Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

The idiots boycotting Gillette will be the same ones buying Vicks cough drops for their winter cough and Charmin for their wiping needs.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

The idiots boycotting Gillette will be the same ones buying Vicks cough drops for their winter cough and Charmin for their wiping needs.

Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.

Buy a double blade safety razor, a mug, and a brush then dhave like a real man f@ggots

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Even better, why not work in a steel mill where the heat will melt the extra hair off for you and you can have a real man's job at the same time.

We work hard, we play hard.

Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.

People want to be told what to do so badly that they’ll listen to anyone.

I wonder when the "Toxic" will be dropped and it will just be #Masculinity.

Bhalla and Gillette are also making the sound bet that a progressive-leaning marketing strategy will pay dividends. Many brands have commodified wokeness with great success: Nike’s revenues leapt after unveiling its campaign starring Colin Kaepernick, Patagonia posted massive sales after directly attacking President Trump, and in Gillette’s own shaving space, Harry’s has made reconsidering masculinity a central tenet of its advertising. And while what’s capturing headlines this morning is the intense backlash from conservative men, plenty of people have tweeted their support for the ad. Gillette’s new commercial isn’t pure marketing, either: the brand also pledged to donate $3 million over the next three years to nonprofits, starting with the Boys and Girls Club of America. (Whether we can rely on brands to move the discourse forward remains an open question.)

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

in Gillette’s own shaving space, Harry’s has made reconsidering masculinity a central tenet of its advertising.

:lol:

Oh man that last sentence. Can’t think of one that incapsulates that classic Hollywood/corporate shitlib mentality more.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

https://www.gq.com/story/gillette-commercial-preposterous-backlash



Well, I'll answer your question: the answer is no. P&G is using women's pain to sell shaving supplies. That's all, really.

P&G revenue from 2018 was over 66 Billion dollars. Donating one million dollars a year for three years is nothing to them. I mean good on them but
it is almost next to nothing for a company of that size.

P&G revenue from 2018 was over 66 Billion dollars. Donating one million dollars a year for three years is nothing to them. I mean good on them but
it is almost next to nothing for a company of that size.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

The fusion of wokeness and capitalism is loathsome, but I'm horrified by its fast-developing antithesis (Tucker Carlsonists?).

I'm not really sure what Carlson thinks. In any case, he's a talking head on Fox. I wouldn't call him a great thinker or intellectual.

Eric Weinstein is definitely an intellectual (((A Really Smart Guy™))) and I would say this is a pertinent question for the Friedmanistas who worship at the altar of free markets: