Tell me what I said that is factually incorrect. For the second time you have accused me of making something up. So provide your proof of what I posted that was made up and incorrect.

Then what's the point of waiting? As you wait an entire defense is being wasted. Once (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky matures into someone worse than Brees then the D will be gone and you'll be stuck with a mediocre QB and no D. Capitalize on the D and make a move for the SB.

Then what's the point of waiting? As you wait an entire defense is being wasted. Once (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky matures into someone worse than Brees then the D will be gone and you'll be stuck with a mediocre QB and no D. Capitalize on the D and make a move for the SB.

The suggestion that the Bears wouldn't even have to change anything if they got a HoF quarterback is funny but I can't call it factually incorrect.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Drew Brees isn't available for next year.

What’s the move for the SB?

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

I never suggested anything.

What actually said- twice- was that if the Bears had a mediocre QB this season, there is a good chance they would have won two games that they ended up losing and thus would have made the playoffs at 10-6.

Maybe instead of lashing out at me suggesting I read my own posts, you should actually read them. Or don't, I don't give a shit. But don't put words into my mouth and then call me a liar because I won't accept your insane view that Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is good and its ten other players on offense that is the problem.

According to Frank the Bears only need a HoF quarterback to fix things. I don't know why I didn't think of that.

Best player wouldn't be the best WR on any team in the division and is about 20th best in the NFL.

The 2nd best player is an offensive lineman who also wouldn't be the best offensive lineman on any other team.

Bring in Brady or Rodgers and things would be better. Of course it would be. Why not just sign Jesus since we're being unrealistic. What free or 2nd round pick would make the Bears a playoff team if nothing else changed?

Yes, let's remove Mitch entirely.

As for who the Bears have, with a better QB that wouldn't matter. Look at some of the guys Brady and Rodgers have thrown too. Brees, Rivers, Luck, Big Ben, among others. Yes there was AB and Michael Thomas and Randy Moss, but there are also a who lot of nobodies yet those QBs and those teams managed to have success because those quarterbacks made guys around them better. Aaron Rodgers, in particular, had some putrid offensive lines during the McCarthy days yet somehow he managed to win games and take his team to the playoffs.

"If if if if" gets you nothing. You can hope for Mitch in one hand and shit in the other and see what fills up first.

Mitch isn't the guy that makes other players better. Just face it.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

What’s the move then vegan? The only other option you have suggested is Jameis winston, who is worse than Mitch. What’s the move for the SB?

Tom Brady
Teddy Bridgewater
Dak Prescott










David Fales

What apologetic posts like this ignore is at 8-8 the Bears were actually really close to making the playoffs, despite all these issues. Why didn't they make it? As mentioned countless times, scoring 35-38 points over the course of four games all things remaining equal would have propelled the Bears into the playoffs. That's all it came down to.

That's not the question. You keep holding out for hope that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will mature into...something better than what he is now because statistically there might be evidence of QBs blossoming after age 25 season. I will ignore how this is basically closing your eyes to observable evidence that he is junk based on a small statistical probability that the crap you're watching has a slight chance of turning into gold. Yet even as you acknowledge he is probably not gold you still want to hold on. So, if he's not gold, then what are you holding on for?

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Will Hypothetical Bears Quarterback ever get a name?

He hasn’t yet. That’s why I find the Mitch complaints so amusing.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

But there is a chance they are, FF. The Cowboys will probably tag Dak, but I don't think the Saints are going to pay a lot for Teddy.


Honestly I would be fine with the Bears taking a QB with #43 or #50 and giving him the reigns from day 1.

I listed two legit options, one maybe, and one long shot.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

No, THIS was my post. What did I say that was factually inaccurate about Brady, Brees etc?

What offensive player on the Bears does Mitch make better, Nas?

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

I also said to draft a guy and start back at square one. That probably isn't going to happen, but it wouldn't be a bad thing to do. Even Daniel Jones threw for more TDs and almost as many yards as Mitch did this year.

The Bears should be drafting a QB every year until they figure the position out.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

You did not answer my questions.

Because you have no answer. You know I'm right.

Prescott was taken at 135, Wilson was taken at 75.

It's possible to find a better QB than Mitch at 43/50.

Then you make up things about Brady, Brees, Roethlisberger, Luck and Rivers that's factually incorrect.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

This is going to reach a head pretty soon.

What did I say that was false about them, Nas? What did I say that was wrong? Tell me.