It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:40 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 360 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I doubt she is. If a professional female has a baby and takes 8 weeks off then hands things over to dad or nanny I doubt there is any retribution in any way. It is illegal.
I'm not going to lay it out in a forum like this but there were issues with other potential employers at the time of her interviews when looking for a new job. It was so common that we actually rehearsed ways to answer subtle questions that they couldn't legally ask. That was one of the reasons she took the job she did because it wasn't an issue.


I am very sorry to hear that. That seems, though, more of a getting a job than the wage gap problem.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I doubt she is. If a professional female has a baby and takes 8 weeks off then hands things over to dad or nanny I doubt there is any retribution in any way. It is illegal.
I'm not going to lay it out in a forum like this but there were issues with other potential employers at the time of her interviews when looking for a new job. It was so common that we actually rehearsed ways to answer subtle questions that they couldn't legally ask. That was one of the reasons she took the job she did because it wasn't an issue.


I am very sorry to hear that. That seems, though, more of a getting a job than the wage gap problem.

Rethink that, mike.

If you have trouble getting hired at one place, do you usually find a job with HIGHER pay than your first choice?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
good dolphin wrote:
It's all worth it when Rick comes out in that little sun dress on a Friday night.

I think we are more focused on people forced into a situation rather than what comes naturally. There are plenty of men that are naturally nurturing. Alternatively, there are plenty of women who only use the child as a prop for Facebook pictures before they go out to day drink prosecco.

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I doubt she is. If a professional female has a baby and takes 8 weeks off then hands things over to dad or nanny I doubt there is any retribution in any way. It is illegal.
I'm not going to lay it out in a forum like this but there were issues with other potential employers at the time of her interviews when looking for a new job. It was so common that we actually rehearsed ways to answer subtle questions that they couldn't legally ask. That was one of the reasons she took the job she did because it wasn't an issue.


I am very sorry to hear that. That seems, though, more of a getting a job than the wage gap problem.
I think it's all related. It ended up working out just fine though but it certainly was enlightening to deal with stuff like that.

Her company is pretty great though so no complaints.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The person who takes on more of the child care responsibilities will lose some of the edge in the professional realm.


It may be a man or a woman.

Regardless of what you think should happen or happened in the past, that is all we are dealing with.

The assumption that woman will be the one taking on more childcare responsibility is a problem.



I think we all agree that's an assumption that should not be made.

Not sure everyone agrees. It seems like some people are defending the right to make that assumption.


The way things are moving, though, are these things going to be legislated? Rahm Emanuel just banned city hiring managers from asking candidates for their salary history. Will there eventually be laws mandating husband and wife share child-rearing duties equally, regardless of their preferences?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I doubt she is. If a professional female has a baby and takes 8 weeks off then hands things over to dad or nanny I doubt there is any retribution in any way. It is illegal.
I'm not going to lay it out in a forum like this but there were issues with other potential employers at the time of her interviews when looking for a new job. It was so common that we actually rehearsed ways to answer subtle questions that they couldn't legally ask. That was one of the reasons she took the job she did because it wasn't an issue.


I am very sorry to hear that. That seems, though, more of a getting a job than the wage gap problem.

Rethink that, mike.

If you have trouble getting hired at one place, do you usually find a job with HIGHER pay than your first choice?


Yes I see that. It is all complex. I can see problems all over like many have said but I fail to see some clear and easy fix or even cause. When you think about it this is pretty much a perfect idea/problem presently being used by the left. There is a problem we can complain about and rally women and like minded people to demand change without a real ability to fix the problem.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Jaw Breaker wrote:
The way things are moving, though, are these things going to be legislated? Rahm Emanuel just banned city hiring managers from asking candidates for their salary history. Will there eventually be laws mandating husband and wife share child-rearing duties equally, regardless of their preferences?
It's already legislated to some degree, though allowing men to have equal paternity leave as women would help.

