It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79537
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
denisdman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:

Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
If you're against racial injustice and police brutality, then you're ok with the NFL protests. Pretty simple. Now time for me to listen to men who are 6 times less likely to be affected by either talk about it.
1:20 PM · May 23, 2018


:lol:


Fighting the good fight. It's not binary. Most of us are dead set against police brutality and racial injustice. But with that presumably large group, MANY feel protesting during the anthem is bad form.

MANY feel protesting before the anthem is played is bad form. MANY seem to feel protesting at all is bad form.



Really? Where is your evidence of that?

Personally, I don't give a fuck if they kneel during the anthem or wipe their asses with the American flag on TV, but what Goff says is simply wrong. A person can very well be against racial injustice/police brutality and against kneeling during the anthem at the same time. That isn't really difficult to understand.

Agreed. It would be like saying if you think Jane Fonda spitting in veterans faces was wrong, you support the Vietnam war.


There are definitely people that think protesting of any kind is wrong. A guy I work with calls em "troublemakers"



Sure, but I'm sure some people just want to be treated like the paying customers they are and that really shouldn't include being forced to indulge those providing the service.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
TIL saying "black people constitute a higher percentage of the prison population than the at-large population because they commit more crimes" is a bigoted statement.

Are you open to the possibility that it may be a little more complex than that?


The statement isn't concerned with the "why" of the criminal behavior. Unless you are prepared to argue that there are a HUGE amount of false convictions, the statement is true and is not in need of further context.


What exactly do you think is the logical inconsistency here?

I find it interesting that in one case you want to delve deeper into the numbers and in the other you implore people to just accept the stats.

Just interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
Not long ago I saw a panel for women's rights in a middle eastern country (forgive me for forgetting which). There were over a dozen men on stage. No ladies. That's what days like this look and sound like.


Meltdown continuing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
So what, was he just cruising down a random street in Syria or Iran in his big, expensive car and just happened upon such a panel?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
TIL saying "black people constitute a higher percentage of the prison population than the at-large population because they commit more crimes" is a bigoted statement.

Are you open to the possibility that it may be a little more complex than that?


The statement isn't concerned with the "why" of the criminal behavior. Unless you are prepared to argue that there are a HUGE amount of false convictions, the statement is true and is not in need of further context.


What exactly do you think is the logical inconsistency here?

I find it interesting that in one case you want to delve deeper into the numbers and in the other you implore people to just accept the stats.

Just interesting.

Nothing JLN posts is interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22454
pizza_Place: Giordano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
TIL saying "black people constitute a higher percentage of the prison population than the at-large population because they commit more crimes" is a bigoted statement.

Are you open to the possibility that it may be a little more complex than that?


The statement isn't concerned with the "why" of the criminal behavior. Unless you are prepared to argue that there are a HUGE amount of false convictions, the statement is true and is not in need of further context.


What exactly do you think is the logical inconsistency here?

I find it interesting that in one case you want to delve deeper into the numbers and in the other you implore people to just accept the stats.

Just interesting.


Where did I say we shouldn't look for explanation of either respective factual statement? I even specifically said that the statement of fact made by Shapiro begs a request for further explanation and examination.

Just a poor, poor gotcha attempt. Do better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:40 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Frank Coztansa wrote:
So what, was he just cruising down a random street in Syria or Iran in his big, expensive car and just happened upon such a panel?

It was the #MoreThanKhomeini event.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17210
pizza_Place: Pequods
Curious Hair wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
So what, was he just cruising down a random street in Syria or Iran in his big, expensive car and just happened upon such a panel?

It was the #MoreThanKhomeini event.

:lol:

They had a woman there, Julie was just wearing a hijab

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
FavreFan wrote:
Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
Not long ago I saw a panel for women's rights in a middle eastern country (forgive me for forgetting which). There were over a dozen men on stage. No ladies. That's what days like this look and sound like.


Meltdown continuing.


I had to double check to make sure that was a Goff tweet and not a Julie tweet.

Next time he should take the extra 30 seconds to verify which country as it would help give the impression his concern was legitimate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
[i]Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
Not long ago I saw a panel for women's rights in a middle eastern country (forgive me for forgetting which).



No, he didn't.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:47 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38683
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:50 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19026
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.


If you already accept that blacks are more likely to be victims of police brutality what does it matter if whites interact with the police more or less often than blacks?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.


BOOM!

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17210
pizza_Place: Pequods
Hatchetman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.


BOOM!

:lol: :lol:

The guys he spots there will be really hung, eh?

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Someone please tweet that at him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

I find it interesting that in one case you want to delve deeper into the numbers and in the other you implore people to just accept the stats.

Just interesting.


Where did I say we shouldn't look for explanation of either respective factual statement? I even specifically said that the statement of fact made by Shapiro begs a request for further explanation and examination.

Just a poor, poor gotcha attempt. Do better.

I guess I misunderstood your saying "no context is needed"

I didn't know you meant "context is definitely needed"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:00 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The guys he spots there will be really hung, eh?

Their window will be open for years!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22454
pizza_Place: Giordano's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.


If you already accept that blacks are more likely to be victims of police brutality what does it matter if whites interact with the police more or less often than blacks?


