It is currently Sat Feb 22, 2025 9:25 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 905 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 31  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You can certainly take quotes out of context to draw that conclusion. Leaving JORR out of it, you did that with CH and his question about "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" and you did it to me because I dared say that there can be a justifiable reason to shoot an unarmed protester.


Yes. Both those statements deserved the derision they got. No one seriously believes that Israel is going away. Not anymore. They did at one time but that's over. Nor does anyone want it to anymore. It's great to have them to prop up as the source of all the bad things. So CH posting his stupid quote as if it has any real meaning today is asinine. Your thought that there could be a justifiable reason to shoot an unarmed protester was not much better. You disagree. Fine.



Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You've been one of the most extreme voices on here in this thread and JBills followed you like a sheep into the same thing.


If you truly believe that, I can't help you. I think a person justifying shooting unarmed people and doctors is probably the most extreme, but to each his own.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I think there are two lines of thinking here.

Israel should be judged exactly the same as any other country.


Yes.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Israel is dealing with a situation unlike virtually any other country in history in that EVERY neighbor actively has attempted to destroy them and thought they had no right to exist. In fact, some people on this very board still question the legitimacy of how they were created and only give the most basic of acknowledgements that they shouldn't be destroyed now. Now, things have slightly improved on that as Israel and a few close nations have worked together to at least be neutral if not somewhat allies. However, it is still completely understandable that Israel would be much more cautious about protesters marching on their land that everyone acknowledges should be theirs with a public plan by a terrorist organization that actively and openly seeks their destruction.


Being more cautious is understandable.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is that giving Israel a pass on what was likely an overreaction? Probably.


Thank you. That's a step in the right direction.


Boilermaker Rick wrote:
There certainly would have been more non-lethal things to do than having snipers shooting at the legs of the marching protesters.


Great! I think we're getting closer.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is that enough for me to turn on Israel? It is not.


We were so close. What does "turn on Israel" mean? Is saying they were wrong and could've handled the situation better mean you are "turning on Israel?

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I have very little sympathy for those who proudly and actively seek the destruction of Israel.


Reasonable. Though I think you overstate the number of people who seriously seek that.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That doesn't mean I think all Arabs are bad or that all Jews are good.


Okay

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That means that I am choosing the Jews in Israel over the Arabs that are seeking to destroy Israel and I have no problem with that even if it gets people like you and FF to mock me by saying things like "TEHY FEARED FOR THEIR LIFE!".


What would Israel have to do for you to criticize Israel or say they were wrong?

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So, you seemingly fall into the first line of thinking where you immediately hear about conflicts like this and immediately blame whoever lost less people. I look at it with the grander scale of what the end goal is of those on each side of the conflict.


You must have confused me with bills. I didn't mention the numbers of casualties once.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
To put it another way, if Hamas came out tomorrow, even with their past, and said "We think Israel has a right to exist and would like to work on a peaceful resolution for the good of the Palestinian people who deserve their own state" then I'm almost certainly going to be with the Palestinian people. As long as they seek the destruction of Israel I'm going to be much more forgiving to Israel for doing things that other countries would be completely in the wrong for doing.


Hopefully that day comes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Jbi11s wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
So the 9 civilian casualties were justified?

The 1300 shot were justified?

Perhaps it's not a bright idea to serve as human shields for terrorists. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

The doctor who was shot was a human shield? His paramedic buddy who was killed was a human shield? Honestly man, Hamas is a bullshit terrible organization, but if you're hard wired to view these people as subhuman than you should just remove yourself from this convo.

Hamas is responsible for everything that happened on Monday. They set it up, they got the people there, and they initiated the violence. If you were a civilian and got yourself caught up in it, then that's your fault. Everyone in Gaza knows what Hamas is. Tough fucking shit.

The only group here viewing the Gazans as subhuman would be Hamas, which sees them as nothing other than cannon fodder.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
So the 9 civilian casualties were justified?

The 1300 shot were justified?

Perhaps it's not a bright idea to serve as human shields for terrorists. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

The doctor who was shot was a human shield? His paramedic buddy who was killed was a human shield? Honestly man, Hamas is a bullshit terrible organization, but if you're hard wired to view these people as subhuman than you should just remove yourself from this convo.