Millenials are making it a lot less of an issue given most Millenials saw enough mistreatment of their parents at work to know that it's foolish to spend your life at work. My dad, approaching retirement age, had to work weekends more than he should have because some of the newer employees would just say no to doing it and there wasn't much the company could do about it after they had already laid of 50% of the department.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I doubt she is. If a professional female has a baby and takes 8 weeks off then hands things over to dad or nanny I doubt there is any retribution in any way. It is illegal.
I'm not going to lay it out in a forum like this but there were issues with other potential employers at the time of her interviews when looking for a new job. It was so common that we actually rehearsed ways to answer subtle questions that they couldn't legally ask. That was one of the reasons she took the job she did because it wasn't an issue.


I am very sorry to hear that. That seems, though, more of a getting a job than the wage gap problem.
I think it's all related. It ended up working out just fine though but it certainly was enlightening to deal with stuff like that.

Her company is pretty great though so no complaints.


Glad to hear it. Related to my previous post though people at her company might be wtf I see no problem? The company down the block may have a revolution going on.

I guess I am just too old and tired. I have come to the conclusion there are many problems like this, race, whatever that are so complex I have no chance to have the perfect answer so I give up. I will just do my own little world and let you young guys figure it out.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
I guess I am just too old and tired. I have come to the conclusion there are many problems like this, race, whatever that are so complex I have no chance to have the perfect answer so I give up. I will just do my own little world and let you young guys figure it out.

IMU, Kirkwood, and me are going to solve a lot of the problems you guys caused.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
pittmike wrote:

Yes I see that. It is all complex. I can see problems all over like many have said but I fail to see some clear and easy fix or even cause. When you think about it this is pretty much a perfect idea/problem presently being used by the left. There is a problem we can complain about and rally women and like minded people to demand change without a real ability to fix the problem.


While it can be complex, many times the answer is pretty simple. For example, why are are over 90% of inmates male? Because of discrimination? No, it's because males are the ones committing the fucking crimes. And why are almost all NFL receivers black?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I gotta admit. I hated it when our group assistant went on 8 weeks maternity and I had to do 30% of her work too. Sorry for feeling that way. I guess you can look at it as me doing my societal good.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Jaw Breaker wrote:
pittmike wrote:

Yes I see that. It is all complex. I can see problems all over like many have said but I fail to see some clear and easy fix or even cause. When you think about it this is pretty much a perfect idea/problem presently being used by the left. There is a problem we can complain about and rally women and like minded people to demand change without a real ability to fix the problem.


While it can be complex, many times the answer is pretty simple. For example, why are are over 90% of inmates male? Because of discrimination? No, it's because males are the ones committing the fucking crimes. And why are almost all NFL receivers black?

Wow.

Women are having a rough few days on the board.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Jaw Breaker wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
The person who takes on more of the child care responsibilities will lose some of the edge in the professional realm.


It may be a man or a woman.

Regardless of what you think should happen or happened in the past, that is all we are dealing with.

The assumption that woman will be the one taking on more childcare responsibility is a problem.



I think we all agree that's an assumption that should not be made.

Not sure everyone agrees. It seems like some people are defending the right to make that assumption.


The way things are moving, though, are these things going to be legislated? Rahm Emanuel just banned city hiring managers from asking candidates for their salary history. Will there eventually be laws mandating husband and wife share child-rearing duties equally, regardless of their preferences?

No, of course not. That's ridiculous and not even close to the salary thing. Come on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Don Tiny wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
It's all worth it when Rick comes out in that little sun dress on a Friday night.

I think we are more focused on people forced into a situation rather than what comes naturally. There are plenty of men that are naturally nurturing. Alternatively, there are plenty of women who only use the child as a prop for Facebook pictures before they go out to day drink prosecco.

:lol: :lol:


good dolphin really is the underrated MVP of this thread...

