It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:27 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 522 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 18  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Douchebag wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
I'm OK with how he Cardinal has stepped up on this.
So if the church takes away your rights, thats OK.

What?


:lol:

Dolphin did ask nicely.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No constitutional rights are being violated. These are temporary executive orders that will be rescinded once the ok is given. There is no violation of the constitution here. I think this whole thing as overblown but please don't warp this into something it's not... and educate yourselves on basic civics.


That are currently restricting the free exercise of religion. Like receiving communion, as DS pointed out.

Having said that, I'm OK with how he Cardinal has stepped up on this.


This is not a constitutional violation if deemed an emergency. Never has been.

I suppose that depends on the legality of the "emergency". Will this one stand up? For longer than 30 days?

You know I'm a second amendment guy... I always look for the slippery slope. Could this make it easier to declare a state of emergency in the future? Legal precedent means something.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Seacrest wrote:
Image

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 pm
Posts: 1150
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
Darkside wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Darkside wrote:
bmac wrote:
Tell you what. Quote Matthew 6:5 for us. Then go sit in the corner and shut the fuck up. Unless you really need the next 4 pages where you will use your usual argument of "nuh uh!!" when people prove you wrong.

Are you actually making the claim that every religion follows the new testament?
Mac, you are better than that. Find a legal claim.

I said that the people who follow the NT should have no issue with it. You are the one who immediately started acting like a 4 year old.

If you did a little research for once in your life, the only people crying about not being able to get together are people who follow the NT. They are, to use Jesus words not mine, hypocrites. So just stop.

I'm acting like a 4 year old? Ok.
(Are we reading the same message board?)

Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?

_________________
(REDACTED)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Caller Bob wrote:
Also, communion is not fully restricted, if a patient needs his last rites, a priest is allowed into the hospital room(no matter how locked down) to administer it. Please gather all facts before posting.


99.9% of Catholics are currently unable to receive communion.

Which means they are restricted.




Please sit this one out.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Image


Yeah, frank, it's me or someone else. Always.


Dolphin kindly asked you to sit one out for your own good.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
B Mac wrote:
Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?


Scripture has no bearing on what the government is doing.

Frank, you are completely wrong. You are so wrong I don't even know how you think you could be right but it's very entertaining. So thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Also, communion is not fully restricted, if a patient needs his last rites, a priest is allowed into the hospital room(no matter how locked down) to administer it. Please gather all facts before posting.


99.9% of Catholics are currently unable to receive communion.

Which means they are restricted.




Please sit this one out.


Again, no constitutional rights are being violated. I will not sit this one out. If the church wanted, they could arrange in home communion for everyone without push back from the state, THEY have deemed this not critical at the moment, not the state. Also I request you pick up a remedial civics book.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Seacrest wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Right. The Gov't is not banning religion. They are prohibiting gatherings.

At least Chicago area churches are abiding and doing the right thing for April.
If you are unable to congregate, then the "free exercise thereof" has been restricted.
The Chicago Archdiocese cancelled all of their in person services before the Stay at Home order was issued.



Which has ZERO to do with the point that DS has made.


Amazing how willing people are to give up their rights......

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
B Mac wrote:
Darkside wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Darkside wrote:
bmac wrote:
Tell you what. Quote Matthew 6:5 for us. Then go sit in the corner and shut the fuck up. Unless you really need the next 4 pages where you will use your usual argument of "nuh uh!!" when people prove you wrong.

Are you actually making the claim that every religion follows the new testament?
Mac, you are better than that. Find a legal claim.

I said that the people who follow the NT should have no issue with it. You are the one who immediately started acting like a 4 year old.

If you did a little research for once in your life, the only people crying about not being able to get together are people who follow the NT. They are, to use Jesus words not mine, hypocrites. So just stop.

I'm acting like a 4 year old? Ok.
(Are we reading the same message board?)

Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?


Here is his quote that started this conversation.

Darkside wrote:
I'm not a religious guy, but forcing churches closed is kind of problematic constitutionally.


Find the word evil, or take the insults and sit this one out champ.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Also, communion is not fully restricted, if a patient needs his last rites, a priest is allowed into the hospital room(no matter how locked down) to administer it. Please gather all facts before posting.


99.9% of Catholics are currently unable to receive communion.

Which means they are restricted.




Please sit this one out.


