It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:56 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 636 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 22  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5407
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
leashyourkids wrote:
If you compare them both at age 33 in the playoffs, Lebron is averaging more points, assists, and rebounds, and his effective field goal percentage is laughably better, and it's an important stat because Lebron takes more threes. His is at 62% while MJ's was 46%. Wow.





I remember some years back -right around Kobe winning without Shaq I think- people were using these same types of arguments to try and justify Kobe surpassing MJ. 'If you look at this stat on this pie chart comparing them at this exact same point in their careers you'll notice that Kobe.. blah blah blah'


lol


Fast forward to now, and almost no one brings up Kobe being greater than Jordan. Some years from now almost no ones going to be bringing up LBJ for this either. But MJ's name will still be getting brought up because he is the greatest, and the next great player after LBJ is long gone is going to be getting compared to Mike too.


Rinse. Repeat.


MJ is the greatest player to ever touch a round ball as of right now. And he'll still be considered by most to be the greatest to ever do it when the next Johnny Come Lately shows up and impresses all the math nerds with some never before heard of metric stat that can be tailored to make him seem like something he isn't.



Image

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
You're entitled to your opinion, but effective field goal % isn't some rogue, convenient stat. It's their shooting percentage adjusted to account for threes. Very good way to measure efficiency.

Image

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
The only efficiency stat I need is 6/6 in NBA finals and 6 finals MVPs. By my math that is 100%.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5407
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
leashyourkids wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion, but effective field goal % isn't some rogue, convenient stat. It's their shooting percentage adjusted to account for threes. Very good way to measure efficiency.

Image





So how many posts before we get to the Iverson crossover gif?



Asking for a friend..



Image

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
If you compare them both at age 33 in the playoffs, Lebron is averaging more points, assists, and rebounds, and his effective field goal percentage is laughably better, and it's an important stat because Lebron takes more threes. His is at 62% while MJ's was 46%. Wow.

Defensive rule changes have had the desired effect for the league.


Yep.

Can you imagine Lebron trying his floppy shit against the Pistons or Knicks?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
NME wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion, but effective field goal % isn't some rogue, convenient stat. It's their shooting percentage adjusted to account for threes. Very good way to measure efficiency.

Image





So how many posts before we get to the Iverson crossover gif?



Asking for a friend..



Image


I don't like that one. Jordan was old, and Iverson was young and spry.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
The irony here is that I have been a maniacal Jordan fan my whole life.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5407
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
leashyourkids wrote:
NME wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
You're entitled to your opinion, but effective field goal % isn't some rogue, convenient stat. It's their shooting percentage adjusted to account for threes. Very good way to measure efficiency.

Image





So how many posts before we get to the Iverson crossover gif?



Asking for a friend..



Image


I don't like that one. Jordan was old, and Iverson was young and spry.




lol


I was in this discussion on SD a few weeks back and that was one of the posters go to's immediately. We were arguing Kobe Vs Jordan tho.


Let's see what else do we have.. the Starks dunk, 'Gary Payton shut down Jordan in the finals and Seattle would have beaten the Bulls if they would have gone with that match up earlier in the series'..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72543
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
The irony here is that I have been a maniacal Jordan fan my whole life.

I find your takes odd on here. You keep maintaining you still as of now think Jordan was better but all you do is argue the LeBron side.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5407
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
leashyourkids wrote:
The irony here is that I have been a maniacal Jordan fan my whole life.





You still are bud. I know it.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The irony here is that I have been a maniacal Jordan fan my whole life.

I find your takes odd on here. You keep maintaining you still as of now think Jordan was better but all you do is argue the LeBron side.


It's because I hate you.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5407
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
The irony here is that I have been a maniacal Jordan fan my whole life.

I find your takes odd on here. You keep maintaining you still as of now think Jordan was better but all you do is argue the LeBron side.





He's just giving you a go FF. Such is life on a message board my friend.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 2609
pizza_Place: Lucio's
Have not read the thread but the answer is Jordan hands down.

The man was an assassin.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5407
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
It's a shame MJ came back to play for the Wiz at the end of his career after he had been away from the game for a while. I feel like prior to that MJ was never seen as a mortal in the sports world. Then he shows up in a blue uniform out of shape and slow and allows the world to see him play the game again as just a guy.


I have always wondered how different these discussions are if the last known image of MJ is in a Bulls uniform hitting a pull up jumper in the finals for the game winning shot..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
I wonder what their respective usage rates happened to be at 33 years old. I'm sure Jordan's was probably lower at that point.

Lebron rarely separates himself from other great players when matched up against them. Durant (who actually outplayed him during the finals) being the latest. Kawhi Leonard, Paul George, Paul Pierce during those battles against Boston all either played him to a standstill or slightly outplayed him.

