It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:01 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

It's that simple if your intent was to white flag the season. If your intent was to compete, the team became worse. It's really THAT simple.

But the team didn't become worse and you have yet to show any evidence they did. Records without context doesn't do it. Their defense has been no worse since the trade than it was before.

However, on the other side, Washington has unarguably been a worse defensive team since acquiring HHCD. He's a bad player that makes teams worse when playing for them.


"You haven't shown me anything about them being worse except for the ultimate arbiter of better or worse"

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
I bet there is a way we can see exactly what the discussion was regarding the Packers white flagging by trading Dix

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

It's that simple if your intent was to white flag the season. If your intent was to compete, the team became worse. It's really THAT simple.

But the team didn't become worse and you have yet to show any evidence they did. Records without context doesn't do it. Their defense has been no worse since the trade than it was before.

However, on the other side, Washington has unarguably been a worse defensive team since acquiring HHCD. He's a bad player that makes teams worse when playing for them.


"You haven't shown me anything about them being worse except for the ultimate arbiter of better or worse"

That's wrong too.

Anyway, you'd have to get into strength of schedule, and how the offense and defense each performed in the wins and losses, if you want to accurately gauge if they miss HHCD's presence or not. Lazily throwing out the records doesn't show me or you anything, and I think you're smart enough to know that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

It's that simple if your intent was to white flag the season. If your intent was to compete, the team became worse. It's really THAT simple.

But the team didn't become worse and you have yet to show any evidence they did. Records without context doesn't do it. Their defense has been no worse since the trade than it was before.

However, on the other side, Washington has unarguably been a worse defensive team since acquiring HHCD. He's a bad player that makes teams worse when playing for them.


"You haven't shown me anything about them being worse except for the ultimate arbiter of better or worse"

That's wrong too.

Anyway, you'd have to get into strength of schedule, and how the offense and defense each performed in the wins and losses, if you want to accurately gauge if they miss HHCD's presence or not. Lazily throwing out the records doesn't show me or you anything, and I think you're smart enough to know that.


There was once a Packer fan who said this post trade:

How many wins do you think the trades cost GB? What did you have their record at the end of the year before the trades and what do you see it as now?

I'll say 9-6-1 before and 9-6-1 after. Same team.[/quote]

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

It's that simple if your intent was to white flag the season. If your intent was to compete, the team became worse. It's really THAT simple.

But the team didn't become worse and you have yet to show any evidence they did. Records without context doesn't do it. Their defense has been no worse since the trade than it was before.

However, on the other side, Washington has unarguably been a worse defensive team since acquiring HHCD. He's a bad player that makes teams worse when playing for them.


"You haven't shown me anything about them being worse except for the ultimate arbiter of better or worse"

That's wrong too.

Anyway, you'd have to get into strength of schedule, and how the offense and defense each performed in the wins and losses, if you want to accurately gauge if they miss HHCD's presence or not. Lazily throwing out the records doesn't show me or you anything, and I think you're smart enough to know that.


There was once a Packer fan who said this post trade:

How many wins do you think the trades cost GB? What did you have their record at the end of the year before the trades and what do you see it as now?

I'll say 9-6-1 before and 9-6-1 after. Same team.
[/quote]
Right, but are you trying to change the subject as a concession you were wrong about the HHCD point? Similar to the bet I made with Frank, that post was indicative of me being wrong about how good GB was. It's not evidence that I was wrong about the value of HHCD.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:

It's that simple if your intent was to white flag the season. If your intent was to compete, the team became worse. It's really THAT simple.

But the team didn't become worse and you have yet to show any evidence they did. Records without context doesn't do it. Their defense has been no worse since the trade than it was before.

However, on the other side, Washington has unarguably been a worse defensive team since acquiring HHCD. He's a bad player that makes teams worse when playing for them.


"You haven't shown me anything about them being worse except for the ultimate arbiter of better or worse"

That's wrong too.

Anyway, you'd have to get into strength of schedule, and how the offense and defense each performed in the wins and losses, if you want to accurately gauge if they miss HHCD's presence or not. Lazily throwing out the records doesn't show me or you anything, and I think you're smart enough to know that.


