It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:48 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1686 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 57  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Are they saying that Bortles is the worst case scenario?

It wasn't really a best case/worst case discussion. They just said that's who he has reminded them of this year.
That's a hard thing to quantify. If we are talking about Bortles in year 2 vs. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky in year 2 then I'll take that and be happy.

If he reminds them of a guy who is going to lose his job to Cody Kessler then I can't agree.

I agree with the bold take that he probably won't be replaced by Cody Kessler this season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is accurate, but he is not consistent. That is different than someone like Bortles who's poor mechanics and lack of fundamentals makes him inaccurate, but Bortles displays his mechanics and fundamentals (I guess that's what you have to call them?) on a consistent basis.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky still forgets things, especially his footwork, from time to time. When he is locked-in he is nails, when he lets his mechanics slip he is wild. That is why this comparison to Bortles is just lazy nonsense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I was a Cutler defender for a while. It’s intersting being on the other side about Mitch. “He doesn’t have top talent around him” “New system!” “If he just would have done _____ they could have won”

All my old excuses for Cutler coming back to be used against me when I say Mitch is shit. Intersting to be on the right side of history this time.

The major difference is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is in year 2, whereas Cutler was in year 5+.

Right now, (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is on pace to have a better season than the pro bowl year Cutler had in Denver.

Almost the entire league is. That doesn't tell us much.
It does when we are comparing the difference between the excuses for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky vs. the excuses for Cutler.

No it doesn't.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
America wrote:
There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is accurate, but he is not consistent. That is different than someone like Bortles who's poor mechanics and lack of fundamentals makes him inaccurate, but Bortles displays his mechanics and fundamentals (I guess that's what you have to call them?) on a consistent basis.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky still forgets things, especially his footwork, from time to time. When he is locked-in he is nails, when he lets his mechanics slip he is wild. That is why this comparison to Bortles is just lazy nonsense.

this post is gibberish :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is accurate, but he is not consistent. That is different than someone like Bortles who's poor mechanics and lack of fundamentals makes him inaccurate, but Bortles displays his mechanics and fundamentals (I guess that's what you have to call them?) on a consistent basis.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky still forgets things, especially his footwork, from time to time. When he is locked-in he is nails, when he lets his mechanics slip he is wild. That is why this comparison to Bortles is just lazy nonsense.

That's just wrong. It's an incorrect evaluation. Both (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Bortles have shown glimpses of being very accurate over short stretches. Hell, Bortles has even done it 3-4 weeks in a row before, which is something Mitch has yet to show. They also are capable of going extended stretches of looking like the worst QB in the league. They are easily among the more inconsistent QBs in the game right now. There's nothing lazy about the comparison.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is accurate, but he is not consistent. That is different than someone like Bortles who's poor mechanics and lack of fundamentals makes him inaccurate, but Bortles displays his mechanics and fundamentals (I guess that's what you have to call them?) on a consistent basis.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky still forgets things, especially his footwork, from time to time. When he is locked-in he is nails, when he lets his mechanics slip he is wild. That is why this comparison to Bortles is just lazy nonsense.

this post is gibberish :lol:

It is a very easy point to understand I am sorry it has proven elusive to you. I dont know how to put it more simply. Perhaps if you and Bill Barnwell went on a nice soy-date he could put it to you a better way?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is accurate, but he is not consistent. That is different than someone like Bortles who's poor mechanics and lack of fundamentals makes him inaccurate, but Bortles displays his mechanics and fundamentals (I guess that's what you have to call them?) on a consistent basis.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky still forgets things, especially his footwork, from time to time. When he is locked-in he is nails, when he lets his mechanics slip he is wild. That is why this comparison to Bortles is just lazy nonsense.

this post is gibberish :lol:

It is a very easy point to understand I am sorry it has proven elusive to you. I dont know how to put it more simply. Perhaps if you and Bill Barnwell went on a nice soy-date he could put it to you a better way?

It's a point that sounds like it is coming from someone who has never watched a NFL game before :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
No it doesn't.
Sure it does. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, at least so far is showing more potential than Cutler ever showed either in Denver or Chicago. He may never reach it but the fact that there are more good quarterbacks now than there have been in a really long time doesn't change that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Gee guys sure is some sort of coincidence that both Packers fans who both love trolling Bears fans have mysteriously aligned on this. My noggin is definitely joggin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No it doesn't.
Sure it does. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, at least so far is showing more potential than Cutler ever showed either in Denver or Chicago. He may never reach it but the fact that there are more good quarterbacks now than there have been in a really long time doesn't change that.

