It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 1:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Peoria Matt wrote:
IMU wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
IMU wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
IMU wrote:
Yankees have paid out more bad money than any team. Probably more than any two teams combined.


When you are one of the top spending teams over the last 20 years, you are more than likely going to pay out more bad money than any other team.

The Cubs are also one of the top spending teams over the last 20 years, so we should be pretty happy at the low percentage of bad money the Cubs have paid out.


Not even comparable to the Yankees payroll over the last 20 years.

You've had a bad stretch so I won't post the actual numbers.

No one is close to the Yankees. Because of all the bad contracts.

Do you want the Cubs to have spent as much bad money as the Yankees?


You just put the Cubs in the same mention as the Yankees on "payroll spending over the last 20 years". The totals between the two are not even close.

Yes, they are, considering Cubs are Top 5 in that stretch. No team is a close second to the Yankees. If you want to go through the effort, add up all the teams: http://www.stevetheump.com/Payrolls.htm

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2953
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Heyward isn't wasted money.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
Heyward isn't wasted money.

Go on...

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
There is no reason to add up all the teams because you said the Cubs payroll was similar to the Yankees over the last 20 years. The other teams have no bearing on this. And I like how you threw in the "no team is a close second" qualifier.

Used either the first two or three numbers of the payroll to save you further embarrassment

Yankees payroll total 1999-2019 : 3 billion 667 million
Cubs payroll total 1999-2019 : 2 billion 290 million

Now if a difference of over a billion dollars is "close", I guess we have different opinions of what the meaning of that word is. Like I said, not even comparable.

The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.


Last edited by Peoria Matt on Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2953
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
Im just stating my opinion that a multiple gold glove winning outfielder, who certainly isn't the worst hitter in baseball and is still relatively young in the game isn't the worst contract signing ever, nor should he be sought to be traded. Im not trying to convince anyone. I'm just adding my thought.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
Im just stating my opinion that a multiple gold glove winning outfielder, who certainly isn't the worst hitter in baseball and is still relatively young in the game isn't the worst contract signing ever, nor should he be sought to be traded. Im not trying to convince anyone. I'm just adding my thought.

And you are so wrong. Try harder.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2953
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
ok, what hot prospect did the cubs have to play RF or CF at the level Heyward has? None. Or, who could/would they have targeted in free agency they could afford or desire to sign long term in the years since? there aren't many.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Level he has. :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:05 am
Posts: 2953
Location: DuPage
pizza_Place: Rosati's
youre right. gold glove is nothing. you should manage teams.

_________________
'Your AT&T Universal Card has arrived'? Oh God, Kick-fucking-ass, I got a Master Card! I don't believe it, man. Life is kinda cool sometimes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
His gold glove dosen't hit. Still wrong. You should try to recognize a great player from a wanna be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
youre right. gold glove is nothing. you should manage teams.

His dwar over 3.5 season with the Cubs is a 2.7 total. Less than 1 game a season.
Maybe we overestimate his defensive talent. His dwar last season was 0.1 and it is this season this far.

In other words 100MM is a lot of money for a defensive specialist that's less than 1 game better defensively than a replacement player.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
The Yankees have no problem eating bad money. The Ricketts seem completely opposed to eating bad money. I think the only bad contract they ate was some shitty closer Theo brought in during his 1st or 2nd year....and Duensing.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
The Yankees have no problem eating bad money. The Ricketts seem completely opposed to eating bad money. I think the only bad contract they ate was some shitty closer Theo brought in during his 1st or 2nd year....and Duensing.


They ate part of the Edwin Jackson contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
That couldn't have been that much. He played the majority of the contract for the Cubs. 15.6 mil. That is nothing compared to what they should be eating on Heyward.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Smart teams admit a mistake and move on. The person or persons responsible for the bad deals usually aren't around to do it again. I am of the mindset that they will never win another WS with this regime.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
That couldn't have been that much. He played the majority of the contract for the Cubs. 15.6 mil. That is nothing compared to what they should be eating on Heyward.

