It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 9:35 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Kirkwood wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
McDude wrote:
Honestly how much longer are the score and ESPN going to be on the radio? 5, if they're lucky 10 years? Podcast and Barstool going to keep getting more popular. Eventually teams are going to stream their own content and not need the radio. And the whole dumping of swear words on the radio is so fucking stupid


The answer is for however as long as today's population of Age 55+ individuals can be relied upon as a driving demographic. I'm 24 and virtually all of my friends who consumer sports audio content do so exclusively from podcasts like Pardon my Take, Barstool Radio, Cowherd (surprisingly to me) and Bill Simmons and crew. While I still consume the Score and 1000, I now only do so through podcasts so I can skip ads and guests/topics that I don't care about. To me and I think people similar to me, the idea of settling for a show/topic that isn't exactly what I'm looking for, and putting up with commercials, is something that one would only do if they don't know any better (which isn't a sustainable business model).

i'm sorry your taste in podcasts is trashy

Barstool is the future of sports media. It's just time to accept it.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Barstool is the future of sports media. It's just time to accept it.

ya i'll short that all day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Barstoolsports.com web traffic has tanked 32% over the last two years. They're declining, if anything.

The only other sports blogging site I can find that also had reduced traffic in that time period is deadspin. Bleacher Report, Fansided and others have increased traffic.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
IMU wrote:
Barstoolsports.com web traffic has tanked 32% over the last two years. They're declining, if anything.

The only other sports blogging site I can find that also had reduced traffic in that time period is deadspin. Bleacher Report, Fansided and others have increased traffic.
Barstool is in effect a startup company and is treated like one. They seem to be desperately trying to find a new way to grow which is normally a bad sign for the strength of the core business. They are trying to become a boxing and pay-per-view company, and by boxing and pay-per-view company, it's more like "Amateur boxing tournaments streaming on a website for cheap so basically bumfights with people with houses(probably)".

That's not to say they are failing. They will always have a niche, but they are dangerously close to having their talent poached by the bigger guys and they know it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11002
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
McDude wrote:
Honestly how much longer are the score and ESPN going to be on the radio? 5, if they're lucky 10 years? Podcast and Barstool going to keep getting more popular. Eventually teams are going to stream their own content and not need the radio. And the whole dumping of swear words on the radio is so fucking stupid


The answer is for however as long as today's population of Age 55+ individuals can be relied upon as a driving demographic. I'm 24 and virtually all of my friends who consumer sports audio content do so exclusively from podcasts like Pardon my Take, Barstool Radio, Cowherd (surprisingly to me) and Bill Simmons and crew. While I still consume the Score and 1000, I now only do so through podcasts so I can skip ads and guests/topics that I don't care about. To me and I think people similar to me, the idea of settling for a show/topic that isn't exactly what I'm looking for, and putting up with commercials, is something that one would only do if they don't know any better (which isn't a sustainable business model).

i'm sorry your taste in podcasts is trashy

Barstool is the future of sports media. It's just time to accept it.


they are persona driven, appealing to a younger audience... and the "presidente" is in his 40's and other key players are approaching their mid 30's...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
billypootons wrote:
they are persona driven, appealing to a younger audience... and the "presidente" is in his 40's and other key players are approaching their mid 30's...

yup. they're just a glorified podcast network dependent on a few aging men stuck in adolescence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
That seems to be a big difference between Barstool and Deadspin. Barstool is Portnoy. Deadspin has a distinct voice, but the people change all the time. Other than Magary, everyone else is grist for the mill, and no matter who comes and goes, the posts called "This Dumb Team Is Dumb For Being Dumb" continue.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Barstoolsports.com web traffic has tanked 32% over the last two years. They're declining, if anything.

The only other sports blogging site I can find that also had reduced traffic in that time period is deadspin. Bleacher Report, Fansided and others have increased traffic.
Barstool is in effect a startup company and is treated like one. They seem to be desperately trying to find a new way to grow which is normally a bad sign for the strength of the core business. They are trying to become a boxing and pay-per-view company, and by boxing and pay-per-view company, it's more like "Amateur boxing tournaments streaming on a website for cheap so basically bumfights with people with houses(probably)".

That's not to say they are failing. They will always have a niche, but they are dangerously close to having their talent poached by the bigger guys and they know it.

Their podcasts continuously top the charts, they sell a lot of merchandise, and brands continue to partner with them thanks to their audience being the prime market for advertisers.