There was once a Packer fan who said this post trade:

How many wins do you think the trades cost GB? What did you have their record at the end of the year before the trades and what do you see it as now?

I'll say 9-6-1 before and 9-6-1 after. Same team.

Right, but are you trying to change the subject as a concession you were wrong about the HHCD point? Similar to the bet I made with Frank, that post was indicative of me being wrong about how good GB was. It's not evidence that I was wrong about the value of HHCD.[/quote]

The team was fine on October 31...then they weren't.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.

i think i understand good dolphin's point.

When HHCD was on the Packers:
Offense - OK
Defense - Fine

When HHCD off the Packers:
Offense - Bad
Defense Fine

Hence HHCD's departure was a net negative on the Packers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.


You and other Packers fans are trying to say that the Redskins are losing because of him and not because they lost Alex Smith and now have a QB who finished a game with a 0 rating.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Kirkwood wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.

i think i understand good dolphin's point.

When HHCD was on the Packers:
Offense - OK
Defense - Fine

When HHCD off the Packers:
Offense - Bad
Defense Fine

Hence HHCD's departure was a net negative on the Packers.


So the Packers were better with an injured Rodgers and are now worse with a healthy Rodgers?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Packers fans be like;

Image

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.


You and other Packers fans are trying to say that the Redskins are losing because of him and not because they lost Alex Smith and now have a QB who finished a game with a 0 rating.

I never said they were losing because of him. I said their defense has gotten a lot worse since they acquired him, and it's a fact that it has.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.

i think i understand good dolphin's point.

When HHCD was on the Packers:
Offense - OK
Defense - Fine

When HHCD off the Packers:
Offense - Bad
Defense Fine

Hence HHCD's departure was a net negative on the Packers.


So the Packers were better with an injured Rodgers and are now worse with a healthy Rodgers?

They are undefeated since they got rid of McCarthy. Using good dolphin logic they might just be the best team in the NFL now, since nobody else is undefeated.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.


You and other Packers fans are trying to say that the Redskins are losing because of him and not because they lost Alex Smith and now have a QB who finished a game with a 0 rating.

I never said they were losing because of him. I said their defense has gotten a lot worse since they acquired him, and it's a fact that it has.


Any defense that never gets off the field sucks.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
So now we are back to pretending FS has the most impact out of any individual position on the field, and that by replacing HHCD with his backup, the team fell out of playoff contention.

Get a grip brother.

i think i understand good dolphin's point.

When HHCD was on the Packers:
Offense - OK
Defense - Fine

When HHCD off the Packers:
Offense - Bad
Defense Fine

Hence HHCD's departure was a net negative on the Packers.


So the Packers were better with an injured Rodgers and are now worse with a healthy Rodgers?

They are undefeated since they got rid of McCarthy. Using good dolphin logic they might just be the best team in the NFL now, since nobody else is undefeated.


They beat one of the worst teams in football.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The Bears are undefeated since McCarthy got shit canned. FF must think the Bears are better than the Patriots!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Bears are undefeated since McCarthy got shit canned. FF must think the Bears are better than the Patriots!

You're confused again Frank. I was making fun of dolphin's logic in evaluating the before and after of the trade. I wasn't subscribing to that belief myself.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Bears are undefeated since McCarthy got shit canned. FF must think the Bears are better than the Patriots!

You're confused again Frank. I was making fun of dolphin's logic in evaluating the before and after of the trade. I wasn't subscribing to that belief myself.


That attempt was as laughable as your belief that the Packers would be better without Dix.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Bears are undefeated since McCarthy got shit canned. FF must think the Bears are better than the Patriots!

You're confused again Frank. I was making fun of dolphin's logic in evaluating the before and after of the trade. I wasn't subscribing to that belief myself.

I’m legit confused as to why Bears fans are so distraught over HHCD and Packers fans couldn’t give less of a shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Kirkwood wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Bears are undefeated since McCarthy got shit canned. FF must think the Bears are better than the Patriots!

You're confused again Frank. I was making fun of dolphin's logic in evaluating the before and after of the trade. I wasn't subscribing to that belief myself.

I’m legit confused as to why Bears fans are so distraught over HHCD and Packers fans couldn’t give less of a shit.

