It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 838 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Agreed. I also don't like some of the language he uses, as it is particularly charged. However, I don't think he does it in the way Milo does. Shapiro simply has strongly held beliefs and is trying to voice them. He is not doing it to intentionally rile people up. He is very polite during the Q & A's, though.


From the article Zeph linked earlier. Antifa sucks btw.

Toward the beginning, he addressed Antifa protesters, whom he called “communist pieces of garbage”: “You guys are so stupid… you can all go to hell, you pathetic, lying, stupid jackasses.” According to the Times, there is a wide gulf between Trump/Yiannopoulos-style vulgar conservatism and Shapiro-style Logical conservatism, but I just am not sure that I see in “Go to hell, you communist piece of garbage” the kind of “polemical brilliance” that Shapiro is reputed to demonstrate. The rest of the speech, when it got beyond making Botox jokes about Nancy Pelosi, was strong on insults (“pusillanimous cowards,” “hard-Left morons,” “uncivilized barbarians”) and light on actual argumentation and substantive factual claims.


Yeah he isn't trying to "rile people up" by making those statements. How could anyone actually believe that he was? Shame on them for thinking such a thing!


I agree that those remarks are unnecessarily inflammatory. The argument isn't that Shapiro is perfect or we agree with everything he says. But saying he's not even worth taking seriously is ridiculous.


It is difficult to take a guy seriously that advocates for the eradication of an entire group of people. Even his treatise on race lacks context because it fails to acknowledge the structural advantages enjoyed by certain members of this society. I don't begrudge anyone and I don't seek for them to hand over what was attained but to pretend that certain historical events haven't provided whites with significant headstart is equally ridiculous.

Even when you lose sight of the history you discover that said advantages still exist. Donald Trump is afforded the luxury of saying things that Al Sharpton simply can't. Shapiro is afforded the luxury of saying things that Louis Farrakhan can't.

When you speak about oppression i can find 3 instances of Donald Trump employing it without thinking too hard about it. I can find instances of others employing it without thinking to hard about it. This isn't some Jim Crow era or slavery era diatribe either. It exists today.


I actually don’t think he acknowledges structural disadvantages enough. But his point is that complaining about structural racism doesn’t do anything. He believes that individual examples of racism or sexism ought to be taken seriously and acted upon. That’s not an extreme view.

Shapiro is nothing like he is described in that dumb article. Just Youtube him and watch him.

It’s fine, though. Let’s just throw out every idea a person has because we don’t agree with them on every issue and then say they’re some kind of “bigot.” That has really worked well for Democrats in past elections, and I’m sure it will continue to do so.


Democrats aren't losing elections because they call people out on bigotry. Promoting and condoning ignorant behavior doesn't work all that well either. And why you sit and state that there is more to him than just his xenophobic views the exact same thing can be said about Farrakhan if one chooses to do so. Farrakhan supporters will argue that there is more to him than his rhetoric on Jewish people yet all whites and conservatives see are his comments on Israel.

If we want to hold an argument as to which of the two has helped more people in their lives Farrakhan wins that in a landslide. However all people see are his anti semitic comments. Why are such comments acceptable in one instance and denounced in others?

As far as losing elections go if appropriately calling bigots out on bigotry causes Dems to lose elections ( I doubt that) then so be it. If a country is turned off by things that are ethically and morally the correct thing to do then so be it. Having strength of conviction matters more in some cases.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue May 22, 2018 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Regular Reader wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
People yellled from a truck near campus. What did you want the school to do about it?


Many others followed the lead and spewed the rhetoric of the Missouri republican legislators that openly wanted kids kicked out of school, where they implied they had no right to belong in the first place.

And ultimately the students (& I) were fine with the response. As I've repeated, I like the place, a lot. I just started this by calling your posting your article poorly timed and disingenuous to this discussion, which you've seemingly already acknowledged.