Again, no constitutional rights are being violated. I will not sit this one out. If the church wanted, they could arrange in home communion for everyone without push back from the state, THEY have deemed this not critical at the moment, not the state. Also I request you pick up a remedial civics book.


Freedom of association is on every level.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
b mac wrote:
Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?

I posted neither of the two things in your first sentence.

And religion as I'm referring to it would mean constitutionally protected religious organizations that have no relationship with matthew scripture.
Any religion.
The answer to your last question is false. Mainly because I've stayed completely rational with you all along. You're already calling me names and lashing out. Why are you being combative? You've been back for what a week?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Also, communion is not fully restricted, if a patient needs his last rites, a priest is allowed into the hospital room(no matter how locked down) to administer it. Please gather all facts before posting.


99.9% of Catholics are currently unable to receive communion.

Which means they are restricted.




Please sit this one out.


Again, no constitutional rights are being violated. I will not sit this one out. If the church wanted, they could arrange in home communion for everyone without push back from the state, THEY have deemed this not critical at the moment, not the state. Also I request you pick up a remedial civics book.



Actually, the governor has restricted churches from gathering as of three weeks ago.

Which you won't find in any civics book.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
There is competing law in this largely academic debate (as Seacrest points out, churches voluntarily closed)

Freedom of/from religion is as certainly one of the biggies. Emergency powers are a checkmate on everything.

In practice: go ahead and congregate. government has the force and some legal backing to break you up. you may have a competing right that may be enforceable BUT you will get your cold comfort that you might be right a few years down the line when the SC takes up the case. In the meantime might is greater than right.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 pm
Posts: 1150
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
Spaulding wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?


Scripture has no bearing on what the government is doing.

Frank, you are completely wrong. You are so wrong I don't even know how you think you could be right but it's very entertaining. So thank you.

Sure it does. The only people who are whining about it are people to whom their beliefs make it clear that this rule is ok, or those who just want something to whine about.

Could you or Darko please provide links to religious organizations that have a problem with this who are not Christian?

_________________
(REDACTED)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
good dolphin wrote:
There is competing law in this largely academic debate (as Seacrest points out, churches voluntarily closed)

Freedom of/from religion is as certainly one of the biggies. Emergency powers are a checkmate on everything.

In practice: go ahead and congregate. government has the force and some legal backing to break you up. you may have a competing right that may be enforceable BUT you will get your cold comfort that you might be right a few years down the line when the SC takes up the case. In the meantime might is greater than right.

Good post.
Thank you.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Also, communion is not fully restricted, if a patient needs his last rites, a priest is allowed into the hospital room(no matter how locked down) to administer it. Please gather all facts before posting.


99.9% of Catholics are currently unable to receive communion.

Which means they are restricted.




Please sit this one out.


Again, no constitutional rights are being violated. I will not sit this one out. If the church wanted, they could arrange in home communion for everyone without push back from the state, THEY have deemed this not critical at the moment, not the state. Also I request you pick up a remedial civics book.



Actually, the governor has restricted churches from gathering as of three weeks ago.

Which you won't find in any civics book.


Gatherings, I never said gatherings...please read my post in full before responding..... Churches, can and are operating with a shell staff. They can arrange appointments with individual parishioners. Some are doing "drive up" confessions. And they can also make house visits if they wanted to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 pm
Posts: 1150
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
Darkside wrote:
Mainly because I've stayed completely rational with you all along. You're already calling me names and lashing out. Why are you being combative? You've been back for what a week?


your opening response
Darkside wrote:
Uh huh.
Ok so does anyone else who actually knows what they're talking about want to join the discussion?

Lakemoor DiCaro strikes again.

_________________
(REDACTED)


Last edited by B Mac on Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:56 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22456
pizza_Place: Giordano's
I'm pretty sure that the free exercise clause is a right of individuals, not "churches". It is the right of every individual to not have the freedom to exercise their religion abridged. Arguing that "well churches could just...." is missing the point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Also, communion is not fully restricted, if a patient needs his last rites, a priest is allowed into the hospital room(no matter how locked down) to administer it. Please gather all facts before posting.


99.9% of Catholics are currently unable to receive communion.

Which means they are restricted.




Please sit this one out.


Again, no constitutional rights are being violated. I will not sit this one out. If the church wanted, they could arrange in home communion for everyone without push back from the state, THEY have deemed this not critical at the moment, not the state. Also I request you pick up a remedial civics book.



