FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
For completely ruining the game of basketball with your emphasis on 3 point shots. For telling the world that they are idiots for thinking that the game is meant to be played and not micromanaged.
Well it's similar to the walk/shift/strikeout problem in baseball. It's hard to blame someone for optimizing their best chance of winning within the current rules, even though it makes for a worse viewing product.
Don't know if its the best chance to win though. Both game 7's were there to be won if they simply stopped chucking 3's.
In the ancient days a player like Trevor Ariza would not be allowed to take 11 3 point shots in an entire series let alone a single game.
James Harden would be benched MVP or no MVP for taking step back contested 27 footers.
Those are bad shots. Houston with all of their so called firepower failed to score 100 in 5 of 7 games.
That philosophy is screwing up the NBA. Gerald Green comes in and immediately starts firing.
I guess it's possible that EVERYBODY in the NBA community is wrong on the value of 3 point shooting.
Golden State and Houston also have very good defensive teams and played defense very well this series. I don't think you can only blame the missed shots. You have to give the defense credit.
Charles Barkley is in the NBA community. So is Mark Jackson. Kenny Smith too. They all thought it was stupid to keep chucking 3 point shots.
Charles Barkley says a lot of stupid stuff. I love him as an entertainer, but he's not very insightful.
Mark Jackson is a certified moron and would have ruined Steph Curry's career if GS hadn't luckily fired him first. He should never coach again.
Kenny Smith has been on record as saying the Houston strategy is the correct one to take on the Warriors. Maybe he changed his mind last night(didn't watch) but he has repeatedly championed that style of play throughout the season even while acknowledging it looks ugly when the threes aren't falling.
There's billions of dollars and hundreds of jobs on the line with this kind of stuff. It's tough to make the argument that all of those resources came to the wrong conclusion. Maybe though, who knows.
You said everyone in the community. I trust guys that have played the game much more than i do Darryl Morey about Basketball.
New Orleans had no problem scoring a hundred (4 out of 5) games against that same G.S.team
Houston did it twice and its not difficult to see why. People were laughing at them "in the NBA community" for that dumb shit last night.
Contested 3 point shots from 27 feet are bad shots. I don't care what data or jobs or whatever genius label you want to attach to that happens to be. Its a bad shot. The object of basketball is to take the best available shot. Whether its a mid range shot or 3 or layup.
They had more success attacking the rim. If they stay with that they probably win.
Mark Jackson interestingly is a moron because he doesn't agree with your opinion. Darryl Morey and D'Antoni aren't because they do.
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.