It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:51 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3767 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 122, 123, 124, 125, 126
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Trumpets on display

https://www.yahoo.com/news/watch-cnn-re ... 00196.html

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:36 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
long time guy wrote:


I don't recall ever labeling you a Trump defender. If I have honestly I have forgotten. You as much as I'll admit bias towards the Clintons in most instances, it is borne out of a lot of things that frankly I think are unfair.

For instance, It is quite unfair to find an equivocation in the racist debate. Trump was found liable in a court of law. He enacted policy which purposely discriminated against blacks. Hillary Clinton expressed prejudices against black criminals. Trump has never attempted to do anything meaningful for blacks and has historically been found to deny blacks things that the law says he shouldn't. There isn't any interpretation necessary for what he does. It was overt.

When I mention Community Reinvestment as a means of uplifting blacks you pooh poohed it and attempted to manufacture it to fit a construct that you have of the Clintons. Donald Trump would never have done that and he has a history of denying blacks the very thing that this piece of legislation sought to combat.


If they are one and the same as far as racism, then explain why the vast majority of white supremacists groups supported Trump. Shouldn't the equivalency extend here also?


Trump's racism is obviously more overt and potentially much more dangerous than that of the Clintons--especially if he proceeds down the path that he outlined during the campaign when he emerged as a neofascist. But Clintonian racism and obsequiousness to free market principles has set the stage for Trump's ugly racial politics and his perverse redefinition of the common good.

The CRA is hardly what people think of as a traditional community investment program. It was essentially a partial, market-based solution to a structural socioeconomic problem. It also contributed to the rise of the subprime loan market and the massive plundering of minority wealth by the predominantly white financial industry via the mortgage crisis.

I don't think you correctly understood my point about equivocation and obfuscation, but it really doesn't matter any more.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
She didn't do a good job of answering pay for play Clinton Foundation.

She also didn't handle the Email either. That is going to be a stain but it's not a deal killer.


I do think that stuff is terrible, but nobody cares. At least nobody who isn't already voting for Trump. She's got all this horrible damning e-mail correspondence and her defense is that it was hacked by Russians. Think about that for a minute. She's not sorry about anything she has done or said, but only that she got caught. And she isn't even embarrassed. In fact, I have yet to see either Clinton embarrassed by anything. She is trying to blame Trump for the hacking somehow. It's really ridiculous.


I think her responses to the emails have been ridiculous from Day 1. A crime was likely committed but she was smart enough to be far enough away from it where no one could charge her. That being said she's absolutely right about Trump and Russia. That relationship and the hacking should be a major story.


There is collusion there and Ronald Reagan is turning over in his grave at the thought of a Republican nominee for President stumping for a communist.



Hey Seacrest you have been lying about me being disinvested collusionwise for a while now. I thought it was about time that I call you in it.

Seacrest wrote:
You have run your mouth for two years about Trump being guilty.

I'm still glad that you are not personally invested in this though. :lol:



And you wonder why I call people such as yourself liars. Here is why. I was on this before the election. I've always been interested in his connection to Russians. Unlike you I didn't all of a sudden change my beat either hypocrite.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:05 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
She didn't do a good job of answering pay for play Clinton Foundation.

She also didn't handle the Email either. That is going to be a stain but it's not a deal killer.


I do think that stuff is terrible, but nobody cares. At least nobody who isn't already voting for Trump. She's got all this horrible damning e-mail correspondence and her defense is that it was hacked by Russians. Think about that for a minute. She's not sorry about anything she has done or said, but only that she got caught. And she isn't even embarrassed. In fact, I have yet to see either Clinton embarrassed by anything. She is trying to blame Trump for the hacking somehow. It's really ridiculous.


I think her responses to the emails have been ridiculous from Day 1. A crime was likely committed but she was smart enough to be far enough away from it where no one could charge her. That being said she's absolutely right about Trump and Russia. That relationship and the hacking should be a major story.


There is collusion there and Ronald Reagan is turning over in his grave at the thought of a Republican nominee for President stumping for a communist.



