking-slope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
And just like that, I officially win for all time the "I'm more liberal than you" argument.



Nope. I trust Nas and Regular Reader to have nukes more than I trust John Bolton and Donald Trump having them.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
And just like that, I officially win for all time the "I'm more liberal than you" argument.



Nope. I trust Nas and Regular Reader to have nukes more than I trust John Bolton and Donald Trump having them.
I'm pretty sure even Rush Limbaugh is like "Come on bro".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
And just like that, I officially win for all time the "I'm more liberal than you" argument.



Nope. I trust Nas and Regular Reader to have nukes more than I trust John Bolton and Donald Trump having them.
I'm pretty sure even Rush Limbaugh is like "Come on bro".



The point of the Amendment is clear. And it has nothing to do with hunting or target shooting. I know you think "it could never happen here". But it's happening to people in places right now.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The point of the Amendment is clear. And it has nothing to do with hunting or target shooting. I know you think "it could never happen here". But it's happening to people in places right now.
I've argued on here before that a citizen army could stand up to the government.

I still don't want a populace that can go to the local Farm and Killing supply store and get a tank.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
And just like that, I officially win for all time the "I'm more liberal than you" argument.



Nope. I trust Nas and Regular Reader to have nukes more than I trust John Bolton and Donald Trump having them.
I'm pretty sure even Rush Limbaugh is like "Come on bro".



The point of the Amendment is clear. And it has nothing to do with hunting or target shooting. I know you think "it could never happen here". But it's happening to people in places right now.



maybe hunting and target shooting should be banned. you can have your guns, but they have to kept in a glass box that says "break in case of government tyranny"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
And just like that, I officially win for all time the "I'm more liberal than you" argument.



Nope. I trust Nas and Regular Reader to have nukes more than I trust John Bolton and Donald Trump having them.
I'm pretty sure even Rush Limbaugh is like "Come on bro".



The point of the Amendment is clear. And it has nothing to do with hunting or target shooting. I know you think "it could never happen here". But it's happening to people in places right now.



maybe hunting and target shooting should be banned. you can have your guns, but they have to kept in a glass box that says "break in case of government tyranny"

See that's a thinkin man, right there


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Why wouldn't they just say militia then? Why the well regulated qualifier?


I believe they thought the militia should be well regulated once it was called. I don't know. That part may be somewhat ambiguous, but it's just a precursor to the very clear language that follows. The fact that the militia is necessary is the reason your right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It certainly is not a reason to infringe said rights.

What, you don't think it's okay to infringe on one's rights in order to "increase the public's sense of safety"??

I'll ask you too then. Do you think there should be absolutely no restrictions on weapons ownership in this country?

JLN is better at this than you as of late.

I didn't say that, and I'm not interested in answering a question that has nothing to do with anything I've said. If you want to search around and find where I've made that statement, then point us all in that direction. Otherwise, pose your inane question to someone else.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
It seemed like you were agreeing with JORR there.

We have gun restrictions now to increase the public's sense of safety. Is that ok?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It seemed like you were agreeing with JORR there.

We have gun restrictions now to increase the public's sense of safety. Is that ok?

Doing anything simply in order to "increase the public's sense of safety" is almost certainly going to get a hard 'no' from me, such as 'duck and cover' drills, the Patriot Act, and the TSA.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
So everyone other than JORR believes there should be some type of common sense restrictions.

Is that a fair statement?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92053
Location: To the left of my post
Don Tiny wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It seemed like you were agreeing with JORR there.

We have gun restrictions now to increase the public's sense of safety. Is that ok?

Doing anything simply in order to "increase the public's sense of safety" is almost certainly going to get a hard 'no' from me, such as 'duck and cover' drills, the Patriot Act, and the TSA.

It just seemed a strange reply to a guy who thinks I should be able to buy a nuclear weapon.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 4:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
So everyone other than JORR believes there should be some type of common sense restrictions.


:lol: Let me know when you all agree on what constitutes "common sense".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 179 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group