It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 636 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 22  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think there is a lot of rewriting history there. Lebron, Wade, and Bosh were openly joking about winning 7 titles together. They were far and away the most talented team in the league in a league where stars win titles. He didn't just choose to leave Cleveland. He chose to team up with his good friends and give themselves a massive competitive advantage. Don't get me wrong. That was their choice. Durant made the same choice to take the easy way to a few titles if not more. I even get it after living their whole lives hearing how Malone, Miller, Barkley and others never got a title. We just don't have to pretend it is the same thing as Scottie Pippen going from lightly regarded project who didn't even start as a rookie and having Horace Grant and then a Dennis Rodman with a questionable future to the point that he was traded for Will Perdue. I mean, that's basically what Kevin Durant gave up on in OKC to go win some easy titles though Westbrook was probably regarded higher when he was drafted than Pippen was.

But, let's say that it is true, and that all Lebron did was "even" the talent level with the 90s Bulls. He still went 2/4 with them. He then chose his next destination, dictated all the moves, got another All Star there along with an up and coming star in Irving. 1/3. Probably 1/4.

A pattern starts to develop. Lebron even while giving himself the best possible chance of winning, and being at worst the second best player of all time, is 3/7 under that circumstance in winning a title.

BREAKING NEWS: Player on sports team sets goal of winning season championship. More at 10.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
How about this. The Jordan was so damn good the Miami Heat retired his number.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
TurdFerguson wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
tl;dr: the talent level of James and Jordan's teammates is more or less equal. That Jordan won more is why most everyone says he's "better," and I don't really dispute that. But they both had the benefit of super talented teams.


I don't get your point then, if the talent around Jordan and LBJ is roughly equal. Then if we are comparing who the better player is, you are saying Jordan is the better player as he took an equal collection of talent and pushed them to a 6-0 record in the finals.



I said in my post that my reply to you wasn't a James vs Jordan who is better thing. I think we've got on a tangent about the narrative about LBJ going to Miami and whether or not he faced the same struggles as other stars did when fighting for his rings. I'm trying to say that yes he did face the same struggles despite the spectacle of The Decision. When you look roster for roster at all the championship teams then you'll see that Miami's teams do not stand out head and shoulders above the rest. That's the narrative created after The Decision but it really doesn't hold up to much scrutiny.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think there is a lot of rewriting history there. Lebron, Wade, and Bosh were openly joking about winning 7 titles together. They were far and away the most talented team in the league in a league where stars win titles. He didn't just choose to leave Cleveland. He chose to team up with his good friends and give themselves a massive competitive advantage. Don't get me wrong. That was their choice. Durant made the same choice to take the easy way to a few titles if not more. I even get it after living their whole lives hearing how Malone, Miller, Barkley and others never got a title. We just don't have to pretend it is the same thing as Scottie Pippen going from lightly regarded project who didn't even start as a rookie and having Horace Grant and then a Dennis Rodman with a questionable future to the point that he was traded for Will Perdue. I mean, that's basically what Kevin Durant gave up on in OKC to go win some easy titles though Westbrook was probably regarded higher when he was drafted than Pippen was.

But, let's say that it is true, and that all Lebron did was "even" the talent level with the 90s Bulls. He still went 2/4 with them. He then chose his next destination, dictated all the moves, got another All Star there along with an up and coming star in Irving. 1/3. Probably 1/4.

A pattern starts to develop. Lebron even while giving himself the best possible chance of winning, and being at worst the second best player of all time, is 3/7 under that circumstance in winning a title.

BREAKING NEWS: Player on sports team sets goal of winning season championship. More at 10.



:lol:

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think there is a lot of rewriting history there. Lebron, Wade, and Bosh were openly joking about winning 7 titles together. They were far and away the most talented team in the league in a league where stars win titles. He didn't just choose to leave Cleveland. He chose to team up with his good friends and give themselves a massive competitive advantage. Don't get me wrong. That was their choice. Durant made the same choice to take the easy way to a few titles if not more. I even get it after living their whole lives hearing how Malone, Miller, Barkley and others never got a title. We just don't have to pretend it is the same thing as Scottie Pippen going from lightly regarded project who didn't even start as a rookie and having Horace Grant and then a Dennis Rodman with a questionable future to the point that he was traded for Will Perdue. I mean, that's basically what Kevin Durant gave up on in OKC to go win some easy titles though Westbrook was probably regarded higher when he was drafted than Pippen was.

