It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:02 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 499 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 17  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
How am I in any way telling blacks or anyone else who to vote for? I'm arguing the exact opposite of that. I'm condemning people who assume certain groups should vote a certain way.



I specifically listed Sowell Loury and Elder. They have been telling blacks that they are stupid for voting Democrat. How is this any different?

Well you should be condemning those three also among other Black Conservatives.

Actually you are more likely to hear this partucular argument from the Black Conservative crowd. That is another way they ingratiate


If any of them say "_____ should vote Republican," I would disagree with them because individuals have different situations and values. But context matters here. You know as well as I do that there is an assumption that minorities should all vote Democrat, and that belief has existed for as long as I have been alive. Sowell and Elder are trying to fight against that myth, but they are in a very small minority. It would be different if black people already primarily voted Republican and Elder and Sowell were saying the same things they say now.



May be assumed i dont know but the reason that blacks vote Democrat is because the Democrats have promoted policies that are advantageous for blacks. Republicans don't and haven't for at least 60 years.

Reader and I have tried to point this out on numerous occasions and it always falls on deaf ears.

When blacks see that Republican are attempting to roll back Affirmative Action programs which benefit blacks, change mininum sentence laws, institute voter id legislation which prevents blacks from voting, then why would they want to vote Republican?

The problem with guys like Sowell is that they never provide a reason for blacks to vote Republican either. It always comes back to "vote Republican because the Democrats have failed you". Nothing is a panacea but i can point to a number of ways in which they haven't "failed us". I can point to specific policies which were designed to benefit blacks.

I can't say that about Republicans and the last Republican president to implement policies to designed to help blacks was Nixon.


THe fact that you bring up rolling back affirmative action programs and also demand to see the implementation of policies to "help blacks" seems to me that you want some crutches to help navigate the big bad world out there. I say those days and crutches are not needed anymore. People have to go way beyond this false notion that US is a racist country where minorities are persecuted. How about stepping up and challenging oneself not insisting on crutches and handouts? That is the only way any person gets ahead in this world, no matter what the color of his skin is.



No one receives more handouts than rich wealthy white men. Let me count the ways. The notion that they don't receive handouts is simply fallacious. If you bothered to read the article that i linked you will see how prevalent racism still happens to be in America.

Also for years Conservatives have argued (falsely) that Affirmative Action is destroying the black community. If that is the case then why is there a need to "roll it back"?



Here is my original point. WFR says this is ridiculous. This is a factual statement so how is this ridiculous?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This is pure incoherence. I said I am am against corporate welfare. I don't see it as a racial issue. As for affirmative action, you are addressing none of the points raised, and instead playing some identity politics game. I don't think white women should get benefits just for being female. As I said I would base it on economics. I am not sure what you think your are arguing.



How is subsidization not welfare? If you answer that then i will explain perfectly what i am talking about. If you can't then i'm done.

Simply saying something is "ridiculous" and "incoherent" doesn't mean it is and failing to provide context makes you look somewhat foolish.

My points on this are very clear.


You points are not clear. They are disorganized and largely incoherent. I said I am against corporate welfare. It's in the post. What the fuck else do you want me to say about it?



What i would like you to say and do the next time that you bash blacks for taking and depending on handouts is to simply realize that the money received by them from it is mere crumbs compared to those that really benefit.


There are people out here that have been subsidized more in a year than what Michael Jordan earns in a year or happens to be worth for that matter.

If we are going to disengage from government then blacks shouldn't be the only ones doing the disengaging.


This is why I say your points are disorganized. Disengage from the government is a very vague statement that could mean almost anything. In this instance it supposedly means end handouts. When I say welfare is not working as intended it means that there was not supposed be a permanent class of people receiving benefits in perpetuity. It was supposed to be uplifting and temporary. Affirmative action is the same thing. It was meant to uplift people not become a necessary crutch.

Corporate handouts have nothing to do with either other than the label of welfare, which is mostly a marketing term. The handouts are usually given in the form of tax breaks for the promise of bringing jobs to the area. The other examples you cited were tax breaks for luxury items. I don't see this asp;'. related to race in anyway or really related to the first argument in anything other than a broad reformation of how our society works. That's really the argument that most people seem to want to have when discussing these things, but they don't actually want to get into that debate (ending capitalism). So they make up some argument about how unfair society is, while pulling in massive fees to do talks at gloried cocktail parties. The last part is a shot at Coates - just to keep things clear.[/quote]


Affirrmative Action is the primary reason for the expansion of the black middle class. Somehow you see that as a crutch yet you fail to acknowledge that whites have also benefitted from said "crutches".


You also fail to acknowledge that whites overwhelmingly benefitted from "said" crutches.

I don't take cues from Coates so i don't know why you constantly reference him.

My essential point is that on some level everyone has been the beneficiaries of handouts.

