It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:14 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 5:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Stalin literally said American production won the war. But LTG knows better. Strange world.


Stalin never was quoted as saying that and for the record he denied it publicly until the time of his death. He never acknowledged the U.S. role publicly and Khrushchev said there was no record of it other than his word.

Thanks for once again providing absolutely nothing.


Quote:
Soviet Premier Josef Stalin would later acknowledge the contributions made by the lend-lease agreement: "Without American production [the Allies] could never have won the war."


https://www.nationalgeographic.org/this ... agreement/

Your dishonesty is never surprising. How frequently with which you lie though, and the acceptance of it by many here is very informing though.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 5:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:
And lastly is this and sort of how I remember Lend Lease. An overwhelming amount of the Lend Lease supplies were provided to the British.

Look at these numbers and weep.
https://orientalreview.org/2015/05/12/w ... -enough-i/


As a result, between 1941 and 1942 only 7% of the wartime cargo shipped from the US made it to the Soviet Union. The bulk of the weapons and other materials arrived in the Soviet Union in 1944-1945, once the winds of war had decisively shifted.

You are aware that a lot of deliveries to the british went to the russians, right?


Well I certainly believe numbers from Oriental Review a website that blames coronavirus on Jews. Not surprising considering who posted it.

Quote:
The New World Order concept is simply the wish of a handful of international bankers that want to economically and politically rule the whole planet as one happy family. It started in 1773 and if it went through important changes over the years, but the concept and objective haven’t changed an iota. Unfortunately for them, international banks that have been looting the planet through the US dollar since 1944 are now threatened by hyperinflation, as their printing machine has been rotating for years to cover their absurd spendings to sustain oil and resource wars that they’ve all ultimately lost. In order to prevent this upcoming hyperinflation, they generated a virus attack on four countries (China, Iran, Italy and now the United States) to spread panic in the population,


https://orientalreview.org/2020/03/31/p ... al-battle/

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Damn, Darkside, you really know your WW2 history.

Impressive.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55969
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
long time guy wrote:
His hatred for Slavic people was well known. It's the primary reason that he invaded Russia.

Hitler was #resistance, damn

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:
And lastly is this and sort of how I remember Lend Lease. An overwhelming amount of the Lend Lease supplies were provided to the British.

Look at these numbers and weep.
https://orientalreview.org/2015/05/12/w ... -enough-i/


As a result, between 1941 and 1942 only 7% of the wartime cargo shipped from the US made it to the Soviet Union. The bulk of the weapons and other materials arrived in the Soviet Union in 1944-1945, once the winds of war had decisively shifted.

You are aware that a lot of deliveries to the british went to the russians, right?


Well I certainly believe numbers from Oriental Review a website that blames coronavirus on Jews. Not surprising considering who posted it.

Quote:
The New World Order concept is simply the wish of a handful of international bankers that want to economically and politically rule the whole planet as one happy family. It started in 1773 and if it went through important changes over the years, but the concept and objective haven’t changed an iota. Unfortunately for them, international banks that have been looting the planet through the US dollar since 1944 are now threatened by hyperinflation, as their printing machine has been rotating for years to cover their absurd spendings to sustain oil and resource wars that they’ve all ultimately lost. In order to prevent this upcoming hyperinflation, they generated a virus attack on four countries (China, Iran, Italy and now the United States) to spread panic in the population,


https://orientalreview.org/2020/03/31/p ... al-battle/

Can you cite anything a you cite anything that I ever posted that is Anti Semitic? If you can't then you're lying.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:52 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:
And lastly is this and sort of how I remember Lend Lease. An overwhelming amount of the Lend Lease supplies were provided to the British.

Look at these numbers and weep.
https://orientalreview.org/2015/05/12/w ... -enough-i/


As a result, between 1941 and 1942 only 7% of the wartime cargo shipped from the US made it to the Soviet Union. The bulk of the weapons and other materials arrived in the Soviet Union in 1944-1945, once the winds of war had decisively shifted.

You are aware that a lot of deliveries to the british went to the russians, right?


