It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:19 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Eddie can wail on the scales! Otherwise, he ain't all that.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40648
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
GoldenJet wrote:
Eddie can wail on the scales! Otherwise, he ain't all that.


Actually he did more melodic chord playing with Hagar as he aged. IMHO.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
pittmike wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Eddie can wail on the scales! Otherwise, he ain't all that.


Actually he did more melodic chord playing with Hagar as he aged. IMHO.


Hang up on yourself.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Eddie can wail on the scales! Otherwise, he ain't all that.


Actually he did more melodic chord playing with Hagar as he aged. IMHO.

Keep this thread on topic.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Eddie can wail on the scales! Otherwise, he ain't all that.


Actually he did more melodic chord playing with Hagar as he aged. IMHO.

Keep this thread on topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6zTXPN_PPo

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
The Fast and the Furious movies suck.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40648
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Telegram Sam wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Eddie can wail on the scales! Otherwise, he ain't all that.


Actually he did more melodic chord playing with Hagar as he aged. IMHO.

Keep this thread on topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6zTXPN_PPo


Yeah on vh2 as well. I take it back.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41376
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The Fast and the Furious movies suck.

So does the poster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
pittmike wrote:
Telegram Sam wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
Eddie can wail on the scales! Otherwise, he ain't all that.


Actually he did more melodic chord playing with Hagar as he aged. IMHO.

Keep this thread on topic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6zTXPN_PPo


Yeah on vh2 as well. I take it back.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQ9pYwCKopE

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Well, God = religion.
And Clapton = God



Chazz: Who'd win in a wresting match? Lemmy or God?

Chris: Lemmy.

Chris: ... God?

Rex: Wrong, dickhead. Trick question. Lemmy *IS* God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2019 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I started believing in a fair and just God just this Saturday right around the time Jason Servis's horse was disqualified from first in the Kentucky Derby.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


Big Chicagoan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Well, God = religion.
And Clapton = God



Chazz: Who'd win in a wresting match? Lemmy or God?

Chris: Lemmy.

Chris: ... God?

Rex: Wrong, dickhead. Trick question. Lemmy *IS* God.


This. Clapton :roll: Keep it.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nardi makes points that are not absurd really. God and the thought of one or a few even can be a spiritual or philosophical for some rather than dogma and religion. Regardless of how he defined or explained it the human nature does have some level of internal inquisitiveness that made survival possible so why not also a desire to find the meaning of life and/or God?

It seems to me unimportant if you have biblical type beliefs or scientific for your private considerations. Even the most non believers in a supreme being have to still be puzzled by what happened or existed just a microsecond before the Big Bang.

I guess people just can't help themselves attaching the religion amendment to the thesis. Even the poster boy for science(DeGrasse Tyson) has begrudgingly endorsed a higher power creation, albeit simulation theory.

Well, God = religion.

A rational argument for the existence of God is not religion. When divine providence is added, that is religion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nardi makes points that are not absurd really. God and the thought of one or a few even can be a spiritual or philosophical for some rather than dogma and religion. Regardless of how he defined or explained it the human nature does have some level of internal inquisitiveness that made survival possible so why not also a desire to find the meaning of life and/or God?

It seems to me unimportant if you have biblical type beliefs or scientific for your private considerations. Even the most non believers in a supreme being have to still be puzzled by what happened or existed just a microsecond before the Big Bang.

I guess people just can't help themselves attaching the religion amendment to the thesis. Even the poster boy for science(DeGrasse Tyson) has begrudgingly endorsed a higher power creation, albeit simulation theory.

Well, God = religion.

A rational argument for the existence of God is not religion. When divine providence is added, that is religion.

What is God without divine providence?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Ronald Reagan

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41376
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Nardi makes points that are not absurd really. God and the thought of one or a few even can be a spiritual or philosophical for some rather than dogma and religion. Regardless of how he defined or explained it the human nature does have some level of internal inquisitiveness that made survival possible so why not also a desire to find the meaning of life and/or God?

It seems to me unimportant if you have biblical type beliefs or scientific for your private considerations. Even the most non believers in a supreme being have to still be puzzled by what happened or existed just a microsecond before the Big Bang.