But, let's say that it is true, and that all Lebron did was "even" the talent level with the 90s Bulls. He still went 2/4 with them. He then chose his next destination, dictated all the moves, got another All Star there along with an up and coming star in Irving. 1/3. Probably 1/4.

A pattern starts to develop. Lebron even while giving himself the best possible chance of winning, and being at worst the second best player of all time, is 3/7 under that circumstance in winning a title.

BREAKING NEWS: Player on sports team sets goal of winning season championship. More at 10.

If only it had worked more often...

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You bash the hell out of Melo for not winning anything even though he is a Hall of Fame player and every team he played on for the first 10-11 years got better.

I seem to remember you bashing the hell out of Boogie Cousins for similar reasons though with him the lack of winning is more pronounced obviously.

I've never bashed either of those for not winning a championship. I've bashed both of those players for making their teams lose.

Not only does Carmelo not win, but he contributes to losses. He is a reason the Thunder were so disappointing.

Cousins has improved his overall game a lot in the past two seasons or so. I haven't ripped him much, or at all, in awhile.

Unlike you, I recognize when players progress or regress.


You need to watch games and stop with talk show narratives.

If Carmelo Anthony is such the loser then why did Denver improve by 26 games with him as its best player during his rookie season?

If he causes teams to lose then why did his teams make the playoffs for the first 9 years of his career?

How did New York enjoy its best season in 20 years with him as its best player?

Why has he had a winning record despite playing in the Western Conf. for the first 9 years of his career?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
is this thread more hot air about how Jordan wasn't that good and Pippen sucked and Phil Jackson couldn't coach....yet somehow the team essentially won six titles in a row?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40820
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Hatchetman wrote:
is this thread more hot air about how Jordan wasn't that good and Pippen sucked and Phil Jackson couldn't coach....yet somehow the team essentially won six titles in a row?


Yeah pretty much.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
You need to watch games and stop with talk show narratives.

If Carmelo Anthony is such the loser then why did Denver improve by 26 games with him as its best player during his rookie season?

If he causes teams to lose then why did his teams make the playoffs for the first 9 years of his career?

Why has he had a winning record despite playing in the Western Conf. for the first 9 years of his career?

We've previously discussed all of these points at great length only a couple of years ago. You tried to push the story line that he was the only player on those teams. That was countered by listing the countless All-Star players Denver started surrounding him with. Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You need to watch games and stop with talk show narratives.

If Carmelo Anthony is such the loser then why did Denver improve by 26 games with him as its best player during his rookie season?

If he causes teams to lose then why did his teams make the playoffs for the first 9 years of his career?

Why has he had a winning record despite playing in the Western Conf. for the first 9 years of his career?

We've previously discussed all of these points at great length only a couple of years ago. You tried to push the story line that he was the only player on those teams. That was countered by listing the countless All-Star players Denver started surrounding him with. Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.


When have you named all of these countless All Stars? you are flat lying and if you have then you should have no problem doing it now. WHo are they?

I also knew that you'd duck the questions and your tank theory if pure speculation. Denver had been a garbage ass franchise well before 02-03.

Lastly to illustrate the inconsistency in your argument you just love some Top 10 Jimmy Butler. Where in the hell have Jimmy Butler led teams gone in the 4-5 years that he has been an elite (in your opinion anyway) player?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You need to watch games and stop with talk show narratives.

If Carmelo Anthony is such the loser then why did Denver improve by 26 games with him as its best player during his rookie season?

If he causes teams to lose then why did his teams make the playoffs for the first 9 years of his career?

Why has he had a winning record despite playing in the Western Conf. for the first 9 years of his career?

