It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 7:18 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
What happened to the original thread title?

Darkhorse MVP! :lol:

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Furious Styles wrote:
What happened to the original thread title?

Darkhorse MVP! :lol:


After self reflection, I didn't find it politically correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Hatchetman wrote:
I've been watching Lavine on defense. It's not that he's not trying, he's just really bad at it.


Lavine is not bad on the ball but he is terrible off the ball. He gets rung up on screens and he turns his head a lot.
He should be better defensively but he might turn out to be serviceable.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nas wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Is this guy for real or is he just the best player on a bad team? I am getting pretty excited that the Bulls have a real star.

And I wish people would stop saying Cam Payne (sounds like campaign). Just call him Payne.


It's a bad team but he appears to have taken a step.


$20 Million looks like a bargain now.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Through the Bulls first 8 games, Zach Lavine is a -78. He has only had two games with a positive +/-, +5 and +3.

In his four games scoring 30 points or more, he is a -28 and he was positive in none of them.

More more Lavine plays (and scores), the more the Bulls lose by.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
+/- is useless for evaluating basketball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Caller Bob wrote:
+/- is useless for evaluating basketball.

In a single game, to evaluate a single player, you may be right.

But Lavine has been in the league for five years now. When he is on the court, the other team is outscoring his team. He directly contributes to his team losing. He often has the single worst +/- on the team. Zach Lavine isn't the first of his kind. Recent NBA history is full of these Monta Ellis type players. If you are simply looking at points in a box score and nothing else, they may look like good players.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Get a (real) coach that teaches defense, mix in some very good defenders and you can hide his defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:
Through the Bulls first 8 games, Zach Lavine is a -78. He has only had two games with a positive +/-, +5 and +3.

In his four games scoring 30 points or more, he is a -28 and he was positive in none of them.

More more Lavine plays (and scores), the more the Bulls lose by.



How much of this was accrued during the G.S. game?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:10 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
IMU wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
+/- is useless for evaluating basketball.

In a single game, to evaluate a single player, you may be right.
So in a single game, a stat may not tell the whole story. But when you have a large enough sample size of said stat, it can tell you something about the player.

Interesting.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Caller Bob wrote:
Get a (real) coach that teaches defense, mix in some very good defenders and you can hide his defense.


I actually agree. I didn't know if he was a guy you could win with but now i am convinced that he is. Lavine has No. 1 scoring option type ability. Those kind of guys don't grow on trees.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
This thread reminds me of the 70s and 80s where Sox fans called Chet Lemon and Harold "our" all stars.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Regular Reader wrote:
This thread reminds me of the 70s and 80s where Sox fans called Chet Lemon and Harold "our" all stars.

The White Sox retiring Baines number in 1989, while still playing is still one of the most bizarre things ever :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Letting Omar Vizquel use a retired number (11) was even stranger.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Two games now he goes for the winning shot and loses the ball. WTF?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
IMU wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
+/- is useless for evaluating basketball.

In a single game, to evaluate a single player, you may be right.
So in a single game, a stat may not tell the whole story. But when you have a large enough sample size of said stat, it can tell you something about the player.

Interesting.

Yes. Think of it as runs and pitcher losses. Max Scherzer sometimes gives up 0 ER and loses. Is Max Scherzer a bad pitcher?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
long time guy wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Get a (real) coach that teaches defense, mix in some very good defenders and you can hide his defense.


I actually agree. I didn't know if he was a guy you could win with but now i am convinced that he is. Lavine has No. 1 scoring option type ability. Those kind of guys don't grow on trees.

Zach Lavine couldn't even start on half the playoff teams in the league.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Get a (real) coach that teaches defense, mix in some very good defenders and you can hide his defense.


I actually agree. I didn't know if he was a guy you could win with but now i am convinced that he is. Lavine has No. 1 scoring option type ability. Those kind of guys don't grow on trees.

Zach Lavine couldn't even start on half the playoff teams in the league.

That's just plain not true.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Get a (real) coach that teaches defense, mix in some very good defenders and you can hide his defense.


I actually agree. I didn't know if he was a guy you could win with but now i am convinced that he is. Lavine has No. 1 scoring option type ability. Those kind of guys don't grow on trees.

Zach Lavine couldn't even start on half the playoff teams in the league.

That's just plain not true.


Yep. Zach Lavine is looking like a big time steal at this point. He is better than what i thought. Has to get better on D but he has the type of offensive game that can compensate for it.

