It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 3:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 227 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38372
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Welp, my recollection is that the Bush administration used faulty intel to sell the American public and the United Nations (Powell presented there if my memory serves). So yes, there was bipartisan and dman support for the war at the outset. But then it ended up being based on lies or mistakes, so we effectively invaded a sovereign nation on a false pretense.

How can I blame Democrats or myself when we were all sold on faulty intel?


I wouldn't expect you to ever blame yourself denis.

It's always the poor peoples fault.


Interesting take. I believe GW is rich.


Some of us find war to be repugnant, and rarely necessary.

The Iraq War was both.

Sorry you chose not to join those who didn't need to be convinced otherwise.


Again revisionist. Republican operatives questioned the Patriotism of any and everyone that disagreed with them about the War.

Dems were cowardly yes. Complicit no. That war never would have occurred if Bush were not President.


Again, Thanks.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Seacrest wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Welp, my recollection is that the Bush administration used faulty intel to sell the American public and the United Nations (Powell presented there if my memory serves). So yes, there was bipartisan and dman support for the war at the outset. But then it ended up being based on lies or mistakes, so we effectively invaded a sovereign nation on a false pretense.

How can I blame Democrats or myself when we were all sold on faulty intel?


I wouldn't expect you to ever blame yourself denis.

It's always the poor peoples fault.


Interesting take. I believe GW is rich.


Some of us find war to be repugnant, and rarely necessary.

The Iraq War was both.

Sorry you chose not to join those who didn't need to be convinced otherwise.


Again revisionist. Republican operatives questioned the Patriotism of any and everyone that disagreed with them about the War.

Dems were cowardly yes. Complicit no. That war never would have occurred if Bush were not President.


Again, Thanks.


No problem. Clarity is always a "net positive"

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
long time guy wrote:
Again revisionist. Republican operatives questioned the Patriotism of any and everyone that disagreed with them about the War.

Dems were cowardly yes. Complicit no. That war never would have occurred if Bush were not President.

I wish I lived in a world where I could simply place my bad decisions on someone else.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
wdelaney72 wrote:
[
I wish I lived in a world where I could simply place my bad decisions on someone else.


so who did you vote for?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
denisdman wrote:
Welp, my recollection is that the Bush administration used faulty intel to sell the American public and the United Nations (Powell presented there if my memory serves). So yes, there was bipartisan and dman support for the war at the outset. But then it ended up being based on lies or mistakes, so we effectively invaded a sovereign nation on a false pretense.

How can I blame Democrats or myself when we were all sold on faulty intel?


Intel got good when Trump became president.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41379
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Iraq was Cheny's war not Bush's. That's why he's all fucked in the head now and does paintings. Bush 2 had zero power.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Welp, my recollection is that the Bush administration used faulty intel to sell the American public and the United Nations (Powell presented there if my memory serves). So yes, there was bipartisan and dman support for the war at the outset. But then it ended up being based on lies or mistakes, so we effectively invaded a sovereign nation on a false pretense.

How can I blame Democrats or myself when we were all sold on faulty intel?


Intel got good when Trump became president.


Again Revisionist. A board staple. There was quite a bit of intel which suggested that he didn't have WMD's. Bush and Co. Chose not to believe it.

They were so desperate to sell the war that they attempted to tie Saddam to 9/11.

Do you recall that or is the biases of the lenses so colored at this point that even the truth is of little
consequence ?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Welp, my recollection is that the Bush administration used faulty intel to sell the American public and the United Nations (Powell presented there if my memory serves). So yes, there was bipartisan and dman support for the war at the outset. But then it ended up being based on lies or mistakes, so we effectively invaded a sovereign nation on a false pretense.

How can I blame Democrats or myself when we were all sold on faulty intel?


Intel got good when Trump became president.


al-Baghdadi agrees from his grave. One of the two long planned military missions trump nearly screwed up with his stupid pull out to appease daddy.

The military & our (former)Kurdish allies got no credit for their roles in those from your guy as far as I can tell though. It's all to his credit, right???

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33070
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Welp, my recollection is that the Bush administration used faulty intel to sell the American public and the United Nations (Powell presented there if my memory serves). So yes, there was bipartisan and dman support for the war at the outset. But then it ended up being based on lies or mistakes, so we effectively invaded a sovereign nation on a false pretense.

How can I blame Democrats or myself when we were all sold on faulty intel?


Intel got good when Trump became president.


Nope it became good when Obama got Osama. That search was great intel.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Last edited by denisdman on Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
How many foreign-based terrorist acts have there been since 9/11? I would say our foreign intelligence employees are doing a fantastic job. they should get a raise.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
The Intel was just fine. The powers that be wanted to invade.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Hatchetman wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
[
I wish I lived in a world where I could simply place my bad decisions on someone else.


so who did you vote for?


Relevance? Last I checked, Illinois voters in the POTUS general mean zilch. Democratic winner of the Primary gets the automatic win....I don't think this will change in our lifetime. I can say I did not vote for George W bush in 2004, but who cares

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38372
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
How many foreign-based terrorist acts have there been since 9/11? I would say our foreign intelligence employees are doing a fantastic job. they should get a raise.


I'd like to agree, but it's pretty hard to take a guy seriously when he blames his support of a war where thousands of Americans have died or been maimed, on his selection of daily periodicals

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Seacrest wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
How many foreign-based terrorist acts have there been since 9/11? I would say our foreign intelligence employees are doing a fantastic job. they should get a raise.


I'd like to agree, but it's pretty hard to take a guy seriously when he blames his support of a war where thousands of Americans have died or been maimed, on his selection of daily periodicals


You make my head hurt with your nonsensical replies. I supported the second Iraq war, eventually, based on information that I received from our government, via various media outlets. How else did one receive information before 8Chan existed?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
https://youtu.be/OsBOWSjOLsE


_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
GoldenJet wrote:
https://youtu.be/OsBOWSjOLsE



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
PostPosted: Wed Oct 30, 2019 9:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38372
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
How many foreign-based terrorist acts have there been since 9/11? I would say our foreign intelligence employees are doing a fantastic job. they should get a raise.


I'd like to agree, but it's pretty hard to take a guy seriously when he blames his support of a war where thousands of Americans have died or been maimed, on his selection of daily periodicals


You make my head hurt with your nonsensical replies. I supported the second Iraq war, eventually, based on information that I received from our government, via various media outlets. How else did one receive information before 8Chan existed?


So you let others decide for you because the hellacious nature of war isn't reason enough to avoid it.

Or take accountability apparently.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 227 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group