We've previously discussed all of these points at great length only a couple of years ago. You tried to push the story line that he was the only player on those teams. That was countered by listing the countless All-Star players Denver started surrounding him with. Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.


When have you named all of these countless All Stars? you are flat lying and if you have then you should have no problem doing it now. WHo are they?

I also knew that you'd duck the questions and your tank theory if pure speculation. Denver had been a garbage ass franchise well before 02-03.

Lastly to illustrate the inconsistency in your argument you just love some Top 10 Jimmy Butler. Where in the hell have Jimmy Butler led teams gone in the 4-5 years that he has been an elite (in your opinion anyway) player?


Carmelo Anthony in 2003-04 was 7th on the team in WS/48, 4th in overall WS, 7th in BPM (0.1), and 4th in VORP. Andre Miller, Marcus Camby and Nene were all higher contributors.

Iverson, Billups, KDdidit Martin were the All Stars. Guys like Camby, Nene and Miller were big contributors that never made the All Star team.

Timberwolves had 16 more wins than the previous season, and the Bulls had 14 fewer wins. Using your own logic, Jimmy Butler is worth approximately 15 wins.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You need to watch games and stop with talk show narratives.

If Carmelo Anthony is such the loser then why did Denver improve by 26 games with him as its best player during his rookie season?

If he causes teams to lose then why did his teams make the playoffs for the first 9 years of his career?

Why has he had a winning record despite playing in the Western Conf. for the first 9 years of his career?

We've previously discussed all of these points at great length only a couple of years ago. You tried to push the story line that he was the only player on those teams. That was countered by listing the countless All-Star players Denver started surrounding him with. Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.


When have you named all of these countless All Stars? you are flat lying and if you have then you should have no problem doing it now. WHo are they?

I also knew that you'd duck the questions and your tank theory if pure speculation. Denver had been a garbage ass franchise well before 02-03.

Lastly to illustrate the inconsistency in your argument you just love some Top 10 Jimmy Butler. Where in the hell have Jimmy Butler led teams gone in the 4-5 years that he has been an elite (in your opinion anyway) player?


Carmelo Anthony in 2003-04 was 7th on the team in WS/48, 4th in overall WS, 7th in BPM (0.1), and 4th in VORP. Andre Miller, Marcus Camby and Nene were all higher contributors.

Iverson, Billups, KDdidit Martin were the All Stars. Guys like Camby, Nene and Miller were big contributors that never made the All Star team.

Timberwolves had 16 more wins than the previous season, and the Bulls had 14 fewer wins. Using your own logic, Jimmy Butler is worth approximately 15 wins.



So now you are going back to the tried and not so true method of using John Hollinger to tell me that guys that were never more valuable were more valuable.
My question wasn't about more wins it was about "playoff success" . Where has top 10 Jimmy Butler ever led anyone? Simple question.



Every team has "big contributors". They were also big contributors that had never made a playoff series til Anthony showed up. It is common knowledge that he was the best player on that team from the moment he was drafted. Iverson was over the hill when he got to Denver. Denver got better after they traded him and Detroit got worse. Philly got better after trading him for Miller also. Each instance is backed up by their respective improvement in record.


Of the All Star guys you named (Doubt Martin ever made one in the West by the way) Only Billups had real impact.

Billups was only really available to Denver for one year. He blew his knee or Achilles out the second year and was moved after that. The one year he was available Denver made it to the Conf finals. Won 54 games. Iverson was around for about 2 seasons as I recall and Martin was a role player at best. Nothing you stated adds up to "countless"

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Quote:
IMU wrote:
Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.



Denver won 27 games in the 01-02 season and 17 in 02-03. That look like a tank job to you?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33206
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think there is a lot of rewriting history there. Lebron, Wade, and Bosh were openly joking about winning 7 titles together. They were far and away the most talented team in the league in a league where stars win titles. He didn't just choose to leave Cleveland. He chose to team up with his good friends and give themselves a massive competitive advantage. Don't get me wrong. That was their choice. Durant made the same choice to take the easy way to a few titles if not more. I even get it after living their whole lives hearing how Malone, Miller, Barkley and others never got a title. We just don't have to pretend it is the same thing as Scottie Pippen going from lightly regarded project who didn't even start as a rookie and having Horace Grant and then a Dennis Rodman with a questionable future to the point that he was traded for Will Perdue. I mean, that's basically what Kevin Durant gave up on in OKC to go win some easy titles though Westbrook was probably regarded higher when he was drafted than Pippen was.

