It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1686 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 57  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Hawk wrote:
I am extremely impressed by the discipline of both of the Bear's lines thus far. Very few instances of jumping off-sides like they did last year. Also, I have seen much better special teams blocking as well a coverage. Hope it continues.


I've noticed that too. That is a sign of good coaching.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Nagy has drilled them well on offense. There is absolutely no confusion or uncertainty with those core players they have.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky definitely is in command of what's going on too, he just cant throw the ball. He goes through his progressions, finds the open man or the outlet and then...the ball goes wherever. Past 15 yards its literally anyone's guess. The accuracy is the issue, not arm strength. He made one horrible read against Seattle that definitely should've been intercepted, but other than that his problems were all about his arm. And we know his arm is physically good enough to make the throws so he has some mental block, yips or nervousness that is really holding him back. He still looks a little scared out there sometimes.

One thing he definitely has is a lightning fast release. Nas wanted a positive? That's a big one that I dont think has been mentioned yet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
When he audibles at the line he generally gets them in a good play.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4765
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
When Mitch drops back, he jumps up and down with both feet like a bunny rabbit, when as a QB you're supposed to move you feet in place while scanning downfield. If you're jumping up and down, your not planted to throw and that might be Mitch's problem with accuracy and throwing for distance. He's not set all the time.

Don't the coaches see these things?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
They certainly do. But you cant make him do things in the game. You dont think EVERY WEEK with Cutler the entire offensive coaching staff didn't beg him to stop throwing the ball into trouble coverage? Of course they did. And he probably agreed, but the lights come on and sometimes guys are just going to be what they are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14924
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Dignified Rube wrote:
When Mitch drops back, he jumps up and down with both feet like a bunny rabbit, when as a QB you're supposed to move you feet in place while scanning downfield. If you're jumping up and down, your not planted to throw and that might be Mitch's problem with accuracy and throwing for distance. He's not set all the time.

Don't the coaches see these things?


I am sure that they do. He's got happy feet. A lot of young qbs have happy feet. Rodgers had happy feet when he was a young qb. Here we have a kid that had limited experience in college and was not developed at all by Fox. To me, this is really his rookie year. He certainly has more good things bad things in his skill set.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Mitch is going to make a lot of people look bad in this thread by the end of the season

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
A lot of unnecessary (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky hate IMO. What are a few things that you all like about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky right now?

He does make some nice throws, and a few of the overthrows are going to go away as he gets more experience. For a second year player, he isn't really that far off from where you would expect. There are full drives where he looks like the real deal. It's probably going to be up and down all year though.

I was thinking about your "first year QB stats are meaningless" thing. Is there even enough relevant history to say that?

How many QB's are we looking at when we decide that? Like 20?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
I was thinking about your "first year QB stats are meaningless" thing. Is there even enough relevant history to say that?

How many QB's are we looking at when we decide that? Like 20?
Literally all of them. Pick 5 quarterbacks you think are great and look at their rookie statistics. There will be almost no correlation to anything. Keep in mind it is about rookie year production. Of course a guy like Rodgers who sat for 3 years before playing will be more prepared than a guy who started playing in his rookie year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I was thinking about your "first year QB stats are meaningless" thing. Is there even enough relevant history to say that?

How many QB's are we looking at when we decide that? Like 20?
Literally all of them. Pick 5 quarterbacks you think are great and look at their rookie statistics. There will be almost no correlation to anything. Keep in mind it is about rookie year production. Of course a guy like Rodgers who sat for 3 years before playing will be more prepared than a guy who started playing in his rookie year.

Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:40 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

Tom Brady

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

Tom Brady
1/3 6 yards 0 touchdowns 0 interceptions.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

Tom Brady

Russell Wilson

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

Do you not get what Im saying here?

If it's based on 5 guys or even 20 guys, it's not enough to say it's a thing.

Roethlisberger was good right away.

You often said the rookie year has no bearing. Im not sure that's true. Of course most QB's improve from their rookie year, but that doesn't mean it's meaningless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

Do you not get what Im saying here?

If it's based on 5 guys or even 20 guys, it's not enough to say it's a thing.

Roethlisberger was good right away.

You often said the rookie year has no bearing. Im not sure that's true. Of course most QB's improve from their rookie year, but that doesn't mean it's meaningless.