You’ve done nothing to refute what’s in the article. Instead you’ve cited different statistics. That’s bad faith. This has nothing to with Republicans. What did you want the school to do about the truck incident? And do you believe taking over the Quad and pushing out student journalists was the right response? Because that’s what drove down enrollment and donations the most.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
long time guy wrote:
Democrats aren't losing elections because they call people out on bigotry. Promoting and condoning ignorant behavior doesn't work all that well either. And why you sit and state that there is more to him than just his xenophobic views the exact same thing can be said about Farrakhan if one chooses to do so. Farrakhan supporters will argue that there is more to him than his rhetoric on Jewish people yet all whites and conservatives see are his comments on Israel.

If we want to hold an argument as to which of the two has helped more people in their lives Farrakhan wins that in a landslide. However all people see are his anti semitic comments. Why are such comments acceptable in one instance and denounced in others?

As far as losing elections go if appropriately calling bigots out on bigotry causes Dems to lose elections ( I doubt that) then so be it. If a country is turned off by things that are ethically and morally the correct thing to do then so be it. Having strength of conviction matters more in some cases.


I don't know who you're talking to. I've never once referenced Louis Farrakhan on this board or probably in real life, either.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Democrats aren't losing elections because they call people out on bigotry. Promoting and condoning ignorant behavior doesn't work all that well either. And why you sit and state that there is more to him than just his xenophobic views the exact same thing can be said about Farrakhan if one chooses to do so. Farrakhan supporters will argue that there is more to him than his rhetoric on Jewish people yet all whites and conservatives see are his comments on Israel.

If we want to hold an argument as to which of the two has helped more people in their lives Farrakhan wins that in a landslide. However all people see are his anti semitic comments. Why are such comments acceptable in one instance and denounced in others?

As far as losing elections go if appropriately calling bigots out on bigotry causes Dems to lose elections ( I doubt that) then so be it. If a country is turned off by things that are ethically and morally the correct thing to do then so be it. Having strength of conviction matters more in some cases.


I don't know who you're talking to. I've never once referenced Louis Farrakhan on this board or probably in real life, either.


I don't recall you doing it but you also won't call out those that bash him either will you? I say this as a guy that doesn't support him by the way. I'm just wondering how Shapiro's language and rhetoric on Arabs is any different than what Farrakhan says about Jewish people? I still haven't gotten an answer on that other than Ogie's predictable ad hominem bullshit.



And the other portion of the show which is off setting for me is the expectation that blacks and other minorities should simply excuse bigoted behavior because you as a white person largely unaffected by it happens to do so. It is easy for you to ignore something that doesn't effect you. Claiming that those directly effected should do the same displays a lack of empathy. Bigots should be called out on bigotry. It isn't about changing the bigots heart either. It is about acknowledging something that needs acknowledging. Changes in Civil Rights laws didn't occur simply because people chose to ignore it. Maybe it does upset a few but the people upset by it probably never gave much of a shit anyway. Doesn't make them terrible people or even racists it just simply means that they aren't as effected by it as others and thus they don't care.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue May 22, 2018 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Democrats aren't losing elections because they call people out on bigotry. Promoting and condoning ignorant behavior doesn't work all that well either. And why you sit and state that there is more to him than just his xenophobic views the exact same thing can be said about Farrakhan if one chooses to do so. Farrakhan supporters will argue that there is more to him than his rhetoric on Jewish people yet all whites and conservatives see are his comments on Israel.

If we want to hold an argument as to which of the two has helped more people in their lives Farrakhan wins that in a landslide. However all people see are his anti semitic comments. Why are such comments acceptable in one instance and denounced in others?

As far as losing elections go if appropriately calling bigots out on bigotry causes Dems to lose elections ( I doubt that) then so be it. If a country is turned off by things that are ethically and morally the correct thing to do then so be it. Having strength of conviction matters more in some cases.


I don't know who you're talking to. I've never once referenced Louis Farrakhan on this board or probably in real life, either.

LTG is just going on another non-sensical rant.

I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Democrats aren't losing elections because they call people out on bigotry. Promoting and condoning ignorant behavior doesn't work all that well either. And why you sit and state that there is more to him than just his xenophobic views the exact same thing can be said about Farrakhan if one chooses to do so. Farrakhan supporters will argue that there is more to him than his rhetoric on Jewish people yet all whites and conservatives see are his comments on Israel.

If we want to hold an argument as to which of the two has helped more people in their lives Farrakhan wins that in a landslide. However all people see are his anti semitic comments. Why are such comments acceptable in one instance and denounced in others?

