It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:24 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 398 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't know who Ben Baldwin is. Turnovers are important I've already said (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is superior to Winston in that regard, but so is every single QB in the league.

What I'm saying is that you don't have anything positive to about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky except that he doesn't turn the ball over. What else do you got? He does literally nothing else. Can't hit deep or intermediate balls. Can't score TDs. Can't diagnose defenses to optimize his team's chances at scoring. He's vanilla as fuck on his best day.

That’s just not true. His best day was what he did against Dallas and he was phenomenal. He has a lot of flaws. But he’s capable of making the highest level throws, he’s got good mobility, and he plays best when the stakes are the highest. That’s enough positive attributes that can’t be coached up to mold a good QB out of. You will be unable to list that number of positive attributes about Jameis.


:lol: Little too heavy on the Nas talking points, all of which are canards. I'll admit to being had here on the obvious joint trolling.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't know who Ben Baldwin is. Turnovers are important I've already said (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is superior to Winston in that regard, but so is every single QB in the league.

What I'm saying is that you don't have anything positive to about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky except that he doesn't turn the ball over. What else do you got? He does literally nothing else. Can't hit deep or intermediate balls. Can't score TDs. Can't diagnose defenses to optimize his team's chances at scoring. He's vanilla as fuck on his best day.

That’s just not true. His best day was what he did against Dallas and he was phenomenal. He has a lot of flaws. But he’s capable of making the highest level throws, he’s got good mobility, and he plays best when the stakes are the highest. That’s enough positive attributes that can’t be coached up to mold a good QB out of. You will be unable to list that number of positive attributes about Jameis.


:lol: Little too heavy on the Nas talking points, all of which are canards. I'll admit to being had here on the obvious joint trolling.

I wasn’t trolling. You said I have nothing positive to say about Mich. I gave you positive attributes. You respond by saying it’s trolling. At this point you’re telling me you’re not interested in making valid points.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't know who Ben Baldwin is. Turnovers are important I've already said (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is superior to Winston in that regard, but so is every single QB in the league.

What I'm saying is that you don't have anything positive to about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky except that he doesn't turn the ball over. What else do you got? He does literally nothing else. Can't hit deep or intermediate balls. Can't score TDs. Can't diagnose defenses to optimize his team's chances at scoring. He's vanilla as fuck on his best day.

That’s just not true. His best day was what he did against Dallas and he was phenomenal. He has a lot of flaws. But he’s capable of making the highest level throws, he’s got good mobility, and he plays best when the stakes are the highest. That’s enough positive attributes that can’t be coached up to mold a good QB out of. You will be unable to list that number of positive attributes about Jameis.


:lol: Little too heavy on the Nas talking points, all of which are canards. I'll admit to being had here on the obvious joint trolling.

I wasn’t trolling. You said I have nothing positive to say about Mich. I gave you positive attributes. You respond by saying it’s trolling. At this point you’re telling me you’re not interested in making valid points.


This has been refuted ad nauseam for the past four months using objective data, pictures, charts, and credible analysis. He doesn't make high level throws consistently. In fact he consistently misses those throws. The mobility point is whatever if you can't throw. And plays the best when the stakes is highest is bullshit of the highest order and I know you know that, hence the trolling allegation. He's in position to launch game winning drives, which he doesn't covert btw, only because his dumbass doesn't do shit for three quarters. He had less than 100 yards at halftime on two occasions this year. Who the fuck does that unless your name is Craig Kreznel or Jonathan Quinn. That's why the team has to come back often - he doesn't score. So yes youve still said nothing persuasively positive about him other than the INTs part.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Robinson had 1400 yards with Bortles, he's just the victim of bad QBs.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.

In what way was he phenomenal at Buffalo? Have you actually seen Watkins plat... like, ever? He’s nothing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.

In what way was he phenomenal at Buffalo? Have you actually seen Watkins plat... like, ever? He’s nothing.


Yes I have. We all saw the highlights too. Robinson runs better routes and can makes maybe more physically demanding catches but that doesn't change the production. Watkins is a guy who has averaged more than 15 yards a catch for most of his career. I like WR who are capable of making a 50+ yard play. That has NEVER been Robinson's game. Too slow.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
Robinson had 1400 yards with Bortles, he's just the victim of bad QBs.


He is also slow.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 10:48 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65759
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Ok as an very disinterested observer let me try to boil this down.
Nagy certainly held mitch back. We should all agree on that. This offense was called poorly.
The tools around mitch were basically one elite WR and a bunch of garbage.
Mitch did not make anyone better.
Mitch still can't read defenses.

