It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 227 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41379
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
pittmike wrote:
All I can say is I am glad they finally got my Army special guys some work. Fucking Seals this and Seals that. Go ride on a ship squids.


He blew himself up with a vest.. Army really didn't do anything. The Seals ACTUALLY killed Bin Laden.


They usually kill themselves.


Seals got Bin Laden in one piece.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
Nas wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
They are just way better at towing the party line to achieve a goal than the Dems. Dems eat their own.


It's funny that both parties seem to admire the other party for towing the party line and complain that they cannot do the same.


One is being honest and the other is trying to get more people on board.


This can't be serious.


Democrats are timid and generally suck at developing a strategy that is easy to sell to the public. Republicans are generally effective at selling things to the public. Regardless of if the public is on board they go for the win no matter what. Can you imagine if Trump had a super majority? Look at what the Republicans have accomplished with the courts without one. I would feel better being a Republican if there was a policy I wanted passed.


I guess I didn't understand what you were saying.

Have you considered that you only view the Dems as meek and ineffective because they are the ones you like? Right now, they are holding private impeachment hearings that are driving down Trump's approval very effectively. And let's not be naive - that is precisely their goal. While I find it to be glaringly political and dishonest, it is very effective politics. It is also Constitutional. Both sides are ultimately out for politics and their own power. It's the ones who don't have those goals that frighten them. AOC, Trump, Gabbard, third parties, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
storkinastorm wrote:
Nas wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
They are just way better at towing the party line to achieve a goal than the Dems. Dems eat their own.


It's funny that both parties seem to admire the other party for towing the party line and complain that they cannot do the same.


One is being honest and the other is trying to get more people on board.


This can't be serious.


Democrats are timid and generally suck at developing a strategy that is easy to sell to the public. Republicans are generally effective at selling things to the public. Regardless of if the public is on board they go for the win no matter what. Can you imagine if Trump had a super majority? Look at what the Republicans have accomplished with the courts without one. I would feel better being a Republican if there was a policy I wanted passed.


I guess I didn't understand what you were saying.

Have you considered that you only view the Dems as meek and ineffective because they are the ones you like? Right now, they are holding private impeachment hearings that are driving down Trump's approval very effectively. And let's not be naive - that is precisely their goal. While I find it to be glaringly political and dishonest, it is very effective politics. It is also Constitutional. Both sides are ultimately out for politics and their own power. It's the ones who don't have those goals that frighten them. AOC, Trump, Gabbard, third parties, etc.


I view them that way because they are generally incompetent and ineffective.

If there are no public hearings, I will support your position. I don't think they are necessary now.

All of the people you named are out for power and elevating their brand. People like Trump and to a certain extent AOC are the worst. They're willing to destroy it all if they don't get their way.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Spaulding wrote:
How prevalent is voter suppression and do you have data on it (from a not left or right leaning source)?


Yeah what is really interesting is that in the last several years most instances of fraud and suppression in voting have been perpetrated by the Dems.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
GoldenJet wrote:
Gerrymandering districts and voter suppression have pretty clearly been an organized operation for the Right for quite some time.

tht first part is done by both sides so that point is moot, just take a look at Illinois.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.

They left want to take away peoples' votes by removing the Electoral College. A device specifically put into place to make sure that all parts of the country have an equitable part in electing our president. If you remove that you basically nullify 46 states from having any voice in the election process. I call that disenfranchisement,don't you?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Wrong Section.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
chaspoppcap wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.

They left want to take away peoples' votes by removing the Electoral College. A device specifically put into place to make sure that all parts of the country have an equitable part in electing our president. If you remove that you basically nullify 46 states from having any voice in the election process. I call that disenfranchisement,don't you?

Why shouldn't every single legal citizen get an equal vote?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
IMU wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.

They left want to take away peoples' votes by removing the Electoral College. A device specifically put into place to make sure that all parts of the country have an equitable part in electing our president. If you remove that you basically nullify 46 states from having any voice in the election process. I call that disenfranchisement,don't you?

Why shouldn't every single legal citizen get an equal vote?


Because California, New York and Texas would get whatever they want and the smaller states would get screwed. The political leaders in those states don't really understand the rest of the country.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.



Are you suggesting only Republicans gerrymander? The act is named after a Democrat, for God's sake.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Will be inneresting when TX eventually flips blue.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:17 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.



Are you suggesting only Republicans gerrymander? The act is named after a Democrat, for God's sake.


Come on! That's not entirely true and it is worse than saying that Republicans aren't racist because their party freed the slaves.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Nas wrote:
IMU wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.

They left want to take away peoples' votes by removing the Electoral College. A device specifically put into place to make sure that all parts of the country have an equitable part in electing our president. If you remove that you basically nullify 46 states from having any voice in the election process. I call that disenfranchisement,don't you?

Why shouldn't every single legal citizen get an equal vote?


Because California, New York and Texas would get whatever they want and the smaller states would get screwed. The political leaders in those states don't really understand the rest of the country.

Shouldn't majority rule?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
No. The founders dreaded majority rule, which is why we are a Constitutional Republic with a Bill of Rights.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.