Its why the lobbying industry is by far the biggest industry in Washington D.C. anyone that thinks that blacks are the only ones seeking to be "crutched" is delusional.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:

Affirrmative Action is the primary reason for the expansion of the black middle class. Somehow you see that as a crutch yet you fail to acknowledge that whites have also benefitted from said "crutches".


You also fail to acknowledge that whites overwhelmingly benefitted from "said" crutches.

I don't take cues from Coates so i don't know why you constantly reference him.

My essential point is that on some level everyone has been the beneficiaries of handouts.

Its why the lobbying industry is by far the biggest industry in Washington D.C. anyone that thinks that blacks are the only ones seeking to be "crutched" is delusional.



The bolded is pure speculation, and it does nothing to refute my issues with affirmative action, which are primarily unintended consequences. Do you think it's a healthy message to say you only have to be x percent as good if you are black? Crutch was the reference to that specifically, and now you are misusing it towards corporate handouts.

You keep blending in tax reform to this argument to the benefit of no one.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Affirrmative Action is the primary reason for the expansion of the black middle class. Somehow you see that as a crutch yet you fail to acknowledge that whites have also benefitted from said "crutches".


You also fail to acknowledge that whites overwhelmingly benefitted from "said" crutches.

I don't take cues from Coates so i don't know why you constantly reference him.

My essential point is that on some level everyone has been the beneficiaries of handouts.

Its why the lobbying industry is by far the biggest industry in Washington D.C. anyone that thinks that blacks are the only ones seeking to be "crutched" is delusional.



The bolded is pure speculation, and it does nothing to refute my issues with affirmative action, which are primarily unintended consequences. Do you think it's a healthy message to say you only have to be x percent as good if you are black? Crutch was the reference to that specifically, and now you are misusing it towards corporate handouts.

You keep blending in tax reform to this argument to the benefit of no one.



It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Do you think that it is good to say you are disqualified if you are black? Affirmative Action was created to combat that.


Do you have a problem when unqualified whites like George W. Bush are admited to Harvard? Or Trump to Penn?.

When i have time i will show you how whites have historically benefitted from Affirmative Action or Govt handouts.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:






I think that I am well off. I am white. Exactly what "handout" did I and people like me receive? Did I get something that any Hispanic or black person didn't receive? The freeking fact is that minorities receive more handouts from the government than white people do. Affirmative action, food stamps, welfare, housing subsidies, et al. All set records in the minority communities under Obama.
Now we have a president finally that understands that these programs are not meant as a way of life but as a life-vest. And that it is the overall economy that solves most problems. It appears that the Democratic leaders do not like for their minions to achieve economic success because if they have it, they LOSE CONTROL over the handouts and therefore lose their control of them when it comes to the ballot.


https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4589188


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/won ... 4e61d34817


Read the first example from the huffpost which is a hugely biased site. And it hugely talked about Corporation tax breaks not people. That sure as hell is not welfare. THe changes in the tax codes is all about more jobs being created which benefits pretty much everyone. And so what if the top execs make a ton of money. Most of them worked their asses off for those positions, took risks, etc. You want me to think that this is bad. Guess what? Poor people do not create jobs. THe wealthy do. That is also what the main spring to creating a middle class is all about.

THe biggest crock of midrash that the left tries to sell is this notion of socialism being good for society in general. That capitalism is evil. That rich people do not deserve to be rich. That companies should be controlled by the state. No country in the world succeeded in a socialism type economy. Some tried but returned to a modified capitalism when pure socialism failed.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?



Some months ago there was a special about a controversy at several Ivy League schools about their discrimination of Asian students with higher academic credentials than all other races. They had 4.0 students with very high SATs being denied entry while much lower scores were accepted.

Personally, I think that some of these institutions go way over-board trying to placate activist minorities at the expense of other races and nationalities. It is unfair. Entrance into any job or academic institution ought to be done fairly and equitably.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?



There were specific examples and you constantly overlook them. Just gave 2 and the article provide some such as: Ex Cons more likely to get a call back than college grads. Do you have a problem with that since you obviously didn't have one with Bush or Trump.


How about the studies of the 3 cities where 70% percent of the people surveyed were found to be hired via hookup?.

You seem to have no problems with Whites that "get ahead" because their mother or father was a high school classmate of the CEO. Merit based only seems to matter when it comes to blacks apparently.

Affirmative Action was created in part because highly qualified blacks were often overlooked. Nothing about this current situation suggests that anything has changed either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The Hawk wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?



Some months ago there was a special about a controversy at several Ivy League schools about their discrimination of Asian students with higher academic credentials than all other races. They had 4.0 students with very high SATs being denied entry while much lower scores were accepted.

Personally, I think that some of these institutions go way over-board trying to placate activist minorities at the expense of other races and nationalities. It is unfair. Entrance into any job or academic institution ought to be done fairly and equitably.