Actually, the governor has restricted churches from gathering as of three weeks ago.

Which you won't find in any civics book.


Gatherings, I never said gatherings...please read my post in full before responding..... Churches, can and are operating with a shell staff. They can arrange appointments with individual parishioners. Some are doing "drive up" confessions. And they can also make house visits if they wanted to.


Gathering for public worship is an essential component of every church. And is currently restricted.

No one is doing drive up confession in Chicago.

Shell staff is unable to distribute Communion to everyone.

There aren't enough priests to do tens of thousands of house visits.

Other than that...

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
B Mac wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?


Scripture has no bearing on what the government is doing.

Frank, you are completely wrong. You are so wrong I don't even know how you think you could be right but it's very entertaining. So thank you.

Sure it does. The only people who are whining about it are people to whom their beliefs make it clear that this rule is ok, or those who just want something to whine about.

Could you or Darko please provide links to religious organizations that have a problem with this who are not Christian?

I'll just say this and then I'll disengage from what is likely to be an unproductive conversation.
I don't need the constitutional protection of religious freedom (well, perhaps I do because I'm also guaranteed freedom from religion as a result, I'll think on that) so my only dog in the fight at the moment is that governors all over the country are getting a taste of putting constitutional protections on hold. And that kind of power tastes good.
So, I always talk about slippery slopes with regard to constitutional freedoms. I've always said in the past that it is important to defend them all, even the ones you don't care about or for because they all dovetail in one way or another.
To put my final point on this, at some point, and in some cases already, things on twitter or reddit have been removed as being "false or fake" information. Do you want, during a national emergency, Donald Trump determining whatbis fake news to be suppressed?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:50 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38329
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
B Mac wrote:
Darkside wrote:
b mac wrote:
Mainly because I've stayed completely rational with you all along. You're already calling me names and lashing out. Why are you being combative? You've been back for what a week?


your opening response
Darkside wrote:
Uh huh.
Ok so does anyone else who actually knows what they're talking about want to join the discussion?

Lakemoor DiCaro strikes again.


Find us the post where he said government was evil.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Quote:
Gathering for public worship is an essential component of every church. And is currently restricted.

Temporarly, and this does not voilate the consituition.

Quote:
No one is doing drive up confession in Chicago.

Choice of the church, if they wanted to, they would not receive push back from the state

Quote:
Shell staff is unable to distribute Communion to everyone.

Church decision, not directed from the state

Quote:
There aren't enough priests to do tens of thousands of house visits.



They could do hundreds, again, church decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Darkside wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?


Scripture has no bearing on what the government is doing.

Frank, you are completely wrong. You are so wrong I don't even know how you think you could be right but it's very entertaining. So thank you.

Sure it does. The only people who are whining about it are people to whom their beliefs make it clear that this rule is ok, or those who just want something to whine about.

Could you or Darko please provide links to religious organizations that have a problem with this who are not Christian?

I'll just say this and then I'll disengage from what is likely to be an unproductive conversation.
I don't need the constitutional protection of religious freedom (well, perhaps I do because I'm also guaranteed freedom from religion as a result, I'll think on that) so my only dog in the fight at the moment is that governors all over the country are getting a taste of putting constitutional protections on hold. And that kind of power tastes good.
So, I always talk about slippery slopes with regard to constitutional freedoms. I've always said in the past that it is important to defend them all, even the ones you don't care about or for because they all dovetail in one way or another.
To put my final point on this, at some point, and in some cases already, things on twitter or reddit have been removed as being "false or fake" information. Do you want, during a national emergency, Donald Trump determining whatbis fake news to be suppressed?


Good post.

I think if the Archdiocese decided today that they wanted to open back up fully tomorrow, the Governor who have no real choice but to give in.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3612
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
B Mac wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Freedom of religion does not guarantee you have to go to a church. You can watch services on TV or online, and pray to whatever or whomever you want in your home or in your yard.

It does though. It specifically says "... no law prohibiting the free exercise thereof".

Matthew 6 also quite clearly says that you should pray by yourself, that those who need to do it publicly are hypocrites. So if you are following the bible, you shouldn't have any issue with this.


