It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 4:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
If she can't raise a kid on $15k a month with the rest going into a trust then she's not fit to raise a child. I don't need her to prove what she's spending the money on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40652
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
America wrote:
like even 5% of this money is going to the kids.


America wrote:
Maybe not that far. But a large percentage of this should be put in a trust for the kids. She shouldn't have all this money.



This is the dumb argument that men often make (although with women being the main breadwinners more and more, they are now making it as well) as if they want the party that has primary custody- or parental responsibility, if you will- to provide a detailed breakdown of exactly how the child support is spent. Guess what? It doesn't work that way.


I get your point and I am gonna guess this is not the case with Blake but some women do misuse child support. From personal experience I can tell you it is not good tho hear your kids say there is no food in the house when you know what you give their mom.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40652
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
America wrote:
If she can't raise a kid on $15k a month with the rest going into a trust then she's not fit to raise a child. I don't need her to prove what she's spending the money on.


I think you miss the point. It is my understanding that the child should be able to live a similar life to what dad does or maybe how it would be if dad was there.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
pittmike wrote:
America wrote:
If she can't raise a kid on $15k a month with the rest going into a trust then she's not fit to raise a child. I don't need her to prove what she's spending the money on.


I think you miss the point. It is my understanding that the child should be able to live a similar life to what dad does or maybe how it would be if dad was there.

Why? Women who don't want children can just kill it in the womb at a clinic. Why should men not have the same option from a legal perspective. At least that way the child gets to live!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
It's a man's world. These kinds of things are just the taxes we pay for the privilege.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I don't know what any of you are talking about, but I wouldn't hire SpiralStairs to make a chicken sandwich.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40652
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
America wrote:
pittmike wrote:
America wrote:
If she can't raise a kid on $15k a month with the rest going into a trust then she's not fit to raise a child. I don't need her to prove what she's spending the money on.


I think you miss the point. It is my understanding that the child should be able to live a similar life to what dad does or maybe how it would be if dad was there.

Why? Women who don't want children can just kill it in the womb at a clinic. Why should men not have the same option from a legal perspective. At least that way the child gets to live!


Because as Steve Martin put it in the movie Parenthood, Women have choices and men have responsibilities. It is one of the great paradoxes of the world.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
America wrote:
pittmike wrote:
America wrote:
If she can't raise a kid on $15k a month with the rest going into a trust then she's not fit to raise a child. I don't need her to prove what she's spending the money on.


I think you miss the point. It is my understanding that the child should be able to live a similar life to what dad does or maybe how it would be if dad was there.

Why? Women who don't want children can just kill it in the womb at a clinic. Why should men not have the same option from a legal perspective. At least that way the child gets to live!


:lol:

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't know what any of you are talking about, but I wouldn't hire SpiralStairs to make a chicken sandwich.


Good thing I don't make chicken sandwiches for a living.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
America wrote:
pittmike wrote:
America wrote:
If she can't raise a kid on $15k a month with the rest going into a trust then she's not fit to raise a child. I don't need her to prove what she's spending the money on.


I think you miss the point. It is my understanding that the child should be able to live a similar life to what dad does or maybe how it would be if dad was there.

Why? Women who don't want children can just kill it in the womb at a clinic. Why should men not have the same option from a legal perspective. At least that way the child gets to live!

Sounds like an argument for a death tax.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:12 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
America wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
America wrote:
like even 5% of this money is going to the kids.


America wrote:
Maybe not that far. But a large percentage of this should be put in a trust for the kids. She shouldn't have all this money.



This is the dumb argument that men often make (although with women being the main breadwinners more and more, they are now making it as well) as if they want the party that has primary custody- or parental responsibility, if you will- to provide a detailed breakdown of exactly how the child support is spent. Guess what? It doesn't work that way.

I never said she should provide evidence of what she's spending the money on.

Don't put words in my mouth. Next thing I know you'll ban me for something you imagine me saying.



You're suggesting that she won't be spending the money "on the kids". How the fuck would the Court know whether the money is being spent "on the kids"? I don't think you have the slightest idea about the legal principles that are pertinent in a child support case.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Some guy should go to court and ask for the Blake special. It's horse shit that he gets to pay such a small percentage of his income in child support. There are guys working multiple jobs to survive because they got divorced.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Nas wrote:
Some guy should go to court and ask for the Blake special. It's horse shit that he gets to pay such a small percentage of his income in child support. There are guys working multiple jobs to survive because they got divorced.


Sorry they're poor.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:24 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
SpiralStairs wrote:
Nas wrote:
Some guy should go to court and ask for the Blake special. It's horse shit that he gets to pay such a small percentage of his income in child support. There are guys working multiple jobs to survive because they got divorced.


Sorry they're poor.


True. He's going to miss $3M a year a lot less than the guy making $50k will miss the $15k he pays in child support.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Nas wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Nas wrote:
Some guy should go to court and ask for the Blake special. It's horse shit that he gets to pay such a small percentage of his income in child support. There are guys working multiple jobs to survive because they got divorced.


Sorry they're poor.


True. He's going to miss $3M a year a lot less than the guy making $50k will miss the $15k he pays in child support.


Yeah 15k is more than enough to house, feed, and clothe kids for a year.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:19 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Downstate
pizza_Place: Woodstocks
Allegedly fake news, but terms are confidential. https://www.syracuse.com/sports/index.s ... pport.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2018 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
America wrote:
https://thebiglead.com/2018/08/02/blake-griffin-child-support-brynn-cameron-kendall-jenner/

That's what Blake Griffin's monthly child support payment is.


i just dont understand how long it will take before american men realize its not good to have kids

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2018 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
She is making more than the POTUS and VICPOTUS combined for the entire term combined doin one year.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He's paying less than fucking 1% of the $40M a year he makes on child support. UNBELIEVABLE!

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/no-blake-g ... 10368.html

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Someone teach Nas math.

oh nvm. I guess he's paying $32k a month.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 2:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24574
pizza_Place: It's gone
what happens when this guy's career is over. how is he going to make $250 K then? these guys must not think long term.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
HawaiiYou wrote:
what happens when this guy's career is over. how is he going to make $250 K then? these guys must not think long term.

What are you taking about? He'll just make more money.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: $258k
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
M
Quote:
Cameron is the mother of Griffin’s two sons, Ford and Finn. She also has a son with former USC quarterback Matt Leinart.

In a separate civil suit, Cameron claims Griffin broke off their engagement after he started dating Kendall Jenner, kicking her out of his house in the process. Cameron claims she only had $100 in her bank account at the time and was “reduced to being homeless.”





I’ve always found these types of arguments ridiculous, especially when a wealthy parent is involved. I mean, isn’t she just essentially admitting to being unfit as a mother and unable to take care of any kids lol?

Judges should just reply ‘ok, you have x amount of time to get on your feet and prove you’re fit to care for these kids, in the meantime -Blake, these kids are yours to take care of.’


It’s more understandable if Griffin insists on her taking the kids, or in a situation where the finances between the 2 parents are much much less. But something like this? Bullshit. That woman should be pushed by the law to get on her own two feet or you lose custody. Same for the rare reversed role where you have some broke ass dude trying to squeeze a rich/famous woman.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group