It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Biggest pretenders in football. Their fundamentals are weak as hell. Defense is a product of weak opponents and not actual talent. Any injuries to the secondary and edge players would spell utter doom.

Rodgers looks absolutely finished and the LeFleur gameplan is actually a little better than I expected but still not good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Antarctica wrote:
Biggest pretenders in football. Their fundamentals are weak as hell. Defense is a product of weak opponents and not actual talent. Any injuries to the secondary and edge players would spell utter doom.

Rodgers looks absolutely finished and the LeFleur gameplan is actually a little better than I expected but still not good.

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Savage or Amos would start over Dix (but the upgrade to Amos is not worth the $$$) and Jaire Alexander would be a fine #2 CB behind Fuller but other than that there isn't a defensive player on the Packers who would sniff the Bears rotations. This is obvious to anyone who watches.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Creeper Bob could learn a thing or two from this guy.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Antarctica wrote:
Savage or Amos would start over Dix (but the upgrade to Amos is not worth the $$$) and Jaire Alexander would be a fine #2 CB behind Fuller but other than that there isn't a defensive player on the Packers who would sniff the Bears rotations. This is obvious to anyone who watches.

Remember that Emmanuel Sanders is on the Broncos? Well today he wasn't. Jaire shut that bitch down.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Antarctica wrote:
Savage or Amos would start over Dix (but the upgrade to Amos is not worth the $$$) and Jaire Alexander would be a fine #2 CB behind Fuller but other than that there isn't a defensive player on the Packers who would sniff the Bears rotations. This is obvious to anyone who watches.

The Smith bros are better than every member of your defense except Mack you clown. And have a shitload more production than Mack this year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Kirkwood wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
Savage or Amos would start over Dix (but the upgrade to Amos is not worth the $$$) and Jaire Alexander would be a fine #2 CB behind Fuller but other than that there isn't a defensive player on the Packers who would sniff the Bears rotations. This is obvious to anyone who watches.

Remember that Emmanuel Sanders is on the Broncos? Well today he wasn't. Jaire shut that patriot down.

Jaire played great today. Quickly putting his name in conversation of best CBs in the league.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I dont think Preston Smith would make the Bears 53 man roster. Honestly. There's no use for him, he's no better than Lynch and really is just an inferior version of Floyd. They'd probably have him over Isaiah Irving all things equal but they'd dump him to save money.

Za'Darius Smith would have a spot a situational rusher to give Mack/Floyd breathers. Can never have too many guys to get after the QB.


Last edited by Antarctica on Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4765
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
That was the most frustrating loss for the Broncos, because without the turnovers and the bad holding call that brought back the TD, they were the better team. They ran all over GB, but Flacco made too many errant plays.

GB didn't do much in the 2nd half. The Broncos D shut them down. One touchdown on a turnover deep in Broncos territory and a measly field goal. Rodgers threw away more balls in the dirt than the pitchers on the Cubs.


Last edited by Dignified Rube on Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
Savage or Amos would start over Dix (but the upgrade to Amos is not worth the $$$) and Jaire Alexander would be a fine #2 CB behind Fuller but other than that there isn't a defensive player on the Packers who would sniff the Bears rotations. This is obvious to anyone who watches.

Remember that Emmanuel Sanders is on the Broncos? Well today he wasn't. Jaire shut that patriot down.

Jaire played great today. Quickly putting his name in conversation of best CBs in the league.

Kevin King has worked to do. But him playing 3 straight games without injury is monumental progress for him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Kirkwood wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
Savage or Amos would start over Dix (but the upgrade to Amos is not worth the $$$) and Jaire Alexander would be a fine #2 CB behind Fuller but other than that there isn't a defensive player on the Packers who would sniff the Bears rotations. This is obvious to anyone who watches.

Remember that Emmanuel Sanders is on the Broncos? Well today he wasn't. Jaire shut that patriot down.

Jaire played great today. Quickly putting his name in conversation of best CBs in the league.

Kevin King has worked to do. But him playing 3 straight games without injury is monumental progress for him

Yup. Best pass rush in the league probably too. Helps the young secondary out a lot.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Antarctica wrote:
I dont think Preston Smith would make the Bears 53 man roster. Honestly. There's no use for him, he's no better than Lynch and really is just an inferior version of Floyd. They'd probably have him over Isaiah Irving all things equal but they'd dump him to save money.

