It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 1:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 202 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

kids don't care about baseball.

and those that do won't be able to watch the Cubs in their home market. :lol:

This is Einhorn's SportsVision and Wirtz's home blackout all over again

no doubt. no cable provider is going to carry this idiotic channel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Was I missing something or wasnt this announced a few months ago?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Can't wait to hear Bernsie spin himself into the ground on this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Was I missing something or wasnt this announced a few months ago?

Twitter was unable to convince them to change their minds.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

This post will not age well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

This post will not age well.

Rpb fully on board!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Trump should throw out the season's first pitch.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Kyle Schwarber goes down swinging and just a reminder the Republicans are the ones who ended slavery. Now here is Anthony Rizzo.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

This post will not age well.

Rpb fully on board!

I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

This post will not age well.

Rpb fully on board!

I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.

Zero chance? It happened to the Dodgers.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
rogers park bryan wrote:
[
I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.


This post will not age well.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
rogers park bryan wrote:
There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.


THEY.KNOW.THE.TV.MARKET.INEFFICIENCIES.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

This post will not age well.

Rpb fully on board!

I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.

Zero chance? It happened to the Dodgers.


:lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I guess Im confused with what is being alleged here. Dodger fans can absolutely pay for the channel and watch games right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Hatchetman wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
[
I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.


This post will not age well.


He used a nice, undefined term like significant, so he is covered.

rpb being able to get the games could be considered a significant amount to him

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38675
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hatchetman wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
[
I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.


This post will not age well.

Yeah the Ricketts are just inbred rubes who Beverly Hillbillied their way into billionairedom and have zero idea how to run and market a business .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

This post will not age well.

Rpb fully on board!

I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.

Zero chance? It happened to the Dodgers.


:lol:

You dont even know what you're laughing at.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
As I said in another thread, this will fail due to the lack of a winter partner. Comcast will not add this channel to their packages, especially when it competes with NBCSCH

This is the same mistake Eddie Einhorn made in the early 80s and that is the moment Chicago became a Cubs town. It will be nice when the next generation of kids only have Sox games available to watch. GO SOX!

SportsVision 2.0 will be as successful as the 1st version was.

This post will not age well.

Rpb fully on board!

I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.

I'll take that bet.

This is going to be a epic disaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
good dolphin wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
[
I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.


This post will not age well.


He used a nice, undefined term like significant, so he is covered.

rpb being able to get the games could be considered a significant amount to him

Sportsvision set the Sox back decades. Do you expect that to happen here?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
was it Comcast in LA that told them to fuck off with the Dodger TV? whatever. most of the town couldn't even watch the games.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
I guess Im confused with what is being alleged here. Dodger fans can absolutely pay for the channel and watch games right?

Nope.

You can't subscribe to the channel unless you are a Time Warner subscriber.

The other cable providers refuse to pay the carriage fee. Time Warner refuses to have the channel as a sports-tier channel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38675
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
[
I dont really care about the politics of Sinclair. There is a zero percent chance this goes the way of sportsvision or that Cub games will be unavailable to a significant amount of fans.


This post will not age well.


He used a nice, undefined term like significant, so he is covered.

rpb being able to get the games could be considered a significant amount to him

Sox fans are used to being counted individually making up a significant portion.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I guess I had some bad info.

I will be shocked if this ends up anything like sportsvision. I guess time will tell.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
But in the five years since the Cubs planted the seed of the regional sports network, the pay-TV landscape has changed dramatically, with cord cutting and skinny bundles squeezing the carriage fees cable companies are willing to pay for even sports, long the most valuable programming commodity.

That is where the Cubs’ partnership with Maryland-based Sinclair, the country’s largest TV station owner, comes into play. Sinclair owns 191 TV stations and the Tennis Channel, which gives it leverage in negotiations with cable and satellite providers such as Comcast, DirecTV and Dish.

Since acquiring the Tennis Channel in 2016 for $350 million, for example, Sinclair has doubled its reach to 60 million homes.

“We have strong relationships with cable companies and satellite operators,” said Sinclair’s president and CEO, Chris Ripley. “That is a key function we will fill here.”

Ripley expressed confidence in getting not only cable and satellite providers, but streaming services to sign up for the new Cubs network. Negotiations are underway, he said.



Seems like the bolded part is significant.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
IM NOT GIVING UP MY TENNIS CHANNEL!!

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
I guess Im confused with what is being alleged here. Dodger fans can absolutely pay for the channel and watch games right?

MLB currently prohibits any team from doing that. It has to go through a cable company. So if comcast says no then all comcast customers are out of luck on legal ways to watch. Illegal streams will exist but the Cubs aren't getting paid for those.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
The problem here is that you guys believe the Dodgers or White Sox fanbase is comparable to the Cubs. It's not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I guess Im confused with what is being alleged here. Dodger fans can absolutely pay for the channel and watch games right?

MLB currently prohibits any team from doing that. It has to go through a cable company. So if comcast says no then all comcast customers are out of luck on legal ways to watch. Illegal streams will exist but the Cubs aren't getting paid for those.

I dont care at all about the Cubs getting paid.

Comcast will cut a deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Illegal streams will exist but the Cubs aren't getting paid for those.


#WINNING


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
But in the five years since the Cubs planted the seed of the regional sports network, the pay-TV landscape has changed dramatically, with cord cutting and skinny bundles squeezing the carriage fees cable companies are willing to pay for even sports, long the most valuable programming commodity.

That is where the Cubs’ partnership with Maryland-based Sinclair, the country’s largest TV station owner, comes into play. Sinclair owns 191 TV stations and the Tennis Channel, which gives it leverage in negotiations with cable and satellite providers such as Comcast, DirecTV and Dish.

Since acquiring the Tennis Channel in 2016 for $350 million, for example, Sinclair has doubled its reach to 60 million homes.

“We have strong relationships with cable companies and satellite operators,” said Sinclair’s president and CEO, Chris Ripley. “That is a key function we will fill here.”

Ripley expressed confidence in getting not only cable and satellite providers, but streaming services to sign up for the new Cubs network. Negotiations are underway, he said.



Seems like the bolded part is significant.

My monthly Xfinity bill includes $8.25 (!) regional sports fee. You expect cable providers agree to increase that when it's already astronomical?

Zero chance. Cubs/Sinclair are fucked.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 202 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group