Well I certainly believe numbers from Oriental Review a website that blames coronavirus on Jews. Not surprising considering who posted it.

Quote:
The New World Order concept is simply the wish of a handful of international bankers that want to economically and politically rule the whole planet as one happy family. It started in 1773 and if it went through important changes over the years, but the concept and objective haven’t changed an iota. Unfortunately for them, international banks that have been looting the planet through the US dollar since 1944 are now threatened by hyperinflation, as their printing machine has been rotating for years to cover their absurd spendings to sustain oil and resource wars that they’ve all ultimately lost. In order to prevent this upcoming hyperinflation, they generated a virus attack on four countries (China, Iran, Italy and now the United States) to spread panic in the population,


https://orientalreview.org/2020/03/31/p ... al-battle/


It really isn't much of a coincidence that you'd be the person familiar with their particular affinities is it?

Also can you cite anything Anti Semitic that I have ever posted on here? Seeing as how I am one of "the protected guys" whose posts don't get edited or deleted then it shouldn't be difficult.

If you do not then you're lying.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
You’ve repeatedly said Israel should not exist. And you read a d cite anti-Semitic websites.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
You’ve repeatedly said Israel should not exist.
No I asked that you "cite" it. Since I have "repeatedly" said it it should not be difficult to cite. Remember I'm "protected" so my posts don't get deleted. If you cannot then you are lying.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Stalin literally said American production won the war. But LTG knows better. Strange world.


Stalin never was quoted as saying that and for the record he denied it publicly until the time of his death. He never acknowledged the U.S. role publicly and Khrushchev said there was no record of it other than his word.

Thanks for once again providing absolutely nothing.

Why would Khrushchev, in the middle of a cold war with the US, credit the US with crucial aid in the Great Patriotic War?



Thought I'd raise you one Darko
https://www.secondworldwarhistory.com/ww2-quotes.php

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
:thumright: :thumright: DS, LTG, Antarctica, Tommy and chas

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:


Ok cool. But you always have to look at it the context of time. Sure in 1944 with a fully mobilized military could they have taken on Germany? Yeah they could have. In 41 when Germany invaded Russia? .

Completely irrelevant. The question never was could the US take on Germany in 1941. The question is, did the US require the Russian involvement to win WWII. Unless your argument is that the US couldn't mobilize without Russia running interference on the eastern front which honestly I cannot fathom that argument being made in good faith.



Again I had to raise you one Darko. Your knowledge of the subject pushed me to dig a little deeper than I wanted to go but thanks. I needed to brush up on some of this stuff anyway.

In FDRs own words to the country.

Here you go.

http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/072843.html

Quote:

FDR
The heaviest and most decisive fighting today is going on in Russia. I am glad that the British and we have been able to contribute somewhat to the great striking power of the Russian armies.

In 1941-1942 the Russians were able to retire without breaking, to move many of their war plants from western Russia far into the interior, to stand together with complete unanimity in the defense of their homeland.

The success of the Russian armies has shown that it is dangerous to make prophecies about them -- a fact which has been forcibly brought home to that mystic master of strategic intuition, Herr Hitler.

The short-lived German offensive, launched early this month, was a desperate attempt to bolster the morale of the German people. The Russians were not fooled by this. They went ahead with their own plans for attack -- plans which coordinate with the whole United Nations' offensive strategy.

The world has never seen greater devotion, determination and self-sacrifice than have been displayed by the Russian people and their armies, under the leadership of Marshal Joseph Stalin.

With a nation which in saving itself is thereby helping to save all the world from the Nazi menace, this country of ours should always be glad to be a good neighbor and a sincere friend in the world of the future.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sun Apr 05, 2020 10:47 am, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Given the USa population and industrial capacity,whomever they took on it was only a matter of time that they would win. The question was how long would it take.From 44 on all the major countries where starting to have manpower issues. Uk was scrapping entire divisions to keep others in the field. The USA was was turning technical troops into infantry,the USA has always had a problem with that. The Russians just made their units leaner and smaller. Germans well they did a number of measures to both keep existing units in the field as well as raise new ones.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
chaspoppcap wrote:
Given the USa population and industrial capacity,whomever they took on it was only a matter of time that they would win. The question was how long would it take.From 44 on all the major countries where starting to have manpower issues. Uk was scrapping entire divisions to keep others in the field. The USA was was turning technical troops into infantry,the USA has always had a problem with that. The Russians just made their units leaner and smaller. Germans well they did a number of measures to both keep existing units in the field as well as raise new ones.


