It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:53 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 398 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
conns7901 wrote:
Mitch 2019 stats:

passing yards: 21st
passing yards per game: 27th
passing yards per attempt: 32nd
tds: 27th
passer rating: 28th


Last year he had better numbers (top 10 in everything before his injury)and finished the season like 3rd in QBR. MANY of you all said that we should ignore those numbers and instead credit Nagy because it didn't fit your narrative. Now that his numbers suck we should focus on them. This reminds me of Trumpets claiming that the unemployment numbers were cooked until Trump became president.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
Watson's line is far superior to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's this year. It isn't close.


Yet Watson was sacked 44 times, to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's 38.


Watson has always held the ball too long.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I don't know what attracts NAS to shitty QBs. Here he is on Glennon:

viewtopic.php?f=72&t=107828&p=2770157&hilit=cutler#p2770462
Nas wrote:
Glennon
3800 yards
26 touchdowns
12 interceptions

Cutler
2100 yards
13 touchdowns
10 interceptions


viewtopic.php?f=72&t=107828&hilit=cutler&start=30#p2770502
Nas wrote:

The Bucs offense was really bad before Winston was drafted. Glennon didn't have much talent to work with. He's a top 15 QB this year



I guess you can give NAS credit for emotionally backing his team. But as far as analysis of the players go...yeesh.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
Rodgers sat until he was like 25 or 26. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't as good as Brady
and another HoF player that means he sucks?
He sucks because his numbers say he sucks. Look at what conns posted.

Nas wrote:
This is almost as ridiculous as you continually claiming that I said Cutler didn't have any talent around him.
I didn't say that, you did. I said you made excuses for Cutler, and you are doing the same thing with Mitch.

Nas wrote:
Why wouldn't you pick up his 5th year option?
Because you want to win more than eight games in 2021.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16483
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Nas wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Mitch 2019 stats:

passing yards: 21st
passing yards per game: 27th
passing yards per attempt: 32nd
tds: 27th
passer rating: 28th


Last year he had better numbers (top 10 in everything before his injury)and finished the season like 3rd in QBR. MANY of you all said that we should ignore those numbers and instead credit Nagy because it didn't fit your narrative. Now that his numbers suck we should focus on them. This reminds me of Trumpets claiming that the unemployment numbers were cooked until Trump became president.


His better numbers from last year were the result of garbage opposition and MANY takeaways constantly putting the Bears in great position. He has feasted on trash (as he and any QB should).

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
Watson's line is far superior to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's this year. It isn't close.


Yet Watson was sacked 44 times, to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's 38.


I've watched Watson play 7 or 8 times this year. He's got no time to throw, he's also a hell of a lot smarter than Mitch, he changes protections and plays and gets rid of the ball quick..he can read a D... Mitch can't.

He’s capable of getting rid of the ball quickly but he usually doesn’t. Only Kyler Murray took more bad sacks than Watson this year

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't know what attracts NAS to shitty QBs. Here he is on Glennon:

viewtopic.php?f=72&t=107828&p=2770157&hilit=cutler#p2770462
Nas wrote:
Glennon
3800 yards
26 touchdowns
12 interceptions

Cutler
2100 yards
13 touchdowns
10 interceptions


viewtopic.php?f=72&t=107828&hilit=cutler&start=30#p2770502
Nas wrote:

The Bucs offense was really bad before Winston was drafted. Glennon didn't have much talent to work with. He's a top 15 QB this year



I guess you can give NAS credit for emotionally backing his team. But as far as analysis of the players go...yeesh.


No one bought my Glennon bit.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:38 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Rodgers sat until he was like 25 or 26. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't as good as Brady
and another HoF player that means he sucks?
He sucks because his numbers say he sucks. Look at what conns posted.

Nas wrote:
This is almost as ridiculous as you continually claiming that I said Cutler didn't have any talent around him.
I didn't say that, you did. I said you made excuses for Cutler, and you are doing the same thing with Mitch.

Nas wrote:
Why wouldn't you pick up his 5th year option?
Because you want to win more than eight games in 2021.


Yes. His numbers sucked this year. His numbers didn't suck last year and MANY of you all said they should be ignored.

