He really sounds like a guy who has accepted the election results.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

The stuff regarding voter suppression is real. I'm still wondering where you bashed Sanders about "not accepting the results"?

I also never made a big deal out of voter suppression either.

You are so biased against the Clintons that you can't see straight. You have no objectivity where she is concerned.

_________________

Stop lying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p-qQlfEfVA

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

No you are full of shit. Sanders openly discussed fucking up the convention. He also discussed the need for the process to be changed. He also discussed conducting a recount of the electoral votes. He also implored his voters to go to the convention and shake things up.


They had to cut deals with him in order to gain his vote.

As i stated before you are so fucking biased against the Clintons that you can't see straight.

You act like she shouldn't or can't be upset about losing. Who the fuck are you to tell somebody how they should feel?

Bernie Sanders started bashing the shit out of her and whining as soon as the General was over yet conveniently that escaped your rather prejudiced and biased lenses. He didn't and still hasn't accepted shit yet you don't hold him accountable.
Until she openly challenges the results then this is a non story.

_________________

Stop lying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p-qQlfEfVA

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

Barney Frank sure was prophetic when he made these statements. I wonder if he knew how much

https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem ... ies-223685

_________________

Hypocrite.Sanders sure was quick to concede following his defeat wasn't he Jorr? I'm sure you being the upstanding guy that you are blasted him for it too.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/06/2 ... m-Policies

_________________

Read Nas's post above.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

He provided an opinion and i disagree with him about wanting to win. He wanted to win he just lost. The media actually favored Sanders tremendously too. His record was never really examined as they were more interested in seeing a horserace. They also made it appear that the race was closer than it actually ever was. She was never in any danger.

As Frank said he was a "caucus" candidate. Caucuses are undemocratic as hell yet Sanders supporters were loathe to complain about them for some reason. He lost by 4 million votes.

_________________

My point is that the party can send whoever it wants as its nominee. Infighting over the nomination or the nominating process of a party is private business. It's not in any way the same as refusing to accept the results of the actual election.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

Here is the other lie you keep telling regarding concession. She conceded the same night as the election yet it wasn't quick enough for your liking so somehow it is the same as not conceding at all.

If she wanted to drag it out she could have. She conceded and also gave a good concession speech but it still wasn't good enough for you though.

_________________

Only because Obama shamed her and she didn't publicly concede. That was the beginning of the refusal to accept that results. It was unprecedented.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

Speaking of Trumpkins who latch on to red herrings...

Nas you really shouldn't be melting down over this.

Are you really this daft? Honest question.

Here's the thing. I'll stack my reputation up against yours and you'll lose every time. That's something you have to deal with. Now tell us how you don't care about what shitheads on this message board think and how the Caller Bob you play at CFMB isn't you. Oh, and have a great day!

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

So instead of having an actual defendable position that sane people can comprehend, you attack me. Drinking early today I see.

See, that doesn't work. Nearly every post you make is an attack on someone. And everyone here knows it. I know, I know, you don't care. You're a great person.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

There is one thing the President tweeted that makes some sense and can possibly put all this shit to rest and expose the DNC/Clintons /Democrats,if it is there. With them suing him he can counter sue and ask for all kinds of stuff. This might back-fire on the Dems a lot more than help. Disclosure is a useful tool.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"

(((Not a Democrat)))

_________________

Pointing out what you are doing doesn't work because.... I do it too?
Seriously man. It's 8:30. Put the bottle down and get some covefe.

Why would anyone play a complete jerkoff as a bit?

_________________

Um.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

The nation would benefit greatly from him filing a counter suit. "Yes Mr. President. Yes we are going to trial Mr President. Right this way please. We have some questions for you to answer under oath." Now, I'm not the Harvard Lawyer that Juicy claims to be, but I think Trump going under oath is the last thing his lawyers want.

At least you're admitting it now. That's the first step.

Here's James Woods' list:

Defeat of ISIS
Burdensome regulatory relief
Border integrity
Census integrity
Denuclearization of the Korean peninsula
Immigration sanctity
Tax relief
Lowest unemployment in years
Record black employment
Strengthened military
Sensible trade agreements

Of course, many of these could be spun as negatives depending on one's beliefs (i.e., tax relief = greater wealth inequality, regulatory relief = destroying the environment, etc).

_________________

I would also submit that about half of them haven't actually happened.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don

Yeah that's a bit of an issue...

_________________

Many of them are also unquantifiable generalizations.

_________________

It's just how I feel...

_________________