Chas you understand this (to an extent :lol:) The war didn't start in 44 though. It was 5 years in at that point. You really didn't expect the Germans and Japanese to punch pause so that the Americans could catch up did you? You also know that one of the biggest advantages that We had was that the war wasn't fought on U.S. soil. That allowed us to rapidly mobilized while the infrastructure of other countries were being ravaged.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:
How does Britain and the U.S. hold off Germany without Russian manpower? That question still hasn't been answered and no saying its irrelevant in 1941 really ain't cutting it.

I've explained it probably at least 3 or 4 times now.
1. Germany had by the time they'd over run france, extended their ground forces beyond reasonable supply lines.
2. Germany was losing more equipment than they were building.
3. Germany had little access to oil thus their need to ally with or invade russian territory.
4. Germany absolute lost the battle of britian and by mid 43 lost the battle of the Atlantic.
5. England was reading Germanys codes having broke them. As a result, they knew where naval forces were positioned and knew how to largely get by them.

In essence, as far as england goes, german ground forces were irrelevant. Germany wasnt taking england.
As far as europe goes, germany literally couldn't sustain their war efforts with both domestic production and the slave labor they subjugated throughout europe. Ask albert speer. He knew it.



All of this overlooks one key and relevant fact.

Stalin asked for the other allies to open up a 2 front and they refused. They had a chance to invade France much earlier in the war and they refused Roosevelt even promised Stalin that he would and reneged. Churchill detailed why. They wanted nothing to do with fighting Germany in Europe. They were afraid of taking heavy casualties.
Quote:
STALIN HOSTS CHURCHILL

The timing of the second front was a vexed question between the wartime Allies: Soviet leader Josef Stalin had urged British Prime Minister Winston Churchill to open it as far back as August 1942.

According to the interpreter's record of their tense encounter that month in Moscow, Churchill argued this would be premature, insisting that "war was war but not folly, and it would be folly to invite a disaster that would help nobody".

A "restless" Stalin retorted that "a man not prepared to take risks could not win a war".

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:15 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65785
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
long time guy wrote:
Chas you understand this (to an extent :lol:) The war didn't start in 44 though. It was 5 years in at that point. You really didn't expect the Germans and Japanese to punch pause so that the Americans could catch up did you? You also know that one of the biggest advantages that We had was that the war wasn't fought on U.S. soil. That allowed us to rapidly mobilized while the infrastructure of other countries were being ravaged.

Exactly. Precisamente.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
long time guy wrote:
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:


Ok cool. But you always have to look at it the context of time. Sure in 1944 with a fully mobilized military could they have taken on Germany? Yeah they could have. In 41 when Germany invaded Russia? .

Completely irrelevant. The question never was could the US take on Germany in 1941. The question is, did the US require the Russian involvement to win WWII. Unless your argument is that the US couldn't mobilize without Russia running interference on the eastern front which honestly I cannot fathom that argument being made in good faith.



Again I had to raise you one Darko. Your knowledge of the subject pushed me to dig a little deeper than I wanted to go but thanks. I needed to brush up on some of this stuff anyway.

In FDRs own words to the country.

Here you go.

http://docs.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/072843.html

Quote:

FDR
The heaviest and most decisive fighting today is going on in Russia. I am glad that the British and we have been able to contribute somewhat to the great striking power of the Russian armies.

In 1941-1942 the Russians were able to retire without breaking, to move many of their war plants from western Russia far into the interior, to stand together with complete unanimity in the defense of their homeland.

The success of the Russian armies has shown that it is dangerous to make prophecies about them -- a fact which has been forcibly brought home to that mystic master of strategic intuition, Herr Hitler.