Hamas is responsible for everything that happened on Monday. They set it up, they got the people there, and they initiated the violence. If you were a civilian and got yourself caught up in it, then that's your fault. Everyone in Gaza knows what Hamas is. Tough fucking shit.

The only group here viewing the Gazans as subhuman would be Hamas, which sees them as nothing other than cannon fodder.


This is what I mean Rick.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Dropping tear gas on the press? Hamas' fault?

It's like speaking to the Israeli press secretary here.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:11 am 
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

The only group here viewing the Gazans as subhuman would be Hamas, which sees them as nothing other than cannon fodder.

Hamas were the ones lighting up people? How did I miss that bit of news?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Jbi11s wrote:
Dropping tear gas on the press? Hamas' fault?

It's like speaking to the Israeli press secretary here.

Funny how you ignore Hamas and Islamic Jihad's own statements which tell us 53 of the dead were terrorists.

Tear gas was used throughout the area as dispersal measures in a closed military zone. None of this happens without Hamas initiating it

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Dropping tear gas on the press? Hamas' fault?

It's like speaking to the Israeli press secretary here.

Funny how you ignore Hamas and Islamic Jihad's own statements which tell us 53 of the dead were terrorists.

Tear gas was used throughout the area as dispersal measures in a closed military zone. None of this happens without Hamas initiating it


That honestly sounds like a fucking child.

They started it so I smacked them with a baseball bat upside the head.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Baby McNown wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:

The only group here viewing the Gazans as subhuman would be Hamas, which sees them as nothing other than cannon fodder.

Hamas were the ones lighting up people? How did I miss that bit of news?

Hamas sent their people there to invade a sovereign country and said sovereign country defended itself and took out dozens of terrorists. I call that a win.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Dropping tear gas on the press? Hamas' fault?

It's like speaking to the Israeli press secretary here.

Funny how you ignore Hamas and Islamic Jihad's own statements which tell us 53 of the dead were terrorists.

Tear gas was used throughout the area as dispersal measures in a closed military zone. None of this happens without Hamas initiating it


That honestly sounds like a fucking child.

They started it so I smacked them with a baseball bat upside the head.

So Israel should've waited until the members of an organization which calls for the killing of every Jew did just that before responding? Sorry, we're not in the game of taking casualties before defending ourselves. We've done that in the past and it didn't work out well.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:16 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38777
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
So the 9 civilian casualties were justified?

The 1300 shot were justified?

Perhaps it's not a bright idea to serve as human shields for terrorists. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

The doctor who was shot was a human shield? His paramedic buddy who was killed was a human shield? Honestly man, Hamas is a bullshit terrible organization, but if you're hard wired to view these people as subhuman than you should just remove yourself from this convo.

Hamas is responsible for everything that happened on Monday. They set it up, they got the people there, and they initiated the violence. If you were a civilian and got yourself caught up in it, then that's your fault. Everyone in Gaza knows what Hamas is. Tough fucking shit.

The only group here viewing the Gazans as subhuman would be Hamas, which sees them as nothing other than cannon fodder.


I think that you left out a few other groups who do that.

The government of Iran and Hezbollah come to mind quickly. The Palestinians have been used for years by too MANY who don't give a scintilla of a shit about them except for how they can fuck with Israel.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:16 am 
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Seacrest wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
So the 9 civilian casualties were justified?

The 1300 shot were justified?

Perhaps it's not a bright idea to serve as human shields for terrorists. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

The doctor who was shot was a human shield? His paramedic buddy who was killed was a human shield? Honestly man, Hamas is a bullshit terrible organization, but if you're hard wired to view these people as subhuman than you should just remove yourself from this convo.

Hamas is responsible for everything that happened on Monday. They set it up, they got the people there, and they initiated the violence. If you were a civilian and got yourself caught up in it, then that's your fault. Everyone in Gaza knows what Hamas is. Tough fucking shit.

The only group here viewing the Gazans as subhuman would be Hamas, which sees them as nothing other than cannon fodder.