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Since we supposedly can't do without reposts of Julie DiCaro tweets for 24 hours, let's move it here!

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I know a family in this exact situation. 3 kids ages 2,4,8. The dad stays home. The mom works. You'd get far more productivity from the woman.


But is she quietly resentful? And I'm certainly not criticizing this arrangement. Perhaps the woman has more income earning ability and it makes sense for their family. If everybody's fine with the situation, that's great. But a woman taking care of the children isn't some patriarchal construction created by man. It occurs throughout all species of mammals. It's just that man is the only mammal capable of outsmarting himself.

Ten more pages!


JORR is becoming a "back in my day, the men were men!" guy in front of our own eyes!


You can make all the laws you want. You can't change nature.


I was a single father of 3 kids for MANY years and for the most part I didn't mess them up. I would like to believe that I'm still a man. There aren't defined parental responsibilities. Doing the best for the child is the only one.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I guess I am just too old and tired. I have come to the conclusion there are many problems like this, race, whatever that are so complex I have no chance to have the perfect answer so I give up. I will just do my own little world and let you young guys figure it out.

IMU, Kirkwood, and me are going to solve a lot of the problems you guys caused.

Can’t go solving world problems with grammar like that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I guess I am just too old and tired. I have come to the conclusion there are many problems like this, race, whatever that are so complex I have no chance to have the perfect answer so I give up. I will just do my own little world and let you young guys figure it out.

IMU, Kirkwood, and me are going to solve a lot of the problems you guys caused.

Can’t go solving world problems with grammar like that.

Grammar is for old people. We communicate with emojis.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Since we supposedly can't do without reposts of Julie DiCaro tweets for 24 hours, let's move it here!

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I know a family in this exact situation. 3 kids ages 2,4,8. The dad stays home. The mom works. You'd get far more productivity from the woman.


But is she quietly resentful? And I'm certainly not criticizing this arrangement. Perhaps the woman has more income earning ability and it makes sense for their family. If everybody's fine with the situation, that's great. But a woman taking care of the children isn't some patriarchal construction created by man. It occurs throughout all species of mammals. It's just that man is the only mammal capable of outsmarting himself.

Ten more pages!


JORR is becoming a "back in my day, the men were men!" guy in front of our own eyes!


You can make all the laws you want. You can't change nature.


I was a single father of 3 kids for MANY years and for the most part I didn't mess them up. I would like to believe that I'm still a man. There aren't defined parental responsibilities. Doing the best for the child is the only one.


So? Nobody has said that a man can't raise children or that a woman can't run a Fortune 500 company.

The point is, when we're looking at the supposed wage gap we have to consider that far less women than men are driven to do what it takes to ascend to those top jobs. That shows up in the data. It isn't because an individual woman isn't as capable as an individual man.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Jorr says women should work harder. :lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Since we supposedly can't do without reposts of Julie DiCaro tweets for 24 hours, let's move it here!

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I know a family in this exact situation. 3 kids ages 2,4,8. The dad stays home. The mom works. You'd get far more productivity from the woman.


But is she quietly resentful? And I'm certainly not criticizing this arrangement. Perhaps the woman has more income earning ability and it makes sense for their family. If everybody's fine with the situation, that's great. But a woman taking care of the children isn't some patriarchal construction created by man. It occurs throughout all species of mammals. It's just that man is the only mammal capable of outsmarting himself.

Ten more pages!


JORR is becoming a "back in my day, the men were men!" guy in front of our own eyes!


You can make all the laws you want. You can't change nature.


I was a single father of 3 kids for MANY years and for the most part I didn't mess them up. I would like to believe that I'm still a man. There aren't defined parental responsibilities. Doing the best for the child is the only one.


So? Nobody has said that a man can't raise children or that a woman can't run a Fortune 500 company.

The point is, when we're looking at the supposed wage gap we have to consider that far less women than men are driven to do what it takes to ascend to those top jobs. That shows up in the data. It isn't because an individual woman isn't as capable as an individual man.


