It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:25 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
83 seconds into the game and they were done. 83!

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Pick 6

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
So the Packers look pretty okay again.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Terry's Peeps wrote:
So the Packers look pretty okay again.

It's amazing how good a team can look when they have a flag thrown on the other team every third play.
The story here is how terrible Atlanta is. They stink! P.U.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
I will enjoy watching the Bears crush this newfound Packer optimism next week.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:05 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The expected bump with a new coach, and playing a terrible dome team in cold weather can make anyone look good.

Bears should win by at least 7-10 points on Sunday.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The expected bump with a new coach, and playing a terrible dome team in cold weather can make anyone look good.

Bears should win by at least 7-10 points on Sunday.

Yup. If the Bears can get out to a strong 20-0 start the lead should be insurmountable.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The expected bump with a new coach, and playing a terrible dome team in cold weather can make anyone look good.

Bears should win by at least 7-10 points on Sunday.

Yup. If the Bears can get out to a strong 20-0 start the lead should be insurmountable.

This is a much different Bears team today than it was in week 1. The same can be said of the Packers.

One team has improved and is MANY times better than way back then. The other team fired coaches, and has lost MANY games.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The expected bump with a new coach, and playing a terrible dome team in cold weather can make anyone look good.

Bears should win by at least 7-10 points on Sunday.

Yup. If the Bears can get out to a strong 20-0 start the lead should be insurmountable.

This is a much different Bears team today than it was in week 1. The same can be said of the Packers.

One team has improved and is MANY times better than way back then. The other team fired coaches, and has lost MANY games.

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
I love Joe Philbin's rapid-fire approach to using his challenges. The Bears are going to have to do some serious game planning to counter that innovation.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis




Poor dolphin, poor Frank.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=113979&p=3040670&hilit=signature#p3040675

Poor FavreFan.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Last edited by Frank Coztansa on Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
FavreFan wrote:




Poor dolphin, poor Frank.


you were the one who said the Packers would get better without him

Poor favre.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:




Poor dolphin, poor Frank.


you were the one who said the Packers would get better without him

Poor favre.

I said they wouldn’t miss him and he was a bad player. Both are true. I never said they would get better. I said the loss wasn’t a loss at all and his play this year has verified that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
I said they wouldn’t miss him and he was a bad player. Both are true. I never said they would get better. I said the loss wasn’t a loss at all and his play this year has verified that.

yup.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:




Poor dolphin, poor Frank.


you were the one who said the Packers would get better without him

Poor favre.

I said they wouldn’t miss him and he was a bad player. Both are true. I never said they would get better. I said the loss wasn’t a loss at all and his play this year has verified that.


Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:21 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:




Poor dolphin, poor Frank.


you were the one who said the Packers would get better without him

Poor favre.

I said they wouldn’t miss him and he was a bad player. Both are true. I never said they would get better. I said the loss wasn’t a loss at all and his play this year has verified that.


Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4


Favre Fan lies, numbers don't.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:

Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4

That's meaningless unless you are prepared to take the bold stance that free safety has the biggest impact on games out every position on the roster when the truth is it usually has close to the least.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4

That's meaningless unless you are prepared to take the bold stance that free safety has the biggest impact on games out every position on the roster when the truth is it usually has close to the least.


Eddie Jackson is a free safety.

I think you are mistaken in what you think the discussion was about. Go back to the thread. As I said, trading a 60 or so game starter while at .500 is waving a white flag.

If Dix's presence or his lack of presence influenced the outcome in even one game then that trade took them out of the playoffs. One game and they would be 6-6-1, just half a game behind the Vikings for the last spot.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4

That's meaningless unless you are prepared to take the bold stance that free safety has the biggest impact on games out every position on the roster when the truth is it usually has close to the least.


Eddie Jackson is a free safety.

I think you are mistaken in what you think the discussion was about. Go back to the thread. As I said, trading a 60 or so game starter while at .500 is waving a white flag.

If Dix's presence or his lack of presence influenced the outcome in even one game then that trade took them out of the playoffs. One game and they would be 6-6-1, just half a game behind the Vikings for the last spot.

I was never confused about the topic. You and Frank were several times, since you seem to think I said they would be better without him when I never did.

Your last sentence would be correct if the "if" part was true but it is not, and actually his presence seems to have torpedoed Washington's once-solid defense.

HHCD is a bad player and it's difficult to argue GB did not get the better end of the deal. It's really that simple.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4

That's meaningless unless you are prepared to take the bold stance that free safety has the biggest impact on games out every position on the roster when the truth is it usually has close to the least.


Eddie Jackson is a free safety.

I think you are mistaken in what you think the discussion was about. Go back to the thread. As I said, trading a 60 or so game starter while at .500 is waving a white flag.