The short-lived German offensive, launched early this month, was a desperate attempt to bolster the morale of the German people. The Russians were not fooled by this. They went ahead with their own plans for attack -- plans which coordinate with the whole United Nations' offensive strategy.

The world has never seen greater devotion, determination and self-sacrifice than have been displayed by the Russian people and their armies, under the leadership of Marshal Joseph Stalin.

With a nation which in saving itself is thereby helping to save all the world from the Nazi menace, this country of ours should always be glad to be a good neighbor and a sincere friend in the world of the future.


Thoughts?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:02 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65785
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
My thoughts are that the Russians fought like animals. They were pushed back to Lenningrad. Here, in mid September 41, Hitler makes a big mistake. He orders lenningrad to be starved rather than stormed. This allows the Russians to fortify and counterattack. These were successful, greatly boosting Russian moral. Hitler breaks off two panzer divisions to assault Kiev.
Kiev was a victory for the Germans. They claim to have killed over a half million Russian troops.
It ultimately led to Hitler's confidence in launching Operation Typhoon, October 1941. Remember, to Hitler, Crimea and kiev were primary objectives. His plan was to economically and morally defeat Russia. We know how Typhoon ended. The Russians would not be broken. Women and children built moats and trenches behind a line of 90k men.
And here is where Hitlers speedy advance cost them. By late October well over half of their vehicles were inoperable. Supply lines were broken. The Germans were still outfitted with warm weather gear. The tanks could not be supported.
Stalin had a few advantages now. All local manufacturing was converted to weapons. He pulls a move trump would appreciate. November 7, he marches his troops directly thru red square and straight to the front. The russian people were morally fortified. The Soviets counterattack from three rings of quality defensive positions. Home field advantage. Although german advances brought the lines close enough to see the city of moscow, an unforeseen condition greatly slowed the attack.
Winter of 41, 42 may have been one of the coldest on record in the area. Hundreds of thousands of germans were disabled by frostbite. Weapons were using grease designed for hot weather. The soviets were prepared. They had buildings to go to to warm in some cases.

Ultimately, the will of the Russians coupled with the over extended German logistical lines and terrible weather kept Moscow from falling.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
long time guy wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
Given the USa population and industrial capacity,whomever they took on it was only a matter of time that they would win. The question was how long would it take.From 44 on all the major countries where starting to have manpower issues. Uk was scrapping entire divisions to keep others in the field. The USA was was turning technical troops into infantry,the USA has always had a problem with that. The Russians just made their units leaner and smaller. Germans well they did a number of measures to both keep existing units in the field as well as raise new ones.


Chas you understand this (to an extent :lol:) The war didn't start in 44 though. It was 5 years in at that point. You really didn't expect the Germans and Japanese to punch pause so that the Americans could catch up did you? You also know that one of the biggest advantages that We had was that the war wasn't fought on U.S. soil. That allowed us to rapidly mobilized while the infrastructure of other countries were being ravaged.


