FF, is this a "reasonable inference" or a "definitive" claim?

Shove your attitude you half-wit.

It’s a definitive claim and unreasonable. Can’t say with any certainty. I was more speaking to the OP in regards to it being a reasonable inference.

Not everything is a court of law. GoldenJet's inference is reasonable.

Once again reading my whole response would be key to making non-embarrassing responses.

Also, your responses in this thread indicate this entire part of the discussion is irrelevant. You already clearly stated that it is not even a reasonable inference to think racism was a factor in the phone call.

You never had the makings of a varsity athlete.

The OP absolutely inferred there was a racial angle to the call. If you remain insistent on denying that it reinforces my belief that you are irrational in this thread and in most matters relating to racial topics.

I also never said evidence was irrational. I said proof and stating it was certain was irrational. Read better please thanks.

Only on the cfmb will someone tell you proof and evidence is interchangable and then tell you to argue better.

I love this place.

proof
pro͞of/Submit
noun
1.
evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

I find this thread interesting. JLN and WFR are by far the two biggest “white people are basically never racist” posters here and WFR specifically said his definition of racism would need to include actively trying to harm a minority. So yes, if she was a bitch to all races but reserved calling the police on innocuous actions to minority kids, that would qualify - and make it relevant.

The other thing you should understand JLN is that most of us aren’t wannabe lawyers and this isn’t a court of law. I don’t need to prove anything. All I’m saying is that I think GoldenJet’s inference is reasonable.. You being the “it’s never racism” guy that you are, of course you disagree. That’s it. We aren’t going to agree on this.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

Piiiiiissssss off. I've already played "Prove You've Called Things Racist" with LTG. Fuck you for trying to go there with that.

All you said was "I think she only calls the cops on black people" with absolutely no evidence to justify THAT claim, which you then used to justify your claim that the inference of racial bias was reasonable. You just kicked the can of substantiated claims down the road a bit further and proclaimed victory.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

Assuming that stuff like this is racially motivated is lazy, close-minded, detrimental, and counter-productive. There is zero evidence that race had anything to do with it. Saying this isn't a court of law is nothing more than a deflection.

For the Twitter mob who loves to label people "racist", the irony here is that they are literally being racist. Or at least prejudiced.

I also love how the OP is 100% sure this was racial but can't provide a shred of evidence.

I don't need to prove anything. There is plenty of precedence and enough evidence in that video to infer racial motivation.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.

So what’s the point of posting this? To show that racism is still a big problem? We don’t know this wome’s montivations. Evan if she is a racist what’s your point? That this proves racism exists? Easier ways to get there.

There is this strange logic game that many people want to play where we say racism is this huge problem, and if you even ask people to clarify their thoughts then you have to assume they are racist, which is the clear accusation by FF here. Maybe Rick can deputize you.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

There is also a need to say nothing is ever racist and even once established it becomes so what "deal with it". Easy to say when you aren't the one adversely effected by it.

For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.

He isn't a "it's never racism" guy. It's that many in society have become so comfortable calling anything "racist" that they don't even see how ridiculous they sound, and he is simply pointing it out. This is a perfect example.

It does nothing other than to piss off white people and infantilize minorities.

You should ease up on the infantilize minorities stuff. It doesn't come off well.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

What laws do you want changed to make society more “equal”? What specifically do you “deal” with because of racial bias?

You people act like it’s the 50s. (Meaning posters here.)

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

I don't need to prove anything. There is plenty of precedence and enough evidence in that video to infer racial motivation.

Great, then it should be no trouble at all to point out some specific examples of this evidence.

It's right there for ya, in black and white.

This woman creates cannibus treats for dogs.

It doesn't come off well because it's trying to make it seem like the very act of pointing out any racism is actually harming minorities. There are ways to say that racism is blamed too much without doing that. It's also shouting down an opposing position which is something you have suddenly become hypersensitive to.

You and others would be going nuts if people said your personal actions were actively harming minorities. Don't do it to those who consider racism a problem still.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.