I think that you left out a few other groups who do that.

The government of Iran and Hezbollah come to mind quickly. The Palestinians have been used for years by too MANY who don't give a scintilla of a shit about them except for how they can fuck with Israel.


This is true too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:18 am 
Seriously. Next time they should bring AK's and tanks and rockets instead of rocks. When the IDF opens fire like it's NYE in Englewood, fire back. When BiBi and his sycophants cry about it, fuck you. We were defending ourselves.

I'm sure Ogie and JORR would be fully supportive of people defending themselves.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Baby McNown wrote:
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

The area within 500 meters of the fence is such a zone as designated by Oslo. The Palestinians agreed to this arrangement so yes it's a closed military zone.

Perhaps you should know the facts before making a complete ass of yourself.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38777
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

The area within 500 meters of the fence is such a zone as designated by Oslo. The Palestinians agreed to this arrangement so yes it's a closed military zone.

Perhaps you should know the facts before making a complete ass of yourself.



He's doing a bit.

He's actually a Nobel Laureate.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:25 pm
Posts: 4292
pizza_Place: pizza and subs
the media is doing good work for hamas here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You can certainly take quotes out of context to draw that conclusion. Leaving JORR out of it, you did that with CH and his question about "From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" and you did it to me because I dared say that there can be a justifiable reason to shoot an unarmed protester.


Yes. Both those statements deserved the derision they got. No one seriously believes that Israel is going away. Not anymore. They did at one time but that's over. Nor does anyone want it to anymore. It's great to have them to prop up as the source of all the bad things. So CH posting his stupid quote as if it has any real meaning today is asinine. Your thought that there could be a justifiable reason to shoot an unarmed protester was not much better. You disagree. Fine.
This is anecdotal, but I was in Manhattan around the time of some sort of big anti-Israel protest. This was being chanted pretty often for the few minutes we were near it. I thought it was pretty remarkable that this was happening in one of the global cities by huge amounts of people. This wasn't in Palestine where many are brainwashed into that thinking. These were the same people with the same access to information that I am and they were proudly chanting something that literally means "Destroy Israel". You discounting it like it's just some small little phrase that no one actually says doesn't fit with what I witnessed completely randomly. I doubt that was the only place it happened either.

Terry's Peeps wrote:
We were so close. What does "turn on Israel" mean? Is saying they were wrong and could've handled the situation better mean you are "turning on Israel?
You can't keep jumping back and forth here. You went after me for simply saying that it could be justified to shoot unarmed protesters based on what they were ultimately doing. Falling back to "could've handled the situation better" doesn't fly given many of your other posts in here. I think everyone agrees they could have handled it better.


Terry's Peeps wrote:
What would Israel have to do for you to criticize Israel or say they were wrong?
I've said they are wrong before. Even Ogie has said they were wrong on things.

Ultimately, it's going to be hard for me to ever side with anyone who is actively and proudly seeking the destruction of Israel especially in a case like this which is now pretty clearly a Hamas sponsored attempt to do "something".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:27 am 
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

The area within 500 meters of the fence is such a zone as designated by Oslo. The Palestinians agreed to this arrangement so yes it's a closed military zone.

Perhaps you should know the facts before making a complete ass of yourself.

So there was a designated area for the press, but since they put that designated area withing the 500 meters it's ok that the press got gassed. LOL. Wow you are a fucking moron. If actual Israelis are like you no wonder the PLO keeps telling them to get fucked.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93616
Location: To the left of my post
Baby McNown wrote:
Seriously. Next time they should bring AK's and tanks and rockets instead of rocks. When the IDF opens fire like it's NYE in Englewood, fire back. When BiBi and his sycophants cry about it, fuck you. We were defending ourselves.

I'm sure Ogie and JORR would be fully supportive of people defending themselves.
This has been answered a few times but yes that would be fine. Drop the arbitrary rules and give Palestine the chance to achieve their ultimate goal of wiping Israel off the map and then let it be decided for good.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Baby McNown wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

The area within 500 meters of the fence is such a zone as designated by Oslo. The Palestinians agreed to this arrangement so yes it's a closed military zone.