True,We had two big oceans protecting us. Gave us a tremendous advantage. You are also incorrect in your date as to when the start of the war was, it was not 1939. It was now listen by most historians as being as 1937 when the Marco Polo incident occurred. You can really if you want date it to the Spanish Civil War as most nations where involved in one way or the other just not in direct confrontation.
Another thing a lot of people do not realize is that the Germans did not go on full war production until 1943 and women where not fully used in war production until the last year of the war. Germany,ie Nazi, economy was a plunder/slave system. It was by necessity geared to constant war and conquest. Once it started it had to keep going or it would fall apart. Some historians believe if The Kriegsmarine would have not built large surface ship and instead put the resources into Uboats the Brits would have been beat in 40,41 by the latest.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Darkside wrote:
My thoughts are that the Russians fought like animals. They were pushed back to Lenningrad. Here, in mid September 41, Hitler makes a big mistake. He orders lenningrad to be starved rather than stormed. This allows the Russians to fortify and counterattack. These were successful, greatly boosting Russian moral. Hitler breaks off two panzer divisions to assault Kiev.
Kiev was a victory for the Germans. They claim to have killed over a half million Russian troops.
It ultimately led to Hitler's confidence in launching Operation Typhoon, October 1941. Remember, to Hitler, Crimea and kiev were primary objectives. His plan was to economically and morally defeat Russia. We know how Typhoon ended. The Russians would not be broken. Women and children built moats and trenches behind a line of 90k men.
And here is where Hitlers speedy advance cost them. By late October well over half of their vehicles were inoperable. Supply lines were broken. The Germans were still outfitted with warm weather gear. The tanks could not be supported.
Stalin had a few advantages now. All local manufacturing was converted to weapons. He pulls a move trump would appreciate. November 7, he marches his troops directly thru red square and straight to the front. The russian people were morally fortified. The Soviets counterattack from three rings of quality defensive positions. Home field advantage. Although german advances brought the lines close enough to see the city of moscow, an unforeseen condition greatly slowed the attack.
Winter of 41, 42 may have been one of the coldest on record in the area. Hundreds of thousands of germans were disabled by frostbite. Weapons were using grease designed for hot weather. The soviets were prepared. They had buildings to go to to warm in some cases.

Ultimately, the will of the Russians coupled with the over extended German logistical lines and terrible weather kept Moscow from falling.

One of the reasons why Leningrad held was the Finns did not press them as hard as they could and should have.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:24 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65785
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
chaspoppcap wrote:
Darkside wrote:
My thoughts are that the Russians fought like animals. They were pushed back to Lenningrad. Here, in mid September 41, Hitler makes a big mistake. He orders lenningrad to be starved rather than stormed. This allows the Russians to fortify and counterattack. These were successful, greatly boosting Russian moral. Hitler breaks off two panzer divisions to assault Kiev.
Kiev was a victory for the Germans. They claim to have killed over a half million Russian troops.
It ultimately led to Hitler's confidence in launching Operation Typhoon, October 1941. Remember, to Hitler, Crimea and kiev were primary objectives. His plan was to economically and morally defeat Russia. We know how Typhoon ended. The Russians would not be broken. Women and children built moats and trenches behind a line of 90k men.
And here is where Hitlers speedy advance cost them. By late October well over half of their vehicles were inoperable. Supply lines were broken. The Germans were still outfitted with warm weather gear. The tanks could not be supported.
Stalin had a few advantages now. All local manufacturing was converted to weapons. He pulls a move trump would appreciate. November 7, he marches his troops directly thru red square and straight to the front. The russian people were morally fortified. The Soviets counterattack from three rings of quality defensive positions. Home field advantage. Although german advances brought the lines close enough to see the city of moscow, an unforeseen condition greatly slowed the attack.
Winter of 41, 42 may have been one of the coldest on record in the area. Hundreds of thousands of germans were disabled by frostbite. Weapons were using grease designed for hot weather. The soviets were prepared. They had buildings to go to to warm in some cases.

Ultimately, the will of the Russians coupled with the over extended German logistical lines and terrible weather kept Moscow from falling.

One of the reasons why Leningrad held was the Finns did not press them as hard as they could and should have.

Interesting. Most stories I've read blame the siege strategy demanded by Hitler against the advice of his commanders.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
chaspoppcap wrote:
Darkside wrote:
It could be argued that another major turning point in the war was english code breakers by late 1942. British shipping was largely getting through the Wolfpack u boats and the british navy was sinking nearly a sub a day. By May 1943, Dönitz had conceded the battle of the atlantic. By this point, allied victory was probably guaranteed. The allies were going to win the battle of attrition, which was greatly sped up by the Russians slaughtering the aging armies on the eastern front.


Actually,While the British did a lot. If it was not for the Polish effort at stealing a machine and getting it to the British they would not have done as well of a job.
The American codebreakers in the Pacific played a huge part as well,let us not forget.


Yeah, the movie Windtalkers about the Navajo code-talkers was a pretty good movie about that.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
.

I guess that LTG is just so head up in his negative view of this country that he wants to down play American excellence in its dealings with all things historical including our minor role in the European theater in WWII. Once again, those cemeteries in Normandy and a lot of Europe would prove otherwise.


