It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Terry's Peeps wrote:
It would take more than one "Fab 5" like class at a HBCU school to make "white universities" lose power.

It would need to be years of sustained influx to multiple schools to even make a dent.

Getting on TV would be easy though.


Of course you need more than one Fab 5 class. She isn't talking about a flash in the pan sort of thing however. SHe is talking about elite black athletes customarily attending HBCUs.

The sort of players she is talking about will typically be one and dones anyway. They aren't attending college for the long haul anyway. Why not bounce around at an HBCU and up the prestige?


For years we have had to hear how black athletes (too many of them anyway) hurt the culture and prestige of PWIs. Ok why not remove the better ones from the equation and see what happens?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You said Duke was a mid major. That is 100 percent false.


The conference Record of Duke during the decade of the 70's (Coach K arrived in 1980) was 60-78

So what? There are mid majors that win 30 games a year.

Do you literally not know what a mid major is?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
What they really need is a top white player to break the color barrier and go to a HBCU.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:47 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
tommy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:

Do you have anything to suggest that Duke was a national power prior to the arrival of Coach K or are you simply pontificating about things you have no knowledge of as usual?


They played in the Final Four in 1963, 1964, 1966, and 1978.


Loyola also played in the National Championship game in 1963 and by 1984 they were a mid major too.



You're abusing the term "mid-major". There was no such thing in the 60s or 70s. That's a term that relates to conference power based upon television money that didn't exist when Oscar Robertson was playing at Cincinnati or when Rutgers made the Final Four.

When did that shift occur? Even Beloit made the NCAAs one or two years, I think. (Or the NIT.) It's funny to look at those schools who used to make it.


I think most people would say the 1979 Final Four with Bird and Magic delineates the modern era.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You said Duke was a mid major. That is 100 percent false.


The conference Record of Duke during the decade of the 70's (Coach K arrived in 1980) was 60-78

So what? There are mid majors that win 30 games a year.

Do you literally not know what a mid major is?


Its obvious you don't. They were 60-78 during the ten years prior to the arrival of COach yet you think they were somehow a high major program.

Again you have nothing to support anything you say other than the rather repetitive dissenting opinion of yours. Provide facts not opinions for once and then there might be a little validity to the things that you state.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Team goes 60-78 over a ten year stretch and Brick still considers them to be a national power.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 10:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
yet you think they were somehow a high major program.


Damn, you're a hardhead. You're misusing these terms just like you misuse "Never Trumper".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Team goes 60-78 over a ten year stretch and Brick still considers them to be a national power.

I didn't say they were a national power.

Is Northwestern a mid major?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?

I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?

St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.

Again you don't know what you are talking about.

You and Jemele are proposing to the elite athlete, Just Do It. and you expect them to come running. Why would they come running? There a a dozen reasons they wouldn't and from what I can tell, one one that they would. And the one reason is certainly against theirs and their family's self interests. Philanthropy is for those that are already successful.


Which actually acknowledges the problem I have with those so aggrieved by her column. DePaul was paying well long ago, Kentucky, UNC, Louisville, Arizona & Auburn are getting caught at it now. It's proof of the flawed system and now if only to disrupt television & shoe company money Hill offers up a choice for some kids & schools that otherwise have been proven to largely have their better educational interests at heart. She's not demanding anything of the elite athlete, just suggesting something many fed up with this entirely corrupt system have murmured about for years. And imo, the reflexive outrage/furor is misplaced, if not completely hypocritical.

It's a completely monopolistic system aided and abetted by the NCAA, major media & shoe companies. That it's so dirty to it's core, yet her clear intent is seemingly being so twisted to defend it is sad imo.

It kind of reminds me of the mid/late 80's & the U. Rotten to the core, but it made boosters feel good & admission applications skyrocket. Bring in the money to what used to be a sleepy school with a crap program and all will be largely overlooked. Until it couldn't be.

In comparison to a dirty national power in basketball at that time, UNLV. Where the games were too late for tv ratings, where the coach thumbed his nose to the "respectables", and yet they were always being hit by the NCAA for fear that they'd disrupt the status quo.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Team goes 60-78 over a ten year stretch and Brick still considers them to be a national power.

I didn't say they were a national power.

Is Northwestern a mid major?


Northwestern tries to be an occasional cute story, substituting Julia Dreyfus for Sister Jean.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
yet you think they were somehow a high major program.


Damn, you're a hardhead. You're misusing these terms just like you misuse "Never Trumper".


Do you have anything to suggest that they were a "high powered" program prior to Coach K's arrival? Trying to play the semantics game is a waste of my (a guy that actually knows of which he speaks) time. You are siding with a dude that made the rather fallacious argument that Duke was high powered program prior to Coach K's time and you are talking about misusage of terms. Its obvious who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2019 11:39 am
Posts: 650
pizza_Place: Burts place
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
yet you think they were somehow a high major program.


Damn, you're a hardhead. You're misusing these terms just like you misuse "Never Trumper".


