It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 1:56 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:09 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Amazon can and wants to attract better employees...


I believe W_Z has almost written a book about the horrible working conditions at Amazon.

One of my friends who was an executive his entire career and worked most of it at one company that went out of business is winding up his working years packing boxes at Amazon for insurance purposes. He assures me that Amazon barely knows who its best employees are. This guy is way more experienced and educated than most of the managers at his facility. He tells me he sees stuff that could be improved for more efficiency all the time, but he rarely says anything and just packs his boxes for ten hours and goes home. He likes one of his managers so he'll occasionally whisper suggestions in her ear to try to make her look good (and make shit easier for himself). Basically, his take isn't much different from Zach's, the place is an exploitative mess.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Amazon can and wants to attract better employees...


I believe W-Z has almost written a book about the horrible working conditions at Amazon.

One of my friends who was an executive his entire career and worked most of it at one company that went out of business is winding up his working years packing boxes at Amazon for insurance purposes. He assures me that Amazon barely knows who its best employees are. This guy is way more experienced and educated that most of the managers at his facility. He tells me he sees stuff that could be improved for more efficiency all the time, but he rarely says anything and just packs his boxes for ten hours and goes home. He likes one of his managers so he'll occasionally whisper suggestions in her ear to try to make her look good (and make shit easier for himself). Basically, his take isn't much different from Zach's, the place is an exploitative mess.


Amazon constantly burns through workers. It's essentially what Marx's worst nightmares of dehumanizing work could not come up with. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/20 ... s-labor/4/

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I'm perfectly OK with companies raising wages as market forces dictate and right now it's a competitive job market so good move by Amazon. Isn't it nice how wages are going up on their own without government interference?

That is precisely how it is supposed to work.
It makes most of the excuses look stupid on why we can't have it be raised.

Most companies probably cannot afford to pay $15 an hour for entry level wages. Your mom and pop shops sure can't. Amazon can and wants to attract better employees so they have voluntarily opted to pay that wage. that's how it should work. Amazon's competitors cannot keep up and thus won't employee the best entry level employees.

Amazon is banking on getting better/more productive employees out of a constrained labor market.

Supply is low and demand is high for labor right now which means the price of labor is naturally going up.

If mom and pops can't pay enough for employees to clothe, feed, and shelter them then I guess they won't survive like the millions of others that didn't survive with a low rate.

The free market has failed to help low income workers for decades whether times were good for bad. Why would it suddenly happen now?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Amazon can and wants to attract better employees...


I believe W_Z has almost written a book about the horrible working conditions at Amazon.

One of my friends who was an executive his entire career and worked most of it at one company that went out of business is winding up his working years packing boxes at Amazon for insurance purposes. He assures me that Amazon barely knows who its best employees are. This guy is way more experienced and educated than most of the managers at his facility. He tells me he sees stuff that could be improved for more efficiency all the time, but he rarely says anything and just packs his boxes for ten hours and goes home. He likes one of his managers so he'll occasionally whisper suggestions in her ear to try to make her look good (and make shit easier for himself). Basically, his take isn't much different from Zach's, the place is an exploitative mess.

Even they think workers deserve more!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I would assume that for small companies under a certain number of employees their might be a waiver for the $15/hr. There are ways around it.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Curious Hair wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Does Amazon turn a profit? Or will their profit come when they are the only retail business left?

Amazon loses money on the retail side and makes faaaaaaat stacks on the CDN side.



yep, taking a somewhat recent quarter (Q4 2017):

Quote:
While the numbers from Amazon's e-commerce operations were impressive, the cash cow remains Amazon Web Services. Consider:

Amazon's North America e-commerce business delivered fourth quarter operating income of $1.69 billion on revenue of $37.3 billion.
International e-commerce sales were $18.04 billion with a operating loss of $919 million.
AWS had operating income of $1.35 billion for the fourth quarter with sales of $5.11 billion.
For the year, Amazon's international e-commerce operating losses eclipsed the company's North American operating profit. AWS had 2017 operating income of $4.33 billion on sales of $17.46 billion.