But, let's say that it is true, and that all Lebron did was "even" the talent level with the 90s Bulls. He still went 2/4 with them. He then chose his next destination, dictated all the moves, got another All Star there along with an up and coming star in Irving. 1/3. Probably 1/4.

A pattern starts to develop. Lebron even while giving himself the best possible chance of winning, and being at worst the second best player of all time, is 3/7 under that circumstance in winning a title
.

BREAKING NEWS: Player on sports team sets goal of winning season championship. More at 10.


Regardless of your little haha, Rick's post was incredibly well thought out. Strong argument.

My personal opinion: I used to be a Jordan is greatest ever guy hands down no argument. But I am watching the current playoffs and just seeing LeBron do incredible things and at an age and with longevity that is evening this argument. And it will always be hard to account for the years Michael missed where he could have won more championships and added to his aggregate stats. They are damn near even in my mind now. Michael will always be the more competitive player, while LeBron is the most incredible physical specimen to have ever played the game.

I have never been a guy to define players' greatness by number of championships. I think it is a factor to be considered, but I always had Dan Marino ranked higher than most in the top QB category as an example.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
My question wasn't about more wins it was about "playoff success" . Where has top 10 Jimmy Butler ever led anyone? Simple question.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/2 ... ba_history

Carmelo is now 25-47 in the postseason, which is a career 34.7% winning percentage. He has only been out of the first round twice in 11 playoff appearances.

Butler is 15-25 in the postseason, which is a career 37.5% winning percentage. He has already been out of the first round twice in only 5 postseason appearances. In 2018-19, he will be playing on the best team he has ever played on and I expect a 3-5 seed season and multiple playoff rounds.

Apparently you care about playoff success even less than I.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
denisdman wrote:
IMU wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think there is a lot of rewriting history there. Lebron, Wade, and Bosh were openly joking about winning 7 titles together. They were far and away the most talented team in the league in a league where stars win titles. He didn't just choose to leave Cleveland. He chose to team up with his good friends and give themselves a massive competitive advantage. Don't get me wrong. That was their choice. Durant made the same choice to take the easy way to a few titles if not more. I even get it after living their whole lives hearing how Malone, Miller, Barkley and others never got a title. We just don't have to pretend it is the same thing as Scottie Pippen going from lightly regarded project who didn't even start as a rookie and having Horace Grant and then a Dennis Rodman with a questionable future to the point that he was traded for Will Perdue. I mean, that's basically what Kevin Durant gave up on in OKC to go win some easy titles though Westbrook was probably regarded higher when he was drafted than Pippen was.

But, let's say that it is true, and that all Lebron did was "even" the talent level with the 90s Bulls. He still went 2/4 with them. He then chose his next destination, dictated all the moves, got another All Star there along with an up and coming star in Irving. 1/3. Probably 1/4.

A pattern starts to develop. Lebron even while giving himself the best possible chance of winning, and being at worst the second best player of all time, is 3/7 under that circumstance in winning a title
.

BREAKING NEWS: Player on sports team sets goal of winning season championship. More at 10.


Regardless of your little haha, Rick's post was incredibly well thought out. Strong argument.

My personal opinion: I used to be a Jordan is greatest ever guy hands down no argument. But I am watching the current playoffs and just seeing LeBron do incredible things and at an age and with longevity that is evening this argument. And it will always be hard to account for the years Michael missed where he could have won more championships and added to his aggregate stats. They are damn near even in my mind now. Michael will always be the more competitive player, while LeBron is the most incredible physical specimen to have ever played the game.

I have never been a guy to define players' greatness by number of championships. I think it is a factor to be considered, but I always had Dan Marino ranked higher than most in the top QB category as an example.


