It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:42 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Jbi11s wrote:
I think there are more fans who follow their favorite schools, but I wouldn’t just brush aside basketball fans who enjoy watching the best players dominate during college.

Both sets of fans exist.


If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.

Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
under this plan, naturally, there would be winners and losers. A couple of the schools might become great (not a foregone conclusion). Others would trail. Do players then have an obligation to bring up those that are lagging behind?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
I think there are more fans who follow their favorite schools, but I wouldn’t just brush aside basketball fans who enjoy watching the best players dominate during college.

Both sets of fans exist.


If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.

Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.


The proposal should be to hire Calipari and create a huge slush fund at an HBCU

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Yes they have and if they weren't then Depaul would have been selling out for years.
Huh? I don't know what point you are making here. I'm less knowledgeable about the fall of DePaul but it seems to have been a combination of a bad stadium situation along with a lower tier conference and other schools being much easier to watch with television.

Still, your whole post was virtually wrong outside of the big time programs paying players.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't Northwestern a hot bed for basketball?
Facilities. Mismanagement. The most apathetic fan base in major college sports.

long time guy wrote:
Penn State?
Hilarious mismanagement for decades. They finally seem to be at least making a decent effort. This is what leads their wikipedia page.
Quote:
In the shadow of football
At a school where the football program captures the vast majority of media and fan interest, the basketball program has historically struggled for relevance. According to ESPN.com writer and Penn State graduate[2] Dana O'Neil,

“ For years the basketball team has been a little sister of the poor stepchild to football, a winter afterthought given all the tending and care of a vegetable garden positioned in the middle of a nuclear field. Administrative support waffles between tepid applause and casual indifference.[3] ”
In O'Neil's view, the "stepchild" status of the program was most starkly illustrated by the last weeks of the 2010–11 season. The team normally practices at a dedicated facility within the Jordan Center. However, for nearly a week in February, while the team was making a run for an NCAA at-large bid, Bon Jovi took over the entire BJC—including the practice facilities—for rehearsals for their upcoming concert tour, which opened at the BJC. The following week, the team was evicted from the BJC for a career fair[2] and for the Penn State IFC/Panhellenic Dance Marathon.[4] On both occasions, the team was forced to practice at the nearby Intramural Building, a facility normally used by Penn State's volleyball teams. Although retrofitted with basketball hoops, the space left much to be desired. Multiple holes for volleyball net stanchions had to be taped over. During the Bon Jovi rehearsals, the hoops had been visibly lower than regulation height. While this error was corrected the following week, one of the hoops remained visibly misaligned.[4]

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
I know she has to write from a sports writers perspective but her proposal really shows the corrupted position sports hold on college campuses.

The answer to irrelevance for a college isn't to become better at sports. That only leads to greater ruination. Going through the college application process, kids find great schools, most of whom have sports as an afterthought.

This thought, almost the premise of the article, is completely incorrect

"It was a moment of hope for HBCUs, and it should have been a moment of fear for the predominantly white institutions whose collective multibillion-dollar revenues have been built largely on the exertions of (uncompensated) black athletes."

Show me the school in this group who couldn't cut out sports entirely and dominate in terms of endowment: https://thebestschools.org/features/ric ... -research/

The proposal should be for the best AA students to go to these schools. That will bring back relevance without selling your academic soul to a corrupted system.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Last edited by good dolphin on Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:55 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40645
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
good dolphin wrote:
I know she has to write from a sports writers perspective but her proposal really shows the corrupted position sports hold on college campuses.

The answer to irrelevance for a college isn't to become better at sports. That only leads to greater ruination. Going through the college application process, kids find great schools, most of whom have sports as an afterthought.

This thought, almost the premise of the article, is completely incorrect

"It was a moment of hope for HBCUs, and it should have been a moment of fear for the predominantly white institutions whose collective multibillion-dollar revenues have been built largely on the exertions of (uncompensated) black athletes."

Show me the school in this group who couldn't cut out sports entirely and dominate in terms of endowment: https://thebestschools.org/features/ric ... -research/

The proposal should be for the best AA students to go to these schools. That will bring back relevance without selling your academic soul to a corrupted system.