The company is worth over $100 million dollars and is turning a profit, which is quite rare in digital media. Heck, their Barstool Gold already reached its year 1 subscription target within 3 days of launch. They are doing fine. You cannot say the same for traditional media.

I know this message board skews a little older than their target audience, but they own the 21-35 male demographic at a time where that demo is very tough to reach. That is the key to Barstool's success.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Their podcasts continuously top the charts, they sell a lot of merchandise, and brands continue to partner with them thanks to their audience being the prime market for advertisers.
Podcasting is not really a great business to be in. Who are the big names in podcasting?

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The company is worth over $100 million dollars and is turning a profit, which is quite rare in digital media. Heck, their Barstool Gold already reached its year 1 subscription target within 3 days of launch. They are doing fine. You cannot say the same for traditional media.
Being worth $100 million in "whatever an investor will pay you" isn't really saying much. There is a reason they are shifting to the up and coming "amateur boxing tournament streaming" market and not just growing as to what got them to this point.

To me, they remind me a lot of the sites that were "the next big thing" and then kind of just leveled off and then went away. I'm guessing they do well enough to survive but it is concerning that they've had to take $25 million in funding and basically are still valued the same way as that one person had them valued.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Barstoolsports.com web traffic has tanked 32% over the last two years. They're declining, if anything.

The only other sports blogging site I can find that also had reduced traffic in that time period is deadspin. Bleacher Report, Fansided and others have increased traffic.
Barstool is in effect a startup company and is treated like one. They seem to be desperately trying to find a new way to grow which is normally a bad sign for the strength of the core business. They are trying to become a boxing and pay-per-view company, and by boxing and pay-per-view company, it's more like "Amateur boxing tournaments streaming on a website for cheap so basically bumfights with people with houses(probably)".

That's not to say they are failing. They will always have a niche, but they are dangerously close to having their talent poached by the bigger guys and they know it.

Their podcasts continuously top the charts, they sell a lot of merchandise, and brands continue to partner with them thanks to their audience being the prime market for advertisers.

The company is worth over $100 million dollars and is turning a profit, which is quite rare in digital media. Heck, their Barstool Gold already reached its year 1 subscription target within 3 days of launch. They are doing fine. You cannot say the same for traditional media.

I know this message board skews a little older than their target audience, but they own the 21-35 male demographic at a time where that demo is very tough to reach. That is the key to Barstool's success.

valuation is in the eye of the beholder (investor)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:58 pm
Posts: 12
pizza_Place: Barnaby's
A couple of things. Barstool is very different than deadspin and Bleacher Report in that they have insane brand loyalty, and that their content strategy is based around the personalities themselves, not the substance of what they are covering. A lot of their readers have been with them since like 2011 (and even earlier for people in Boston),. As part of that, their core personalities have been interacting with their users on twitter and letting them into their personal lives for close to a decade, which allows them to feel more like friends and relatable common men (regardless of whether you agree), as opposed to deadspin, which is run by SJWs and people who have no appeal whatsoever to the typical non-pussy male 18-34. In that sense, Barstool has become more about the personalities' take on the content (usually news/sports pop culture stories), than the content itself, and the content experience more like a reality show than a sports content distributor. As such, to many readers, the Barstool personalities feel a lot more relatable and "common-man-esque." Because of the brand loyalty barstool has built (which will be undoubtedly be put to the test by the roll-out of Barstool Gold), their sustainability is far stronger than deadspin. While deadspin might not piss as many people off, they don't have even close to the brand loyalty that barstool has, which is what matters when comes to being able to monetize and grow your brand. In today's day and age where people have more choices than ever in content options, mild, "PC," mass approval entities (like deadspin) not nearly as profitable as polarizing entities with hardcore, loyal fanbases. Quite simply, many males 18-34 who disdain SJWs are more likely to enjoy barstool and find their guys to be relatable than what can be said for deadspin.

Sure, there are 18-34 male SJWs out there, but there aren't as many, and even of that group, they don't possess the same level of brand loyalty for deadspin that comes close to what barstool has cultivated. While it is true that there there are plenty are of 18-34 SJWs out there, a very very small minority of them are hardcore sports content consumers, which is not the case for non-SJW "common man" 18-34 males, which is who Barstool cultivates. Barstool is not expecting to convert their entire user base to Barstool Gold; they are hoping to convert a portion of their core base, which is probably realistic. There is no comparable "core base" for deadspin in terms of size and consistent site interaction (as evidenced by average numbers comments per article and twitter replies per site tweet.