Perhaps you should know the facts before making a complete ass of yourself.

So there was a designated area for the press, but since they put that designated area withing the 500 meters it's ok that the press got gassed. LOL. Wow you are a fucking moron. If actual Israelis are like you no wonder the PLO keeps telling them to get fucked.

Israel didn't designate the press area, Hamas officials in Gaza more or less told them where to go as Israel has no boots on the ground or people on that side of the fence. The press should be less trusting of Hamas.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15086
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Baby McNown wrote:
Seriously. Next time they should bring AK's and tanks and rockets instead of rocks. When the IDF opens fire like it's NYE in Englewood, fire back. When BiBi and his sycophants cry about it, fuck you. We were defending ourselves.

I'm sure Ogie and JORR would be fully supportive of people defending themselves.


Who would do that? Hamas? The Palestinians? Nah. Hamas prefers to sit back behind non combatants and lob rockets into Israel and pay Palestinians to try and kidnap Israeli women and children to use for ransom purposes. Hamas is a rat pack in need of an extermination.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:42 am 
The Hawk wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Seriously. Next time they should bring AK's and tanks and rockets instead of rocks. When the IDF opens fire like it's NYE in Englewood, fire back. When BiBi and his sycophants cry about it, fuck you. We were defending ourselves.

I'm sure Ogie and JORR would be fully supportive of people defending themselves.


Who would do that? Hamas? The Palestinians? Nah. Hamas prefers to sit back behind non combatants and lob rockets into Israel and pay Palestinians to try and kidnap Israeli women and children to use for ransom purposes. Hamas is a rat pack in need of an extermination.

This would make more sense if you just posted under your actual name.

And if Hamas just likes to sit back and lob rockets, then there was no threat when the IDF decided this was Fallujah was there?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:42 am 
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

The area within 500 meters of the fence is such a zone as designated by Oslo. The Palestinians agreed to this arrangement so yes it's a closed military zone.

Perhaps you should know the facts before making a complete ass of yourself.

So there was a designated area for the press, but since they put that designated area withing the 500 meters it's ok that the press got gassed. LOL. Wow you are a fucking moron. If actual Israelis are like you no wonder the PLO keeps telling them to get fucked.

Israel didn't designate the press area, Hamas officials in Gaza more or less told them where to go as Israel has no boots on the ground or people on that side of the fence. The press should be less trusting of Hamas.

So they openly gassed people in a press area who were not on their side of the fence. Glad you can admit some actual facts in this.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
:lol:

Leave it 312 playa to boil this down to brass tacks.



Jorr is a sharp guy.. He should see this shit and recognize it.. I wouldn't waste my time with 75%of these dipshits who've made their mind up.



Anti-Semitism and the scapegoating of Jews didn't start in 1967 or 1948. Jews aren't hated because of the existence of Israel. Modern Israel exists because Jews are hated. This shit goes all the way back to antiquity and is entwined with religious codes that caused Jews to be bankers/lenders; it runs down through the actions/words of the Catholic Church to Martin Luther and all the way up until the present.

Jewish stereotypes are no different than the "Jezebel" or the "Mandingo" or "Jumpin' Jim Crow". It's interesting to juxtapose this conversation against some of those that deal with African-American issues. If there are "dog whistles" in those discussions, there are fucking air horns in this one.


I pointed out the same thing last night. People who yell "anti-Semite" sound just like those who scream "racism" at the drop of a hat.

I understand that you're trying to use the term "anti-Semite" in a more historical way, but that's not what the modern understanding of "anti-Semite" is. When you say "anti-Semitism" today in Chicago, IL, people are not interpreting it as someone who ignores the fact that Jews have been historically persecuted and that there are both historical and contemporary examples of systemic geopolitical bullying by anti-Zionist global power interests. They are thinking of it just as "someone who hates Jews". I doubt many, if any, people here hate Jews. It's just a bad word to use.



I don't think it's overt. Just like most white people don't actively hate blacks. But there is built in suspicion.