Correct.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
I think there are more fans who follow their favorite schools, but I wouldn’t just brush aside basketball fans who enjoy watching the best players dominate during college.

Both sets of fans exist.


If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.

Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.



I don't think what you and Hill are suggesting is impossible but it would be a lot more difficult than Howard and Grambling signing Duke and Kentucky's recruiting classes.

I think you're underestimating the impact of the sizes of these schools and their huge alumni bases. I don't think Harvard or Claremont could pull it off either.

Your point about Northwestern actually supports the argument against you. NU is a small school more like the HBCUs in size than the massive state universities.

As far is DePaul is concerned, yeah it's big, but it's a commuter school in a big pro city.

There's something about spending four or five years in a college town that builds loyalty in a way I don't think attending college in D.C. or Atlanta or Chicago can.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

So Duke was a mid major prior to Coach K but St John's was a national power because you saw them on tv?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31611
pizza_Place: What??
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

You and Jemele are proposing to the elite athlete, Just Do It. and you expect them to come running. Why would they come running? There a a dozen reasons they wouldn't and from what I can tell, one one that they would. And the one reason is certainly against theirs and their family's self interests. Philanthropy is for those that are already successful.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

So Duke was a mid major prior to Coach K but St John's was a national power because you saw them on tv?


You may not know this (You don't) but the creation and growth of the Big East was heavily powered by St. John's back then.

Do you have anything to suggest that Duke was a national power prior to the arrival of Coach K or are you simply pontificating about things you have no knowledge of as usual?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

You and Jemele are proposing to the elite athlete, Just Do It. and you expect them to come running. Why would they come running? There a a dozen reasons they wouldn't and from what I can tell, one one that they would. And the one reason is certainly against theirs and their family's self interests. Philanthropy is for those that are already successful.



Sure its in their family's best interest to take the money that elite programs offer. The primary reason that elite players attend Kentucky, Duke and Kansas is because they are paid to attend Duke, Kansas, and Kentucky. If they paid the same way at HBCUs those same players would attend those schools too.

I haven't heard anything yet which suggests otherwise.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
I think there are more fans who follow their favorite schools, but I wouldn’t just brush aside basketball fans who enjoy watching the best players dominate during college.

Both sets of fans exist.


If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.

Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.



I don't think what you and Hill are suggesting is impossible but it would be a lot more difficult than Howard and Grambling signing Duke and Kentucky's recruiting classes.

I think you're underestimating the impact of the sizes of these schools and their huge alumni bases. I don't think Harvard or Claremont could pull it off either.

Your point about Northwestern actually supports the argument against you. NU is a small school more like the HBCUs in size than the massive state universities.

As far is DePaul is concerned, yeah it's big, but it's a commuter school in a big pro city.

There's something about spending four or five years in a college town that builds loyalty in a way I don't think attending college in D.C. or Atlanta or Chicago can.



Depaul was also a big commuter school and bigger than the Bulls during the period in which you attended also. I know you are aware of that. Brick isn't however. When they had iconic, legendary players and nationally ranked every year they were a big deal. ONce they stopped attracting said players they were not.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31611
pizza_Place: What??
long time guy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

You and Jemele are proposing to the elite athlete, Just Do It. and you expect them to come running. Why would they come running? There a a dozen reasons they wouldn't and from what I can tell, one one that they would. And the one reason is certainly against theirs and their family's self interests. Philanthropy is for those that are already successful.



Sure its in their family's best interest to take the money that elite programs offer. The primary reason that elite players attend Kentucky, Duke and Kansas is because they are paid to attend Duke, Kansas, and Kentucky. If they paid the same way at HBCUs those same players would attend those schools too.

I haven't heard anything yet which suggests otherwise.

OK. I'll concede the point. It's probable if Grambling had a slush fund, an elite athlete would consider attending. UNLV back in the day is an outstanding example. But I haven't heard you say anything about Jemele promoting segregation due to comfort.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:

Do you have anything to suggest that Duke was a national power prior to the arrival of Coach K or are you simply pontificating about things you have no knowledge of as usual?