I think you missed part of the story. Legacy admissions had more to do with it than minority enrollment.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Hawk wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?



Some months ago there was a special about a controversy at several Ivy League schools about their discrimination of Asian students with higher academic credentials than all other races. They had 4.0 students with very high SATs being denied entry while much lower scores were accepted.

Personally, I think that some of these institutions go way over-board trying to placate activist minorities at the expense of other races and nationalities. It is unfair. Entrance into any job or academic institution ought to be done fairly and equitably.



That is merely an opinion.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 11:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

Reason and logic are good things.
I was of course mocking the tendency of IDW/Quillette types to prattle on about how reasonable and non-tribalistic they're being when of course all of that flowery language about reason and logic is window dressing for what's in fact glaringly ideological.

Incidentally I see Sam Harris has Hughes on as a guest today. I'm glad he could he finally have on his second or third black interviewee ever and I'm sure his choice of guest has absolutely nothing to do with Hughes telling him exactly what he wants to hear on racial issues :lol:

Quote:
You only seem to only want to play identity politics- such as saying that you only like "black conservatives". What you don't get is that the race of the people saying things does not matter. Nor should it. It's about the ideas. To say you only like that type of black person is stupid, and it's said to avoid discussing the facts and idea. So is saying things like "feeling warm and fuzzy," which is meaningless.
If it's all about the ideas and not the identity of the speaker, then why have you been in such a rush to share such a poorly reasoned and sourced article in the first place? It seems to me the identity of the author in question played quite a significant role in your signal boosting that claptrap.

As for feeling warm and fuzzy, you guys have had no hesitation whatsoever about casting aspersions on Coates and specifically his readers, so forgive me if you don't like it when that same standard gets applied to the black conservatives you enjoy.
Quote:
Coates is all about saying things like we need to "come to grip" about what happened post slavery. And that nothing like that happened anywhere else in the world. Both of these things are certainly debatable. Even the average student knows that blacks were not treated well in the country for a long time. It's a national religion, and something that you can't avoid. What I don't know is if that's a net positive.
This paragraph says absolutely nothing of value.

Quote:
As for post-slavery, it's been nearly 50 years of welfare and affirmative action. These do not seem to be working as intended. I am not saying to eliminate them, but both systems should be examined and fixed. And there should be massive change to criminal justice and the legal systems. But even with all of that you are not going to see much change in outcomes without a change in culture. I don't know how you or Coates can dispute that or say that racism is the sole cause of poor outcomes.

I don't think you can disentangle the cultural from the structural, particularly given that the latter form of oppression is still pressingly relevant today, despite your protestations to the contrary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 11:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?



Some months ago there was a special about a controversy at several Ivy League schools about their discrimination of Asian students with higher academic credentials than all other races. They had 4.0 students with very high SATs being denied entry while much lower scores were accepted.

Personally, I think that some of these institutions go way over-board trying to placate activist minorities at the expense of other races and nationalities. It is unfair. Entrance into any job or academic institution ought to be done fairly and equitably.



That is merely an opinion.


Do you believe otherwise? Do you think that allowing a person with lower qualifications to get into a school or to get a job than a better qualified person is fair and justified? IF so why?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?



Some months ago there was a special about a controversy at several Ivy League schools about their discrimination of Asian students with higher academic credentials than all other races. They had 4.0 students with very high SATs being denied entry while much lower scores were accepted.

Personally, I think that some of these institutions go way over-board trying to placate activist minorities at the expense of other races and nationalities. It is unfair. Entrance into any job or academic institution ought to be done fairly and equitably.



That is merely an opinion.


Do you believe otherwise? Do you think that allowing a person with lower qualifications to get into a school or to get a job than a better qualified person is fair and justified? IF so why?



If merit was the only way that people were hired for jobs or admitted to college then yes i'd agree but it isn't and has been for centuries.

The reason that Affirmative Action was created was related somewhat to this practice.


For years Conservatives such as yourself have fallaciously argued that it doesn't help blacks.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Mad respect to both of you for getting in the mud on a Sunday morning at 6.

LTG, I think you can remove the "white" from your statement. There are unfair subsidies for rich people in general. And I don't think anyone is in favor of crony capitalism.



I hoop on Sunday mornings so it is right in my wheelhouse.

Here is my point. I never said they were the only beneficiaries of it. They are the primary beneficiaries of it however.

Blacks aren't the only beneficiaries of Affirmative Action either yet no one has ever had a problem with the notion that it is a race based program.

There aren't a lot of blacks that benefit from corporate welfare.

If i say that corporate welfare overwhelmingly favors rich white men then that is a fact.

Blacks aren't the primary beneficiaries of welfare. Rich white men are and for me to say that is factual and i haven't heard one thing that disproves it.

Only way it can be disproven is if the notion that subsidization is welfare is disproven.

It can't be.