It's also a weird angle to take considering how dumb they sound talking up HHCD, and the fact that Rodgers and the entire GB team has sucked this year anyway and would ostensibly make a much better target.

I'll chalk it up to them not seeing a successful Bear team in a decade and therefore forgetting how to act when you have the upper hand in the rivalry.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:05 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Kirkwood wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Bears are undefeated since McCarthy got shit canned. FF must think the Bears are better than the Patriots!

You're confused again Frank. I was making fun of dolphin's logic in evaluating the before and after of the trade. I wasn't subscribing to that belief myself.

I’m legit confused as to why Bears fans are so distraught over HHCD and Packers fans couldn’t give less of a shit.


We're enjoying you all scapegoating him for your failure.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Bears are undefeated since McCarthy got shit canned. FF must think the Bears are better than the Patriots!

You're confused again Frank. I was making fun of dolphin's logic in evaluating the before and after of the trade. I wasn't subscribing to that belief myself.

I’m legit confused as to why Bears fans are so distraught over HHCD and Packers fans couldn’t give less of a shit.

It's also a weird angle to take considering how dumb they sound talking up HHCD, and the fact that Rodgers and the entire GB team has sucked this year anyway and would ostensibly make a much better target.

I'll chalk it up to them not seeing a successful Bear team in a decade and therefore forgetting how to act when you have the upper hand in the rivalry.

i guess, for maybe a year. next year and until rodgers retires i see it resorting to normalcy. unless bears find a qb. then the rivalry has for sure swung to the bears favor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Kirkwood wrote:
I’m legit confused as to why Bears fans are so distraught over HHCD and Packers fans couldn’t give less of a shit.
I'm legit confused as to how you could have posted something like this when FF clearly gave enough of a shit to start this whole mess again; viewtopic.php?f=90&t=113803&start=450#p3117474

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
I’m legit confused as to why Bears fans are so distraught over HHCD and Packers fans couldn’t give less of a shit.
I'm legit confused as to how you could have posted something like this when FF clearly gave enough of a shit to start this whole mess again; viewtopic.php?f=90&t=113803&start=450#p3117474

well, ya, dolphin and you should've apologized to ff for your very wrong posts and thanked him for teaching you two about nfl talent evaluation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Kirkwood wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
I’m legit confused as to why Bears fans are so distraught over HHCD and Packers fans couldn’t give less of a shit.
I'm legit confused as to how you could have posted something like this when FF clearly gave enough of a shit to start this whole mess again; viewtopic.php?f=90&t=113803&start=450#p3117474

well, ya, dolphin and you should've apologized to ff for your very wrong posts and thanked him for teaching you two about nfl talent evaluation.

Vikings fans like IMU probably would have had the class to do that. Wasn’t expecting that from Bear fans.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:33 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I suppose it's classy to quote something that is 2 months old at this point, then pretend you are right about it?

Packers fans are having a very rough go of it. Bear Down, fellas. It's only going to get worse for you from here on out!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23841
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Packers living rent-free in 1st place Bears fans heads. Sad.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I suppose it's classy to quote something that is 2 months old at this point, then pretend you are right about it?

Packers fans are having a very rough go of it. Bear Down, fellas. It's only going to get worse for you from here on out!

The HHCD isn’t pretending to be right about anything. We told you all he was bad at the time of the trade, you mocked us for that, and you guys look silly since then. That’s it.

Take a victory lap over all the reasons GB sucks all you want, I would if I were you, just don’t pretend you and gd looked anything other than classic out of town stupid on this trade. Happens to the best of us.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I'll take a victory lap all over your face. I never said Dix was good or bad. I said the Packers losing thier starting safety does not make them better. I was right. What gd said or didnt say has nothing to do with it. Out of town or in town there is one person who looks stupid here, and it ain't me.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2018 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'll take a victory lap all over your face. I never said Dix was good or bad. I said the Packers losing thier starting safety does not make them better. I was right. What gd said or didnt say has nothing to do with it. Out of town or in town there is one person who looks stupid here, and it ain't me.

It is you. Everyone who has watched non-Bears games this years knows this.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group