It does seem to me from reading this thread that many people here don't understand that Israel and Jews are inseparable. Obviously, as a Jew himself Ogie understands it quite clearly. Those who complain that the response is "disproportionate" don't grasp that the Jews were already killed in the 30s. They won't willingly go to the gas again. But many expect them to just take it.

Let me use an analogy. Slavery was an African holocaust. We still suffer its effects today. Imagine if Canada still promoted enslaving blacks and from time to time "unarmed" Canadians ran into the U.S. attempting to grab black people. If a bunch of African-Americans shot them up, do you think there is a single CFMB member who would defend the Canadians and whine about a "disproportionate response"?


Yeah, we just disagree on this issue. Poor analogy aside, I just don't see this large contingent of anti-Semitic people (consciously or subconsciously) walking around in America today. You seem to see it everywhere. I'm sure some of it has to do with the fact that you grew up in Skokie, but we both live in the same state in the same country... and it seems like we're living in two different worlds. I maintain that most people couldn't even pick out a Jewish person in a crowd.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Baby McNown wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

The area within 500 meters of the fence is such a zone as designated by Oslo. The Palestinians agreed to this arrangement so yes it's a closed military zone.

Perhaps you should know the facts before making a complete ass of yourself.

So there was a designated area for the press, but since they put that designated area withing the 500 meters it's ok that the press got gassed. LOL. Wow you are a fucking moron. If actual Israelis are like you no wonder the PLO keeps telling them to get fucked.

Israel didn't designate the press area, Hamas officials in Gaza more or less told them where to go as Israel has no boots on the ground or people on that side of the fence. The press should be less trusting of Hamas.

So they openly gassed people in a press area who were not on their side of the fence. Glad you can admit some actual facts in this.

Closed military zone during active operations, one which even the Palestinians agreed to since 1994. The press should've stayed further back and not trusted Hamas. Also, it's just tear gas. Israel used non-lethal means where appropriate and turned to lethal means where needed (those directly working to break through the border)

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56730
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
No one seriously believes that Israel is going away. Not anymore. They did at one time but that's over. Nor does anyone want it to anymore. It's great to have them to prop up as the source of all the bad things. So CH posting his stupid quote as if it has any real meaning today is asinine.


The Democratic Socialists of America, at their last national convention, took time to chant "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free" after voting to endorse BDS policies, BDS being a way to wage economic war on Israel. I'm not unearthing some ancient text here. The desire for Palestine to eliminate Israel is very much alive. I guess what you're arguing here is something like "aw shucks, they don't mean it, it's just catchy! it rhymes! it has a good beat and you can dance to it!" I would argue that the dream of an annihilated Israel is what guides the Arabs who wish to return to "their traditional homeland." Do you think they yearn to be Israelis?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:52 am 
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
The press area was a cleared military zone? My god. Were you dropped on your head as a child?

The area within 500 meters of the fence is such a zone as designated by Oslo. The Palestinians agreed to this arrangement so yes it's a closed military zone.

Perhaps you should know the facts before making a complete ass of yourself.

So there was a designated area for the press, but since they put that designated area withing the 500 meters it's ok that the press got gassed. LOL. Wow you are a fucking moron. If actual Israelis are like you no wonder the PLO keeps telling them to get fucked.

Israel didn't designate the press area, Hamas officials in Gaza more or less told them where to go as Israel has no boots on the ground or people on that side of the fence. The press should be less trusting of Hamas.

So they openly gassed people in a press area who were not on their side of the fence. Glad you can admit some actual facts in this.

Closed military zone during active operations, one which even the Palestinians agreed to since 1994. The press should've stayed further back and not trusted Hamas. Also, it's just tear gas. Israel used non-lethal means where appropriate and turned to lethal means where needed (those directly working to break through the border)

Any chance you are going to give your approval for the PLO to bring weapons next time and defend themselves?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24688
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
https://dsapalestinejustice.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56730
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
At this point it would be better if they did bring real weapons so we don't have to hear about the IDF murdering attackers armed with tennis rackets, pea gravel, and a wacky waving arm inflatable tube man.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2018 11:56 am 
KDdidit wrote:
https://dsapalestinejustice.org

I don't see anything about wiping the Jews off the planet in there.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 905 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 31  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group