Me too. i have always loved the "Jordan became a champion by becoming a better player" non sense too. Jordan became a champion by virtue of playing with better players. Nothing more and nothing less. All one has to do is pull up some of the box scores from playoff series held during the Collins years to see what I'm referencing . THe starting lineups from those teams were dreadful.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
Quote:
IMU wrote:
Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.



Denver won 27 games in the 01-02 season and 17 in 02-03. That look like a tank job to you?

Yes, it does. Cleveland and Denver tanking in the 2002-03 season was well documented. Maybe that was before you started following Carmelo... err, the NBA.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33206
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I read these NBA threads and have a hard time following you guys. I just don't have the depth of knowledge that you all possess. I love the game, but there is only so much time in the day to consume things that one loves. Now have at it!

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
denisdman wrote:
But I am watching the current playoffs and just seeing LeBron do incredible things and at an age and with longevity that is evening this argument. And it will always be hard to account for the years Michael missed where he could have won more championships and added to his aggregate stats.
Lebron James is 33. Michael Jordan won his last title at 34.

We've got to wait a few years to give Lebron the longevity edge.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
My question wasn't about more wins it was about "playoff success" . Where has top 10 Jimmy Butler ever led anyone? Simple question.

https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/2 ... ba_history

Carmelo is now 25-47 in the postseason, which is a career 34.7% winning percentage. He has only been out of the first round twice in 11 playoff appearances.

Butler is 15-25 in the postseason, which is a career 37.5% winning percentage. He has already been out of the first round twice in only 5 postseason appearances. In 2018-19, he will be playing on the best team he has ever played on and I expect a 3-5 seed season and multiple playoff rounds.

Apparently you care about playoff success even less than I.


Again you quote meaningless statistics to demonstrate what exactly? My point was specific to him being an "elite player" as you seem to think he has become. I don't care if he won playoff series as the 7th banana. Carmelo Anthony has never been that probably on any team in his life.

You keep obfuscating and attempting to redefine the question. Not getting away with it this rip. Butler has been good for 4 seasons. He has only been out of the first round once and even during that season he was the 2nd best player to Gasol. He also was surrounded by talent that MANY believed would compete with Cleveland that year.


In the 3 years since he has 2 eighth place finishes and one year where he missed the playoffs completely. He has yet to standout in any playoff series that he has participated in and James Harden showed him this year what an "elite" player happens to be.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Quote:
IMU wrote:
Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.



Denver won 27 games in the 01-02 season and 17 in 02-03. That look like a tank job to you?

Yes, it does. Cleveland and Denver tanking in the 2002-03 season was well documented. Maybe that was before you started following Carmelo... err, the NBA.


Tanking from what? they were already a terrible franchise. You may need to look up the definition of tanking and Well documented as a source isn't going to cut it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33206
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
denisdman wrote:
But I am watching the current playoffs and just seeing LeBron do incredible things and at an age and with longevity that is evening this argument. And it will always be hard to account for the years Michael missed where he could have won more championships and added to his aggregate stats.
Lebron James is 33. Michael Jordan won his last title at 34.

We've got to wait a few years to give Lebron the longevity edge.


Yes I looked that up before I posted that. But LeBron has longevity based on years played, correct? That is why I commented that is is tough to replace what would have been if Jordan didn't have gaps.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Quote:
IMU wrote:
Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.



Denver won 27 games in the 01-02 season and 17 in 02-03. That look like a tank job to you?

Yes, it does. Cleveland and Denver tanking in the 2002-03 season was well documented. Maybe that was before you started following Carmelo... err, the NBA.


Tanking from what? they were already a terrible franchise. You may need to look up the definition of tanking and Well documented as a source isn't going to cut it.

This Nuggets blog details the two years of tanking Denver did in the 2001-02 and 2002-03 seasons.

The Nuggets lost their last 8 games of the season by playing randoms for 30-35 minutes per game. Do you remember the illustrious careers of Vincent Yarbrough, Nikoloz Tskitishvili and Jeff Trepagnier? They had one of the ultimate tank jobs in NBA history.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Quote:
IMU wrote:
Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.