That's your racism speaking again


Sure, LTG, better call Crest to delete one of my posts again. How do you like to be treated like a protected spoiled child, anyway? :P :P

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:39 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65785
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
.

I guess that LTG is just so head up in his negative view of this country that he wants to down play American excellence in its dealings with all things historical including our minor role in the European theater in WWII. Once again, those cemeteries in Normandy and a lot of Europe would prove otherwise.


That's your racism speaking again


Sure, LTG, better call Crest to delete one of my posts again. How do you like to be treated like a protected spoiled child, anyway? :P :P

Dude. C'mon please. We're having a civilized conversation here.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
It’s not civil to pull numbers from clear propaganda websites and present them as facts. Also, I’m not even sure what the debate is anymore it went from America wasn’t important in WW2 to Russia did more. The former is ridiculous and the latter is not in dispute in terms of battlefield casualties. As for Germany being stronger than the United States. They couldn’t defeat Britain.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19488
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Darkside wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
.

I guess that LTG is just so head up in his negative view of this country that he wants to down play American excellence in its dealings with all things historical including our minor role in the European theater in WWII. Once again, those cemeteries in Normandy and a lot of Europe would prove otherwise.


That's your racism speaking again


Sure, LTG, better call Crest to delete one of my posts again. How do you like to be treated like a protected spoiled child, anyway? :P :P

Dude. C'mon please. We're having a civilized conversation here.


Not to be an ahole, but LTG is taking sly jabs at everyone in this thread. Look at his last response to me. Dude ca not help insulting people. Thinks he is better than everyone.

Now, As we all have a lot of time on our hands. I book I recommend on the Allied side of the war and why some things where done the way they where read,Blood,Tears and Folly by Len ZDeighton. He goes into why things got done. Like the width of the Sherman. Why was it that size? SO they could fit as many as possible into each cargo ship. Almost All American planning was centered aropund logistics. It was why we did not build bigger tanks in Europe like the rest of the combatants. What did we do in response? slapped armor on in theater to the point that the suspension was almost unable to handle it.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:48 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65785
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
long time guy wrote:
Darkside wrote:
long time guy wrote:
How does Britain and the U.S. hold off Germany without Russian manpower? That question still hasn't been answered and no saying its irrelevant in 1941 really ain't cutting it.

I've explained it probably at least 3 or 4 times now.
1. Germany had by the time they'd over run france, extended their ground forces beyond reasonable supply lines.
2. Germany was losing more equipment than they were building.
3. Germany had little access to oil thus their need to ally with or invade russian territory.
4. Germany absolute lost the battle of britian and by mid 43 lost the battle of the Atlantic.
5. England was reading Germanys codes having broke them. As a result, they knew where naval forces were positioned and knew how to largely get by them.

In essence, as far as england goes, german ground forces were irrelevant. Germany wasnt taking england.
As far as europe goes, germany literally couldn't sustain their war efforts with both domestic production and the slave labor they subjugated throughout europe. Ask albert speer. He knew it.



All of this overlooks one key and relevant fact.

Stalin asked for the other allies to open up a 2 front and they refused. They had a chance to invade France much earlier in the war and they refused Roosevelt even promised Stalin that he would and reneged. Churchill detailed why. They wanted nothing to do with fighting Germany in Europe. They were afraid of taking heavy casualties.
Quote:
STALIN HOSTS CHURCHILL

The timing of the second front was a vexed question between the wartime Allies: Soviet leader Josef Stalin had urged British Prime Minister Winston Churchill to open it as far back as August 1942.

According to the interpreter's record of their tense encounter that month in Moscow, Churchill argued this would be premature, insisting that "war was war but not folly, and it would be folly to invite a disaster that would help nobody".

A "restless" Stalin retorted that "a man not prepared to take risks could not win a war".