12.5 million eaten.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Peoria Matt wrote:
There is no reason to add up all the teams because you said the Cubs payroll was similar to the Yankees over the last 20 years. The other teams have no bearing on this. And I like how you threw in the "no team is a close second" qualifier.

Used either the first two or three numbers of the payroll to save you further embarrassment

Yankees payroll total 1999-2019 : 3 billion 667 million
Cubs payroll total 1999-2019 : 2 billion 290 million

Now if a difference of over a billion dollars is "close", I guess we have different opinions of what the meaning of that word is. Like I said, not even comparable.

The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.

I think you considering the Cubs a small payroll team is head scratching. They aren't the Yankees. No one is the Yankees. The Cubs spend as much or more than 28 other teams and have relatively few albatross contracts to show for it, but you want to "die on the hill" and get pissy that the Cubs currently have 3-4 big contracts. Oh no! The Cubs won the World Series (first time in awhile if you remember) after one of these contracts were signed, and a year after another big contract was signed. 2 of the other big deals are in Year 2, and there have been plenty of contracts in pro sports that didn't look good at the beginning but panned out.

Do you want the Cubs to stop being in the mix for top free agents? Do you want a Jose Abreu type contract to be the Cubs biggest deal?

The Cubs have largely hit on free agent deals. Most free agent deals don't live up to their AAV. You're mostly signing 30+ players that have already had their career years.

The Cubs have made out better than most.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Scooter wrote:
Smart teams admit a mistake and move on. The person or persons responsible for the bad deals usually aren't around to do it again. I am of the mindset that they will never win another WS with this regime.


With this regime the person responsible for most of the good draft picks is the guy before Theo. The draft and development of this regime has been atrocious. Look at the Dodgers. They draft in the late first round every single year and they have prospects flowing out of their ass year in and year out.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I tell ya what really pisses me off, DJ Lemehieu has 28 hits with runners in scoring position this year. The Cubs are the worst team in Mlb with runners on. They traded away a guy who was hitting well for a fucking bum. They had a chance to sign him again this year and reupped that shitbag Addy.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
IMU wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
There is no reason to add up all the teams because you said the Cubs payroll was similar to the Yankees over the last 20 years. The other teams have no bearing on this. And I like how you threw in the "no team is a close second" qualifier.

Used either the first two or three numbers of the payroll to save you further embarrassment

Yankees payroll total 1999-2019 : 3 billion 667 million
Cubs payroll total 1999-2019 : 2 billion 290 million

Now if a difference of over a billion dollars is "close", I guess we have different opinions of what the meaning of that word is. Like I said, not even comparable.

The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.

I think you considering the Cubs a small payroll team is head scratching. They aren't the Yankees. No one is the Yankees. The Cubs spend as much or more than 28 other teams and have relatively few albatross contracts to show for it, but you want to "die on the hill" and get pissy that the Cubs currently have 3-4 big contracts. Oh no! The Cubs won the World Series (first time in awhile if you remember) after one of these contracts were signed, and a year after another big contract was signed. 2 of the other big deals are in Year 2, and there have been plenty of contracts in pro sports that didn't look good at the beginning but panned out.

Do you want the Cubs to stop being in the mix for top free agents? Do you want a Jose Abreu type contract to be the Cubs biggest deal?

The Cubs have largely hit on free agent deals. Most free agent deals don't live up to their AAV. You're mostly signing 30+ players that have already had their career years.

The Cubs have made out better than most.


That's swell and all but it really doesn't change the fact that Heyward is performing at a replacement level defender and just at to below replacement level at bat.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Scooter wrote:
Smart teams admit a mistake and move on. The person or persons responsible for the bad deals usually aren't around to do it again. I am of the mindset that they will never win another WS with this regime.


With this regime the person responsible for most of the good draft picks is the guy before Theo. The draft and development of this regime has been atrocious. Look at the Dodgers. They draft in the late first round every single year and they have prospects flowing out of their ass year in and year out.