That is not what it says. "And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others" (Matthew 6:5 NIV). Those people who choose to do it publicly aren't hypocrites rather don't be like those who are doing it publicly to be seen. Continuing on with your flawed thought, assembling at a church (or any house of worship) is more than just prayer. As has been noted there is teaching, preaching, and sacraments. To hold to that scripture to say that people who pray in public are hypocrites is tenuous as best and borderline willful ignorance at worst.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Good post.

I think if the Archdiocese decided today that they wanted to open back up fully tomorrow, the Governor who have no real choice but to give in.


:lol: :lol: :lol: They are nearly bankrupt from paying the pedophile cases, you really think the Archdiocese has the appetite to defy executive orders and fight this in court?


Last edited by Caller Bob on Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:56 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 pm
Posts: 1150
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Also, communion is not fully restricted, if a patient needs his last rites, a priest is allowed into the hospital room(no matter how locked down) to administer it. Please gather all facts before posting.


99.9% of Catholics are currently unable to receive communion.

Which means they are restricted.




Please sit this one out.


Again, no constitutional rights are being violated. I will not sit this one out. If the church wanted, they could arrange in home communion for everyone without push back from the state, THEY have deemed this not critical at the moment, not the state. Also I request you pick up a remedial civics book.



Actually, the governor has restricted churches from gathering as of three weeks ago.

Which you won't find in any civics book.


Gatherings, I never said gatherings...please read my post in full before responding..... Churches, can and are operating with a shell staff. They can arrange appointments with individual parishioners. Some are doing "drive up" confessions. And they can also make house visits if they wanted to.


Gathering for public worship is an essential component of every church. And is currently restricted.

No one is doing drive up confession in Chicago.

Shell staff is unable to distribute Communion to everyone.

There aren't enough priests to do tens of thousands of house visits.

Other than that...

For the church, yes. Not the religion. Matthew 18 says where 2 or more are gathered. Matthew 6 says pray in private. It's amusing how quickly what's written in the book doesn't matter.

_________________
(REDACTED)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:49 pm
Posts: 1150
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati’s
Seacrest wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Darkside wrote:
b mac wrote:
Mainly because I've stayed completely rational with you all along. You're already calling me names and lashing out. Why are you being combative? You've been back for what a week?


your opening response
Darkside wrote:
Uh huh.
Ok so does anyone else who actually knows what they're talking about want to join the discussion?

Lakemoor DiCaro strikes again.


Find us the post where he said government was evil.

Maybe you're new here....

_________________
(REDACTED)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Caller Bob wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Good post.

I think if the Archdiocese decided today that they wanted to open back up fully tomorrow, the Governor who have no real choice but to give in.


:lol: :lol: :lol: They are nearly bankrupt from paying the pedophile cases, you really think the Archdiocese has appetite to defy executive orders and fight this in court?


If they wanted to, they wouldn't have to fight in court.

They'd have priests and parishoners holding sit-ins in churches across the city.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: JB
PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Darkside wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
B Mac wrote:
Yes. We are. You post one of 2 things "the government is evil and taking away our rights" or "nuh uh!!!"

I pointed out the scripture that shows the people you are stanning for should have no issues with these rules and you turned into a baby because of who was telling you. True or false?


Scripture has no bearing on what the government is doing.

Frank, you are completely wrong. You are so wrong I don't even know how you think you could be right but it's very entertaining. So thank you.

Sure it does. The only people who are whining about it are people to whom their beliefs make it clear that this rule is ok, or those who just want something to whine about.

Could you or Darko please provide links to religious organizations that have a problem with this who are not Christian?

I'll just say this and then I'll disengage from what is likely to be an unproductive conversation.
I don't need the constitutional protection of religious freedom (well, perhaps I do because I'm also guaranteed freedom from religion as a result, I'll think on that) so my only dog in the fight at the moment is that governors all over the country are getting a taste of putting constitutional protections on hold. And that kind of power tastes good.
So, I always talk about slippery slopes with regard to constitutional freedoms. I've always said in the past that it is important to defend them all, even the ones you don't care about or for because they all dovetail in one way or another.
To put my final point on this, at some point, and in some cases already, things on twitter or reddit have been removed as being "false or fake" information. Do you want, during a national emergency, Donald Trump determining whatbis fake news to be suppressed?


You are a scholar of history. Honest Abe was much more heavy handed than anything we have seen right now and he is now a beloved cornerstone of our country.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 522 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group