Denver won 27 games in the 01-02 season and 17 in 02-03. That look like a tank job to you?

Yes, it does. Cleveland and Denver tanking in the 2002-03 season was well documented. Maybe that was before you started following Carmelo... err, the NBA.


Tanking from what? they were already a terrible franchise. You may need to look up the definition of tanking and Well documented as a source isn't going to cut it.

This Nuggets blog details the two years of tanking Denver did in the 2001-02 and 2002-03 seasons.

The Nuggets lost their last 8 games of the season by playing randoms for 30-35 minutes per game. Do you remember the illustrious careers of Vincent Yarbrough, Nikoloz Tskitishvili and Jeff Trepagnier? They had one of the ultimate tank jobs in NBA history.


Oh Nik was a top 5 pick. Probably wanted to take a look at him. Other guys were bums. 02 wasn't that strong of a draft to be tanking as i recall. Can't remember the No 1 overall. Even if guys sat that season they still were a shitty team that improved greatly during Anthony's first season. If you give them all 8 games they still only win 25. 18 game improvement still. Look at their combined record of the 6 seasons previously. Only won 40 once and if I delve further it is probably worse. Fact remains Carmelo put Denver on the map and as the face of the franchise he took his team to the playoffs for 9 seasons straight. Mind you a franchise that had missed the playoffs for 6-7 years running. I will look it up for verification. You and others are celebrating Butler but the fact remains that his Minnesota team had a top 15 guy on it when he arrived. Anthony until this season had never played with a top 15 guy and that includes the washed up Iverson.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
denisdman wrote:
But I am watching the current playoffs and just seeing LeBron do incredible things and at an age and with longevity that is evening this argument. And it will always be hard to account for the years Michael missed where he could have won more championships and added to his aggregate stats.
Lebron James is 33. Michael Jordan won his last title at 34.

We've got to wait a few years to give Lebron the longevity edge.


At age 34, Jordan won the Title, League MVP, Finals MVP, All-star Game MVP, Scoring Title, first team All-NBA, first team all defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
It's also interesting that even if you include the Wizards years, Lebron has already played in about 70 more regular season games than Jordan, and yet people say that Lebron seems poised to pass Jordan eventually. Shouldn't it pretty much be decided given that?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's also interesting that even if you include the Wizards years, Lebron has already played in about 70 more regular season games than Jordan, and yet people say that Lebron seems poised to pass Jordan eventually. Shouldn't it pretty much be decided given that?


He's not going to pass him in rings. That's pretty much set in stone.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18494
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
The last few years with the Knicks and this year with OKC Melo just been collecting checks.When OKC got Melo and Playoff P you declared them the best team in the West.....then you saw them play :shock:

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
The last few years with the Knicks and this year with OKC Melo just been collecting checks.When OKC got Melo and Playoff P you declared them the best team in the West.....then you saw them play :shock:


You are talking about a guy in his 15 season that has come off of 2 major knee surgeries the previous two years and you're expecting him to be the Hall of Fame guy that he has always been. Is it a problem with him or you?

Also I never stated that they'd be the best team in the West. I stated that they'd be 2nd best. You are flatout lying about that.

In addition he was the 3rd option on a team where the first option took a combined 80+ shots over their teams last 2 games of the season. Again given the parameter I just provided is it a problem with him or you?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2018 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18494
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
long time guy wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
The last few years with the Knicks and this year with OKC Melo just been collecting checks.When OKC got Melo and Playoff P you declared them the best team in the West.....then you saw them play :shock:


You are talking about a guy in his 15 season that has come off of 2 major knee surgeries the previous two years and you're expecting him to be the Hall of Fame guy that he has always been. Is it a problem with him or you?

Also I never stated that they'd be the best team in the West. I stated that they'd be 2nd best. You are flatout lying about that.

In addition he was the 3rd option on a team where the first option took a combined 80+ shots over their teams last 2 games of the season. Again given the parameter I just provided is it a problem with him or you?

Let's see who goes after Carmelo or does he eat up that money on the table....

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 636 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 22  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group