Cutler showed way more potential in Denver than Mitch has this year. Numbers aren't going to show that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is accurate, but he is not consistent. That is different than someone like Bortles who's poor mechanics and lack of fundamentals makes him inaccurate, but Bortles displays his mechanics and fundamentals (I guess that's what you have to call them?) on a consistent basis.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky still forgets things, especially his footwork, from time to time. When he is locked-in he is nails, when he lets his mechanics slip he is wild. That is why this comparison to Bortles is just lazy nonsense.

this post is gibberish :lol:

It is a very easy point to understand I am sorry it has proven elusive to you. I dont know how to put it more simply. Perhaps if you and Bill Barnwell went on a nice soy-date he could put it to you a better way?

No need to throw a fit because you're typing nonsensical garbage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Kirkwood wrote:
No need to throw a fit because you're typing nonsensical garbage.

look, i get that you're butthurt because you dont like being labeled a tourist in what you call your "hometown", but leave that kind of bickering to relevant threads.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
I'll help you realize how dumb you sound. There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. Lonzo Ball is accurate, but he is not consistent. When he makes a 3-pointer he is accurate. He just isn't consistent about making 3-pointers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
No need to throw a fit because you're typing nonsensical garbage.

look, i get that you're butthurt because you dont like being labeled a tourist in what you call your "hometown", but leave that kind of bickering to relevant threads.

now you're just being desperate :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Kirkwood wrote:
I'll help you realize how dumb you sound. There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. Lonzo Ball is accurate, but he is not consistent. When he makes a 3-pointer he is accurate. He just isn't consistent about making 3-pointers.

If Lonzo Ball were to have a different motion between when he makes most of his 3-pointers and when he barely makes any 3-pointers you would say he is inconsistent. If Lonzo Ball had the exact same motion and missed all his 3-pointers you would say he's inaccurate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
America wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No it doesn't.
Sure it does. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, at least so far is showing more potential than Cutler ever showed either in Denver or Chicago. He may never reach it but the fact that there are more good quarterbacks now than there have been in a really long time doesn't change that.

Cutler showed way more potential in Denver than Mitch has this year. Numbers aren't going to show that.

I don't think that is true. Cutler showed promise and then backed into a pro bowl because a bunch of other guys said no.

You think the Bears will trade him this offseason?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
America wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No it doesn't.
Sure it does. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, at least so far is showing more potential than Cutler ever showed either in Denver or Chicago. He may never reach it but the fact that there are more good quarterbacks now than there have been in a really long time doesn't change that.

Cutler showed way more potential in Denver than Mitch has this year. Numbers aren't going to show that.

I don't think that is true. Cutler showed promise and then backed into a pro bowl because a bunch of other guys said no.

You think the Bears will trade him this offseason?

I dont think Nagy is going to go full McDaniels and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky doesn't seem like the type to demand a trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
I'll help you realize how dumb you sound. There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. Lonzo Ball is accurate, but he is not consistent. When he makes a 3-pointer he is accurate. He just isn't consistent about making 3-pointers.

If Lonzo Ball were to have a different motion between when he makes most of his 3-pointers and when he barely makes any 3-pointers you would say he is inconsistent. If Lonzo Ball had the exact same motion and missed all his 3-pointers you would say he's inaccurate.

When Lonzo Ball is locked in he's a sniper. Suuuper accurate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No it doesn't.
Sure it does. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, at least so far is showing more potential than Cutler ever showed either in Denver or Chicago. He may never reach it but the fact that there are more good quarterbacks now than there have been in a really long time doesn't change that.

Based on what?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
I'll help you realize how dumb you sound. There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. Lonzo Ball is accurate, but he is not consistent. When he makes a 3-pointer he is accurate. He just isn't consistent about making 3-pointers.

If Lonzo Ball were to have a different motion between when he makes most of his 3-pointers and when he barely makes any 3-pointers you would say he is inconsistent. If Lonzo Ball had the exact same motion and missed all his 3-pointers you would say he's inaccurate.