In other words, on an annual basis all of Amazon's operating income derives from AWS.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/all-of-am ... -from-aws/




Amazon sorta stumbled into AWS (Amazon Web Services).

Eschewing their fellow Seattle-ites MS products, Amazon from the beginning built an internal *nix-based IT infrastructure to handle internal IT tasks/running Amazon.com.

Eventually they realized they could scale up their internal IT infrastructure and sell off the excess capacity at a tidy profit with minimal effort.

They already had the devops systems in place to automagically spin-up new capacity on demand. The containerization/docker/kubernetes revolution of the last few years has only made that process cheaper/easier/more profitable; while skyrocketing demand for cloud-based IT infrastructure hosting like AWS or Google's Firebase competitor or even Microsoft's Azure offering.

Once people get comfortable with using virtualization/containers within their own IT departments, on their own hardware, it makes a world of sense to stop buying expensive-but-short-of-life and costly-to-maintain-and-host hardware every year and simply off-load your IT infrastructure to the cloud.

Bonus: once you stop buying and maintaining your own hardware, you can fire the neckbeards you were paying six-figures + benefits to write/babysit clunky bash/powershell scripts to keep the network and "boxes" up.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hussra wrote:
Once people get comfortable with using virtualization/containers within their own IT departments, on their own hardware, it makes a world of sense to stop buying expensive-but-short-of-life and costly-to-maintain-and-host hardware every year and simply off-load your IT infrastructure to the cloud.

Bonus: once you stop buying and maintaining your own hardware, you can fire the neckbeards you were paying six-figures + benefits to write/babysit clunky bash/powershell scripts to keep the network and "boxes" up.



Larry Ellison was a man ahead of his time.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
How the heck has Ellison escaped being #MeToo'd. Maybe having your own island makes you untouchable. Same for Richard Branson.

Amazon keeps saying they're going to ween themselves off of Oracle's database products and shift to their homegrown Amazon Aurora database product...but then I see they have ~3 dozen standing orders for various flavors of Oracle DBA's across their various locations. Doesn't sound like a company about to stop writing $60 million checks to Oracle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Every person should make $75 per hour. That equates to roughly $150k per year, so that way every person in America can afford nice food, great car, good housing. Perfect world.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Heisenberg wrote:
Every person should make $75 per hour. That equates to roughly $150k per year, so that way every person in America can afford nice food, great car, good housing. Perfect world.

You have yet to answer. What should the minimum wage be?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Every person should make $75 per hour. That equates to roughly $150k per year, so that way every person in America can afford nice food, great car, good housing. Perfect world.

You have yet to answer. What should the minimum wage be?

What the market dictates.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Heisenberg wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Every person should make $75 per hour. That equates to roughly $150k per year, so that way every person in America can afford nice food, great car, good housing. Perfect world.

You have yet to answer. What should the minimum wage be?

What the market dictates.
That means no minimum wage at all?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
Every person should make $75 per hour. That equates to roughly $150k per year, so that way every person in America can afford nice food, great car, good housing. Perfect world.

You have yet to answer. What should the minimum wage be?

What the market dictates.
That means no minimum wage at all?

I’m ok with a floor of some sort. But the Panda Express by my house has a sign up for $12 an hour, so I don’t think we need the government saying Panda should be paying $75 per hour, although that would make their employees very happy, temporarily. Of course, no one could afford Panda anymore, so they would go out of business.

It’s weird that you are clearly intelligent, but cannot see the folly of artificial wage supports.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Heisenberg wrote:
It’s weird that you are clearly intelligent, but cannot see the folly of artificial wage supports.


I already tried to teach him about Adam Smith and all that but he doesn't bother to understand.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
:D :D
Hatchetman wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
It’s weird that you are clearly intelligent, but cannot see the folly of artificial wage supports.