If Dix's presence or his lack of presence influenced the outcome in even one game then that trade took them out of the playoffs. One game and they would be 6-6-1, just half a game behind the Vikings for the last spot.
[/quote]
Production at free safety since HHCD left is not why they are 2-4. The trade was brilliant in selling high on name recognition/pedigree rather than results.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4

That's meaningless unless you are prepared to take the bold stance that free safety has the biggest impact on games out every position on the roster when the truth is it usually has close to the least.


Eddie Jackson is a free safety.

I think you are mistaken in what you think the discussion was about. Go back to the thread. As I said, trading a 60 or so game starter while at .500 is waving a white flag.

If Dix's presence or his lack of presence influenced the outcome in even one game then that trade took them out of the playoffs. One game and they would be 6-6-1, just half a game behind the Vikings for the last spot.

Production at free safety since HHCD left is not why they are 2-4. The trade was brilliant in selling high on name recognition/pedigree rather than results.[/quote]

1) Stop stealing my bits
2) That was a brilliant trade launching a starter in the middle of the playoff hunt and subsequently being eliminated from the playoff race and getting a coach fired.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

Packers pre Dix trade: 3-3-1
Packers post Dix trade: 2-4

That's meaningless unless you are prepared to take the bold stance that free safety has the biggest impact on games out every position on the roster when the truth is it usually has close to the least.


Eddie Jackson is a free safety.

I think you are mistaken in what you think the discussion was about. Go back to the thread. As I said, trading a 60 or so game starter while at .500 is waving a white flag.

If Dix's presence or his lack of presence influenced the outcome in even one game then that trade took them out of the playoffs. One game and they would be 6-6-1, just half a game behind the Vikings for the last spot.

I was never confused about the topic. You and Frank were several times, since you seem to think I said they would be better without him when I never did.

Your last sentence would be correct if the "if" part was true but it is not, and actually his presence seems to have torpedoed Washington's once-solid defense.

HHCD is a bad player and it's difficult to argue GB did not get the better end of the deal. It's really that simple.


It's that simple if your intent was to white flag the season. If your intent was to compete, the team became worse. It's really THAT simple.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:

It's that simple if your intent was to white flag the season. If your intent was to compete, the team became worse. It's really THAT simple.

But the team didn't become worse and you have yet to show any evidence they did. Records without context doesn't do it. Their defense has been no worse since the trade than it was before.

However, on the other side, Washington has unarguably been a worse defensive team since acquiring HHCD. He's a bad player that makes teams worse when playing for them.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Washington has gone in the tank since they acquired him. He is also divisive in the locker room. Absolutely no one should sign him for anything more than a 1 year deal with no guaranteed money. Packers D has been fine in all these losses. The offense has been awful. Smooth move by Gute to dump him on a playoff team and have him take them out of the playoffs.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
I was never confused about the topic. You and Frank were several times, since you seem to think I said they would be better without him when I never did.
You are confused. You said the Packers would be better without Dix. I said when a team loses their starting safety they aren't better. Given their record since the trade, I was correct.

I'll PM your sig to you later on.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Washington has gone in the tank since they acquired him. He is also divisive in the locker room. Absolutely no one should sign him for anything more than a 1 year deal with no guaranteed money. Packers D has been fine in all these losses. The offense has been awful. Smooth move by Gute to dump him on a playoff team and have him take them out of the playoffs.


Losing 2 quarterbacks is the reason Washington is losing. Packers fans are flailing. It puts a smile on my face.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I was never confused about the topic. You and Frank were several times, since you seem to think I said they would be better without him when I never did.
You are confused. You said the Packers would be better without Dix. I said when a team loses their starting safety they aren't better. Given their record since the trade, I was correct.

I'll PM your sig to you later on.

I never said the Packers would be better without him. That's why I said you were confused. I said they are the same defense without him and the numbers bear that out.

It's not a coincidence that every Packer fan that posted about HHCD in this thread has been proven correct and every Bear fan has been proven wrong. Maybe next time you guys should realize that other teams fans probably know more about their players than out of towners.

Looking forward to the sig when GB is eliminated from the playoff race. As of now they're still in the hunt!

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
If any of you have followed HHCD on twitter and also seen him play a good amount of snaps the last 3 years you will know what is up with him. He finished his degree in criminal justice and IIRC got a masters in it and is actively involved with law enforcement back in Florida. He is preserving his body while maximizing his bank account. He is going to take his signing bonus, play next year and then retire early in the 2020 season citing concussions.

Look at the clip from yesterday. He took an INTENTIONALLY lazy angle and provided an escort to the endzone for Barkley. He routinely showed up just after an opponents TD catch when he was on the Packers. He hovers around looking for easy int's but ignores his primary responsibilities to do so. When he provides help over the top he usually turns himself around and runs himself out of the play. He refuses to make any type of hard contact.

He can still play, he was good as hell his first 2 years, he just doesn't want to.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 3:57 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Blaming Dix instead of dicks for the Packers suckage is embarrassing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group