I NEVER made excuses for Cutler outside of trolling for a season. I absolutely hated Cutler and Orton. Winning a Super Bowl would have been the only thing to change that. I was still bitter about Grossman.

Picking up the 5th year option doesn't tie the Bears to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky UNLESS he suffers a major injury that prevents him from playing most or all of 2021. Picking up the 5th year option is simply insurance in the event he has a great year. It would be foolish not to pick it up unless you plan on moving on from him today.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Rodgers sat until he was like 25 or 26. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't as good as Brady
and another HoF player that means he sucks?
He sucks because his numbers say he sucks. Look at what conns posted.

Nas wrote:
This is almost as ridiculous as you continually claiming that I said Cutler didn't have any talent around him.
I didn't say that, you did. I said you made excuses for Cutler, and you are doing the same thing with Mitch.

Nas wrote:
Why wouldn't you pick up his 5th year option?
Because you want to win more than eight games in 2021.


Yes. His numbers sucked this year. His numbers didn't suck last year and MANY of you all said they should be ignored.

I NEVER made excuses for Cutler outside of trolling for a season. I absolutely hated Cutler and Orton. Winning a Super Bowl would have been the only thing to change that. I was still bitter about Grossman.

Picking up the 5th year option doesn't tie the Bears to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky UNLESS he suffers a major injury that prevents him from playing most or all of 2021. Picking up the 5th year option is simply insurance in the event he has a great year. It would be foolish not to pick it up unless you plan on moving on from him today.


You said he finished top ten last year in lots of categories. He didn't. 17th in passer rating and 14th in TDs.

Quote:
he suffers a major injury that prevents him from playing most or all of 2021.


Sounds good to me.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Nas wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Mitch 2019 stats:

passing yards: 21st
passing yards per game: 27th
passing yards per attempt: 32nd
tds: 27th
passer rating: 28th


Last year he had better numbers (top 10 in everything before his injury)and finished the season like 3rd in QBR. MANY of you all said that we should ignore those numbers and instead credit Nagy because it didn't fit your narrative. Now that his numbers suck we should focus on them. This reminds me of Trumpets claiming that the unemployment numbers were cooked until Trump became president.


His better numbers from last year were the result of garbage opposition and MANY takeaways constantly putting the Bears in great position. He has feasted on trash (as he and any QB should).


You're proving my point. Give (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky credit for nothing good and blame him for everything bad.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
While you do the opposite. Point the finger and everyone and everything except the elephant in the room.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Rodgers sat until he was like 25 or 26. If (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky isn't as good as Brady
and another HoF player that means he sucks?
He sucks because his numbers say he sucks. Look at what conns posted.

Nas wrote:
This is almost as ridiculous as you continually claiming that I said Cutler didn't have any talent around him.
I didn't say that, you did. I said you made excuses for Cutler, and you are doing the same thing with Mitch.

Nas wrote:
Why wouldn't you pick up his 5th year option?
Because you want to win more than eight games in 2021.


Yes. His numbers sucked this year. His numbers didn't suck last year and MANY of you all said they should be ignored.

I NEVER made excuses for Cutler outside of trolling for a season. I absolutely hated Cutler and Orton. Winning a Super Bowl would have been the only thing to change that. I was still bitter about Grossman.

Picking up the 5th year option doesn't tie the Bears to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky UNLESS he suffers a major injury that prevents him from playing most or all of 2021. Picking up the 5th year option is simply insurance in the event he has a great year. It would be foolish not to pick it up unless you plan on moving on from him today.


You said he finished top ten last year in lots of categories. He didn't. 17th in passer rating and 14th in TDs.

Quote:
he suffers a major injury that prevents him from playing most or all of 2021.


Sounds good to me.


I said that he was top 10 in MANY categories BEFORE his shoulder injury last year. There is a (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky vs Rodgers thread somewhere in this section that illustrates (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky having better numbers in every category except interceptions at one point before his injury.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:50 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
While you do the opposite. Point the finger and everyone and everything except the elephant in the room.


No, I've pointed out his shortcomings and even said that despite some flashes I don't expect him to become a great quarterback but simply a player that you can win with and occasionally win because of. You should probably read the original post in this thread.