Because I'd like to know what is the driving force behind the observed fact, as the statistics in the aggregate do not necessarily implicate an active racial bias in policing. Police interaction data (perhaps from body camera footage plugged into an AI) can give us a better understanding of what we observe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22454
pizza_Place: Giordano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

I find it interesting that in one case you want to delve deeper into the numbers and in the other you implore people to just accept the stats.

Just interesting.


Where did I say we shouldn't look for explanation of either respective factual statement? I even specifically said that the statement of fact made by Shapiro begs a request for further explanation and examination.

Just a poor, poor gotcha attempt. Do better.

I guess I misunderstood your saying "no context is needed"

I didn't know you meant "context is definitely needed"


Again with the gotcha attempts of a fourth grader. I didnt chide Jason for failing to provide or reference the context in which his figure is true. In fact, I specifically said "proceeding from that point of fact...".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.


BOOM!

:lol: :lol:

The guys he spots there will be really hung, eh?


hanged

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17210
pizza_Place: Pequods
leashyourkids wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.


BOOM!

:lol: :lol:

The guys he spots there will be really hung, eh?


hanged

It's all right, Taggart. Just a man and a horse being hung.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.

+ :lol: (sorry, RR)

Wow . . . you sure can find the soft spot in someone's armor.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Curious Hair wrote:
Jason would go to the Middle East to fight injustice, but he'd wind up being celebrated by local clerics because no one had ever identified more homosexuals.
This is part of why he is so salty.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
rogers park bryan wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

I find it interesting that in one case you want to delve deeper into the numbers and in the other you implore people to just accept the stats.

Just interesting.


Where did I say we shouldn't look for explanation of either respective factual statement? I even specifically said that the statement of fact made by Shapiro begs a request for further explanation and examination.

Just a poor, poor gotcha attempt. Do better.

I guess I misunderstood your saying "no context is needed"

I didn't know you meant "context is definitely needed"


Good catch. Whenever it is something that he agrees with it is never necessary to dig deeper. Whenever it is something that he doesn't agree with then we must invariably"dig deeper". It will become so deep with inquiry that the hope is that you will lose sight of what the original point happens to be. You haven't reached the point where you just have to address some irrelevant point simply in order to address an irrelevant. It is coming however.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Wed May 23, 2018 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:19 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19026
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.


If you already accept that blacks are more likely to be victims of police brutality what does it matter if whites interact with the police more or less often than blacks?


Because I'd like to know what is the driving force behind the observed fact, as the statistics in the aggregate do not necessarily implicate an active racial bias in policing. Police interaction data (perhaps from body camera footage plugged into an AI) can give us a better understanding of what we observe.


I guess I need you to say specifically what you mean when you said, "Goff's statement". To me his statement essentially was: blacks are 6X more likely to be effected by police brutality than whites [I'm not including the more nebulous "racial injustice" which seems impossible to measure]. You appear to accept this statement as true.

If you already acknowledge that blacks are six times more likely to be victims of police brutality than whites, what difference does it make whether or not there is or isn't a racial bias in policing? Even if you were to assume there was no racial bias in policing that still doesn't take away from the fact that blacks are six times more likely than whites to be victims of police brutality. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding your position.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:26 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
A player for the Bucks got tased for no reason.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22454
pizza_Place: Giordano's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Are we sure that, if we assume an interaction with a police officer, that whites are less likely to be victimized by unwarranted police violence than black people?

The aggregate statistics make Goff's statement true, and proceeding from that point of fact, I think it is prudent to then explore how likely white people are to interact with police officers relative to black people doing the same. I remember a study that tried to approximate "police interaction rates" using police reports, but not all interactions with police generate a report, in fact I'm willing to bet that most interactions, regardless of race, do not wind up documented in reports.


If you already accept that blacks are more likely to be victims of police brutality what does it matter if whites interact with the police more or less often than blacks?


Because I'd like to know what is the driving force behind the observed fact, as the statistics in the aggregate do not necessarily implicate an active racial bias in policing. Police interaction data (perhaps from body camera footage plugged into an AI) can give us a better understanding of what we observe.


I guess I need you to say specifically what you mean when you said, "Goff's statement". To me his statement essentially was: blacks are 6X more likely to be effected by police brutality than whites [I'm not including the more nebulous "racial injustice" which seems impossible to measure]. You appear to accept this statement as true.

If you already acknowledge that blacks are six times more likely to be victims of police brutality than whites, what difference does it make whether or not there is or isn't a racial bias in policing? Even if you were to assume there was no racial bias in policing that still doesn't take away from the fact that blacks are six times more likely than whites to be victims of police brutality. Maybe I'm just misunderstanding your position.


Would you agree that we should know more about the cause of an issue if we want to rectify it? But if you just want to sit around and clutch pearls feel free.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 10:32 am
Posts: 208
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
Say Bruh Metrics
Say Bruh Metrics
@Jason1Goff
Not long ago I saw a panel for women's rights in a middle eastern country (forgive me for forgetting which). There were over a dozen men on stage. No ladies. That's what days like this look and sound like.


Meltdown continuing.


Why would he be surprised by that or expect any less?

_________________
You must act as a man, not a boy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Curious Hair wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
So what, was he just cruising down a random street in Syria or Iran in his big, expensive car and just happened upon such a panel?

It was the #MoreThanKhomeini event.

More than Khomeni,
More than Khomeni to me.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 172 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group