Also Bleacher Report is not really in the same content space as barstool or deadspin, as they've sought to become a neutral, journalistic entity. They're moreso competing against likes of ESPN.com, and the Athletic. A buddy of mine (also 24), was spot on in my opinion by saying that The Athletic is "Bleacher Report for adults."

Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Barstoolsports.com web traffic has tanked 32% over the last two years. They're declining, if anything.

The only other sports blogging site I can find that also had reduced traffic in that time period is deadspin. Bleacher Report, Fansided and others have increased traffic.
Barstool is in effect a startup company and is treated like one. They seem to be desperately trying to find a new way to grow which is normally a bad sign for the strength of the core business. They are trying to become a boxing and pay-per-view company, and by boxing and pay-per-view company, it's more like "Amateur boxing tournaments streaming on a website for cheap so basically bumfights with people with houses(probably)".

That's not to say they are failing. They will always have a niche, but they are dangerously close to having their talent poached by the bigger guys and they know it.

Their podcasts continuously top the charts, they sell a lot of merchandise, and brands continue to partner with them thanks to their audience being the prime market for advertisers.

The company is worth over $100 million dollars and is turning a profit, which is quite rare in digital media. Heck, their Barstool Gold already reached its year 1 subscription target within 3 days of launch. They are doing fine. You cannot say the same for traditional media.

I know this message board skews a little older than their target audience, but they own the 21-35 male demographic at a time where that demo is very tough to reach. That is the key to Barstool's success.

valuation is in the eye of the beholder (investor)


Last edited by chimrichalds on Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
chimrichalds wrote:
As such, to many readers, the Barstool personalities feel a lot more relatable and "common-man-esque."

Great, they're still all trust fund kids just like Deadspin.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:58 pm
Posts: 12
pizza_Place: Barnaby's
Curious Hair wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
As such, to many readers, the Barstool personalities feel a lot more relatable and "common-man-esque."

Great, they're still all trust fund kids just like Deadspin.


Again, there has always been (and will continue to be) a side that likes them and a side that dislikes them. This is a surprise to literally nobody. But that the end of the day, the argument about business sustainability is an objective one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
chimrichalds wrote:
Quite simply, many males 18-34 who disdain SJWs are more likely to enjoy barstool and find their guys to be relatable than what can be said for deadspin..

and then these guys grow up and have bigger priorities than seeing if j-rad hit chad in the nuts during happy hour facebook live bro talk.

then the the next wave of 18-35 year olds will consume what the older loser guys are not


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:58 pm
Posts: 12
pizza_Place: Barnaby's
Kirkwood wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
Quite simply, many males 18-34 who disdain SJWs are more likely to enjoy barstool and find their guys to be relatable than what can be said for deadspin..

and then these guys grow up and have bigger priorities than seeing if j-rad hit chad in the nuts during happy hour facebook live bro talk.

then the the next wave of 18-35 year olds will consume what the older loser guys are not


I agree that Barstool's problem is going to arrive when their core guys become too old to have appeal to the 18-34 demo (which is why you see Bill Simmons trying to hire as many high-personality young writers as he can (because his brand is facing the issue that will inevitably confront Portnoy and Big Cat in 10-15 years). However, I'd venture to say that your description of Barstool is a pretty gross misrepresentation and indicative of someone who has only encountered them on social media (which is admittedly catered toward college kids and a different experience than most of their content). If you listened to 10 minutes of redline radio, I don't think you'd would get that impression whatsoever. I'd also point out that literally zero of their core personalities were in fraternities in college, and that they had less than 10 employees for the first 6-7 years of its existence. It started out as a physical newspaper that Portnoy and one other employee were literally handing out to people at the Boston train station.

But regardless, my point stands that the fact that somebody (such as yourself) doesn't like Barstool and finds their podcasts "trashy" is literally a surprise to no one and doesn't change the fact that being polarizing as a media brand is no longer the threat to financial viability that it once was.


Last edited by chimrichalds on Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
chimrichalds wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
As such, to many readers, the Barstool personalities feel a lot more relatable and "common-man-esque."

Great, they're still all trust fund kids just like Deadspin.


Again, there has always been (and will continue to be) a side that likes them and a side that dislikes them. This is a surprise to literally nobody. But that the end of the day, the argument about business sustainability is an objective one.