I don't think you'll find many people who will disagree that special benefits for individual people is bad. Within the context of poor urban (black) America, my argument would be that welfare hasn't worked, not that it costs more than other government spending.

The reason I don't get the Trump hate is that we MUST try something else, IMO. Regardless of who is at fault, poor black communities have a lack of fathers and ridiculously high crime rates. Of course we all agree that it isn't some genetic factor that led to this... it came about as a result of circumstance. No matter who is responsible, we should fix it. No one wants any group to perpetually suffer. When I drive on the south side of Chicago, which I occasionally have to do, I'm not going to lie and tell you I'm not on edge. I am. It's practically a war zone. But I'm also sad for the individuals who have to grow up in that environment. The welfare state does not appear to be helping. Democratic leadership in Chicago does not appear to be helping. Don't you think it's reasonable to discuss other methods?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
It isn't speculative as it is fairly easy to draw a correlation. Believing that it creates "crutches" is what is speculative.


Then draw the correlation and be specific about isolating the specific practice of affirmative action. It certainly has created a crutch look. At incoming test scores to colleges by race. I don't blame the kids. Saying a 3.3 is as good as a 4.0 is going to alter a person's behavior.

Do you thing having lower academic standards for blacks permanently was the original plan?



There were specific examples and you constantly overlook them. Just gave 2 and the article provide some such as: Ex Cons more likely to get a call back than college grads. Do you have a problem with that since you obviously didn't have one with Bush or Trump.


How about the studies of the 3 cities where 70% percent of the people surveyed were found to be hired via hookup?.


You seem to have no problems with Whites that "get ahead" because their mother or father was a high school classmate of the CEO. Merit based only seems to matter when it comes to blacks apparently.

Affirmative Action was created in part because highly qualified blacks were often overlooked. Nothing about this current situation suggests that anything has changed either.


None of this means anything. It completely avoided the question and used more imprecise language. And it based on data that exists in your head like the bolded. Then you fall back into Bush and Trump suck. No thanks. This is pure ignorance.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Mad respect to both of you for getting in the mud on a Sunday morning at 6.

LTG, I think you can remove the "white" from your statement. There are unfair subsidies for rich people in general. And I don't think anyone is in favor of crony capitalism.



I hoop on Sunday mornings so it is right in my wheelhouse.

Here is my point. I never said they were the only beneficiaries of it. They are the primary beneficiaries of it however.

Blacks aren't the only beneficiaries of Affirmative Action either yet no one has ever had a problem with the notion that it is a race based program.

There aren't a lot of blacks that benefit from corporate welfare.

If i say that corporate welfare overwhelmingly favors rich white men then that is a fact.

Blacks aren't the primary beneficiaries of welfare. Rich white men are and for me to say that is factual and i haven't heard one thing that disproves it.

Only way it can be disproven is if the notion that subsidization is welfare is disproven.

It can't be.


I don't think you'll find many people who will disagree that special benefits for individual people is bad. Within the context of poor urban (black) America, my argument would be that welfare hasn't worked, not that it costs more than other government spending.

The reason I don't get the Trump hate is that we MUST try something else, IMO. Regardless of who is at fault, poor black communities have a lack of fathers and ridiculously high crime rates. Of course we all agree that it isn't some genetic factor that led to this... it came about as a result of circumstance. No matter who is responsible, we should fix it. No one wants any group to perpetually suffer. When I drive on the south side of Chicago, which I occasionally have to do, I'm not going to lie and tell you I'm not on edge. I am. It's practically a war zone. But I'm also sad for the individuals who have to grow up in that environment. The welfare state does not appear to be helping. Democratic leadership in Chicago does not appear to be helping. Don't you think it's reasonable to discuss other methods?
I guess I’m out of the loop on this. Please explain what Trump’s plan is to fix it and then we can reasonably discuss the “other methods”.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
ZephMarshack wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

Reason and logic are good things.
I was of course mocking the tendency of IDW/Quillette types to prattle on about how reasonable and non-tribalistic they're being when of course all of that flowery language about reason and logic is window dressing for what's in fact glaringly ideological.

Incidentally I see Sam Harris has Hughes on as a guest today. I'm glad he could he finally have on his second or third black interviewee ever and I'm sure his choice of guest has absolutely nothing to do with Hughes telling him exactly what he wants to hear on racial issues :lol:

Quote:
You only seem to only want to play identity politics- such as saying that you only like "black conservatives". What you don't get is that the race of the people saying things does not matter. Nor should it. It's about the ideas. To say you only like that type of black person is stupid, and it's said to avoid discussing the facts and idea. So is saying things like "feeling warm and fuzzy," which is meaningless.
If it's all about the ideas and not the identity of the speaker, then why have you been in such a rush to share such a poorly reasoned and sourced article in the first place? It seems to me the identity of the author in question played quite a significant role in your signal boosting that claptrap.

