leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
For it not to happen in the first place? Eric Garner was unable to sue from his grave.
How do you know that it was racially motivated?
What the police did was clearly wrong, regardless of whether Sefalosha was black, white, pink, or purple. Why do we always assume that things are racially motivated without any evidence of that? And it isn't statistically significant. The only examples we have here are anecdotal. There are far more prevalent dangers to all people than getting beaten up by the cops. There were 30 people shot in Chicago this weekend. That's not deflection. It's fact. If there was genuine concern about black people, it would be for the kids who grow up in that environment, who don't have a shot at life, and who live miserable existences. It's saddening. Russell Westbrook having to deal with an idiot is not, and dedicating one iota of attention to it and trying to draw grand conclusions from it is a waste of time (and, I would argue, harmful, because it is creating animosity between people of different races that doesn't need to exist).
Your assertion that it "must not happen in the first place" is noble but really doesn't make sense in the whole scheme of things. You seem to be saying that if any injustice ever occurs in America and happens to be to a person with dark skin tone, then racism is flourishing. It's just not true, and it never will be. People do bad things to each other. People are imperfect. That's why we have a court system which works to remedy those things. It should be seen as a positive effect of a good system that this was remedied.
Im not going to respond to all of this because I believe you and I have covered all of it in the past. I agree with some of it and some is a bit off.
I will point out that it's possible to care about people getting shot in Chicago and think racism in the police is also worth addressing.
My post was making the point that sometimes monetary compensation doesn't undo the act. I know you know that but your post seemed like you were saying, the monetary thing made it all good.
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont believe he said his back to back was a racist thought. Its not. It's a victim blaming thought though. Most of us are guilty of that from time to time.
Come on. Then what's the point in saying it? Kyle Korver wrote an op-ed to let the world know he is guilty of occasional victim-blaming? Deep.
What do you think Korver's objective in writing this piece was?[/quote]
I think it was written purely for monetary gain that will come from being the woke white nba guy.