Hey Seacrest you have been lying about me being disinvested collusionwise for a while now. I thought it was about time that I call you in it.

Seacrest wrote:
You have run your mouth for two years about Trump being guilty.

I'm still glad that you are not personally invested in this though. :lol:



And you wonder why I call people such as yourself liars. Here is why. I was on this before the election. I've always been interested in his connection to Russians. Unlike you I didn't all of a sudden change my beat either hypocrite.


December of 2016 is AFTER the election.

You aren't being dishonest there. Just mistaken.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
She didn't do a good job of answering pay for play Clinton Foundation.

She also didn't handle the Email either. That is going to be a stain but it's not a deal killer.


I do think that stuff is terrible, but nobody cares. At least nobody who isn't already voting for Trump. She's got all this horrible damning e-mail correspondence and her defense is that it was hacked by Russians. Think about that for a minute. She's not sorry about anything she has done or said, but only that she got caught. And she isn't even embarrassed. In fact, I have yet to see either Clinton embarrassed by anything. She is trying to blame Trump for the hacking somehow. It's really ridiculous.


I think her responses to the emails have been ridiculous from Day 1. A crime was likely committed but she was smart enough to be far enough away from it where no one could charge her. That being said she's absolutely right about Trump and Russia. That relationship and the hacking should be a major story.


There is collusion there and Ronald Reagan is turning over in his grave at the thought of a Republican nominee for President stumping for a communist.



Hey Seacrest you have been lying about me being disinvested collusionwise for a while now. I thought it was about time that I call you in it.

Seacrest wrote:
You have run your mouth for two years about Trump being guilty.

I'm still glad that you are not personally invested in this though. :lol:



And you wonder why I call people such as yourself liars. Here is why. I was on this before the election. I've always been interested in his connection to Russians. Unlike you I didn't all of a sudden change my beat either hypocrite.


December of 2016 is AFTER the election.

You aren't being dishonest there. Just mistaken.


And you are still lying. Unfucking believable. I made the post on Oct. 20th/21st 2016.

Again you wonder why I refer to guys like you as being a liars. Here is why.

Page 115 of this thread for those scoring at home.
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=99618&start=3420#p2575431

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:27 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Does it really matter when you began fantasizing about Hillary Clinton created nonsense?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Does it really matter when you began fantasizing about Hillary Clinton created nonsense?


Yeah it does. The guy you run the site with has been lying about my level of "interest" for a while now and it was high time that he be called on it. If you weren't going to call him on it previously then no need to try and deflect now.

He has been on this for a while now and he has been lying each time he does it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Does it really matter when you began fantasizing about Hillary Clinton created nonsense?


It also matters where you are concerned also. You repetitively make the case that people are only concerned because "Hillary lost". Wrong. I cared even when I thought she was going to win.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
So... Who moves threads to the politics section?

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jbi11s wrote:
So... Who moves threads to the politics section?



I merged the Smollett threads. I don't think we really needed two, do you?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
idk if we needed one.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79557
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jbi11s wrote:
idk if we needed one.


:lol: Jussie Smollett didn't just commit a crime against himself. He committed a crime against humanity. I'm not normally in favor of the death penalty, but this could be an exception.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Jbi11s wrote:
So... Who moves threads to the politics section?



Seems to me Nas did most of this. Or at least less of it happens now. Just observational opinion though. No inside info with my fellow colluders Jorr and Seacrest.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
The board is much more enjoyable when the political arguments are not seen in active topics.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
idk if we needed one.


:lol: Jussie Smollett didn't just commit a crime against himself. He committed a crime against humanity. I'm not normally in favor of the death penalty, but this could be an exception.


Throw in the trump family and we have a great deal. Big league.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
let's just wash this down all at once.
Jussie. Trumps. Clintons.

This way we're all happy....deal?

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
wdelaney72 wrote:
let's just wash this down all at once.
Jussie. Trumps. Clintons.

This way we're all happy....deal?


No problem :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3767 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 122, 123, 124, 125, 126

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group