When Lonzo Ball is locked in he's a sniper. Suuuper accurate

I have literally never watched Lonzo Ball play basketball and I am not sure what relevance it has to this thread about Mitchell (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You think the Bears will trade him this offseason?

I think if they tried they aren't getting two first round picks and a starting caliber QB back :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You think the Bears will trade him this offseason?

I think if they tried they aren't getting two first round picks and a starting caliber QB back :lol:

You may want to look at this coming draft class, there's a reason everyone is dumping picks. And that's a generous description of Kyle Orton!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You think the Bears will trade him this offseason?

I think if they tried they aren't getting two first round picks and a starting caliber QB back :lol:

You may want to look at this coming draft class, there's a reason everyone is dumping picks. And that's a generous description of Kyle Orton!

It's an accurate description. Very solid QB between the 20's.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
I'll help you realize how dumb you sound. There is a fundamental difference between accuracy and consistency. Lonzo Ball is accurate, but he is not consistent. When he makes a 3-pointer he is accurate. He just isn't consistent about making 3-pointers.

If Lonzo Ball were to have a different motion between when he makes most of his 3-pointers and when he barely makes any 3-pointers you would say he is inconsistent. If Lonzo Ball had the exact same motion and missed all his 3-pointers you would say he's inaccurate.

When Lonzo Ball is locked in he's a sniper. Suuuper accurate

I have literally never watched Lonzo Ball play basketball and I am not sure what relevance it has to this thread about Mitchell (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Both are shit at shooting/throwing. But when they make a basketball or complete a pass they're like, really, really, accurate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Kirkwood wrote:
Both are shit at shooting/throwing. But when they make a basketball or complete a pass they're like, really, really, accurate.

The difference in (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky when he is accurate vs inaccurate is not necessarily in outcome. Wild Mitch can make throws, locked-in Mitch can miss throws...its not 100% either way. But overall Mitch is a much better QB when he follows his coaching than when he doesn't.

I am repeating myself over and over with this and you clearly would rather talk about the NBA, I suggest using this forum viewforum.php?f=91 instead of the Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky thread for that discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No it doesn't.
Sure it does. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, at least so far is showing more potential than Cutler ever showed either in Denver or Chicago. He may never reach it but the fact that there are more good quarterbacks now than there have been in a really long time doesn't change that.

Based on what?
Assuming he plays like this for the whole season, and that is an assumption that may prove untrue, he will have a better season than Cutler ever had and he is STILL making enough mistakes that he should get better with more experience.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No it doesn't.
Sure it does. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, at least so far is showing more potential than Cutler ever showed either in Denver or Chicago. He may never reach it but the fact that there are more good quarterbacks now than there have been in a really long time doesn't change that.

Based on what?
Assuming he plays like this for the whole season, and that is an assumption that may prove untrue, he will have a better season than Cutler ever had and he is STILL making enough mistakes that he should get better with more experience.

So just based on stats then? We've tried explaining to you why that's a flawed, at best, comparison.

I don't think Mitch is currently doing better relative to his peers during the season in question than Jay did that year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You think the Bears will trade him this offseason?

I think if they tried they aren't getting two first round picks and a starting caliber QB back :lol:

I think they would as long as he keeps this up. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has made a pretty big leap this season and will be cheap for a while.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You think the Bears will trade him this offseason?

I think if they tried they aren't getting two first round picks and a starting caliber QB back :lol:

I think they would as long as he keeps this up. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has made a pretty big leap this season and will be cheap for a while.

He's only got two more cheap years after this. That's another downside to the whole "He's young, you have to be patient and let him develop" mindset. At the rate he's currently developing, he's not really the valuable asset on a rookie contract that you had hoped for when building the team around that contract.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mitch has potential
PostPosted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
So just based on stats then? We've tried explaining to you why that's a flawed, at best, comparison.

I don't think Mitch is currently doing better relative to his peers during the season in question than Jay did that year.
It doesn't matter that quarterback play is as good as it has been in a long time. There is a lot of young talent in the league along with many guys who are playing really well at an age they should be retired or backups or Eli Manning. If Brady, Brees, and Rodgers retired tomorrow does that mean that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is playing better?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1686 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ... 57  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blackhawksfan, The Doctor Of Style and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group