Sorry I missed this post earlier.
My understanding is that Stalin panicked in his request to open a second front august 1941. It would seem he believed that opening a western front would divert resources away from his eastern front. I think churchill believed that they were so unprepared to launch such an offensive that germany would be able to absorb it without redeployment of their eastern divisions. As it turned out, with three additional years of buildup and preparation on the allies behalf, the offensive was a narrow victory with tremendous losses.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Darkside wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Hawk, i disagree. Hitler outlined his plot to invade Russia in mein kampf. Stalin knew it too. Russian troops are reported to have engaged germans who were simply approaching lines to report Intel.
The only way hitler doesn't invade Russia is if Russia gives germany access to Caucasus and Romanian oil freely. Stalin wasn't hip to that at all. Stalin distrusted the allies even while accepting their aid. It's the culture.
By the time hitler crossed Poland stalin knew what was up.


Its only a theory. I know about Mein kampf and Hitler's notion. My theory is that Hitler was a pragmatist for awhile and if Japan had not attacked, the entire war in the west would have been completely different. I think Hitler would have settled for territory won, fed his nationalistic ego and waited to see what happened later. His biggest mistake was believing that the US would be so occupied with Japan that it wouldn't have time, manpower and resources to fight in Europe. He chose wrongly :eye: :eye: :eye:

Word. Do you believe that the US sits on the sidelines in europe without pearl?
I mean, it's possible England had shit handled with aid alone. Russia was not a concern of the US at all until barbarossa and then russia was mainly a convenient distraction.
Or does the US enter when rommel over ran north Africa and US commanders knew that with access to Iranian oil, germany didnt need to fuck with Russia?


I do not believe that FDR would have let England fall and would have declared war on both Germany and Italy. It might not have been a super popular decision as there were some pretty strong isolationists but the US and FDR would have probably picked a fight with Hitler. Maybe it would have been the sinking of US ships by HItler's Uboats or something else, but something would have happened to spark a US reaction and a war declaration.

I also think and immediate action in the form of a draft would have occurred that would mostly have been dispatched to England along with a deployment of the majority of the Pacific fleet to merge with England already formidable naval forces and aircraft would have occurred. Later airborne and invasion forces and the heavy equipment required to prosecute the invasion would arrive and basically what eventually would result in the Normandy invasion would occur but earlier by at least a year.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
chaspoppcap wrote:
One of the reasons why Leningrad held was the Finns did not press them as hard as they could and should have.

Once again, it's time to recommend Molotov Cocktail, which I purchased for fiddy cent at Woolworth's in Ford City in sixth grade. Sex scene in chapter two. (I've got to hide this book, I thought; my mom, mother to over a baker's dozen children, wouldn't even let Carl Sagan's Cosmos in the house, much less a book that talked about sex. I also left the sex scene out of my United Nations report on Finland that year.)

Talked about the heroic young Finns fighting off on the Viet Russia. Left out the shit about the Nazis, but nadie es perfecto.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 12:59 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65785
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
It’s not civil to pull numbers from clear propaganda websites and present them as facts. Also, I’m not even sure what the debate is anymore it went from America wasn’t important in WW2 to Russia did more. The former is ridiculous and the latter is not in dispute in terms of battlefield casualties. As for Germany being stronger than the United States. They couldn’t defeat Britain.

That's fair. I just told him I wouldnt click the link. Whether he knew what he was linking to or not I don't know.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2020 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
tommy wrote:
chaspoppcap wrote:
One of the reasons why Leningrad held was the Finns did not press them as hard as they could and should have.

Once again, it's time to recommend Molotov Cocktail, which I purchased for fiddy cent at Woolworth's in Ford City in sixth grade. Sex scene in chapter two. (I've got to hide this book, I thought; my mom, mother to over a baker's dozen children, wouldn't even let Carl Sagan's Cosmos in the house, much less a book that talked about sex. I also left the sex scene out of my United Nations report on Finland that year.)

Talked about the heroic young Finns fighting off on the Viet Russia. Left out the shit about the Nazis, but nadie es perfecto.

She sounded hot, too. The chick in the book. I think her name was LaSauna Heikkennenalatta.

Also, in my report, I got teary-eyed at the discrimination against Laplanders. Long live the Sámi!! #resistance #suomi4all


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group