It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 179 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regarding folk’s arguments that if you are for the second amendment then why not nukes, tanks and cannon for everyone? I would say as the text says right to bear “arms” people and courts could assume that means small arms (an acceptable term).


Most of the responses were in response to crazy old JORR wanting citizens to have bazookas and rail guns.



I'm surprised that so many of you are so pro-Trump.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regarding folk’s arguments that if you are for the second amendment then why not nukes, tanks and cannon for everyone? I would say as the text says right to bear “arms” people and courts could assume that means small arms (an acceptable term).


Most of the responses were in response to crazy old JORR wanting citizens to have bazookas and rail guns.



I'm surprised that so many of you are so pro-Trump.


I love President.

Best president.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regarding folk’s arguments that if you are for the second amendment then why not nukes, tanks and cannon for everyone? I would say as the text says right to bear “arms” people and courts could assume that means small arms (an acceptable term).


Most of the responses were in response to crazy old JORR wanting citizens to have bazookas and rail guns.



I'm surprised that so many of you are so pro-Trump.

I'm surprised you can outcrazy Trump.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 6:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Regarding folk’s arguments that if you are for the second amendment then why not nukes, tanks and cannon for everyone? I would say as the text says right to bear “arms” people and courts could assume that means small arms (an acceptable term).


Most of the responses were in response to crazy old JORR wanting citizens to have bazookas and rail guns.



I'm surprised that so many of you are so pro-Trump.

I'm surprised you can outcrazy Trump.


Outcrazy? You're the one who wants him to have control of all weapons.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Unbelievable condescension from a group who can't properly interpret a basic sentence.

And Rick, your view is anything but Liberal. It's definitely totalitarian, though.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
leashyourkids wrote:
Unbelievable condescension from a group who can't properly interpret a basic sentence.

And Rick, your view is anything but Liberal. It's definitely totalitarian, though.

In at least a few cases it's being misinterpreted willfully.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Don Tiny wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Unbelievable condescension from a group who can't properly interpret a basic sentence.

And Rick, your view is anything but Liberal. It's definitely totalitarian, though.

In at least a few cases it's being misinterpreted willfully.


Agree

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
Unbelievable condescension from a group who can't properly interpret a basic sentence.

And Rick, your view is anything but Liberal. It's definitely totalitarian, though.


Shut up.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Who fucking cares, none of you bums are rich enough (save Denis) to live in Deerfield anyways.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Unbelievable condescension from a group who can't properly interpret a basic sentence.

And Rick, your view is anything but Liberal. It's definitely totalitarian, though.
Not wanting personal ownership of nukes is totalitarian?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Unbelievable condescension from a group who can't properly interpret a basic sentence.

And Rick, your view is anything but Liberal. It's definitely totalitarian, though.
Not wanting personal ownership of nukes is totalitarian?


Yes.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Caller Bob wrote:
Who fucking cares, none of you bums are rich enough (save Denis) to live in Deerfield anyways.



IF my credit wasn't horseshit I'd pull the trigger on a rehab there. I looked @ 2 for a friend of mine last week that were real dumpy..could be had for under 3 .

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's interesting that everyone seems to be ignoring JORR saying all weapons should be legal and instead obsfucating with "military grade".


At the time of the Second, citizens were allowed to own a light arm (right?) like a cannon. So the idea that Second protection extends beyond mere small arms is not unfounded, not to mention untested by the Supremes as far as I know.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I can't believe these shit kickers are legally buying tannerite and blowing limbs off.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 1:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2954
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 5:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's interesting that everyone seems to be ignoring JORR saying all weapons should be legal and instead obsfucating with "military grade".


At the time of the Second, citizens were allowed to own a light arm (right?) like a cannon. So the idea that Second protection extends beyond mere small arms is not unfounded, not to mention untested by the Supremes as far as I know.

So are you going to say there should be no rules for gun ownership too?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 6:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


Protection from the government has become protection by the government.

Lot of Kim Jung Un fans in here.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:07 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


Protection from the government has become protection by the government.

Lot of Kim Jung Un fans in here.


Kim could NEVER happen in the United States. Now let me go post in another thread about how Trump is literally Hitler.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


Protection from the government has become protection by the government.

Lot of Kim Jung Un fans in here.


Kim could NEVER happen in the United States. Now let me go post in another thread about how Trump is literally Hitler.


:lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


Protection from the government has become protection by the government.

Lot of Kim Jung Un fans in here.
Who stole your account and where do you have the Bernie Sanders supporter locked up?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


We're really gonna trust the writings of people who couldn't figure out basic sentence structure?

Really?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


Protection from the government has become protection by the government.

Lot of Kim Jung Un fans in here.


Totally didn't vote for Trump.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 8:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79587
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


We're really gonna trust the writings of people who couldn't figure out basic sentence structure?

Really?


Let he among us who has never used an extra comma, throw the first stone.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


We're really gonna trust the writings of people who couldn't figure out basic sentence structure?

Really?


Let he among us who has never used an extra comma, throw the first stone.

:lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92100
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
why do the anti gun folks assume the "back when they wrote it, people had muskets and only shot once every 2 minutes" argument is automatically a support for their cause? how do they know the forefathers wouldn't have been like, "oh shit, now that you've explained fully automatics and large capacity magazines to me, I definitely think citizens should be able to own a similar version"

not that it matters. because "...shall not be infringed."


Those guys fought a brutal war in order to assert their God-given rights. It only took 250 years for guys like BRick and Peeps to declare those rights "crazy". It's been a good run.


We're really gonna trust the writings of people who couldn't figure out basic sentence structure?

Really?


Let he among us who has never used an extra comma, throw the first stone.

What, are you talking about, now?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2018 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
leashyourkids wrote:
Protection from the government has become protection by the government.

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65779
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Injunction issued.
Suck it Deerfield.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Deerfield, IL
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 12:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
Activist judges...

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 179 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group