They played in the Final Four in 1963, 1964, 1966, and 1978.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:20 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
Depaul was also a big commuter school and bigger than the Bulls during the period in which you attended also. I know you are aware of that. Brick isn't however. When they had iconic, legendary players and nationally ranked every year they were a big deal. ONce they stopped attracting said players they were not.


I did not attend DePaul. Like many Chicagoans, I certainly was a HUGE fan. But I will say what happened with them in the late 70s/early 80s was a perfect storm. I don't think if you had a ten year run of teams that good now that it would be received the same way. Chicago was so starved for a winner at that time that we would have latched onto anything.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

So Duke was a mid major prior to Coach K but St John's was a national power because you saw them on tv?


You may not know this (You don't) but the creation and growth of the Big East was heavily powered by St. John's back then.

Do you have anything to suggest that Duke was a national power prior to the arrival of Coach K or are you simply pontificating about things you have no knowledge of as usual?

You said Duke was a mid major. That is 100 percent false.

St John's was a good program. They weren't a national power. A lot of good programs aren't as good as they used to be. You aren't making any good points.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
I think there are more fans who follow their favorite schools, but I wouldn’t just brush aside basketball fans who enjoy watching the best players dominate during college.

Both sets of fans exist.


If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.

Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.



I don't think what you and Hill are suggesting is impossible but it would be a lot more difficult than Howard and Grambling signing Duke and Kentucky's recruiting classes.

I think you're underestimating the impact of the sizes of these schools and their huge alumni bases. I don't think Harvard or Claremont could pull it off either.

Your point about Northwestern actually supports the argument against you. NU is a small school more like the HBCUs in size than the massive state universities.

As far is DePaul is concerned, yeah it's big, but it's a commuter school in a big pro city.

There's something about spending four or five years in a college town that builds loyalty in a way I don't think attending college in D.C. or Atlanta or Chicago can.



Depaul was also a big commuter school and bigger than the Bulls during the period in which you attended also. I know you are aware of that. Brick isn't however. When they had iconic, legendary players and nationally ranked every year they were a big deal. ONce they stopped attracting said players they were not.

Yup. It could easily happen to any school. Nor sure if the infrastructure would immediately follow, as BRick points out, but in terms of winning, especially in basketball, a small number of guys could make a difference. The TV cameras will have to follow the winners.

As far as voluntary segregation goes, that's one of our society's growing pains. No easy answers. It certainly seems like a step back, but then again, many college students go where they feel comfortable. Some Black people might flip out if they heard me say it, but I can relate, to a degree, to not feeling comfortable on a campus due to who I was. And yes, you have to get over that, but attrition, man. Attrition is a killer. DePaul is a good example of that, since the CPS coaches perceived, at least, that their former players weren't getting the kind of support they needed.

I can definitely see her point. And other groups did this, too. (Catholics, anyone?)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

You and Jemele are proposing to the elite athlete, Just Do It. and you expect them to come running. Why would they come running? There a a dozen reasons they wouldn't and from what I can tell, one one that they would. And the one reason is certainly against theirs and their family's self interests. Philanthropy is for those that are already successful.



Sure its in their family's best interest to take the money that elite programs offer. The primary reason that elite players attend Kentucky, Duke and Kansas is because they are paid to attend Duke, Kansas, and Kentucky. If they paid the same way at HBCUs those same players would attend those schools too.

I haven't heard anything yet which suggests otherwise.

OK. I'll concede the point. It's probable if Grambling had a slush fund, an elite athlete would consider attending. UNLV back in the day is an outstanding example. But I haven't heard you say anything about Jemele promoting segregation due to comfort.


I must have missed where she is promoting Segregation. She didn't advocate for all black athletes to attend HBCUs. She wants elite athletes to attend HBCUs. When she begins to lay out the numbers she actually makes a compelling case. Why can't Kentucky acquire the sort of talent that regularly attends Prairie View or Texas Southern?