They are clearly concerned given they seemingly want to be an amateur boxing ppv service.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:58 pm
Posts: 12
pizza_Place: Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
As such, to many readers, the Barstool personalities feel a lot more relatable and "common-man-esque."

Great, they're still all trust fund kids just like Deadspin.


Again, there has always been (and will continue to be) a side that likes them and a side that dislikes them. This is a surprise to literally nobody. But that the end of the day, the argument about business sustainability is an objective one.

They are clearly concerned given they seemingly want to be an amateur boxing ppv service.


Are you aware of how small of a part of their company Rough n Rowdy is? Are you also aware that it costs relatively nothing to produce, and has been a profitable venture thus far? What is the downside to having one more profitable venture as part of your company's arsenal? They don't lose anything by having it or take anything away from their content by having it so long as it continues to be profitable. This would be like saying the Bears are clearly giving up on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky seeing as they're running Tarik Cohen from the wild cat a couple of times a game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
chimrichalds wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
As such, to many readers, the Barstool personalities feel a lot more relatable and "common-man-esque."

Great, they're still all trust fund kids just like Deadspin.


Again, there has always been (and will continue to be) a side that likes them and a side that dislikes them. This is a surprise to literally nobody. But that the end of the day, the argument about business sustainability is an objective one.

They are clearly concerned given they seemingly want to be an amateur boxing ppv service.


Are you aware of how small of a part of their company Rough n Rowdy is? Are you also aware that is costs relatively nothing to produce, and has been a profitable venture thus far? What is the downside to having one more profitable venture as part of your company's arsenal? They don't lose anything by having it or take anything away from their content by having it so long as it continues to be profitable.

How small it is the reason it is concerning a 100 million dollar company who supposedly is growing rapidly feels the need to do something with no logical connection to the core business.

The reason a startup that is still actively taking capital creates a second unrelated product is because of a belief the main product won't be growing enough to keep investors happy.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:58 pm
Posts: 12
pizza_Place: Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
As such, to many readers, the Barstool personalities feel a lot more relatable and "common-man-esque."

Great, they're still all trust fund kids just like Deadspin.


Again, there has always been (and will continue to be) a side that likes them and a side that dislikes them. This is a surprise to literally nobody. But that the end of the day, the argument about business sustainability is an objective one.

They are clearly concerned given they seemingly want to be an amateur boxing ppv service.


Are you aware of how small of a part of their company Rough n Rowdy is? Are you also aware that is costs relatively nothing to produce, and has been a profitable venture thus far? What is the downside to having one more profitable venture as part of your company's arsenal? They don't lose anything by having it or take anything away from their content by having it so long as it continues to be profitable.

How small it is the reason it is concerning a 100 million dollar company who supposedly is growing rapidly feels the need to do something with no logical connection to the core business.

The reason a startup that is still actively taking capital creates a second unrelated product is because of a belief the main product won't be growing enough to keep investors happy.


They were valued at $100 million at the time of Peter Chernin's most recent reinvestment. That was before they acquired Rough n Rowdy, before their podcasts have grown to the point they are at now (which are quite high), and before they rolled out their premium service, which hit its year-end subscription goal within 3 days. If one were to offer Chernin $100 million for Barstool currently, they would get laughed out the door. Barstool is absolutely not perfect, and they do face significant growth challenges going forward likes all rising companies do. But to say they are trying to turn themselves into an amateur PPV boxing company was a really inaccurate statement that I felt like rebutting.


Last edited by chimrichalds on Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
chimrichalds wrote:
But to say they are trying to turn themselves into an amateur PPV boxing company was a really inaccurate statement that I felt like rebutting.

10 more pages...

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
That subscription goal was laughably low. That is why they did it in 3 days.

Why not just post as Ogie?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:58 pm
Posts: 12
pizza_Place: Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That subscription goal was laughably low. That is why they did it in 3 days.

Why not just post as Ogie?


Hey man if that's what you want to fixate on, so be it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
chimrichalds wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That subscription goal was laughably low. That is why they did it in 3 days.

Why not just post as Ogie?


Hey man if that's what you want to fixate on, so be it

:lol: :lol:

Do you realize who you are talking to?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
chimrichalds wrote:
There is no comparable "core base" for deadspin in terms of size and consistent site interaction (as evidenced by average numbers comments per article and twitter replies per site tweet.