Hendry was a great GM. He would have done better FA wise than this group. Baez was his pick let us not forget.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Darkside wrote:
IMU wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
There is no reason to add up all the teams because you said the Cubs payroll was similar to the Yankees over the last 20 years. The other teams have no bearing on this. And I like how you threw in the "no team is a close second" qualifier.

Used either the first two or three numbers of the payroll to save you further embarrassment

Yankees payroll total 1999-2019 : 3 billion 667 million
Cubs payroll total 1999-2019 : 2 billion 290 million

Now if a difference of over a billion dollars is "close", I guess we have different opinions of what the meaning of that word is. Like I said, not even comparable.

The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.

I think you considering the Cubs a small payroll team is head scratching. They aren't the Yankees. No one is the Yankees. The Cubs spend as much or more than 28 other teams and have relatively few albatross contracts to show for it, but you want to "die on the hill" and get pissy that the Cubs currently have 3-4 big contracts. Oh no! The Cubs won the World Series (first time in awhile if you remember) after one of these contracts were signed, and a year after another big contract was signed. 2 of the other big deals are in Year 2, and there have been plenty of contracts in pro sports that didn't look good at the beginning but panned out.

Do you want the Cubs to stop being in the mix for top free agents? Do you want a Jose Abreu type contract to be the Cubs biggest deal?

The Cubs have largely hit on free agent deals. Most free agent deals don't live up to their AAV. You're mostly signing 30+ players that have already had their career years.

The Cubs have made out better than most.


That's swell and all but it really doesn't change the fact that Heyward is performing at a replacement level defender and just at to below replacement level at bat.

That's correct, and it still makes him the second most effective hitter out of the OF group and the second most effective defender out of the OF group.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Scooter wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Scooter wrote:
Smart teams admit a mistake and move on. The person or persons responsible for the bad deals usually aren't around to do it again. I am of the mindset that they will never win another WS with this regime.


With this regime the person responsible for most of the good draft picks is the guy before Theo. The draft and development of this regime has been atrocious. Look at the Dodgers. They draft in the late first round every single year and they have prospects flowing out of their ass year in and year out.

Hendry was a great GM. He would have done better FA wise than this group. Baez was his pick let us not forget.



Tim Wilken drafted Baez, Hendry was a moron.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
IMU wrote:
Darkside wrote:
IMU wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
There is no reason to add up all the teams because you said the Cubs payroll was similar to the Yankees over the last 20 years. The other teams have no bearing on this. And I like how you threw in the "no team is a close second" qualifier.

Used either the first two or three numbers of the payroll to save you further embarrassment

Yankees payroll total 1999-2019 : 3 billion 667 million
Cubs payroll total 1999-2019 : 2 billion 290 million

Now if a difference of over a billion dollars is "close", I guess we have different opinions of what the meaning of that word is. Like I said, not even comparable.

The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.

I think you considering the Cubs a small payroll team is head scratching. They aren't the Yankees. No one is the Yankees. The Cubs spend as much or more than 28 other teams and have relatively few albatross contracts to show for it, but you want to "die on the hill" and get pissy that the Cubs currently have 3-4 big contracts. Oh no! The Cubs won the World Series (first time in awhile if you remember) after one of these contracts were signed, and a year after another big contract was signed. 2 of the other big deals are in Year 2, and there have been plenty of contracts in pro sports that didn't look good at the beginning but panned out.

Do you want the Cubs to stop being in the mix for top free agents? Do you want a Jose Abreu type contract to be the Cubs biggest deal?

The Cubs have largely hit on free agent deals. Most free agent deals don't live up to their AAV. You're mostly signing 30+ players that have already had their career years.

The Cubs have made out better than most.


That's swell and all but it really doesn't change the fact that Heyward is performing at a replacement level defender and just at to below replacement level at bat.

That's correct, and it still makes him the second most effective hitter out of the OF group and the second most effective defender out of the OF group.