I already tried to teach him about Adam Smith and all that but he doesn't bother to understand.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Heisenberg wrote:
I’m ok with a floor of some sort. But the Panda Express by my house has a sign up for $12 an hour, so I don’t think we need the government saying Panda should be paying $75 per hour, although that would make their employees very happy, temporarily. Of course, no one could afford Panda anymore, so they would go out of business.
Where is this $75 an hour straw man coming from? I'm asking a simple question. If you don't like $15 then tell me what it should be.

Heisenberg wrote:
It’s weird that you are clearly intelligent, but cannot see the folly of artificial wage supports.
What is the folly?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
I’m ok with a floor of some sort. But the Panda Express by my house has a sign up for $12 an hour, so I don’t think we need the government saying Panda should be paying $75 per hour, although that would make their employees very happy, temporarily. Of course, no one could afford Panda anymore, so they would go out of business.
Where is this $75 an hour straw man coming from? I'm asking a simple question. If you don't like $15 then tell me what it should be.

Heisenberg wrote:
It’s weird that you are clearly intelligent, but cannot see the folly of artificial wage supports.
What is the folly?

The minimum wage should be $75 per hour so everyone can live happily with nice cars, a house, and vacations. The entire economy would benefit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
The "invisible hand" just so happens to use that hand to suppress wages down to the point where you can work a full time job and not feed, clothe, and shelter yourself. As I said before, why don't we let the invisible hand also handle all environmental protections? The invisible hand will eventually figure out that black water and lead in the water is bad for business.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Heisenberg wrote:
The minimum wage should be $75 per hour so everyone can live happily with nice cars, a house, and vacations. The entire economy would benefit.
Oh, by folly you meant made up arguments used to avoid answering a question that should be pretty simple. Well, I was using the first definition of folly.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The "invisible hand" just so happens to use that hand to suppress wages down to the point where you can work a full time job and not feed, clothe, and shelter yourself. As I said before, why don't we let the invisible hand also handle all environmental protections? The invisible hand will eventually figure out that black water and lead in the water is bad for business.


Those are well covered issues in Economic Theory. It happens because no one individually owns the air. But that might be a good idea.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:31 pm
Posts: 1379
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
The minimum wage should be $75 per hour so everyone can live happily with nice cars, a house, and vacations. The entire economy would benefit.
Oh, by folly you meant made up arguments used to avoid answering a question that should be pretty simple. Well, I was using the first definition of folly.

Sorry. The minimum wage should be $100 per hour so everyone can drive an eco-friendly Tesla.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Hatchetman wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The "invisible hand" just so happens to use that hand to suppress wages down to the point where you can work a full time job and not feed, clothe, and shelter yourself. As I said before, why don't we let the invisible hand also handle all environmental protections? The invisible hand will eventually figure out that black water and lead in the water is bad for business.


Those are well covered issues in Economic Theory. It happens because no one individually owns the air. But that might be a good idea.
Oh, an ECON 101 response.

For as long as we as a people have to take the burden of the poor who can't feed, clothe, and shelter themselves it should be viewed the same way as we have to take the burden of polluted lakes and air.

Now, as I've argued before, a good alternative solution would be to make it illegal for any company above 50 employees to hire someone on any sort of government welfare. Let the "invisible hand" compete with that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16827
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Using the minimum wage to leverage private industry as redistributors of wealth and achievers of social justice seems like a less-than-optimal/bad way to go.

One thing I've noticed even free-market economist types (e.g., uber-Adam Smith-ian Russ Roberts) supporting is some form of universal basic income. And they sometimes do so logically as a substitute for jacking up the minimum wage. After all, what good will a minimum wage hike do for a taxi driver replaced by a self-driving uber/lyft; or a mcdonald's cashier/grocery store checkout girl replaced by a computerized kiosk. etc.