I guess people just can't help themselves attaching the religion amendment to the thesis. Even the poster boy for science(DeGrasse Tyson) has begrudgingly endorsed a higher power creation, albeit simulation theory.

Well, God = religion.

A rational argument for the existence of God is not religion. When divine providence is added, that is religion.

What is God without divine providence?

The creator.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
:lol: ok.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
:lol: ok.


Are you talking about ongoing intervention? There could be a dead or disinterested God.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
Telegram Sam wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
:lol: ok.


Are you talking about ongoing intervention? There could be a dead or disinterested God.

Those aren't the only possibilities. One being the universe was made for a purpose. They say necessity is the mother of invention. If you can wrap your head around that the possibilities become numerous. Frankly, atheists are in the shallow end of the pool and they're stuck there. No matter how they try to escape, they're right back where they started because every theory ends up having to have a beginning. So they lash out, RELIGION. Doesn't do them any good though.


Last edited by Nardi on Tue May 07, 2019 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nardi wrote:
Telegram Sam wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
:lol: ok.


Are you talking about ongoing intervention? There could be a dead or disinterested God.

Those aren't the only possibilities. One being the universe was made for a purpose. They say necessity is the mother of invention. If you can wrap your head around that the possibilities become numerous. Frankly, atheists are in the shallow end of the pool and their stuck there. No matter how they try to escape, they're right back where they started because every theory ends up having to have a beginning. So they lash out, RELIGION. Doesn't do them any good though.


So the only possible explanation is religion? Frankly, that seems rather shallow.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40648
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Maybe. But if it isn’t right to pick on believers and their theory the the opposite has to be true. The atheist can believe what they are told is proof. Or they can even choose to not be bothered by it at all. I find it hard not to wonder about something though looking up at a clear unlit light at a million stars.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Telegram Sam wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
:lol: ok.


Are you talking about ongoing intervention? There could be a dead or disinterested God.

Those aren't the only possibilities. One being the universe was made for a purpose. They say necessity is the mother of invention. If you can wrap your head around that the possibilities become numerous. Frankly, atheists are in the shallow end of the pool and their stuck there. No matter how they try to escape, they're right back where they started because every theory ends up having to have a beginning. So they lash out, RELIGION. Doesn't do them any good though.


So the only possible explanation is religion? Frankly, that seems rather shallow.

I prefer to think of God in a religious sense but I just got done explaining that there are non-religious possibilities.

There's always a beginning, and something can't come from nothing. I wish we could get off the religion aspect but that seems to be impossible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
pittmike wrote:
Maybe. But if it isn’t right to pick on believers and their theory the the opposite has to be true. The atheist can believe what they are told is proof. Or they can even choose to not be bothered by it at all. I find it hard not to wonder about something though looking up at a clear unlit light at a million stars.

I'm attempting to appeal to the atheist. Simulation theory appeals to the atheist.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Telegram Sam wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
:lol: ok.


Are you talking about ongoing intervention? There could be a dead or disinterested God.

Those aren't the only possibilities. One being the universe was made for a purpose. They say necessity is the mother of invention. If you can wrap your head around that the possibilities become numerous. Frankly, atheists are in the shallow end of the pool and they're stuck there. No matter how they try to escape, they're right back where they started because every theory ends up having to have a beginning. So they lash out, RELIGION. Doesn't do them any good though.

You said there were only two possibilities. I have no idea what you are talking about now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 07, 2019 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Telegram Sam wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
:lol: ok.


Are you talking about ongoing intervention? There could be a dead or disinterested God.

Those aren't the only possibilities. One being the universe was made for a purpose. They say necessity is the mother of invention. If you can wrap your head around that the possibilities become numerous. Frankly, atheists are in the shallow end of the pool and they're stuck there. No matter how they try to escape, they're right back where they started because every theory ends up having to have a beginning. So they lash out, RELIGION. Doesn't do them any good though.

You said there were only two possibilities. I have no idea what you are talking about now.

All I'm doing is responding to what you say. You said God=religion. I said there are other possibilities that God does not equal religion. I'm disappointed you start something and then can't follow along.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 08, 2019 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
All I'm doing is responding to what you say. You said God=religion. I said there are other possibilities that God does not equal religion. I'm disappointed you start something and then can't follow along.
This is what started it.
Nardi wrote:
Listen, I was agnostic. I didn't much care because I was young and full of myself. Then I cared so I looked into it pretty extensively doing my best to use reason and be rational. I came out the other end with 2 possibilities. God and an alien kid in his basement running a computer program. So I choose God.