Do you have anything to suggest that they were a "high powered" program prior to Coach K's arrival? Trying to play the semantics game is a waste of my (a guy that actually knows of which he speaks) time. You are siding with a dude that made the rather fallacious argument that Duke was high powered program prior to Coach K's time and you are talking about misusage of terms. Its obvious who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't


LTG exposed again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Team goes 60-78 over a ten year stretch and Brick still considers them to be a national power.

I didn't say they were a national power.

Is Northwestern a mid major?


Yes they are. They are a mid major in a high major conference. Just because you play in a high major conference doesn't mean that you are a high major program. Northwestern has never been a high major program.

A high major program doesn't miss the NCAA tournament for the number of years that Northwestern did.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Bababooey wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
yet you think they were somehow a high major program.


Damn, you're a hardhead. You're misusing these terms just like you misuse "Never Trumper".


Do you have anything to suggest that they were a "high powered" program prior to Coach K's arrival? Trying to play the semantics game is a waste of my (a guy that actually knows of which he speaks) time. You are siding with a dude that made the rather fallacious argument that Duke was high powered program prior to Coach K's time and you are talking about misusage of terms. Its obvious who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't


LTG exposed again.


By whom? a dude that claimed that Duke was big time prior to Coach K's arrival and another guy that uses stats claimed they were big time because of a few Final Four appearances? please this is a joke.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Yes they have and if they weren't then Depaul would have been selling out for years.
Huh? I don't know what point you are making here. I'm less knowledgeable about the fall of DePaul but it seems to have been a combination of a bad stadium situation along with a lower tier conference and other schools being much easier to watch with television.

Still, your whole post was virtually wrong outside of the big time programs paying players.

long time guy wrote:
Why isn't Northwestern a hot bed for basketball?
Facilities. Mismanagement. The most apathetic fan base in major college sports.

long time guy wrote:
Penn State?
Hilarious mismanagement for decades. They finally seem to be at least making a decent effort. This is what leads their wikipedia page.
Quote:
In the shadow of football
At a school where the football program captures the vast majority of media and fan interest, the basketball program has historically struggled for relevance. According to ESPN.com writer and Penn State graduate[2] Dana O'Neil,

“ For years the basketball team has been a little sister of the poor stepchild to football, a winter afterthought given all the tending and care of a vegetable garden positioned in the middle of a nuclear field. Administrative support waffles between tepid applause and casual indifference.[3] ”
In O'Neil's view, the "stepchild" status of the program was most starkly illustrated by the last weeks of the 2010–11 season. The team normally practices at a dedicated facility within the Jordan Center. However, for nearly a week in February, while the team was making a run for an NCAA at-large bid, Bon Jovi took over the entire BJC—including the practice facilities—for rehearsals for their upcoming concert tour, which opened at the BJC. The following week, the team was evicted from the BJC for a career fair[2] and for the Penn State IFC/Panhellenic Dance Marathon.[4] On both occasions, the team was forced to practice at the nearby Intramural Building, a facility normally used by Penn State's volleyball teams. Although retrofitted with basketball hoops, the space left much to be desired. Multiple holes for volleyball net stanchions had to be taped over. During the Bon Jovi rehearsals, the hoops had been visibly lower than regulation height. While this error was corrected the following week, one of the hoops remained visibly misaligned.[4]



So everything comes down to "mismanagement"? Again Ok. If Penn State starts paying for players in Basketball then all of a sudden the "mismanagement" disappears. There is no magic bullet in this. The teams that acquire top players pay top dollar for those players.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
yet you think they were somehow a high major program.


Damn, you're a hardhead. You're misusing these terms just like you misuse "Never Trumper".


Do you have anything to suggest that they were a "high powered" program prior to Coach K's arrival? Trying to play the semantics game is a waste of my (a guy that actually knows of which he speaks) time. You are siding with a dude that made the rather fallacious argument that Duke was high powered program prior to Coach K's time and you are talking about misusage of terms. Its obvious who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't


They were in the Final Four two years before Kryszewski arrived. Bill Foster was the coach. He was 113–64 as the coach at Duke.

And you're mistakenly equating "high-powered" with major. Vanderbilt and Northwestern are major programs. Most people wouldn't call them "high-powered".

long time guy wrote:
Its obvious who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't


It certainly is.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79540
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
and another guy that uses stats claimed they were big time because of a few Final Four appearances?


How many school have more Final Four appearances than Duke prior to 1980? I assure you it isn't many.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.


From 1976-1993 St. John's only missed the tournament twice.

From 1980-1992 they won 5 Big East regular season Championships. Mind you this occurred during a period in which the Big East was arguably the top conf in the Country.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Mid majors are teams that play outside of the power conferences.

A team in the Big 10 isn't a mid major.

A team in the Big East in 2019 probably is.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
and another guy that uses stats claimed they were big time because of a few Final Four appearances?