As far as losing elections go if appropriately calling bigots out on bigotry causes Dems to lose elections ( I doubt that) then so be it. If a country is turned off by things that are ethically and morally the correct thing to do then so be it. Having strength of conviction matters more in some cases.


I don't know who you're talking to. I've never once referenced Louis Farrakhan on this board or probably in real life, either.


I don't recall you doing it but you also won't call out those that bash him either will you? I say this as a guy that doesn't support him by the way. I'm just wondering how Shapiro's language and rhetoric on Arabs is any different than what Farrakhan says about Jewish people? I still haven't gotten an answer on that other than Ogie's predictable ad hominem bullshit.

I don't think Shapiro has said anything like what Farrkhan has. You're going to need to cite that shit.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

LTG has a long record of antisemitism on this board. Is it really a shock he is now trying to backdoor defend Farrkhan? I'd say his support for him has shaped his beliefs on the issue.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
No, it's a basic point about selection bias. The average Asian immigrant isn't as poor as the average African American in the first place, so pointing to their wealth doesn't result in an apples-to-apples comparison.


So does racism to non-whites determine wealth or earning potential or doesn't it? It's ludicrous to pretend that the racism of America only impacts the wealth/earning potential of black people...and then, only poor black people. If racism is determinant of economic outcomes for people, their base wealth shouldn't matter once they come here.
Do you seriously think racism can strictly function as completely determinative or not at all? That's definitely the sense I'm getting from this hilariously rigid dichotomy you're alluding to here and it makes it sound like you're completely oblivious about how social science macro variables actually function.

I also think it's rather hilarious that you find it absurd that racism against blacks specifically could ever possibly a more intense and/or unique form than racism against other minority groups given this country's history.
Quote:
If Asian Americans tend to be more wealthy than white Americans because of their base wealth and education level, and are unaffected by the racism of Americe, then it cannot also be true that education is non-determinant in the wealth or earning power of black people, as the author does in your linked piece.

He's not saying education is wholly irrelevant here. He's making a point about how tautological it is to say "get a full time job" as a prescription for success is since one of the greatest obstacles, aside from and in addition to education, is actually getting said jobs.
Quote:
How does it not when your author states that education level doesn't help black people's earning power because of racism? If the racism of America keeps educated black people from earning, why does that same racism not impact Asian Americans in the same way?
The whole point of highlighting how wealthy immigrants make up a large portion of Asian Americans is to dispel the very bootstrap snake oil that Shapiro is selling. At bare minimum racism is unlikely to erode the existing familial wealth but there's also the fact that a wealthy person is unlikely to actually emigrate unless the earning potential was in place already.
Quote:
Shapiro did put a control on the data, the author disregarded it in favor a statistic that isn't relevant to what Shapiro said. It's a rather disingenuous strawman, like I said.

It's not a strawman to look at the median wealth of single parent white households compared to minority two-parent households. You seem to think the switch from single-parent to single-mother constitutes some sort of huge GOTCHA, but again, Robinson's statistic seems perfectly relevant as a response to the logic of people choosing to be poor.

Quote:
Yeah, I know, because you disagree with him, not because Shapiro is completely unreasonable or hateful in his opinions and thoughts.

He can both hold bad opinions and make bad arguments for them. And of course also spout completely hateful rhetoric about the Arabs, leftists, trans people, and homosexuals. But don't dare let that detract from the presumption of good faith, as that would be downright uncharitable!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Democrats aren't losing elections because they call people out on bigotry. Promoting and condoning ignorant behavior doesn't work all that well either. And why you sit and state that there is more to him than just his xenophobic views the exact same thing can be said about Farrakhan if one chooses to do so. Farrakhan supporters will argue that there is more to him than his rhetoric on Jewish people yet all whites and conservatives see are his comments on Israel.

If we want to hold an argument as to which of the two has helped more people in their lives Farrakhan wins that in a landslide. However all people see are his anti semitic comments. Why are such comments acceptable in one instance and denounced in others?

As far as losing elections go if appropriately calling bigots out on bigotry causes Dems to lose elections ( I doubt that) then so be it. If a country is turned off by things that are ethically and morally the correct thing to do then so be it. Having strength of conviction matters more in some cases.