As for feeling warm and fuzzy, you guys have had no hesitation whatsoever about casting aspersions on Coates and specifically his readers, so forgive me if you don't like it when that same standard gets applied to the black conservatives you enjoy.
Quote:
Coates is all about saying things like we need to "come to grip" about what happened post slavery. And that nothing like that happened anywhere else in the world. Both of these things are certainly debatable. Even the average student knows that blacks were not treated well in the country for a long time. It's a national religion, and something that you can't avoid. What I don't know is if that's a net positive.
This paragraph says absolutely nothing of value.

Quote:
As for post-slavery, it's been nearly 50 years of welfare and affirmative action. These do not seem to be working as intended. I am not saying to eliminate them, but both systems should be examined and fixed. And there should be massive change to criminal justice and the legal systems. But even with all of that you are not going to see much change in outcomes without a change in culture. I don't know how you or Coates can dispute that or say that racism is the sole cause of poor outcomes.

I don't think you can disentangle the cultural from the structural, particularly given that the latter form of oppression is still pressingly relevant today, despite your protestations to the contrary.


Sam Harris does not speak to enough black people. This is your argument. You have zero responses to anything and only have shallow responses to anything. Respond to the post in actual reasoned way. You have nothing to say except this is bad cause I say so.

What more do we specifically need to do about remembering or fixing Jim Crow that has not been attempted? And why is this the only piece of our history that we need to correct for?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Mad respect to both of you for getting in the mud on a Sunday morning at 6.

LTG, I think you can remove the "white" from your statement. There are unfair subsidies for rich people in general. And I don't think anyone is in favor of crony capitalism.



I hoop on Sunday mornings so it is right in my wheelhouse.

Here is my point. I never said they were the only beneficiaries of it. They are the primary beneficiaries of it however.

Blacks aren't the only beneficiaries of Affirmative Action either yet no one has ever had a problem with the notion that it is a race based program.

There aren't a lot of blacks that benefit from corporate welfare.

If i say that corporate welfare overwhelmingly favors rich white men then that is a fact.

Blacks aren't the primary beneficiaries of welfare. Rich white men are and for me to say that is factual and i haven't heard one thing that disproves it.

Only way it can be disproven is if the notion that subsidization is welfare is disproven.

It can't be.


I don't think you'll find many people who will disagree that special benefits for individual people is bad. Within the context of poor urban (black) America, my argument would be that welfare hasn't worked, not that it costs more than other government spending.

The reason I don't get the Trump hate is that we MUST try something else, IMO. Regardless of who is at fault, poor black communities have a lack of fathers and ridiculously high crime rates. Of course we all agree that it isn't some genetic factor that led to this... it came about as a result of circumstance. No matter who is responsible, we should fix it. No one wants any group to perpetually suffer. When I drive on the south side of Chicago, which I occasionally have to do, I'm not going to lie and tell you I'm not on edge. I am. It's practically a war zone. But I'm also sad for the individuals who have to grow up in that environment. The welfare state does not appear to be helping. Democratic leadership in Chicago does not appear to be helping. Don't you think it's reasonable to discuss other methods?
I guess I’m out of the loop on this. Please explain what Trump’s plan is to fix it and then we can reasonably discuss the “other methods”.


My initial point wasn't specific to Trump, but I did mention him so I'll respond.

Trump's "plan" is to advocate for America first. He has done this by lowering the corporate tax rate, punishing other countries for unfair trade, and reigning in regulations.

He doesn't have a plan that is specific to inner cities, but does it matter? This is my confusion with Trump haters. Every group in America is objectively better off than it was four years ago. Does it matter if the president paid lip service to them to get there? Obama didn't do shit for the working class. Should we be happier with him simply because he said the right things but didn't do anything? Or should we praise the guy who didn't say the right things but is presiding over one of the most prosperous periods in American history (for ALL groups)?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 2:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

Sam Harris does not speak to enough black people. This is your argument.
Nah, it's that he only wants to speak to black people who flatter his priors whilst downplaying any actual issues of structural racism. And that it's rather hypocritical of someone who goes on all the time about having difficult conversations and keeping an open mind to be blatantly seeking out confirmation bias and nothing more.
Quote:
You have zero responses to anything and only have shallow responses to anything. Respond to the post in actual reasoned way. You have nothing to say except this is bad cause I say so.
I said several other substantive things in that post, and neither you nor JORR have come up with any kind of answer about how it's appalling that Coates has white liberal readers but you guys are just being objective and real (and definitely not tribal!) while fawning over the black conservative of the week.

I've likewise posted several actual shortcomings in Hughes' article, most particularly lack of historical understanding about the Civil War, complete misrepresentation of the critics he's attempting to refute, and only the shallowest engagement with any kind of literature on the wealth gap possible. Compare that to your totally non-shallow posts about Coates several pages ago.