How many school have more Final Four appearances than Duke prior to 1980? I assure you it isn't many.


Do you want me to provide Duke's record in conf from about 1968-1985? Definitely nowhere near an elite program. St. John's only missed the NCAA tournament twice in 17 years. He said they were not a national power during those years. Sure they weren't.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Mid majors are teams that play outside of the power conferences.

A team in the Big 10 isn't a mid major.

A team in the Big East in 2019 probably is.



Teams that miss the tournament each and every year aren't high major programs. Rutgers isn't high major just because they happen to play in the Big Ten.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
yet you think they were somehow a high major program.


Damn, you're a hardhead. You're misusing these terms just like you misuse "Never Trumper".


Do you have anything to suggest that they were a "high powered" program prior to Coach K's arrival? Trying to play the semantics game is a waste of my (a guy that actually knows of which he speaks) time. You are siding with a dude that made the rather fallacious argument that Duke was high powered program prior to Coach K's time and you are talking about misusage of terms. Its obvious who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't


They were in the Final Four two years before Kryszewski arrived. Bill Foster was the coach. He was 113–64 as the coach at Duke.

And you're mistakenly equating "high-powered" with major. Vanderbilt and Northwestern are major programs. Most people wouldn't call them "high-powered".

long time guy wrote:
Its obvious who knows what they are talking about and who doesn't


It certainly is.



I just provided Dukes in conference record during the decade of the 70's. One Final Four appearance doesn't change that. Loyola also made the Final Four last year. Are they all of a sudden "high major" as a result?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Team goes 60-78 over a ten year stretch and Brick still considers them to be a national power.

I didn't say they were a national power.

Is Northwestern a mid major?


Yes they are. They are a mid major in a high major conference. Just because you play in a high major conference doesn't mean that you are a high major program. Northwestern has never been a high major program.

A high major program doesn't miss the NCAA tournament for the number of years that Northwestern did.

You do not know what a mid major means.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Team goes 60-78 over a ten year stretch and Brick still considers them to be a national power.

I didn't say they were a national power.

Is Northwestern a mid major?


Yes they are. They are a mid major in a high major conference. Just because you play in a high major conference doesn't mean that you are a high major program. Northwestern has never been a high major program.

A high major program doesn't miss the NCAA tournament for the number of years that Northwestern did.

You do not know what a mid major means.


Just because you play in a high major conference doesn't mean you run a high major program. For some reason unsurprisingly you don't understand that.

Duke didn't run a high major program until they began paying for high major players.

You keep wanting to pound this point primarily because your point regarding people showing up to college games for the purpose of attending college games was customarily debunked.

The interest in college sports wanes tremendously in places where the teams are crappy. The entire notion that they cheer for the school and not the team thing that continuously push is a joke. When those teams win their is much more interest. When they don't their isn't.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
So everything comes down to "mismanagement"? Again Ok. If Penn State starts paying for players in Basketball then all of a sudden the "mismanagement" disappears. There is no magic bullet in this. The teams that acquire top players pay top dollar for those players.
With Northwestern and Penn State it does come down to mismanagement why they have struggled mightily as a basketball program.

I mean, I guess technically they could cheat more than anyone else and do better but that isn't exactly making an argument for anything relevant to this thread. No one is arguing that Grambling couldn't pay Zion a million dollars and get him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Do you want me to provide Duke's record in conf from about 1968-1985? Definitely nowhere near an elite program. St. John's only missed the NCAA tournament twice in 17 years. He said they were not a national power during those years. Sure they weren't.
That does not make you a national power.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82203
Terry's Peeps wrote:
What they really need is a top white player to break the color barrier and go to a HBCU.


I remember some made for tv movie in my youth about that. I think it starred bruce jenner

BOOM, found it:

Image

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92037
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Team goes 60-78 over a ten year stretch and Brick still considers them to be a national power.

I didn't say they were a national power.

Is Northwestern a mid major?


Yes they are. They are a mid major in a high major conference. Just because you play in a high major conference doesn't mean that you are a high major program. Northwestern has never been a high major program.

A high major program doesn't miss the NCAA tournament for the number of years that Northwestern did.

You do not know what a mid major means.


Just because you play in a high major conference doesn't mean you run a high major program. For some reason unsurprisingly you don't understand that.
I don't understand because you have made up your own definition.

No one says that a member of the Big Ten is a mid major even if they lose every game. The whole concept is that you aren't in a major conference.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23822
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Usually ltg’s derails serve him well, but his failure to know what a mid-major is really kneecapped him here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Do you want me to provide Duke's record in conf from about 1968-1985? Definitely nowhere near an elite program. St. John's only missed the NCAA tournament twice in 17 years. He said they were not a national power during those years. Sure they weren't.
That does not make you a national power.


Winning the Big East 5 times in 12 years during the 80's and early 90's does make you a national power. Apparently you do not know what the Big East was like (unsurprisingly) during the 80's. Probably the Best conf in all of College Basketball at the time.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 394 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group