Good to see you walking back the "you can't change nature" crap.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Women's brains are a third the size of men's brains.

It's science.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The point is, when we're looking at the supposed wage gap we have to consider that far less women than men are driven to do what it takes to ascend to those top jobs. That shows up in the data. It isn't because an individual woman isn't as capable as an individual man.
Except when the women do ascend to those jobs there is a gap that varies by industry but still exists.

Though, as I said "women need to act like men" isn't exactly a great argument that sexism isn't part of it. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Saw an op-ed this morning, essentially asking why over time we have made girls more boy-like but boys have been forced to stick with the same definition of masculinity.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Women's brains are a third the size of men's brains.

It's science.

:lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Hatchetman wrote:
Saw an op-ed this morning, essentially asking why over time we have made girls more boy-like but boys have been forced to stick with the same definition of masculinity.


The boys that don't tend to stick with that definition are called tranny's...or Matt Spiegel...whatever.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Good to see you walking back the "you can't change nature" crap.


I'm walking back nothing. Women bear children. Men do not. That's nature. Women feed babies. Men cannot. (Sure we can argue about the creation and health benefits- or lack thereof- of ersatz mother's milk, but that's getting far afield from the discussion of the wage gap.) Again, the point is that there are X number of jobs. There is brutal competition to obtain the highest paying jobs. This place is filled with men, most of whom obviously are making the choice not to compete at that level by virtue of posting here rather than doing the work that earns those top jobs. That's a choice. Do I think Terry's Peeps could run Motorola if he had it in him to make that effort? Probably. But he doesn't and that's no crime. I don't either. And the simple fact is there are less women making the choice to compete for those jobs than there are men. I'm making no argument against the likely fact that as many women are as capable of competing and winning those jobs as men, but rather that far less women have the desire to enter such competition because they have different priorities and nature plays a big part in that.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The point is, when we're looking at the supposed wage gap we have to consider that far less women than men are driven to do what it takes to ascend to those top jobs. That shows up in the data. It isn't because an individual woman isn't as capable as an individual man.
Except when the women do ascend to those jobs there is a gap that varies by industry but still exists.

Though, as I said "women need to act like men" isn't exactly a great argument that sexism isn't part of it. :lol:


In his infamous Google memo, James Damore's point was that pay inequality exists not just because women don't often "act like men" (more ambition, more willingness to ask for raises, etc), but also because of the societal pressures on men who are reluctant to take on traditional female roles (not being the breadwinner, being a stay-at-home dad, etc).

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The point is, when we're looking at the supposed wage gap we have to consider that far less women than men are driven to do what it takes to ascend to those top jobs. That shows up in the data. It isn't because an individual woman isn't as capable as an individual man.
Except when the women do ascend to those jobs there is a gap that varies by industry but still exists.

Though, as I said "women need to act like men" isn't exactly a great argument that sexism isn't part of it. :lol:


Maybe I'm not articulating it well, because you don't seem to understand.

I'm not sure what "act like a man" means in this context. It takes tremendous effort to be a C-level exec at a large corporation. I don't consider such effort "acting like a man". A woman can choose to make such an effort. The fact is for every woman that does, there are many more men fighting for the same spot(s).

As for your assertion that woman are paid less in the same jobs as men, I don't believe there is evidence to support it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Hatchetman wrote:
Saw an op-ed this morning, essentially asking why over time we have made girls more boy-like but boys have been forced to stick with the same definition of masculinity.

Are you sure boys have been forced to stick with one definition of masculinity? The complaint that school has become designed for girls to thrive (JORR alluded to it here or there) is not wholly without merit.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Hatchetman wrote:
Saw an op-ed this morning, essentially asking why over time we have made girls more boy-like but boys have been forced to stick with the same definition of masculinity.

This is why I'm raising my son gender-nonspecific.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 360 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group