It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 10:11 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO WHITE SOX

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
whistler
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2020 10:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
Every day!

Every day a Sox game from the 2005 season is shown at 4PM on NBC SportsNet.

They are going thru the whole season. Dog Days included. Listless games against KC included.

Relive Ozzie's bullshit.

Right now they are in June, vs Indians I think.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years
Top
 Profile  
 
PortageP_Chi
PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2020 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:51 am
Posts: 785
Location: Chicago, IL
pizza_Place: Favorite Pizza Place
whistler wrote:
Every day!

Every day a Sox game from the 2005 season is shown at 4PM on NBC SportsNet.

They are going thru the whole season. Dog Days included. Listless games against KC included.

Relive Ozzie's bullshit.

Right now they are in June, vs Indians I think.


Thanks.
Top
 Profile  
 
tommy
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
'85 Sox game with Seaver winning his 300th on now on MLB TV. That was a decent team, and Seaver should have won 20 that year.
Top
 Profile  
 
whistler
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2020 7:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 8642
pizza_Place: Passero's
tommy wrote:
'85 Sox game with Seaver winning his 300th on now on MLB TV. That was a decent team, and Seaver should have won 20 that year.



Interesting to hear Baby Hawk as the analyst. He hardly ever chimed in too. And I believe that was Drysdale on the call.

Also forgot about some of those Sox players like Rudy Law and Luis Salazar lol.

And never heard of that dude with the low-crouch battin' stance! Jesus.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Bully Hendry would have signed Harper for 2.5 Billion over 30 years
Top
 Profile  
 
tommy
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2020 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
Ranking the World Series

Read this a week or two ago. Decent article. 2005 comes in at #35! Not bad. I thought the '60 and '79 Series shoulda been a little higher. '79 was great. "We are fam-i-ly" came back from a 2-0 deficit to win. In spite of being from an American League household, I pulled for them Pirates.

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/291 ... lb-history
Top
 Profile  
 
sjboyd0137
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2020 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38636
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
tommy wrote:
Ranking the World Series

Read this a week or two ago. Decent article. 2005 comes in at #35! Not bad. I thought the '60 and '79 Series shoulda been a little higher. '79 was great. "We are fam-i-ly" came back from a 2-0 deficit to win. In spite of being from an American League household, I pulled for them Pirates.

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/291 ... lb-history


I was half hoping ESPN would forget about the 05 World Series again so I had a reason to shit all over how terrible ESPN is.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
WaitingforRuffcorn
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2020 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Interesting write-up:

Quote:
By our series leverage index -- which measures how tight the World Series was -- this ranks just 56th all time. But the games themselves were outrageously good. By our game leverage index, this was the tightest collection of World Series games ever. Every game was either tied or within one run in the eighth inning or later. Every White Sox starter went at least seven innings. Compare that to the seven-game series between the Cubs and Cleveland in 2016, in which no starting pitcher went seven. The White Sox's 11-1 postseason record ended a World Series drought that was two years longer than the Red Sox's had been.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.
Top
 Profile  
 
tommy
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2020 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Interesting write-up:

Quote:
By our series leverage index -- which measures how tight the World Series was -- this ranks just 56th all time. But the games themselves were outrageously good. By our game leverage index, this was the tightest collection of World Series games ever. Every game was either tied or within one run in the eighth inning or later. Every White Sox starter went at least seven innings. Compare that to the seven-game series between the Cubs and Cleveland in 2016, in which no starting pitcher went seven. The White Sox's 11-1 postseason record ended a World Series drought that was two years longer than the Red Sox's had been.

Yeah, I was glad to read that. I agree, too.

sjboyd0137 wrote:
I was half hoping ESPN would forget about the 05 World Series again so I had a reason to shit all over how terrible ESPN is.

:lol:
Top
 Profile  
 
conns7901
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2020 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19378
sjboyd0137 wrote:
tommy wrote:
Ranking the World Series

Read this a week or two ago. Decent article. 2005 comes in at #35! Not bad. I thought the '60 and '79 Series shoulda been a little higher. '79 was great. "We are fam-i-ly" came back from a 2-0 deficit to win. In spite of being from an American League household, I pulled for them Pirates.

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/291 ... lb-history


I was half hoping ESPN would forget about the 05 World Series again so I had a reason to shit all over how terrible ESPN is.


They had the 2005 White Sox as the 95th best World Series winning team of All-Time last week.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
tommy
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2020 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:33 pm
Posts: 12078
pizza_Place: Vito and Nick's
conns7901 wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
tommy wrote:
Ranking the World Series

Read this a week or two ago. Decent article. 2005 comes in at #35! Not bad. I thought the '60 and '79 Series shoulda been a little higher. '79 was great. "We are fam-i-ly" came back from a 2-0 deficit to win. In spite of being from an American League household, I pulled for them Pirates.

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/291 ... lb-history


I was half hoping ESPN would forget about the 05 World Series again so I had a reason to shit all over how terrible ESPN is.


They had the 2005 White Sox as the 95th best World Series winning team of All-Time last week.

Conns u die

Peter Gammons said they were one of the top four teams from 1980-2005.

Gammons > Conns the Traitor
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO WHITE SOX

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group