Don't start this vicious circle.

Listen, I was agnostic. I didn't much care because I was young and full of myself. Then I cared so I looked into it pretty extensively doing my best to use reason and be rational. I came out the other end with 2 possibilities. God and an alien kid in his basement running a computer program. So I choose God.

Don't take my word for it. Check out Quantum physics, string theory, multi-universe, the apparent fine tuning of the universe, the internal workings of a biological cell. Read agnostics and atheists who switched sides. Read people of faith who then turned atheist. Honestly, if you care enough to know, find out for yourself.

Don't start this vicious circle.

Listen, I was agnostic. I didn't much care because I was young and full of myself. Then I cared so I looked into it pretty extensively doing my best to use reason and be rational. I came out the other end with 2 possibilities. God and an alien kid in his basement running a computer program. So I choose God.

Don't take my word for it. Check out Quantum physics, string theory, multi-universe, the apparent fine tuning of the universe, the internal workings of a biological cell. Read agnostics and atheists who switched sides. Read people of faith who then turned atheist. Honestly, if you care enough to know, find out for yourself.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

If those are your only 2 possibilities then you really shouldn't be trusted. It's impossible to not think that we aren't simply living the same cycle of life that every other animal in history has in which we exist for our time on Earth and play our role and then that is it. Did the dinosaurs have an afterlife? What about mosquitoes?

Who said anything about an afterlife? Who said I disagree about the cycle of life? I'm telling about my experience about the question of a creator.

Life is nasty, brutish, a little too long IMO, and largely accidental.

Plenty of circumstantial proof. From the coded genes to the universe that was CREATED on a razor's edge as far as being life bearing. Science is the study of how God did it. Science and God will meet someday. The only other tenable option is that this is a simulation and I am open to that idea because science says something can't come from nothing. The multi universe theory is garbage. String theory is a dead end.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

Who said anything about an afterlife? Who said I disagree about the cycle of life? I'm telling about my experience about the question of a creator.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

Did Nardi say he subscribed to a religion?

Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole

He’s a Mormon.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

It's been evolutionary since the big bang. The question is, was it all in the blueprints?

Did Nardi say he subscribed to a religion?

I agree there are immutable patterns in the universe. Or maybe we just understand and process certain random elements as patterns. Are you familiar with Deism? It's the notion that God is a watchmaker. Built it, wound it, set it aside, let it do it's own thing.

Well, if there is no afterlife, then virtually every religion that has ever existed is 100% wrong.

It's pointing out the flaw in your enlightened view that in the whole history of the world you have come up with the only 2 possible explanations.

How does a watch do it's own thing? It moves in a circular pattern at a programmed rate. It doesn't switch directions or change speeds.

I've been pretty specific. I don't know where the whole history of the world comes in to the conversation. I only veered when I talked about DNA being hard wired to faith. I didn't specify any religion, only the desire to find the Creator.

Entropy.

I agree there are immutable patterns in the universe. Or maybe we just understand and process certain random elements as patterns. Are you familiar with Deism? It's the notion that God is a watchmaker. Built it, wound it, set it aside, let it do it's own thing.

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

Nardi makes points that are not absurd really.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

Way to take a stand, Mike.

Nardi makes points that are not absurd really. God and the thought of one or a few even can be a spiritual or philosophical for some rather than dogma and religion. Regardless of how he defined or explained it the human nature does have some level of internal inquisitiveness that made survival possible so why not also a desire to find the meaning of life and/or God?

It seems to me unimportant if you have biblical type beliefs or scientific for your private considerations. Even the most non believers in a supreme being have to still be puzzled by what happened or existed just a microsecond before the Big Bang.

I guess people just can't help themselves attaching the religion amendment to the thesis. Even the poster boy for science(DeGrasse Tyson) has begrudgingly endorsed a higher power creation, albeit simulation theory.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

I guess people just can't help themselves attaching the religion amendment to the thesis. Even the poster boy for science(DeGrasse Tyson) has begrudgingly endorsed a higher power creation, albeit simulation theory.

We know very little. We just think we know stuff because the only basis for comparison is the past.

Well, God = religion.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

And Clapton = God