Even if you removed (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and inserted whatever reject that you love the Bears offense would still suck. The quarterback isn't holding this team or offense back. The irrational hate MANY of you all have for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky prevents you from seeing this.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
The quarterback isn't holding this team or offense back.
The quarterback didn't help move them forward this year either.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
While you do the opposite. Point the finger and everyone and everything except the elephant in the room.


No, I've pointed out his shortcomings and even said that despite some flashes I don't expect him to become a great quarterback but simply a player that you can win with and occasionally win because of. You should probably read the original post in this thread.

Even if you removed (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and inserted whatever reject that you love the Bears offense would still suck. The quarterback isn't holding this team or offense back. The irrational hate MANY of you all have for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky prevents you from seeing this.


We're talking about scoring 11 points against GB, 18 against SD, and 18 against the Rams. You do that and we're 11-5. That's not that difficult, even if the TEs and o-line suck. He did hold the offense back.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:55 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
So, if the Bears offense would still suck regardless of who the QB is...then you might as well draft one next year and bring in a FA.

The current QB isn't helping this offense either. Maybe a solid O-Line and a TE makes all the difference, but those overthrows, not going through reads, and flat our missing wide open WR's, isn't an O-line or TE problem. It's a Mitch problem.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Mitch did enough to warrant one more look next year. Bring in Mariota to “compete” for the job, and if shit goes south next year you’ll have your 2021 1st to take the next shot at QB

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
Mitch did enough to warrant one more look next year.
I'd say the same thing if I were GB.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
Mitch did enough to warrant one more look next year. Bring in Mariota to “compete” for the job, and if shit goes south next year you’ll have your 2021 1st to take the next shot at QB



Mariotta blows, no thanks.

We need to draft Hurts in the 2nd and pick up an undrafted free agent QB.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
yeah, right...every NFL team outside of Lake Forest wants Mitch to be the Bears QB.

I like Hurts, but he's dropping...

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
While you do the opposite. Point the finger and everyone and everything except the elephant in the room.


No, I've pointed out his shortcomings and even said that despite some flashes I don't expect him to become a great quarterback but simply a player that you can win with and occasionally win because of. You should probably read the original post in this thread.

Even if you removed (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and inserted whatever reject that you love the Bears offense would still suck. The quarterback isn't holding this team or offense back. The irrational hate MANY of you all have for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky prevents you from seeing this.


We're talking about scoring 11 points against GB, 18 against SD, and 18 against the Rams. You do that and we're 11-5. That's not that difficult, even if the TEs and o-line suck. He did hold the offense back.


This isn't basketball where 1 player can make the difference between winning and losing. That being said (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't good in 2 of those games. He'll blame injury for his performance against the Rams. The Chargers game was lost for similar reasons as the Eagles playoff game. The defense wet the bed late and gave back a lead. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky led the offense down the field late (like he always does) and put them in position to win. The kicker missed an easy 40 yard kick.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Mitch did enough to warrant one more look next year. Bring in Mariota to “compete” for the job, and if shit goes south next year you’ll have your 2021 1st to take the next shot at QB



Mariotta blows, no thanks.

We need to draft Hurts in the 2nd and pick up an undrafted free agent QB.

They aren’t going to draft a QB in the 2nd round and sooner or later you will realize all your realistic options blow next year too.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
doug - evergreen park wrote:
So, if the Bears offense would still suck regardless of who the QB is...then you might as well draft one next year and bring in a FA.

The current QB isn't helping this offense either. Maybe a solid O-Line and a TE makes all the difference, but those overthrows, not going through reads, and flat our missing wide open WR's, isn't an O-line or TE problem. It's a Mitch problem.


If the Bears changed nothing and simply just brought in another guy then maybe MANY of you would recognize that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't in the top 4 or 5 when it comes to this team's problems.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was more good than bad over the past 7 games and possibly more great than bad over the past 5 games or so. Simply watching the games would confirm this.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14922
pizza_Place: Grazianos
So, the "consensus" on this board is that to get rid of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky would solve all or most of the offenses problems next season, right? Okay, he's traded or benched. Who do the Bears sign as a free agent or draft as a quarterback? If you draft for a QB in what round and who? And with your remaining draft picks and free agent money, what else do you do to "FIX" this horrific offense?