Quote:
What more do we specifically need to do about remembering or fixing Jim Crow that has not been attempted? And why is this the only piece of our history that we need to correct for?

This seems like a rather fruitless conversation given your refusal to admit to the existence of strucutral racism in the present at all in the first place. A far more robust welfare state and the kinds of job programs that Coates (and Sanders!) advocate for would definitely be a start, not just as reparations for past crimes but also as an effort to correct ongoing effects of systemic racism. As would not just sighing and shrugging about issues like Flint, the North Carolina voter ID laws, etc.

I suppose since affirmative action exists at top universities though, everything should be seen as hunky dory, and the current condition of blacks in this country are more the result of personal moral failings (plus as noted "scientist" Murray would say, genes) and a disinterest in pulling themselves up by their bootstraps..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
leashyourkids wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Mad respect to both of you for getting in the mud on a Sunday morning at 6.

LTG, I think you can remove the "white" from your statement. There are unfair subsidies for rich people in general. And I don't think anyone is in favor of crony capitalism.



I hoop on Sunday mornings so it is right in my wheelhouse.

Here is my point. I never said they were the only beneficiaries of it. They are the primary beneficiaries of it however.

Blacks aren't the only beneficiaries of Affirmative Action either yet no one has ever had a problem with the notion that it is a race based program.

There aren't a lot of blacks that benefit from corporate welfare.

If i say that corporate welfare overwhelmingly favors rich white men then that is a fact.

Blacks aren't the primary beneficiaries of welfare. Rich white men are and for me to say that is factual and i haven't heard one thing that disproves it.

Only way it can be disproven is if the notion that subsidization is welfare is disproven.

It can't be.


I don't think you'll find many people who will disagree that special benefits for individual people is bad. Within the context of poor urban (black) America, my argument would be that welfare hasn't worked, not that it costs more than other government spending.

The reason I don't get the Trump hate is that we MUST try something else, IMO. Regardless of who is at fault, poor black communities have a lack of fathers and ridiculously high crime rates. Of course we all agree that it isn't some genetic factor that led to this... it came about as a result of circumstance. No matter who is responsible, we should fix it. No one wants any group to perpetually suffer. When I drive on the south side of Chicago, which I occasionally have to do, I'm not going to lie and tell you I'm not on edge. I am. It's practically a war zone. But I'm also sad for the individuals who have to grow up in that environment. The welfare state does not appear to be helping. Democratic leadership in Chicago does not appear to be helping. Don't you think it's reasonable to discuss other methods?
I guess I’m out of the loop on this. Please explain what Trump’s plan is to fix it and then we can reasonably discuss the “other methods”.


My initial point wasn't specific to Trump, but I did mention him so I'll respond.

Trump's "plan" is to advocate for America first. He has done this by lowering the corporate tax rate, punishing other countries for unfair trade, and reigning in regulations.

He doesn't have a plan that is specific to inner cities, but does it matter? This is my confusion with Trump haters. Every group in America is objectively better off than it was four years ago. Does it matter if the president paid lip service to them to get there? Obama didn't do shit for the working class. Should we be happier with him simply because he said the right things but didn't do anything? Or should we praise the guy who didn't say the right things but is presiding over one of the most prosperous periods in American history (for ALL groups)?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I would argue that you are giving way too much credit to Trump when you say that. If we’re talking economics then every group did better in Obama’s last 7 years than they did in the years prior. You are swallowing the propaganda Trump is spewing without a critical eye. The 3 items you listed above are not universally accepted as positive in the long term despite the fact that we are still doing well currently as an economy (note: “still” - we were doing well before Trump despite the loud voices in the room).

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40652
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Great. Now I have to contemplate structural racism as I go out to dinner this evening. This is fucking awesome. I thought I only had to carry the recently reenactment of Jim Crow but I can also hold onto the structure of the whole thing.

Besides donate all my worldly goods and eat a bullet I’m not really sure what will help.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
ZephMarshack wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

Sam Harris does not speak to enough black people. This is your argument.
Nah, it's that he only wants to speak to black people who flatter his priors whilst downplaying any actual issues of structural racism. And that it's rather hypocritical of someone who goes on all the time about having difficult conversations and keeping an open mind to be blatantly seeking out confirmation bias and nothing more.
Quote:
You have zero responses to anything and only have shallow responses to anything. Respond to the post in actual reasoned way. You have nothing to say except this is bad cause I say so.
I said several other substantive things in that post, and neither you nor JORR have come up with any kind of answer about how it's appalling that Coates has white liberal readers but you guys are just being objective and real (and definitely not tribal!) while fawning over the black conservative of the week.

I've likewise posted several actual shortcomings in Hughes' article, most particularly lack of historical understanding about the Civil War, complete misrepresentation of the critics he's attempting to refute, and only the shallowest engagement with any kind of literature on the wealth gap possible. Compare that to your totally non-shallow posts about Coates several pages ago.