Za'Darius Smith would have a spot a situational rusher to give Mack/Floyd breathers. Can never have too many guys to get after the QB.

Let me know when Mack gets a sack. The Smiths have like 5 or 6 already :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis


Facts

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis


Fucking love it. Can’t wait for Thursday. Let’s keep this rolling

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

:lol: they won by 11 dipshit.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Probably not the best comparison to make since Khalil Mack absolutely dominated the Broncos by drawing a near record number of holding penalties.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

:lol: they won by 11 dipshit.

At home. Broncos are a different animal at home.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Antarctica wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

:lol: they won by 11 dipshit.

At home. Broncos are a different animal at home.

I’m good with this trend of the Packers continuously winning and then afterwards you telling me why they shouldn’t have won. I expect it be a 4th straight time Thursday night.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Antarctica wrote:
Probably not the best comparison to make since Khalil Mack absolutely dominated the Broncos by drawing a near record number of holding penalties.

Lol. Yeah my guys got sacks. But it’s cute your guy drew a couple flags.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4765
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

:lol: they won by 11 dipshit.


That 11 is inflated in view of Denver's turnovers and the one bad holding call on the TD run. I'm not saying GB didn't make good plays on defense, but the game was a lot closer than the score shows. Denver hurt themselves.

This game does nothing to change my mind the Broncos are still a good team with great RBs. They didn't sack Rodgers, but they had him pressured plenty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dignified Rube wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

:lol: they won by 11 dipshit.


That 11 is inflated in view of Denver's turnovers and the one bad holding call on the TD run. I'm not saying GB didn't make good plays on defense, but the game was a lot closer than the score shows. Denver hurt themselves.

This game does nothing to change my mind the Broncos are still a good team with great RBs. They didn't sack Rodgers, but they had him pressured plenty.

The game was never close. But yes, GB’s great defense did force some big turnovers once again. 8)

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

Hey shit for brains, instead of picking on the undefeated Packers, why don't you show face in the Cubs section and respond to your dumbass posts there. I'd say you should be castrated, but its pretty clear you don't even have balls to remove. Taunt the Sox and praise the Cubs all year and you fail to post during thier downfall. Sackless piece of shit.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I love Frank

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Broncos YPP - 4.2

That'll do. Take it every week.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

Hey shit for brains, instead of picking on the undefeated Packers, why don't you show face in the Cubs section and respond to your dumbass posts there. I'd say you should be castrated, but its pretty clear you don't even have balls to remove. Taunt the Sox and praise the Cubs all year and you fail to post during thier downfall. Sackless piece of shit.


Don't hold back Frank :lol: :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank is soft of the Packers and that disappoints me. You can never run out of reasons to bash the Packers. It's literally one of our birth rights.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
FavreFan wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
I dont think Preston Smith would make the Bears 53 man roster. Honestly. There's no use for him, he's no better than Lynch and really is just an inferior version of Floyd. They'd probably have him over Isaiah Irving all things equal but they'd dump him to save money.

Za'Darius Smith would have a spot a situational rusher to give Mack/Floyd breathers. Can never have too many guys to get after the QB.

Let me know when Mack gets a sack. The Smiths have like 5 or 6 already :lol:

The Smiths are castoffs that their original teams didn’t want. :lol: God Antarctica is a clown.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 7:11 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
Frank is soft of the Packers and that disappoints me. You can never run out of reasons to bash the Packers. It's literally one of our birth rights.

I hate idiot Cub fans like Bob almost as much as i hate the fudgePackers

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
It's good they got some sacks considering they let a couple of scrub running backs from Denver run all over them.

Hey shit for brains, instead of picking on the undefeated Packers, why don't you show face in the Cubs section and respond to your dumbass posts there. I'd say you should be castrated, but its pretty clear you don't even have balls to remove. Taunt the Sox and praise the Cubs all year and you fail to post during thier downfall. Sackless piece of shit.



Remember folks, this is the fucking unhinged loser that throws a fucking golf themed party for a 1-year-old. Yeah, that kid will need therapy one day.

Find some other lotion to get you off.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9743 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group