Essentially mitch was not the worst problem the offense had. It was clearly the playcalling.
That being said, mitch has so many flaws in his ability to read defenses and find 2nd and 3rd reads the playcalling had to be so simple, so moron proof that there could not be any creativity.

Nagy didnt adapt to a terrible QB. Nagy could have, had he been the offensive genius he was supposed to be, have called an offense conducive to mitchs strengths.

This is twofold. Mitch is a poor starting QB, and his coach can't fix that. He can't playcall to his limited strengths.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Darkside wrote:
Ok as an very disinterested observer let me try to boil this down.
Nagy certainly held mitch back. We should all agree on that. This offense was called poorly.
The tools around mitch were basically one elite WR and a bunch of garbage.
Mitch did not make anyone better.
Mitch still can't read defenses.

Essentially mitch was not the worst problem the offense had. It was clearly the playcalling.
That being said, mitch has so many flaws in his ability to read defenses and find 2nd and 3rd reads the playcalling had to be so simple, so moron proof that there could not be any creativity.

Nagy didnt adapt to a terrible QB. Nagy could have, had he been the offensive genius he was supposed to be, have called an offense conducive to mitchs strengths.

This is twofold. Mitch is a poor starting QB, and his coach can't fix that. He can't playcall to his limited strengths.


Agree with some not sure about other parts. Fair post nonetheless.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Robinson had 1400 yards with Bortles, he's just the victim of bad QBs.


He is also slow.

Michael Thomas says hello.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.

In what way was he phenomenal at Buffalo? Have you actually seen Watkins plat... like, ever? He’s nothing.


Yes I have. We all saw the highlights too. Robinson runs better routes and can makes maybe more physically demanding catches but that doesn't change the production. Watkins is a guy who has averaged more than 15 yards a catch for most of his career. I like WR who are capable of making a 50+ yard play. That has NEVER been Robinson's game. Too slow.

Sounds like you want Robby Anderson more than Allen Robinson and Michael Thomas. And here I was thinking Al Davis was dead.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't know who Ben Baldwin is. Turnovers are important I've already said (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is superior to Winston in that regard, but so is every single QB in the league.

What I'm saying is that you don't have anything positive to about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky except that he doesn't turn the ball over. What else do you got? He does literally nothing else. Can't hit deep or intermediate balls. Can't score TDs. Can't diagnose defenses to optimize his team's chances at scoring. He's vanilla as fuck on his best day.

That’s just not true. His best day was what he did against Dallas and he was phenomenal. He has a lot of flaws. But he’s capable of making the highest level throws, he’s got good mobility, and he plays best when the stakes are the highest. That’s enough positive attributes that can’t be coached up to mold a good QB out of. You will be unable to list that number of positive attributes about Jameis.


:lol: Little too heavy on the Nas talking points, all of which are canards. I'll admit to being had here on the obvious joint trolling.

Remember that one time he was really good. That’s a positive. A truly bad QB doesn’t have a good game like that.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy chill. I’m trying to fight on two fronts right now lol

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 11:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.

In what way was he phenomenal at Buffalo? Have you actually seen Watkins plat... like, ever? He’s nothing.


Yes I have. We all saw the highlights too. Robinson runs better routes and can makes maybe more physically demanding catches but that doesn't change the production. Watkins is a guy who has averaged more than 15 yards a catch for most of his career. I like WR who are capable of making a 50+ yard play. That has NEVER been Robinson's game. Too slow.

Sounds like you want Robby Anderson more than Allen Robinson and Michael Thomas. And here I was thinking Al Davis was dead.


There are exceptions to every rule. I hope you aren't suggesting that Robinson is as good as Thomas.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.

In what way was he phenomenal at Buffalo? Have you actually seen Watkins plat... like, ever? He’s nothing.


Yes I have. We all saw the highlights too. Robinson runs better routes and can makes maybe more physically demanding catches but that doesn't change the production. Watkins is a guy who has averaged more than 15 yards a catch for most of his career. I like WR who are capable of making a 50+ yard play. That has NEVER been Robinson's game. Too slow.

Sounds like you want Robby Anderson more than Allen Robinson and Michael Thomas. And here I was thinking Al Davis was dead.


There are exceptions to every rule. I hope you aren't suggesting that Robinson is as good as Thomas.