Quote:
What more do we specifically need to do about remembering or fixing Jim Crow that has not been attempted? And why is this the only piece of our history that we need to correct for?

This seems like a rather fruitless conversation given your refusal to admit to the existence of strucutral racism in the present at all in the first place. A far more robust welfare state and the kinds of job programs that Coates (and Sanders!) advocate for would definitely be a start, not just as reparations for past crimes but also as an effort to correct ongoing effects of systemic racism. As would not just sighing and shrugging about issues like Flint, the North Carolina voter ID laws, etc.

I suppose since affirmative action exists at top universities though, everything should be seen as hunky dory, and the current condition of blacks in this country are more the result of personal moral failings (plus as noted "scientist" Murray would say, genes) and a disinterest in pulling themselves up by their bootstraps..


Structural racism is a made-up turn. It's a bogeyman that we can never solve for. What do you want to do to correct for Jim Crow that has not been tried. Answer the question and stop with the jargon.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Image

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
pittmike wrote:
Great. Now I have to contemplate structural racism as I go out to dinner this evening. This is fucking awesome. I thought I only had to carry the recently reenactment of Jim Crow but I can also hold onto the structure of the whole thing.

Besides donate all my worldly goods and eat a bullet I’m not really sure what will help.

Seems to me you worry a lot about stupid bullshit Mike. Live your life and you'll be fine. I truly don't understand where you are coming from on this.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:

Sam Harris does not speak to enough black people. This is your argument.
Nah, it's that he only wants to speak to black people who flatter his priors whilst downplaying any actual issues of structural racism. And that it's rather hypocritical of someone who goes on all the time about having difficult conversations and keeping an open mind to be blatantly seeking out confirmation bias and nothing more.
Quote:
You have zero responses to anything and only have shallow responses to anything. Respond to the post in actual reasoned way. You have nothing to say except this is bad cause I say so.
I said several other substantive things in that post, and neither you nor JORR have come up with any kind of answer about how it's appalling that Coates has white liberal readers but you guys are just being objective and real (and definitely not tribal!) while fawning over the black conservative of the week.

I've likewise posted several actual shortcomings in Hughes' article, most particularly lack of historical understanding about the Civil War, complete misrepresentation of the critics he's attempting to refute, and only the shallowest engagement with any kind of literature on the wealth gap possible. Compare that to your totally non-shallow posts about Coates several pages ago.

Quote:
What more do we specifically need to do about remembering or fixing Jim Crow that has not been attempted? And why is this the only piece of our history that we need to correct for?

This seems like a rather fruitless conversation given your refusal to admit to the existence of strucutral racism in the present at all in the first place. A far more robust welfare state and the kinds of job programs that Coates (and Sanders!) advocate for would definitely be a start, not just as reparations for past crimes but also as an effort to correct ongoing effects of systemic racism. As would not just sighing and shrugging about issues like Flint, the North Carolina voter ID laws, etc.

I suppose since affirmative action exists at top universities though, everything should be seen as hunky dory, and the current condition of blacks in this country are more the result of personal moral failings (plus as noted "scientist" Murray would say, genes) and a disinterest in pulling themselves up by their bootstraps..


Structural racism is a made-up turn.

Made up?

You're really going all in on being the most worthless poster here. Congrats.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40652
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Great. Now I have to contemplate structural racism as I go out to dinner this evening. This is fucking awesome. I thought I only had to carry the recently reenactment of Jim Crow but I can also hold onto the structure of the whole thing.

Besides donate all my worldly goods and eat a bullet I’m not really sure what will help.

Seems to me you worry a lot about stupid bullshit Mike. Live your life and you'll be fine. I truly don't understand where you are coming from on this.


Dude if you have been reading this board the last year we are now living in the worst times ever. Nothing is good at all and it is your fault. So I suggest you figure out how to make good.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
pittmike wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Great. Now I have to contemplate structural racism as I go out to dinner this evening. This is fucking awesome. I thought I only had to carry the recently reenactment of Jim Crow but I can also hold onto the structure of the whole thing.

Besides donate all my worldly goods and eat a bullet I’m not really sure what will help.

Seems to me you worry a lot about stupid bullshit Mike. Live your life and you'll be fine. I truly don't understand where you are coming from on this.


Dude if you have been reading this board the last year we are now living in the worst times ever. Nothing is good at all and it is your fault. So I suggest you figure out how to make good.

Things are better than they ever have been in history, material wise. But yes structural racism a real thing that continues to exist in our country and the available data readily confirms that. But that doesn't mean you should feel white guilt over it and have it ruin your days. It just means acknowledging a simple fact and going on about your day like we all do. Not everyone needs to feel the need to correct all the injustices of the world every day they live.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Great. Now I have to contemplate structural racism as I go out to dinner this evening. This is fucking awesome. I thought I only had to carry the recently reenactment of Jim Crow but I can also hold onto the structure of the whole thing.