If you swap the talent (Which Hill appears to be suggesting and not the Segregating of talent) then the level of interest in HBCU programs would heighten tremendously. Conversely the level of "Blueblood" programs would lessen tremendously. They would start getting the doors off of them and I guarantee that the love of all things college which Brick keeps claiming would subsequently be lost.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Do you have anything to suggest that Duke was a national power prior to the arrival of Coach K or are you simply pontificating about things you have no knowledge of as usual?


They played in the Final Four in 1963, 1964, 1966, and 1978.


Loyola also played in the National Championship game in 1963 and by 1984 they were a mid major too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You said Duke was a mid major. That is 100 percent false.


The conference Record of Duke during the decade of the 70's (Coach K arrived in 1980) was 60-78

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Depaul was also a big commuter school and bigger than the Bulls during the period in which you attended also. I know you are aware of that. Brick isn't however. When they had iconic, legendary players and nationally ranked every year they were a big deal. ONce they stopped attracting said players they were not.


I did not attend DePaul. Like many Chicagoans, I certainly was a HUGE fan. But I will say what happened with them in the late 70s/early 80s was a perfect storm. I don't think if you had a ten year run of teams that good now that it would be received the same way. Chicago was so starved for a winner at that time that we would have latched onto anything.

Probably not. But the winter sports season revolved around them. I was surprised, when I got to be a teen, to learn that the Demons weren't quite a Kentucky-level program, and that Ray Meyer wasn't universally considered to be the greatest coach of all time. It was like that Loyola run every season.

Except in my house, where I had to watch them and the Illini on the sly. (We watched the Hoosiers because Knight played white guys. Yes, my father changed.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
It would take more than one "Fab 5" like class at a HBCU school to make "white universities" lose power.

It would need to be years of sustained influx to multiple schools to even make a dent.

Getting on TV would be easy though.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Do you have anything to suggest that Duke was a national power prior to the arrival of Coach K or are you simply pontificating about things you have no knowledge of as usual?


They played in the Final Four in 1963, 1964, 1966, and 1978.


Loyola also played in the National Championship game in 1963 and by 1984 they were a mid major too.



You're abusing the term "mid-major". There was no such thing in the 60s or 70s. That's a term that relates to conference power based upon television money that didn't exist when Oscar Robertson was playing at Cincinnati or when Rutgers made the Final Four.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
It would take more than one "Fab 5" like class at a HBCU school to make "white universities" lose power.

It would need to be years of sustained influx to multiple schools to even make a dent.

Getting on TV would be easy though.

It would likely help their general student population. Not sure if HBCUs would follow the model as other schools who get tv exposure. Even Butler had massive jumps in applications after their success in the tournament. Alabama has a much higher quality of student today than a generation ago partially due to futbol norteamericano.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
No you aren't making any points other than "you're wrong" which is pretty weak. You have no frame of reference to back up anything that you're saying. I can however. St. John's basketball was much bigger during the early 80's than Duke happened to be.
Why did you delete this?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
De Paul relevance was tied to WGN, just like the lovable losers from the north

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Do you have anything to suggest that Duke was a national power prior to the arrival of Coach K or are you simply pontificating about things you have no knowledge of as usual?


They played in the Final Four in 1963, 1964, 1966, and 1978.


Loyola also played in the National Championship game in 1963 and by 1984 they were a mid major too.



You're abusing the term "mid-major". There was no such thing in the 60s or 70s. That's a term that relates to conference power based upon television money that didn't exist when Oscar Robertson was playing at Cincinnati or when Rutgers made the Final Four.

When did that shift occur? Even Beloit made the NCAAs one or two years, I think. (Or the NIT.) It's funny to look at those schools who used to make it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
tommy wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
It would take more than one "Fab 5" like class at a HBCU school to make "white universities" lose power.

It would need to be years of sustained influx to multiple schools to even make a dent.

Getting on TV would be easy though.

It would likely help their general student population. Not sure if HBCUs would follow the model as other schools who get tv exposure. Even Butler had massive jumps in applications after their success in the tournament. Alabama has a much higher quality of student today than a generation ago partially due to futbol norteamericano.


Image

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group