Hes replacement level. I've watched him pooch way too many RiSP opportunities and positively stink in the playoffs and in late innings. The data is there.
If hes not performing above replacement level replace him and see if a replacement can play above his level with regular reps.
It's time to cut bait. He does not work.
It's all right there in the data.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Well he is .6 WAR so slightly over replacement level.

Anyway, the stats also show that his hard hit percentage, XBH% and ISO are as high as they've been in a long time while having an unusually low BAbip, even for him. So projections would have him performing even better as the season goes on. Positive regression.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65734
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
IMU wrote:
Well he is .6 WAR so slightly over replacement level.

Anyway, the stats also show that his hard hit percentage, XBH% and ISO are as high as they've been in a long time while having an unusually low BAbip, even for him. So projections would have him performing even better as the season goes on. Positive regression.

We'll see. I'd pull the plug. I'd rather give a replacement some reps.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Peoria Matt wrote:
The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.
They're also not very high.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
IMU wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
There is no reason to add up all the teams because you said the Cubs payroll was similar to the Yankees over the last 20 years. The other teams have no bearing on this. And I like how you threw in the "no team is a close second" qualifier.

Used either the first two or three numbers of the payroll to save you further embarrassment

Yankees payroll total 1999-2019 : 3 billion 667 million
Cubs payroll total 1999-2019 : 2 billion 290 million

Now if a difference of over a billion dollars is "close", I guess we have different opinions of what the meaning of that word is. Like I said, not even comparable.

The hills you choose to die on are head scratching.

I think you considering the Cubs a small payroll team is head scratching. They aren't the Yankees. No one is the Yankees. The Cubs spend as much or more than 28 other teams and have relatively few albatross contracts to show for it, but you want to "die on the hill" and get pissy that the Cubs currently have 3-4 big contracts. Oh no! The Cubs won the World Series (first time in awhile if you remember) after one of these contracts were signed, and a year after another big contract was signed. 2 of the other big deals are in Year 2, and there have been plenty of contracts in pro sports that didn't look good at the beginning but panned out.

Do you want the Cubs to stop being in the mix for top free agents? Do you want a Jose Abreu type contract to be the Cubs biggest deal?

The Cubs have largely hit on free agent deals. Most free agent deals don't live up to their AAV. You're mostly signing 30+ players that have already had their career years.

The Cubs have made out better than most.


I'm not getting pissy.... I showed you that there was over a billion dollar difference between the Yankees and Cubs payrolls over the last 20 years. That is not similar or even remotely close which was your original argument. You then typed a paragraph that had nothing to do with the original disagreement.

At no point did I say the Cubs spend like a small market club. The Cubs spend plenty of money and have spent a ton of it badly. Because of those deals, they had to trade Drew Smyly (who they paid to rehab) so they could pick up the option on Hamels who they had to trade for because of the failure of Darvish and Chatwood. Then they had to wait until what looks to be the retiring of Zobrist so they could spend money to sign Kimbrel to replace another bad signing in Morrow.

The Cubs have had three monster contracts. Lester, Darvish and Heyward. If two don't pan out? Uh oh.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Darkside wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
That couldn't have been that much. He played the majority of the contract for the Cubs. 15.6 mil. That is nothing compared to what they should be eating on Heyward.

12.5 million eaten.


Hey, Hey!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Scooter wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Scooter wrote:
Smart teams admit a mistake and move on. The person or persons responsible for the bad deals usually aren't around to do it again. I am of the mindset that they will never win another WS with this regime.


With this regime the person responsible for most of the good draft picks is the guy before Theo. The draft and development of this regime has been atrocious. Look at the Dodgers. They draft in the late first round every single year and they have prospects flowing out of their ass year in and year out.

Hendry was a great GM. He would have done better FA wise than this group. Baez was his pick let us not forget.


and Contrearas

arguably the two most key pieces on this team

I also think he would have been able to Bryant, as he was the clear pick at that spot

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 180 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group