Besides donate all my worldly goods and eat a bullet I’m not really sure what will help.

Seems to me you worry a lot about stupid bullshit Mike. Live your life and you'll be fine. I truly don't understand where you are coming from on this.


Dude if you have been reading this board the last year we are now living in the worst times ever. Nothing is good at all and it is your fault. So I suggest you figure out how to make good.

Things are better than they ever have been in history, material wise. But yes structural racism a real thing that continues to exist in our country and the available data readily confirms that. But that doesn't mean you should feel white guilt over it and have it ruin your days. It just means acknowledging a simple fact and going on about your day like we all do. Not everyone needs to feel the need to correct all the injustices of the world every day they live.


White guilt is why you absolve Kenny Williams of blame and place it on Rick Hahn for 2014-2016.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
long time guy wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Mad respect to both of you for getting in the mud on a Sunday morning at 6.

LTG, I think you can remove the "white" from your statement. There are unfair subsidies for rich people in general. And I don't think anyone is in favor of crony capitalism.



I hoop on Sunday mornings so it is right in my wheelhouse.

Here is my point. I never said they were the only beneficiaries of it. They are the primary beneficiaries of it however.

Blacks aren't the only beneficiaries of Affirmative Action either yet no one has ever had a problem with the notion that it is a race based program.

There aren't a lot of blacks that benefit from corporate welfare.

If i say that corporate welfare overwhelmingly favors rich white men then that is a fact.

Blacks aren't the primary beneficiaries of welfare. Rich white men are and for me to say that is factual and i haven't heard one thing that disproves it.

Only way it can be disproven is if the notion that subsidization is welfare is disproven.

It can't be.


I don't think you'll find many people who will disagree that special benefits for individual people is bad. Within the context of poor urban (black) America, my argument would be that welfare hasn't worked, not that it costs more than other government spending.

The reason I don't get the Trump hate is that we MUST try something else, IMO. Regardless of who is at fault, poor black communities have a lack of fathers and ridiculously high crime rates. Of course we all agree that it isn't some genetic factor that led to this... it came about as a result of circumstance. No matter who is responsible, we should fix it. No one wants any group to perpetually suffer. When I drive on the south side of Chicago, which I occasionally have to do, I'm not going to lie and tell you I'm not on edge. I am. It's practically a war zone. But I'm also sad for the individuals who have to grow up in that environment. The welfare state does not appear to be helping. Democratic leadership in Chicago does not appear to be helping. Don't you think it's reasonable to discuss other methods?
I guess I’m out of the loop on this. Please explain what Trump’s plan is to fix it and then we can reasonably discuss the “other methods”.


My initial point wasn't specific to Trump, but I did mention him so I'll respond.

Trump's "plan" is to advocate for America first. He has done this by lowering the corporate tax rate, punishing other countries for unfair trade, and reigning in regulations.

He doesn't have a plan that is specific to inner cities, but does it matter? This is my confusion with Trump haters. Every group in America is objectively better off than it was four years ago. Does it matter if the president paid lip service to them to get there? Obama didn't do shit for the working class. Should we be happier with him simply because he said the right things but didn't do anything? Or should we praise the guy who didn't say the right things but is presiding over one of the most prosperous periods in American history (for ALL groups)?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I would argue that you are giving way too much credit to Trump when you say that. If we’re talking economics then every group did better in Obama’s last 7 years than they did in the years prior. You are swallowing the propaganda Trump is spewing without a critical eye. The 3 items you listed above are not universally accepted as positive in the long term despite the fact that we are still doing well currently as an economy (note: “still” - we were doing well before Trump despite the loud voices in the room).



Running up $12T more in debt to keep the economy "growing" is an economic plan?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Clearing the Air
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Great. Now I have to contemplate structural racism as I go out to dinner this evening. This is fucking awesome. I thought I only had to carry the recently reenactment of Jim Crow but I can also hold onto the structure of the whole thing.

Besides donate all my worldly goods and eat a bullet I’m not really sure what will help.

Seems to me you worry a lot about stupid bullshit Mike. Live your life and you'll be fine. I truly don't understand where you are coming from on this.


Dude if you have been reading this board the last year we are now living in the worst times ever. Nothing is good at all and it is your fault. So I suggest you figure out how to make good.

Things are better than they ever have been in history, material wise. But yes structural racism a real thing that continues to exist in our country and the available data readily confirms that. But that doesn't mean you should feel white guilt over it and have it ruin your days. It just means acknowledging a simple fact and going on about your day like we all do. Not everyone needs to feel the need to correct all the injustices of the world every day they live.


White guilt is why you absolve Kenny Williams of blame and place it on Rick Hahn for 2014-2016.

I appreciate the joke attempt but I've been clear on wanting everyone in that organization fired. Fire the fucking ball boy. Clean house.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 499 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group