Are you suggesting only Republicans gerrymander? The act is named after a Democrat, for God's sake.


Come on! That's not entirely true and it is worse than saying that Republicans aren't racist because their party freed the slaves.


Correct

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
storkinastorm wrote:
No. The founders dreaded majority rule, which is why we are a Constitutional Republic with a Bill of Rights.

The founders also approved slavery, so maybe they got some things wrong.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2017 2:45 pm
Posts: 690
pizza_Place: My own
Nas wrote:
I view them that way because they are generally incompetent and ineffective.

If there are no public hearings, I will support your position. I don't think they are necessary now.

All of the people you named are out for power and elevating their brand. People like Trump and to a certain extent AOC are the worst. They're willing to destroy it all if they don't get their way.


A corrupt ruling class consisting of both Ds and Rs has run this country against the interests of the people for far too long. Why do you think guys like Lindsey Graham, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Joe Biden, etc have so much interest in Middle East affairs? Why do you think both parties have been so pro-globalist for so long? It's because they all use their office for personal gain, including deals made with foreign interests, regardless of how it impacts our country. That's why it is laughable to act as though Trump is some level of corruption we have never seen before. That's why all Ds and most establishment Rs don't like Trump. He is asking questions they don't want us to find the answers to but that we should know. The fact that he does it in such an unimpressive manner is a way for them to cast him as a tyrant.

AOC may be a child, but she is one of the few politicians alive who says what she really believes. She and Trump are unique in that regard. Nancy Pelosi doesn't care about health care. Mitch McConnell doesn't care about the Constitution. They say those things and occasionally address them to keep people voting for them. But what they really want is power. There is no discernable difference between either of them. They are both great at politics and have no principles.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nate Silver is in the act of being canceled over this:


_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
chaspoppcap wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
How prevalent is voter suppression and do you have data on it (from a not left or right leaning source)?


Yeah what is really interesting is that in the last several years most instances of fraud and suppression in voting have been perpetrated by the Dems.


I'm sorry...but...WUT?!

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This. Is. America. We don't have to pretend that we love our political leaders.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
GoldenJet wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
How prevalent is voter suppression and do you have data on it (from a not left or right leaning source)?


Yeah what is really interesting is that in the last several years most instances of fraud and suppression in voting have been perpetrated by the Dems.


I'm sorry...but...WUT?!


No no no no. Don't get him started.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nate Silver is in the act of being canceled over this:



The original tweet that Smug quoted was pretty terrible.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10111
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
IMU wrote:
storkinastorm wrote:
No. The founders dreaded majority rule, which is why we are a Constitutional Republic with a Bill of Rights.

The founders also approved slavery, so maybe they got some things wrong.

Then go pass an amendment. Or execute a coup and install a new constitution. Your choice.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Nas wrote:
This. Is. America. We don't have to pretend that we love our political leaders.


I think Nate was commenting on the quoted tweet from Jamie Lee Curtis and not the crowd booing.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:00 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Nas wrote:
This. Is. America. We don't have to pretend that we love our political leaders.


I think Nate was commenting on the quoted tweet from Jamie Lee Curtis and not the crowd booing.


Disregard my post

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
GoldenJet wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
How prevalent is voter suppression and do you have data on it (from a not left or right leaning source)?


Yeah what is really interesting is that in the last several years most instances of fraud and suppression in voting have been perpetrated by the Dems.


I'm sorry...but...WUT?!


Don't be sorry.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 1:26 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
GoldenJet wrote:
I wouldn't say the Right "admires" the Left. The Right uses the "They're all out to take what's yours and give it to some minority moocher" talk to stir the fear pot and drum up support.

Also, who's talking about taking anyone's vote away? Other than the GOP'ers pushing gerrymandered districts while making it more and more difficult for certain "disenfranchised" groups to make it to the polling sites...of course.



Are you suggesting only Republicans gerrymander? The act is named after a Democrat, for God's sake.


Come on! That's not entirely true and it is worse than saying that Republicans aren't racist because their party freed the slaves.



It was a glib comment but the point stands- gerrymandering is a bipartisan pursuit.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
What is really funny is all the Dems are coming out and railing on the president for not letting them know before it took place? I didn't see them fucking with the previous guy when the big raid went down and he got Bin Ladin.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
chaspoppcap wrote:
What is really funny is all the Dems are coming out and railing on the president for not letting them know before it took place? I didn't see them fucking with the previous guy when the big raid went down and he got Bin Ladin.


Which Dems are railing on the president for not letting them know before it took place?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Terry's Peeps wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
What is really funny is all the Dems are coming out and railing on the president for not letting them know before it took place? I didn't see them fucking with the previous guy when the big raid went down and he got Bin Ladin.


Which Dems are railing on the president for not letting them know before it took place?


The last guy informed all of the necessary people. I don't think it's that big of a deal but Trump only told a couple of Republicans because he believed that Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats may alert the terrorists. The Democrats in the Gang of 8 or whatever the bipartisan's group name is mildly complained about it. Nothing more or less than that happened.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 227 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group