It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 487 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Now the last unsigned draft pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 2:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The more I hear about this the worse the Bears look. Now it sounds like this won't be resolved anytime soon.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Nas wrote:
The more I hear about this the worse the Bears look.


Shocker.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I'd think the NFL would discourage or prohibit teams from guaranteeing financial immunity to players for illegal hits and resulting suspensions. That kind of removes the deterrence.


If I'm reading this right it isn't immunity from fines from the NFL. It's to protect the player from the team taking away guarantees because of ever evolving shitty NFL rules.


Yeah, I know -- I'm just saying the NFL can't be happy with teams offering to soften the blow for behavior that the NFL deems excessively dangerous.






And I’m just as sure that players aren’t all that happy with the double standard of the NFL wanting people to be willing to go out and sacrifice their bodies for entertainment right up until the NFL decides something done under that guise isn’t kosher using the illusion of ‘player safety’ as the back drop.. when what they’re really trying to do is avoid further legal issue because they don’t want to admit this is a violent sport, and they don’t want to take care of vets from the past that they already allegedly lied to.


Hypocrisy.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:19 pm
Posts: 980
Of course the Bears look bad. They run a business. We live in a time where it is popular to hate big business and anything tied to it, success, etc. The Bears are absolutely protecting against precedent. And they should be. These sports leagues have already surrendered a ton to players and agents. The NBA is joke now.

The Bears always have their rookies signed. They have a point on this.

And Roquan can have a point too. But personal responsibility is still a thing. If he cannot see himself playing football without guarantees against a bad hit, then he can go do something else. The real issue isnt the Bears. If players and agents want to truly guarantee against this stuff then they can take their fight to the league and their rules or put a lot of personal practice time in to making sure they dont get dinged.

But he won't have to because the Bears will eventually pay him. You cannot be in their position and win in the court of public opinion. They are evil.

_________________
"Mattress technology has come a long way"

- Dan Bernstein, 2016


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23838
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
mrgoodkat wrote:
Of course the Bears look bad. They run a business. We live in a time where it is popular to hate big business and anything tied to it, success, etc. The Bears are absolutely protecting against precedent. And they should be. These sports leagues have already surrendered a ton to players and agents. The NBA is joke now.

The Bears always have their rookies signed. They have a point on this.

And Roquan can have a point too. But personal responsibility is still a thing. If he cannot see himself playing football without guarantees against a bad hit, then he can go do something else. The real issue isnt the Bears. If players and agents want to truly guarantee against this stuff then they can take their fight to the league and their rules or put a lot of personal practice time in to making sure they dont get dinged.

But he won't have to because the Bears will eventually pay him. You cannot be in their position and win in the court of public opinion. They are evil.


On the other hand we literally just had a thread asking why the public now seems to side with management in worker disputes, with sports as a prime example. We really don’t live in a time where it is popular to hate big business.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:19 pm
Posts: 980
It is one of the defining factors of the current time we live in. It's why 30% of the electorate and one of the two major political parties are seriously flirting with socialism.

I have no idea what thread you are referring to.

The Bears are not going to and have not withheld money from guys who get suspended for infractions like this. They just dont want to want to be forced to. It's about precedent. And every team is watching this hoping they dont cave. They will.

_________________
"Mattress technology has come a long way"

- Dan Bernstein, 2016


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 3:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23838
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
When did we all start siding with management?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 6:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I'd think the NFL would discourage or prohibit teams from guaranteeing financial immunity to players for illegal hits and resulting suspensions. That kind of removes the deterrence.


If I'm reading this right it isn't immunity from fines from the NFL. It's to protect the player from the team taking away guarantees because of ever evolving shitty NFL rules.


Yeah, I know -- I'm just saying the NFL can't be happy with teams offering to soften the blow for behavior that the NFL deems excessively dangerous.


Roquan Smith will end up a hero in the NFLPA for his stance on this.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Hasn't this issue already been dealt with on other teams?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
So the Bears are coming off as shitheads here, but lets be honest about this whole thing. IMO, this would not be a problem if the NFL had rules that people could actually read and make sense out of.

Hopefully this gets worked out very soon.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Peoria Matt wrote:
Hasn't this issue already been dealt with on other teams?


Yes. Gurley and Barkley supposedly already have the language Smith wants.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Hasn't this issue already been dealt with on other teams?


Yes. Gurley and Barkley supposedly already have the language Smith wants.


So just the Bears being the Bears. I was hoping this wasn't the case.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Peoria Matt wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Hasn't this issue already been dealt with on other teams?


Yes. Gurley and Barkley supposedly already have the language Smith wants.


So just the Bears being the Bears. I was hoping this wasn't the case.


Smith is the first defensive player to ask for the language. So there's that.

But yes it seems silly.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
surprised Smith is the first defensive player. the NFL's new helmet rule this season--despite its prima facie simplicity-- could prove a confusing mess. The players most likely to get dinged by it (get fined and/or suspended after the fact by the NFL, beyond the in-game 15 yd penalty) would be defensive players making tackles.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
We will all have a good laugh about this when he has his first 4 sack game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
mrgoodkat wrote:
Of course the Bears look bad. They run a business. We live in a time where it is popular to hate big business and anything tied to it, success, etc.

OR

We live in a time when workers are standing up for themselves and there is blow back against the ridiculous but prevalent thought that employment = employer providing charity by giving a job to the worker.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
Of course the Bears look bad. They run a business. We live in a time where it is popular to hate big business and anything tied to it, success, etc.

OR

We live in a time when workers are standing up for themselves and there is blow back against the ridiculous but prevalent thought that employment = employer providing charity by giving a job to the worker.


There are all sorts of aspects to that. Not the least of which is people deciding not to live and die for a job but for a job to augment life.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 10:07 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Hasn't this issue already been dealt with on other teams?


Yes. Gurley and Barkley supposedly already have the language Smith wants.


So just the Bears being the Bears. I was hoping this wasn't the case.


Smith is the first defensive player to ask for the language. So there's that.

But yes it seems silly.


Another rookie linebacker has the language as well. Can't remember who or what team. That team apparently includes the language in every contract though.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 10:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Nas wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Hasn't this issue already been dealt with on other teams?


Yes. Gurley and Barkley supposedly already have the language Smith wants.


So just the Bears being the Bears. I was hoping this wasn't the case.


Smith is the first defensive player to ask for the language. So there's that.

But yes it seems silly.


Another rookie linebacker has the language as well. Can't remember who or what team. That team apparently includes the language in every contract though.

I believe it was the Bills with Tremaine Edmunds. He apparently has the same agent as the Smith, so that's one reason they're looking for the same thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
This kid has never played in a 3-4 ...he's gonna be way behind. The Bears continue to shoot themselves in the foot.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I think the Bears are stupid enough to let this ruin their season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
Just think of it as getting two first round picks next year!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 11:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
You have to know that it is the idiot Bears to be the team that can't sign its number one draft pick because of something like this. It is asinine. Smith was supposed to be a difference maker on defense on an improving team and he isn't even on the team learning its defense. This is all on the Bears management for making this an issue. They once again have figured out of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Bears hold all the leverage here..what's he gonna do, go play in Canada?


Last edited by Caller Bob on Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Hated this fucking pick from day one...why couldn't we draft just a normal human being?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Find a new team next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I hated the pick too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
They say that he's a hard worker and a quick learner.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16825
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Caller Bob wrote:
Bears hold all the leverage here..what's he gonna do, go play in Canada?



#XFL2020


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 487 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group