I don't know who you're talking to. I've never once referenced Louis Farrakhan on this board or probably in real life, either.

LTG is just going on another non-sensical rant.

I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


And you still can't acknowledge how there is a difference in the views expressed about Arabs and those expressed by Farrakhan about Jews. You display your bias each and every time and it is getting to a point that you are turning into a punchline.

Your only defense is Anti Semitism charges which really appear weak and frivolous because if i asked you to identify one time in which I stated anything remotely Anti Semitic you couldn't. I'd even bet money on it. That is how confident I am about it. I know what discrimination and bigotry looks like. Apparently you don't or you are very selective in how you choose to view it. Either way that is fucked up.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

LTG has a long record of antisemitism on this board. Is it really a shock he is now trying to backdoor defend Farrkhan? I'd say his support for one has shaped his beliefs on the other.


Fwiw I don't see it that way. Neither do most mainstream blacks. I personally despise Farrakhan, for a variety of reasons including his bigotry. Most of us don't like or follow Farrakhan, and view him as fundamentally the same kind of crackpot who elsewhere seems to be interested in appealing to others often in a lowest common denominator style like a demagogue who knows better, but doesn't care. Because clicks & views = $$$.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

LTG has a long record of antisemitism on this board. Is it really a shock he is now trying to backdoor defend Farrkhan? I'd say his support for him has shaped his beliefs on the issue.



How much money would you like to put on you not being able to find something Anti Semitic that I have stated? Use the search function.

Conversely lets check for all of the Anti Arab comments made by you. WHo do you think wins in the battle of discriminators if you will? Have at it and will destroy your prejudiced ass in less than 10 seconds. You hate Arabs and you preach about someone that has never made one comment about Jewish people other than that they are Jewish people being Anti Semitic. Lets roll you damn hypocrite.

WIth each and every posting you get exposed.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

LTG has a long record of antisemitism on this board. Is it really a shock he is now trying to backdoor defend Farrkhan? I'd say his support for him has shaped his beliefs on the issue.



How much money would you like to put on you not being able to find something Anti Semitic that I have stated? Use the search function.

Conversely lets check for all of the Anti Arab comments made by you. WHo do you think wins in the battle of discriminators if you will? Have at it and will destroy your prejudiced ass in less than 10 seconds. You hate Arabs and you preach about someone that has never made one comment about Jewish people other than that they are Jewish people being Anti Semitic. Lets roll you damn hypocrite.

WIth each and every posting you get exposed.

You're going to have to site some examples if you try to paint Shapiro and Farrakhan with the same brush. The problem is you can't.

As for your antisemitism, you have denied the Jewish people a right to their own homeland, denied them a right to self determination, and tried to spread lies that they have no connection to that homeland despite a historical and genetic record saying otherwise.

The only person getting exposed here is you.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

LTG has a long record of antisemitism on this board. Is it really a shock he is now trying to backdoor defend Farrkhan? I'd say his support for one has shaped his beliefs on the other.


Fwiw I don't see it that way. Neither do most mainstream blacks. I personally despise Farrakhan, for a variety of reasons including his bigotry. Most of us don't like or follow Farrakhan, and view him as fundamentally the same kind of crackpot who elsewhere seems to be interested in appealing to others often in a lowest common denominator style like a demagogue who knows better, but doesn't care. Because clicks & views = $$$.

You've never defended Farrakhan on this board. I expect most people wouldn't and for the reasons you cite.

LTG on the other hand has tried to defend him in this thread and others (the women's march thread for example).

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

LTG has a long record of antisemitism on this board. Is it really a shock he is now trying to backdoor defend Farrkhan? I'd say his support for one has shaped his beliefs on the other.


Fwiw I don't see it that way. Neither do most mainstream blacks. I personally despise Farrakhan, for a variety of reasons including his bigotry. Most of us don't like or follow Farrakhan, and view him as fundamentally the same kind of crackpot who elsewhere seems to be interested in appealing to others often in a lowest common denominator style like a demagogue who knows better, but doesn't care. Because clicks & views = $$$.