I’m not suggesting anything. I’m saying outright Robinson is a million times better than Watkins and I don’t think anyone who knows football would disagree.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 12:05 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
I’m not suggesting anything. I’m saying outright Robinson is a million times better than Watkins and I don’t think anyone who knows football would disagree.


So you don't have anything to quantify how he's better?

Have you at least dropped the Diggs and Golladay comparison?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 12:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I’m not suggesting anything. I’m saying outright Robinson is a million times better than Watkins and I don’t think anyone who knows football would disagree.


So you don't have anything to quantify how he's better?

Have you at least dropped the Diggs and Golladay comparison?

Quantify how? He has better stats when healthy, he’s played with worse QBs, and he has a better catch % despite being in way more heavily contested spots. There’s nothing to quantify. Robinson is better than Watkins in every way a WR can be except speed and that doesn’t seem to matter given ARob’s contested catch %.

No I have not. Golladay is going to be better but there’s nothing to suggest he has been yet. Diggs is an entirely different player but he’s not better either.

You underestimate A Rob. He’s the best Bears WR of the past 20 years. You probably think Mike Evans is better. Stop relying on stats and watch games for context.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 2:23 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Nas wrote:
When the year started, I saw a guy who was not only struggling to read defenses, but he was afraid to roll out of the pocket or run if it wasn't the last drive of a game. He was clearly thinking too much. A clear sign of too many people in his ear and a guy who may not be very bright.

There were clues from Cohen and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that they weren't happy with Nagy's play calling and his offense. As time went on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky took more ownership of the offense and his career and the Bears and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky looked better.

Despite being handcuffed by his coach and having absolutely the worst offensive talent around him of any young quarterback, (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played well in the 2nd half. He was good more times than not and his flashes of greatness were somewhat frequent. He showed he can even read defenses now.

The Bears have to get better talent around him or anyone else they bring in. Preferably at least 1 elite talent. Mahomes has an elite offensive line and elite skill players. All of them are far better than the Bears best offensive player. Someone is almost always open. That makes life as a quarterback easier. I think Mahomes is the best quarterback in the NFL, but if he switched places with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky MANY would view both players differently. Watson has arguably the 2nd best WR in football and a #2 who is comparable to Allen Robinson.

I don't think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will ever be great despite the flashes. I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will be a good to really good quarterback for a long time that flashes greatness from time to time. He's not only a guy I think you can win with, but he's a guy I think you can lean on with the game on the line. That late game ability isn't something that you can coach.

Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is my quarterback.


They weren't able to win with him this season. They couldn't lean with him with the game on the line.

They do need to improve around him. The offensive tackles need to be improved and they need a TE.

It's very difficult to replace him this off-season unless they just shock us, but the most I would expect is bringing in a veteran QB who can potentially give some light competition (but probably not be better) and fill in on the OL/TE. I don't expect an overhaul of the WR group because they have a #1 type in Robinson and Miller did enough in the 2nd half to give them hope on him. From there, Wims (who did not impress) and Ridley are also young and will get chances to find roles.

They can't replace everyone, but I would expect some change. Mitch will be our QB in 2020, but there's no reason to expect much better than what we've seen. He's not accurate down the field and the offense doesn't score touchdowns.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.


Didn't the market already speak on the question of Watkins v Robinson. I think they were both FA at the same time (and probably drafted in the same year but its NYE and I ain't doing the extra keystrokes today)

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
This silly thread and all of this nonsense boils down to two sentences that I think MANY will agree with.

It is possible to win a Super Bowl with Mitch at QB. Its unlikely to win a Super Bowl because Mitch is at QB.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
Robinson had 1400 yards with Bortles, he's just the victim of bad QBs.


He is also slow.


Great hands, fights for balls, great route runner. Tough dude. Lot more than speed to make a great WR.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 12:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Robinson is 10x the player Watkins is. I’m having trouble figuring out if you’re trolling at this point.


Based on what? Watkins was a phenomenal player in Buffalo and he's putting up numbers that project to be better than Robinson's if he had a similar usage rate.

The argument that he's better than Diggs or Golladay is absolutely laughable.


Didn't the market already speak on the question of Watkins v Robinson. I think they were both FA at the same time (and probably drafted in the same year but its NYE and I ain't doing the extra keystrokes today)


The Chiefs gave Watkins a bigger contract and more guaranteed money.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
312player wrote:
[ fights for balls, .