Lebron has a little bumslayer aspect about him too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
@NME

I understand what you're saying, and it definitely didn't fit with the storybook career, but his time with the Wiz actually made me more impressed. He was still one of the top 10 scorers as he neared 40, and he did it against a younger, different generation of players. He was slow, though. All his points came in halfcourt setups.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93149
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
If you compare them both at age 33 in the playoffs, Lebron is averaging more points, assists, and rebounds, and his effective field goal percentage is laughably better, and it's an important stat because Lebron takes more threes. His is at 62% while MJ's was 46%. Wow.

I don't understand. His effective field goal percentage is higher because he takes more 3s. It's why Kerr has a much higher one too along with like 100 other players.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72543
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
@NME

I understand what you're saying, and it definitely didn't fit with the storybook career, but his time with the Wiz actually made me more impressed. He was still one of the top 10 scorers as he neared 40, and he did it against a younger, different generation of players. He was slow, though. All his points came in halfcourt setups.

One of my all time favorite commcercials was around that time featuring old MJ vs Young MJ. “You reach, I teach.” Think it was a Gatorade commercial.

Kinda silly tho that they implied old MJ would win. :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Regardless of allegiances, what Lebron is doing physically right now is incredible. He's still doing things he did when he was 24. He's almost getting better with age after15 grueling seasons.

He might be the career playoff leader in points, rebounds, and assists by the time he's done.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93149
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Regardless of allegiances, what Lebron is doing physically right now is incredible. He's still doing things he did when he was 24. He's almost getting better with age after15 grueling seasons.

He might be the career playoff leader in points, rebounds, and assists by the time he's done.

Oh this is just a troll job. How old do you think he is?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72543
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
Regardless of allegiances, what Lebron is doing physically right now is incredible. He's still doing things he did when he was 24. He's almost getting better with age after15 grueling seasons.

He might be the career playoff leader in points, rebounds, and assists by the time he's done.

Repeatedly going to game 7s against shittier teams tends to help the counting stats.

But yeah he’s great.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
If you compare them both at age 33 in the playoffs, Lebron is averaging more points, assists, and rebounds, and his effective field goal percentage is laughably better, and it's an important stat because Lebron takes more threes. His is at 62% while MJ's was 46%. Wow.

I don't understand. His effective field goal percentage is higher because he takes more 3s. It's why Kerr has a much higher one too along with like 100 other players.


Uh... only if you MAKE a lot of those threes.

His regular FG % is way higher too.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93149
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
If you compare them both at age 33 in the playoffs, Lebron is averaging more points, assists, and rebounds, and his effective field goal percentage is laughably better, and it's an important stat because Lebron takes more threes. His is at 62% while MJ's was 46%. Wow.

I don't understand. His effective field goal percentage is higher because he takes more 3s. It's why Kerr has a much higher one too along with like 100 other players.


Uh... only if you MAKE a lot of those threes.

His regular FG % is way higher too.

LeBron doesn't have a remarkably higher percentage from 3 especially since he plays in an era where it's much more prevalent and everyone seems much better at it. Just go look at the list of effective field goal percentage leaders. You'll see it really isn't a good metric outside of single seasons and you still have some unfortunate conclusions with players who played at the same time as MJ.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
at 33 the case for James is better. Jordan was in decline at that point though he was still the best player in the league.


Jordan in his prime was simply better.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
long time guy wrote:
at 33 the case for James is better. Jordan was in decline at that point though he was still the best player in the league.


Jordan in his prime was simply better.


I think we can agree on that. Jordan didn't have near the athleticism at this age.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
If you compare them both at age 33 in the playoffs, Lebron is averaging more points, assists, and rebounds, and his effective field goal percentage is laughably better, and it's an important stat because Lebron takes more threes. His is at 62% while MJ's was 46%. Wow.

I don't understand. His effective field goal percentage is higher because he takes more 3s. It's why Kerr has a much higher one too along with like 100 other players.


Uh... only if you MAKE a lot of those threes.

His regular FG % is way higher too.

LeBron doesn't have a remarkably higher percentage from 3 especially since he plays in an era where it's much more prevalent and everyone seems much better at it. Just go look at the list of effective field goal percentage leaders. You'll see it really isn't a good metric outside of single seasons and you still have some unfortunate conclusions with players who played at the same time as MJ.


I knew Lebron haters would twist everything to suit their argument, but I never imagined you would seriously argue that 2 is more than 3.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18494
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Image

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
22 games where he was facing elimination?

Loser.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 4:36 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57569
Terry's Peeps wrote:
22 games where he was facing elimination?

Loser.

Exactly.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2018 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5407
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Terry's Peeps wrote:
22 games where he was facing elimination?

Loser.





22 games coming out of the weakest conference in the NBA, some of those years on a super team lmao

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 636 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 22  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group