For those not yet replaced by robots, the idea is that a low-wage worker who makes say $10 stocking Wal-Mart shelves with cheap chinese crap might also get the equivalent of $10 an hour in EITC (Earned Income Tax Credit), or whatever implementation of basic income. Of course, then smart, cheap companies like Wal-Mart might then build that government subsidy into their compensation plan and leave people at $10 an hour ad infinitum.


Last edited by Hussra on Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55998
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Who knew the evil meth man was this easy to rattle?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Heisenberg wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Heisenberg wrote:
The minimum wage should be $75 per hour so everyone can live happily with nice cars, a house, and vacations. The entire economy would benefit.
Oh, by folly you meant made up arguments used to avoid answering a question that should be pretty simple. Well, I was using the first definition of folly.

Sorry. The minimum wage should be $100 per hour so everyone can drive an eco-friendly Tesla.

I respect your dedication to being disingenuous.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10112
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Amazon can and wants to attract better employees...


I believe W_Z has almost written a book about the horrible working conditions at Amazon.

One of my friends who was an executive his entire career and worked most of it at one company that went out of business is winding up his working years packing boxes at Amazon for insurance purposes. He assures me that Amazon barely knows who its best employees are. This guy is way more experienced and educated than most of the managers at his facility. He tells me he sees stuff that could be improved for more efficiency all the time, but he rarely says anything and just packs his boxes for ten hours and goes home. He likes one of his managers so he'll occasionally whisper suggestions in her ear to try to make her look good (and make shit easier for himself). Basically, his take isn't much different from Zach's, the place is an exploitative mess.

My dad had a job like that at Panera for 15 years, not for the insurance as he was already in his late 60s when he started, but just to get out of the house and talk with customers. He had owned restaurants for 40 years, and was willing to work for $13/hour out in front for a few hours most weekdays for some spending money - he refused to take cash because he felt their register management system was too easy to abuse in somebody else's name. It was a real challenge for him to not try and put in operational improvements. But the first year he worked there, the location blew every other location out of the water in bakery sales and the regional managers had to come talk with him to find out how he was upselling the customers while they were waiting in line or sitting finishing their meals. [My dad grew up peddling tomatoes on a donkey in the countryside to people who could only pay in olive oil, so convincing a bunch of DuPage residents to buy a mediocre cinnamon roll wasn't exactly a challenge.]

So then one of the regional managers would make it his business to come sit with my dad every couple of months for about 30 minutes and let my dad give him an honest appraisal of what was working and what needed fixing. Said regional manager told the various store manager(s) over time to leave him the fuck alone, and all but one manager followed that advice.

Good organizations keep learning from their best minions, even when they get big.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Heisenberg wrote:
Every person should make $75 per hour. That equates to roughly $150k per year, so that way every person in America can afford nice food, great car, good housing. Perfect world.

Good point. While we're at it, why not eliminate all taxes since lowering taxes is believed to be a benefit to the economy.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
[
Now, as I've argued before, a good alternative solution would be to make it illegal for any company above 50 employees to hire someone on any sort of government welfare. Let the "invisible hand" compete with that.


I would be fine with that. Like I've tried to explain (fruitlessly) many times before, when you raise the price of something (workers), less of it is purchased. That is a fact. Cannot be denied. If you want to hep poor people, just give them the dough and let them figure it out.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10112
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
In olden times, when the elders of an area decided that they had too many poor stupid people, they would start a war to conquer another area. A side benefit was that many of the poor stupid people would get killed in battle, and you didn't have to pay them enough to have their own cow and candles, and you could distributed the dead peoples' cows and candles to others and they'd think their lot in life was improving.

Then electricity and the Internet came along and fucked it up for everybody.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
Hatchetman wrote:
I would be fine with that. Like I've tried to explain (fruitlessly) many times before, when you raise the price of something (workers), less of it is purchased. That is a fact. Cannot be denied. If you want to hep poor people, just give them the dough and let them figure it out.
That isn't a fact, and one page from your ECON 101 book doesn't make it a fact. So, is this move going to really hurt Amazon? Why are they doing it?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group