See, Frank also has the qualities to be an NFL wide receiver

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
If we’re going by what the market says I’m going to need some apologies for Amos vs Haha

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
If we’re going by what the market says I’m going to need some apologies for Amos vs Haha


Packers were desperate

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:36 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
When the year started, I saw a guy who was not only struggling to read defenses, but he was afraid to roll out of the pocket or run if it wasn't the last drive of a game. He was clearly thinking too much. A clear sign of too many people in his ear and a guy who may not be very bright.

There were clues from Cohen and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that they weren't happy with Nagy's play calling and his offense. As time went on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky took more ownership of the offense and his career and the Bears and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky looked better.

Despite being handcuffed by his coach and having absolutely the worst offensive talent around him of any young quarterback, (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played well in the 2nd half. He was good more times than not and his flashes of greatness were somewhat frequent. He showed he can even read defenses now.

The Bears have to get better talent around him or anyone else they bring in. Preferably at least 1 elite talent. Mahomes has an elite offensive line and elite skill players. All of them are far better than the Bears best offensive player. Someone is almost always open. That makes life as a quarterback easier. I think Mahomes is the best quarterback in the NFL, but if he switched places with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky MANY would view both players differently. Watson has arguably the 2nd best WR in football and a #2 who is comparable to Allen Robinson.

I don't think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will ever be great despite the flashes. I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will be a good to really good quarterback for a long time that flashes greatness from time to time. He's not only a guy I think you can win with, but he's a guy I think you can lean on with the game on the line. That late game ability isn't something that you can coach.

Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is my quarterback.


Matt Nagy disagrees.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
how come no one is talking about the shitty quality of the tablets the bears give to (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to study defensive formations and personnel packages. Even though I believe he reads defenses better than anyone I wouldn't be surprised if he missed something due to shitty screens on his tablets.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 31, 2019 4:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14922
pizza_Place: Grazianos
BD wrote:
Nas wrote:
When the year started, I saw a guy who was not only struggling to read defenses, but he was afraid to roll out of the pocket or run if it wasn't the last drive of a game. He was clearly thinking too much. A clear sign of too many people in his ear and a guy who may not be very bright.

There were clues from Cohen and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that they weren't happy with Nagy's play calling and his offense. As time went on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky took more ownership of the offense and his career and the Bears and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky looked better.

Despite being handcuffed by his coach and having absolutely the worst offensive talent around him of any young quarterback, (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played well in the 2nd half. He was good more times than not and his flashes of greatness were somewhat frequent. He showed he can even read defenses now.

The Bears have to get better talent around him or anyone else they bring in. Preferably at least 1 elite talent. Mahomes has an elite offensive line and elite skill players. All of them are far better than the Bears best offensive player. Someone is almost always open. That makes life as a quarterback easier. I think Mahomes is the best quarterback in the NFL, but if he switched places with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky MANY would view both players differently. Watson has arguably the 2nd best WR in football and a #2 who is comparable to Allen Robinson.

I don't think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will ever be great despite the flashes. I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will be a good to really good quarterback for a long time that flashes greatness from time to time. He's not only a guy I think you can win with, but he's a guy I think you can lean on with the game on the line. That late game ability isn't something that you can coach.

Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is my quarterback.


They weren't able to win with him this season. They couldn't lean with him with the game on the line.

They do need to improve around him. The offensive tackles need to be improved and they need a TE.

It's very difficult to replace him this off-season unless they just shock us, but the most I would expect is bringing in a veteran QB who can potentially give some light competition (but probably not be better) and fill in on the OL/TE. I don't expect an overhaul of the WR group because they have a #1 type in Robinson and Miller did enough in the 2nd half to give them hope on him. From there, Wims (who did not impress) and Ridley are also young and will get chances to find roles.

They can't replace everyone, but I would expect some change. Mitch will be our QB in 2020, but there's no reason to expect much better than what we've seen. He's not accurate down the field and the offense doesn't score touchdowns.


Look, can we agree on one thing? The Bears as a first priority, need to commit to add good talent to their offense line and the Tight End position. IF they do nothing else, the offensive performance will automatically be better. They still have free agent money and two good 2nd round draft picks. They need FOUR good players as I see it. Two offensive tackle, one guard, and one Tight End. This is what they need to do.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 398 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Curious Hair, Darkside, Drunk Squirrel, FrankDrebin, Jaw Breaker, KDdidit, McCareins_Fan, Nardi, NME, Sneakers O'Toole, The Man, USA, Zippy-The-Pinhead and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group