Yep. Most blacks don't follow him and I have had issue with him since I was a high school student. One of the reasons pertained to his demagoguery and hatred of Jews and also his unconditional support of Muslim nations that commit human rights abuses.

I also can acknowledge (to piggyback on Leash) some of the good that he has done. The Million Man March was a net positive. Some of the anti addiction programs advocated by NOI have been a net positive also. What in the hell has Ben Shapiro ever done?


Ogie is incapable of looking past his own biases and prejudices which render any opinion that he has useless. He views things threw biased lenses and I think more than anything he is incapable of ever looking at anything from a position that doesn't run lock step with what he believes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I should've known he was a Farrakhan supporter as it fits in line with his long established string of antisemitism.


That's completely unnecessary.

LTG has a long record of antisemitism on this board. Is it really a shock he is now trying to backdoor defend Farrkhan? I'd say his support for one has shaped his beliefs on the other.


Fwiw I don't see it that way. Neither do most mainstream blacks. I personally despise Farrakhan, for a variety of reasons including his bigotry. Most of us don't like or follow Farrakhan, and view him as fundamentally the same kind of crackpot who elsewhere seems to be interested in appealing to others often in a lowest common denominator style like a demagogue who knows better, but doesn't care. Because clicks & views = $$$.

You've never defended Farrakhan on this board. I expect most people wouldn't and for the reasons you cite.

LTG on the other hand has tried to defend him in this thread and others (the women's march thread for example).



Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".


I am certain that this is an exaggeration at best.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".


I am certain that this is an exaggeration at best.

yeah, he has never called for that and LTG will not find an example of him ever saying that.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".


I am certain that this is an exaggeration at best.

yeah, he has never called for that and LTG will not find an example of him ever saying that.



Infer from this what you want.

https://forward.com/opinion/388621/why- ... amophobia/

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".


I am certain that this is an exaggeration at best.

yeah, he has never called for that and LTG will not find an example of him ever saying that.



Infer from this what you want.

https://forward.com/opinion/388621/why- ... amophobia/


Peter Beinart :lol: :lol: :lol:

Also, not seeing anything in there calling for "the annihilation of Arabs"

Once again, LTG didn't read his own link before posting.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Tue May 22, 2018 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".


I am certain that this is an exaggeration at best.

yeah, he has never called for that and LTG will not find an example of him ever saying that.



Infer from this what you want.

https://forward.com/opinion/388621/why- ... amophobia/



That could very well be ghostwritten by Jorr, Curioushair and Brick.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:27 pm 
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Peter Beinart :lol: :lol: :lol:

Also, not seeing anything in there calling for "the annihilation of Arabs"

Once again, LTG didn't read his own link before posting.

We are laughing at sources in a discussion defending Ben Shapiro. And people wonder why this place sucks.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".


I am certain that this is an exaggeration at best.

yeah, he has never called for that and LTG will not find an example of him ever saying that.



Infer from this what you want.

https://forward.com/opinion/388621/why- ... amophobia/


Peter Beinart :lol: :lol: :lol:

Also, not seeing anything in there calling for "the annihilation of Arabs"

Once again, LTG didn't read his own link before posting.



I did it is why i used the word "infer".

Lets delve a little deeper into the views of Shapiro. I actually caught this "conservative Intellectual" on the pundit circuit and never thought much of him. Now i know why and it correlates to what Zeph stated. Bogus claims and intellectual dishonesty the norm.


Read this and explain how he isn't advocating in a "backdoor" sort of way for the annihilation of Arabs.

https://townhall.com/columnists/benshap ... rd-n976781

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Isn't it interesting how your defense of a guy that wants to wipeout Arabs is simply shrugged off by you and others.

If I defended Farrakhan show evidence or shut the fuck up. What i simply did was point out the hypocrisy of you and others when it comes to certain issues. Isn't it isn't interesting how you haven't once denounced Shapiro for advocating for the annihilation of Arabs. I'm wondering when someone will arrive attempting to change the subject. Guarantee someone will come along asking everyone to take the proverbial "high road".


I am certain that this is an exaggeration at best.

yeah, he has never called for that and LTG will not find an example of him ever saying that.