He has a complete offensive game.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Then why has he not compensated for it? Why can't he outscore the other team? Why are the other teams scorers always better?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Give Zach Lavine the ball and get out of the way.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
Then why has he not compensated for it? Why can't he outscore the other team? Why are the other teams scorers always better?

He has compensated for it.

It is difficult for one player to outscore an entire NBA team.

Other teams scorers aren't always better.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Then why has he not compensated for it? Why can't he outscore the other team? Why are the other teams scorers always better?

He has compensated for it.

It is difficult for one player to outscore an entire NBA team.

Other teams scorers aren't always better.

https://www.foxsports.com/nba/chicago-b ... ISC&time=0

If you find Bulls lineups of any 5 guys excluding Lavine, you will find the Bulls are more competitive without him than with him.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Then why has he not compensated for it? Why can't he outscore the other team? Why are the other teams scorers always better?

He has compensated for it.

It is difficult for one player to outscore an entire NBA team.

Other teams scorers aren't always better.

https://www.foxsports.com/nba/chicago-b ... ISC&time=0

If you find Bulls lineups of any 5 guys excluding Lavine, you will find the Bulls are more competitive without him than with him.

No you won't. You're misunderstanding what those numbers are representing. There's a reason that the guys who have started the most games all have the worst +/-.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Then why has he not compensated for it? Why can't he outscore the other team? Why are the other teams scorers always better?

He has compensated for it.

It is difficult for one player to outscore an entire NBA team.

Other teams scorers aren't always better.

https://www.foxsports.com/nba/chicago-b ... ISC&time=0

If you find Bulls lineups of any 5 guys excluding Lavine, you will find the Bulls are more competitive without him than with him.

No you won't. You're misunderstanding what those numbers are representing. There's a reason that the guys who have started the most games all have the worst +/-.

I knew'd you go that route. So take a look at another bad team: https://www.foxsports.com/nba/orlando-m ... ISC&time=0

Their best player has a better +/- than all of the other players on his team that start alongside him and play the same types of minutes. Out of anyone with a real amount of minutes, he has their best +/- (but admittedly it is still negative because they suck.)

I'm not expecting Lavine to be +300 when the season ends. But he should not be in the Bottom 5 in the league in plus-minus, which he is now.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
IMU wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
IMU wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
+/- is useless for evaluating basketball.

In a single game, to evaluate a single player, you may be right.
So in a single game, a stat may not tell the whole story. But when you have a large enough sample size of said stat, it can tell you something about the player.

Interesting.

Yes. Think of it as runs and pitcher losses. Max Scherzer sometimes gives up 0 ER and loses. Is Max Scherzer a bad pitcher?
Max Scherzer has a career W-L record of 159-82.

Now a guy with a record of say 84-83 is decidedly mediocre, even though he had a great game here and there.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Then why has he not compensated for it? Why can't he outscore the other team? Why are the other teams scorers always better?

He has compensated for it.

It is difficult for one player to outscore an entire NBA team.

Other teams scorers aren't always better.

https://www.foxsports.com/nba/chicago-b ... ISC&time=0

If you find Bulls lineups of any 5 guys excluding Lavine, you will find the Bulls are more competitive without him than with him.

No you won't. You're misunderstanding what those numbers are representing. There's a reason that the guys who have started the most games all have the worst +/-.

I knew'd you go that route. So take a look at another bad team: https://www.foxsports.com/nba/orlando-m ... ISC&time=0

Their best player has a better +/- than all of the other players on his team that start alongside him and play the same types of minutes. Out of anyone with a real amount of minutes, he has their best +/- (but admittedly it is still negative because they suck.)

I'm not expecting Lavine to be +300 when the season ends. But he should not be in the Bottom 5 in the league in plus-minus, which he is now.

You have an over-reliance on +/-, and these two examples perfectly illustrate why it's bad to only use that metric when evaluating a player. All of the advanced and traditional numbers suggest he is quite clearly a net positive player.

Now, to be clear, I don't really like Lavine and I'm not sure this hot start is sustainable. I suspect it's not. If he regresses offensively he's no longer going to be a useful player, his defense is just too bad. But as long as he's putting up 28+ a game on north of 50% shooting while being the entire starting lineup's focal point on offense, he's a good, useful player. He's on one of the worst teams in the league, on arguably the worst defensive team of all time, so his +/- is going to be horrendous all year even if he started averaging 40 ppg on 60% shooting.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
looking good!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 2:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
Caller Bob wrote:
looking good!


Bum slayer.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4492
pizza_Place: Rosati's
conns7901 wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
looking good!


Bum slayer.


I’ll take 41 on 25 shots any time.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group