In this case, God=religion. It's the concept that someone who was intelligent created our entire existence with a purpose. This is the fundamental basis of religion. It doesn't matter how active they are in it today or not. The concept of an intelligent creator(God) is religion. You can explain otherwise but you really have to stretch things to the point of making the whole definition useless by basically making any start of the universe a "creator" even if it was just a random collection of molecules.

Going back to the original point though, there is a pretty obvious third option, though it is the most depressing of all which is that we are basically the most advanced known chemical reactions in the universe. We exist just as the animals and plants do and for the same purpose which is to survive.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 08, 2019 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31613
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
All I'm doing is responding to what you say. You said God=religion. I said there are other possibilities that God does not equal religion. I'm disappointed you start something and then can't follow along.
This is what started it.
Nardi wrote:
Listen, I was agnostic. I didn't much care because I was young and full of myself. Then I cared so I looked into it pretty extensively doing my best to use reason and be rational. I came out the other end with 2 possibilities. God and an alien kid in his basement running a computer program. So I choose God.


In this case, God=religion. It's the concept that someone who was intelligent created our entire existence with a purpose. This is the fundamental basis of religion. It doesn't matter how active they are in it today or not. The concept of an intelligent creator(God) is religion. You can explain otherwise but you really have to stretch things to the point of making the whole definition useless by basically making any start of the universe a "creator" even if it was just a random collection of molecules.

Going back to the original point though, there is a pretty obvious third option, though it is the most depressing of all which is that we are basically the most advanced known chemical reactions in the universe. We exist just as the animals and plants do and for the same purpose which is to survive.

Circled back again. Every chemical had a beginning, was created.

God could be a spiritual being, all knowing, and timeless. That would be religion. God could have accidently created, had no idea what he had done, and then went on his merry way, oblivious.

Lots of people on their high horses say there doesn't have to be a beginning. These are also the same people who look at every single other thing and say, a caused b, and b caused c. Everything has to go back to an unmoved or primal mover(see Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Edward Feser), and there is zero chance of getting around that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 08, 2019 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40648
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nardi wrote:
Lots of people on their high horses say there doesn't have to be a beginning. These are also the same people who look at every single other thing and say, a caused b, and b caused c. Everything has to go back to an unmoved or primal mover(see Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Edward Feser), and there is zero chance of getting around that.


Another way of thinking about the Big Bang is that someone or something put it into motion. Newton's first law of motion states that "An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force." Who or what put things in motion?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 08, 2019 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
pittmike wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Lots of people on their high horses say there doesn't have to be a beginning. These are also the same people who look at every single other thing and say, a caused b, and b caused c. Everything has to go back to an unmoved or primal mover(see Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Edward Feser), and there is zero chance of getting around that.


Another way of thinking about the Big Bang is that someone or something put it into motion. Newton's first law of motion states that "An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force." Who or what put things in motion?

God has always been the answer to explain the unexplainable. As every decade passes, God explains less.

But in so far as human knowledge has been keeping score, Science is up approximately 10,000 to 0 on God, in things that can be explained.

God needs a coaching change...or maybe a good draft.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 08, 2019 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Circled back again. Every chemical had a beginning, was created.

God could be a spiritual being, all knowing, and timeless. That would be religion. God could have accidently created, had no idea what he had done, and then went on his merry way, oblivious.
It is certainly possible that chemicals were created by an intelligent being but it also clearly is not the only possible option.
Nardi wrote:
Lots of people on their high horses say there doesn't have to be a beginning. These are also the same people who look at every single other thing and say, a caused b, and b caused c. Everything has to go back to an unmoved or primal mover(see Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Edward Feser), and there is zero chance of getting around that.
This is further eroding your own point because no matter where you move it down the line, something had to exist that didn't have a beginning. Let's go with your accepted theory that "God" either accidentally or on purpose created everything we have and then disappeared. He either didn't have a beginning or he falls under the same concepts that you think prove his existence.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group