Infer from this what you want.

https://forward.com/opinion/388621/why- ... amophobia/


Peter Beinart :lol: :lol: :lol:

Also, not seeing anything in there calling for "the annihilation of Arabs"

Once again, LTG didn't read his own link before posting.



I did it is why i used the word "infer".

Lets delve a little deeper into the views of Shapiro. I actually caught this "conservative Intellectual" on the pundit circuit and never thought much of him. Now i know why and it correlates to what Zeph stated. Bogus claims and intellectual dishonesty the norm.


Read this and explain how he isn't advocating in a "backdoor" sort of way for the annihilation of Arabs.

https://townhall.com/columnists/benshap ... rd-n976781
You realize transfer has been part of the negotiations there, right?

I know you are completely clueless on the Middle East, but if there ever is a 2 state solution, Jews will certainly be transferred from their lands as well. In fact, 850,000 Jews have already been transferred from Arab lands since 1949 so it doesn't concern me that Shapiro asks the same. It's really the only way a 2 state solution could ever work.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
How the hell did a thread about HRC not taking her loss in a graceful way turn into a race thread? Oh yeah LTG showed up.

But serious now. Yes after wars and such when national lines are moved populations are transferred /shifted. Done all the time even after WW2,this is the only case where one side has refused to accept the mandate,wonder why?
Also,LTG,I don't know if you understand or know this but there is a difference between Arab and Muslim. One is a race and one is a religion. There are, hold your hat,Christian Arabs,but not a lot as whenever the Muslim assholes who live around them feel like it bomb them,shoot them or simply mistreat them in a myriad of ways. All it seems laid out in the Quran. Whereas in Israel,those no matter their religion,even Muslims, to live a peaceful law abiding life can live there as equals. Can that be said of the 40-50 Muslim majority nations?
No one really wants to wipe the Islamics off the face of the Earth,even me. If they just evolve from the ,let's face it,barbarians they are to a more modern viewpoint on relations with the rest of civilization then everyone would be cool with them,the whole,have a coke and a smile shit.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
ZephMarshack wrote:
He's not saying education is wholly irrelevant here. He's making a point about how tautological it is to say "get a full time job" as a prescription for success is since one of the greatest obstacles, aside from and in addition to education, is actually getting said jobs.


Of course, it can be hard to get a full-time job if you're black (for various reasons), but I'm surprised at how hard it is to do once you're over 40. Wasn't expecting that. (This is an irrelevant aside.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
chaspoppcap wrote:
Quote:
Also,LTG,I don't know if you understand or know this but there is a difference between Arab and Muslim. One is a race and one is a religion. There are, hold your hat,Christian Arabs,but not a lot as whenever the Muslim assholes who live around them feel like it bomb them,shoot them or simply mistreat them in a myriad of ways. All it seems laid out in the Quran. Whereas in Israel,those no matter their religion,even Muslims, to live a peaceful law abiding life can live there as equals. Can that be said of the 40-50 Muslim majority nations?



Do me a favor stop with the condescending remarks. The "Ums" and such leave it alone. You get too much wrong about this to ever be some sort of authority. I know the difference and I used them in a way in which they were synonymous because Shapiro views them in that way. If you are as familiar with the conflict as you proclaim yourself to be you'd know that he was referencing Palestinian Arabs.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22490
pizza_Place: Giordano's
long time guy wrote:
Do me a favor stop with the condescending remarks.


Oh. My. Fucking. God.

No way. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:


I know you are completely clueless on the Middle East, but if there ever is a 2 state solution, Jews will certainly be transferred from their lands as well. In fact, 850,000 Jews have already been transferred from Arab lands since 1949 so it doesn't concern me that Shapiro asks the same. It's really the only way a 2 state solution could ever work.


SO because it was part of the negotiation then that somehow makes it ok to do so now? Shapiro's declaration also wasn't a request you hypocritical asshole. His was the equivalent of a "removal". Are you familiar with how those things operate you damn ignoramus or do you need a damn education. They aren't peaceful that is why they are referred to as "forcible"

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2018 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Baby McNown wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
You act like people who disagree with you or like certain people aren't entitled to their opinions.

This is your entire board persona now. Shut the fuck up with the victim card.

Now that is irony....


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 838 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group