Remember, though, the present Bear's team does not have ONE starting player that is equal or better than the KC Chiefs starting offensive 11. So, in other words, the Bears have SHIT for starting offensive players all around.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
doug - evergreen park wrote:
So, if the Bears offense would still suck regardless of who the QB is...then you might as well draft one next year and bring in a FA.

The current QB isn't helping this offense either. Maybe a solid O-Line and a TE makes all the difference, but those overthrows, not going through reads, and flat our missing wide open WR's, isn't an O-line or TE problem. It's a Mitch problem.


If the Bears changed nothing and simply just brought in another guy then maybe MANY of you would recognize that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't in the top 4 or 5 when it comes to this team's problems.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was more good than bad over the past 7 games and possibly more great than bad over the past 5 games or so. Simply watching the games would confirm this.

The KC game stands out. He was atrocious in that game. Other than that he’s played ok lately.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Based on how rookie contracts are there is no reason to not being him back even if it is a 1 percent chance he becomes great next year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
While you do the opposite. Point the finger and everyone and everything except the elephant in the room.


No, I've pointed out his shortcomings and even said that despite some flashes I don't expect him to become a great quarterback but simply a player that you can win with and occasionally win because of. You should probably read the original post in this thread.

Even if you removed (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and inserted whatever reject that you love the Bears offense would still suck. The quarterback isn't holding this team or offense back. The irrational hate MANY of you all have for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky prevents you from seeing this.


We're talking about scoring 11 points against GB, 18 against SD, and 18 against the Rams. You do that and we're 11-5. That's not that difficult, even if the TEs and o-line suck. He did hold the offense back.


This isn't basketball where 1 player can make the difference between winning and losing. That being said (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't good in 2 of those games. He'll blame injury for his performance against the Rams. The Chargers game was lost for similar reasons as the Eagles playoff game. The defense wet the bed late and gave back a lead. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky led the offense down the field late (like he always does) and put them in position to win. The kicker missed an easy 40 yard kick.


So let me get this straight.

Chargers average 21 ppg. Bears hold them to 17
Chargers average 276 pass yards per game. Bears hold them to 201 and intercept the ball once.
Chargers average 90 rushing yards per game and the Bears hold them to 36.

And now Nas says the defense is actually at fault for losing and not (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. :lol:

Why don't you try telling this to a Bears player on defense and see how they'd respond.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Hey Nas, where did you play QB? :lol:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2020/story/_/id/28266417/meet-2020-nfl-draft-quarterback-class-everything-know-joe-burrow-tua-tagovailoa-more

you draft whomever is available of these guys...or you wait until 2021.

What are the 4-5 things that are ahead of Mitch (ON THE FIELD) that are the issues?

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14922
pizza_Place: Grazianos
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Mitch did enough to warrant one more look next year. Bring in Mariota to “compete” for the job, and if shit goes south next year you’ll have your 2021 1st to take the next shot at QB



Mariotta blows, no thanks.

We need to draft Hurts in the 2nd and pick up an undrafted free agent QB.


Then what? Now you have two untested rookie on your team and only one 2nd round pick and some probable non starter type picks left. Now what do you do? Hurts is your starting quarterback and you still need three offensive line starting players, no tight end. No decent all around running back. One quality receiver on your team. What now?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 1:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Hawk wrote:
So, the "consensus" on this board is that to get rid of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky would solve all or most of the offenses problems next season, right? Okay, he's traded or benched. Who do the Bears sign as a free agent or draft as a quarterback? If you draft for a QB in what round and who? And with your remaining draft picks and free agent money, what else do you do to "FIX" this horrific offense?

Remember, though, the present Bear's team does not have ONE starting player that is equal or better than the KC Chiefs starting offensive 11. So, in other words, the Bears have SHIT for starting offensive players all around.


MANY laughably believe that Winston or every other reject would be better. Winston had Mike Evans and still threw more picks this season than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has for his entire career. FF said 7 of them were touchdowns to the other team. They still think he's better though.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 398 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Chicagoan, FrankDrebin, KDdidit, The Man, USA and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group