Bruce Woof on the Twitter muscle:

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

It is significantly different from previous treatments of this highly contentious subject in that it does not try to simply interpret or reinterpret every single word that eyewitnesses said in 1912. Instead, it takes a novel approach of applying specific analytical techniques to test the many conflicting and contradictory statements that were made in 1912 in order to find the reality of what took place. It includes detailed analysis of distances, bearings, headings, speeds, drift rates, ranges of visibility and other quantifiable information that has never before been examined in any great detail.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

The ship hit an iceberg. What else is there to know?

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

I am thankful we have people like...checks notes....Resist Programming monitoring which Twitter and Instagram accounts athletes follow.

Really doing God's work.

:lol: Yeah it’s Fox News that’s the problem Lil Danny . Absolutely torched in the responses .

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

You can tell he doesn't watch Fox. He just has his idea of what it is. Because bernstein is a latecomer to the panic. Tucker has been panic peddling this thing for 2 months.

Hasn't Tucker been fighting an uphill battle too?

Tucker is not the face of FoxNews when he says or does something I agree with

Tucker is not the face of FoxNews.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Tucker is not the face of FoxNews.

Hannity is the domineering personality of FoxNews.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

He's on their key prime time show. In the O'Reilly time slot. He's certainly the lead Fox show.

But whatever, he's been leading his show with coronavirus for probably over two months, certainly much longer than bernstein has been giving medical advice on the disease.

Yes it is.

When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.

Does anyone pay attention to him, though? He's an oaf. I don't sit down in front of the TV for a night of Fox News, but I have a much better idea of what's going on with Tucker Carlson than I do with Hannity.

Yes it is.

When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Tucker isn't a news guy, he's an infotainment guy like everyone in prime-time cable news.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Tucker is the only person on the big three cable news channels who will have Glenn Greenwald on. He has Krystal Ball on, too, but she pops up on CNN's morning show from time to time (leaving MSNBC conspicuous in its absence). As I've said before, I try to keep half an eye on what's going on with him and where it's going; Hannity and Ingraham are explicitly Bush-era fossils.

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.