Wilson, Ben, and Cam all had very good rookie years.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Russ Wilson was good immediately, Dan Marino, Cam Newton.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Yea but plenty of guys who start strong flame out and wind up being shit. Or just kind of fade into being less than what you thought. What about Jay Cutler or Marcus Mariota?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol

:lol:

I still think Dak is salvageable. Scott Linehan is a fucking joke and Jerry Jones or whoever the GM in name only is hasn't done much to help him.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
America wrote:
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol


I was an early bird in terms of shorting the Dak Prescott stock
viewtopic.php?f=90&t=108656


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
America wrote:
Yea but plenty of guys who start strong flame out and wind up being shit. Or just kind of fade into being less than what you thought. What about Jay Cutler or Marcus Mariota?



Sure Andy Dalton and RG3 came out great and faded. I watched Wentz his rookie year and knew he'd be very good.. Good pocket presence and he threw a nice deep ball, lotta downfield throws.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

Do you not get what Im saying here?

If it's based on 5 guys or even 20 guys, it's not enough to say it's a thing.

Roethlisberger was good right away.

You often said the rookie year has no bearing. Im not sure that's true. Of course most QB's improve from their rookie year, but that doesn't mean it's meaningless.
It is based on every quarterback that has ever existed. Of course some were good their rookie year. You also have Andy Dalton, RGIII, Mike Glennon and a bunch of other guys who had good rookie seasons and it didn't mean much.

To put it another way, these guys either didn't play or weren't very good their rookie year.
Brady
Brees
Rodgers
Elway
Warner

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Who is all though? You're talking in modern times? Im not doubting it, Im just wondering if its enough of a sample size.
The sample size is as big as you want it to be. Just choose 5 quarterbacks who you hope (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky becomes and look at what their rookie year was. They likely either didn't play much, or were average at best.

Do you not get what Im saying here?

If it's based on 5 guys or even 20 guys, it's not enough to say it's a thing.

Roethlisberger was good right away.

You often said the rookie year has no bearing. Im not sure that's true. Of course most QB's improve from their rookie year, but that doesn't mean it's meaningless.
It is based on every quarterback that has ever existed. Of course some were good their rookie year. You also have Andy Dalton, RGIII, Mike Glennon and a bunch of other guys who had good rookie seasons and it didn't mean much.

To put it another way, these guys either didn't play or weren't very good their rookie year.
Brady
Brees
Rodgers
Elway
Warner

Rookie years are not meaningless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol

:lol:

I still think Dak is salvageable. Scott Linehan is a fucking joke and Jerry Jones or whoever the GM in name only is hasn't done much to help him.

:lol:
Linehan has been the offensive coordinator since 2015, well puppet OC, since Garrett calls the plays, but whatever, these are the same coaches Prescott had as a rookie when everyone was in love. So all of a sudden, now, it's the coaching?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
America wrote:
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol


I was an early bird in terms of shorting the Dak Prescott stock
http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopi ... 0&t=108656

You were off on the Glennon comp but the Josh Freeman comp is interesting.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:39 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
America wrote:
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol


I was an early bird in terms of shorting the Dak Prescott stock
http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopi ... 0&t=108656

You were off on the Glennon comp but the Josh Freeman comp is interesting.


The Freeman fall was due to a mental illness wasn't it?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol

:lol:

I still think Dak is salvageable. Scott Linehan is a fucking joke and Jerry Jones or whoever the GM in name only is hasn't done much to help him.

:lol:
Linehan has been the offensive coordinator since 2015, well puppet OC, since Garrett calls the plays, but whatever, these are the same coaches Prescott had as a rookie when everyone was in love. So all of a sudden, now, it's the coaching?

It's always been the coaching. If you have five All World linemen and a great RB the playcalling doesn't really matter. Now it does.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
Remember when Dak Prescott was talked about as an MVP candidate lol

:lol:

I still think Dak is salvageable. Scott Linehan is a fucking joke and Jerry Jones or whoever the GM in name only is hasn't done much to help him.

:lol:
Linehan has been the offensive coordinator since 2015, well puppet OC, since Garrett calls the plays, but whatever, these are the same coaches Prescott had as a rookie when everyone was in love. So all of a sudden, now, it's the coaching?

It's always been the coaching. If you have five All World linemen and a great RB the playcalling doesn't really matter. Now it does.


So it's the players. Agreed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch Blows
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Rookie years are not meaningless.
In terms of being predictive of who is going to be good long term and who isn't they are.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1686 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 57  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group