Let me know how much revenue Barstool gets from comments per article and twitter replies per site tweet.

Deadspin has higher ad revenue from a more active website. You may discuss brand loyalty all you want...maybe Barstool sells a lot of bumper stickers. But Deadspin simply has more traffic, and more ad impressions. Furthermore, Deadspin has the entire Gizmodo Media Group behind it. The commission revenue from Kinja Deals alone is significant.

How many Barstool Gold subscriptions have they sold for $100 / year?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
Kirkwood wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
McDude wrote:
Honestly how much longer are the score and ESPN going to be on the radio? 5, if they're lucky 10 years? Podcast and Barstool going to keep getting more popular. Eventually teams are going to stream their own content and not need the radio. And the whole dumping of swear words on the radio is so fucking stupid


The answer is for however as long as today's population of Age 55+ individuals can be relied upon as a driving demographic. I'm 24 and virtually all of my friends who consumer sports audio content do so exclusively from podcasts like Pardon my Take, Barstool Radio, Cowherd (surprisingly to me) and Bill Simmons and crew. While I still consume the Score and 1000, I now only do so through podcasts so I can skip ads and guests/topics that I don't care about. To me and I think people similar to me, the idea of settling for a show/topic that isn't exactly what I'm looking for, and putting up with commercials, is something that one would only do if they don't know any better (which isn't a sustainable business model).

i'm sorry your taste in podcasts is trashy



YUP

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
That subscription goal was laughably low. That is why they did it in 3 days.

Why not just post as Ogie?

This might shock you, but I'm not the only Barstool fan here.

As for the company, their boxing events only occur about every 2-3 months and it makes money for the company. Barstool isn't pivoting into boxing so much as they happened to uncover a niche which provides additional content for the company while also attacting more eyes to the brand.

Their biggest moves this year have been their new video shows on Saturday and Sunday. They are all gambling themed and with major sponsorships. The company knows their audience, targets them well, and then creates an environment where ad buyers pay big bucks to be featured on their various shows and podcasts.

You may thing ads on a podcast are not a big deal, but when the target demo is not listening to radio and there is a podcast with 2-3 million listeners per episode, then you can bet that brands will shell out to reach that audience in a medium that where ads cannot be skipped and where the audience is loyal to the content producer.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2019 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
IMU wrote:
chimrichalds wrote:
There is no comparable "core base" for deadspin in terms of size and consistent site interaction (as evidenced by average numbers comments per article and twitter replies per site tweet.

Let me know how much revenue Barstool gets from comments per article and twitter replies per site tweet.

Deadspin has higher ad revenue from a more active website. You may discuss brand loyalty all you want...maybe Barstool sells a lot of bumper stickers. But Deadspin simply has more traffic, and more ad impressions. Furthermore, Deadspin has the entire Gizmodo Media Group behind it. The commission revenue from Kinja Deals alone is significant.

How many Barstool Gold subscriptions have they sold for $100 / year?

Oh yeah they have the mighty Gizmodo Media Group behind them, which just laid off 15-20% of their workforce (including 20% of Deadspin's staff) :lol:

Meanwhile, Barstool is hiring and expanding. The new Chicago branch is a symbol of that expansion.

Tell me, which company is actually generating revenue growth and a profit?

heck, Univision is looking to possibly unload GMG, and they won't get anywhere near what investors would pay for Barstool. In fact, Gizmodo has imploded so much over the last few years that Univisoin is going to take a hefty loss when all is said and done.

As for Barstool Gold subs, Barstool reported that 81% of the subscriptions purchased have been for the $100/year package. I'm not even among them as I've been too busy to listen to much Barstool content over the last few months as I'm in my busy season. I expect I'll be buying the subscription in a few months when I actually have time to utilize it.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Disabling comments because too many stoolies are racist! :lol:

They are brand loyal though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Disabling comments because too many stoolies are racist! :lol:

They are brand loyal though.

As I've said, Deadspin writers have colleagues, but Barstool writers have fans.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Barstool Chicago
PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17217
pizza_Place: Pequods
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Disabling comments because too many stoolies are racist! :lol:

They are brand loyal though.

and watch the comments end up returning as a Gold perk.

Dave will be laughing all the way to the bank.

Another thing to note re traffic, Barstool has spent the last 2 years encouraging people to use their app so the most loyal stoolies are consuming their content via means outside of the regular site.

I don't think Deadpsin has an app.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 87 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group